This let the A-Wings get a shot in at the shield projectors in the domes on the bridge
Those are scanning domes.
Moderator: Vympel
How do you know? A deleted scene was even scripted to show B-wings knocking out an ISD (presumably after its shields had failed).Alexus wrote:And the fighter attack failed to destroy a single cruiser. Useless.
I agree, but I think the tendency is to overlook starfighters' potential contributions to combat. A wounded ship that is not harassed by enemy fighters can easily maneuver to protect itself. One that IS harried by enemy fighters is still vulnerable, and can take damage or potentially even be destroyed even after such a maneuver.Scrap the fighter attack, pull out ILM and ADD CAPSHIP COMBAT.
On a side note, that scene was even composited, but ultimately wasn't used.Master of Ossus wrote:How do you know? A deleted scene was even scripted to show B-wings knocking out an ISD (presumably after its shields had failed).Alexus wrote:And the fighter attack failed to destroy a single cruiser. Useless.
Oh, it was. It was a blunder that the Emperor ordered his fleet to squander its starfighter cover in such a manner--no question about it.Alexus wrote:I was talking about the TIE attack. You talked about the Empire squandering the fighter support, and then I said it was a waste anyway.
The ITW confirms that while the domes themselves are Scanners and Comunications, the little antennea crowing them are local area shield projectors.Alexus wrote:This let the A-Wings get a shot in at the shield projectors in the domes on the bridge
Those are scanning domes.
Sorry for missing this earlier. I only half-remembered it obviously, probably because I more or less dismissed it. Glad to hear it was not involved with ROTJ (Come to think of it, I should have realized this at once if I only thought about it first. But when you don't want to..).Thirdfain wrote:That took place after ANH, during the rebel evacuation of Yavin through a blockade headed by the newly-christened HIMS Executor. They managed to kill the ship's shields with this one-time use crystal weapon originally designed by a pirate clan the Jedi had wiped out, and then damage the DN's engines, buying the rebels enough time to escape.nightmare wrote:There is a rather far out EU explanation that the rebels used some unique power crystals taken from a pirate gang, and that was what downed the Executor's shields. Can't say I like that one though..
Against a fresh, if surprised and disorganized, capital ship fleet I have little doubt in my mind that the Imperial starfighter strike was wrecked and probably stripped of her heavy strike elements. It even looked like the TIEs were blowing straight past the Rebel fighter screen to reach the fleet combatants ... and the Rebels brought dedicated anti-fighter escorts to the party.Master of Ossus wrote:My guess is that by sending their fighters to engage the Rebel fleet alone (before the Alliance cap ships were softened up by capital ship fire), the Empire also greatly decreased their ability to destroy Alliance ships quickly during the battle itself.
At a guess I would say they might have been able to reconfigure the other generators to 'steatch' the shield...but not in the time they had before Mr A-Wing came for a visit.The Original Nex wrote:The ITW confirms that while the domes themselves are Scanners and Comunications, the little antennea crowing them are local area shield projectors.Alexus wrote:This let the A-Wings get a shot in at the shield projectors in the domes on the bridge
Those are scanning domes.
Destroying them meant that the bridge shields could not be re-raised even after the generator had recharged.
Thy are dedicated toward one function more than the other. The vanes are described as "local-area shield projector vanes," which suggests that they're for the domes themselves, not the tower.Chris OFarrell wrote:They are both. Read ITW.Alexus wrote:This let the A-Wings get a shot in at the shield projectors in the domes on the bridge
Those are scanning domes.
Semantics. They perform both functions, thus either description will suffice. And they are not for the globes themselves. The EU is clear on this. Like it or love it, ITW fits in well with the EU sources which define an area shield generation ability. On ISD's it appaers to be sufficent to cover the ship, on an Executor its much less given the far larger volume, which fits the 'local' defintion.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Thy are dedicated toward one function more than the other. The vanes are described as "local-area shield projector vanes," which suggests that they're for the domes themselves, not the tower.Chris OFarrell wrote:They are both. Read ITW.Alexus wrote:
Those are scanning domes.
Your playing semanitcs. The structure is there for MULTIPLE PURPOSES. Including scanning, communications and shields. Because equipment for one is bigger then the other suddenly you want to plug your fingers in your ears and scream that they ARE NOT SHIELD DOMES SO NAH?!?!!Spanky The Dolphin wrote:No, either will NOT suffice. The primary dedication of the structure itself is towards scanning, while the shield vanes offer mild protection to the structure.
That's because other examples of shield projectors in the ICSs show them to be internally-located structures just below the hull.Chris OFarrell wrote:They are clearly NOT there just to protect the domes. By that logic we should see those vains all OVER the hull covering at a constent rate if they are used to project shields, and need one every small unit of area to proejct a shield.