Hi guys,
Is the subject of Shmi Skywalker's slavery and lack of rescue from this fate ever covered in the novellisations?? In AotC Anakin is concerned for her welfare but Obi-Wan seems to give it little weight. Why was she not rescued earlier?
Shmi's Freedom
Moderator: Vympel
- GuppyShark
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: 2005-03-13 06:52am
- Location: South Australia
Re: Shmi's Freedom
Ghosts of Tatooine seems to set up the storyline that Qui Gon gave her a precious crystal so as to help her redeem herself.GuppyShark wrote:Hi guys,
Is the subject of Shmi Skywalker's slavery and lack of rescue from this fate ever covered in the novellisations?? In AotC Anakin is concerned for her welfare but Obi-Wan seems to give it little weight. Why was she not rescued earlier?
Let him land on any Lyran world to taste firsthand the wrath of peace loving people thwarted by the myopic greed of a few miserly old farts- Katrina Steiner
Re: Shmi's Freedom
Because of the fact that the Jedi Order didn't condone attachments. Anakin had to let go of his attachment to his mother (something he never did). That is at least what I think.GuppyShark wrote:Hi guys,
Is the subject of Shmi Skywalker's slavery and lack of rescue from this fate ever covered in the novellisations?? In AotC Anakin is concerned for her welfare but Obi-Wan seems to give it little weight. Why was she not rescued earlier?
- Lord Pounder
- Pretty Hate Machine
- Posts: 9695
- Joined: 2002-11-19 04:40pm
- Location: Belfast, unfortunately
- Contact:
Re: Shmi's Freedom
Do you not mean Tatooine Ghost by Troy Denning?PainRack wrote:Ghosts of Tatooine seems to set up the storyline that Qui Gon gave her a precious crystal so as to help her redeem herself.GuppyShark wrote:Hi guys,
Is the subject of Shmi Skywalker's slavery and lack of rescue from this fate ever covered in the novellisations?? In AotC Anakin is concerned for her welfare but Obi-Wan seems to give it little weight. Why was she not rescued earlier?
RIP Yosemite Bear
Gone, Never Forgotten
Gone, Never Forgotten
- Chmee
- Sith Marauder
- Posts: 4449
- Joined: 2004-12-23 03:29pm
- Location: Seattle - we already buried Hendrix ... Kurt who?
Re: Shmi's Freedom
So .... the death & destruction wrought by the Emperor and Vader is all a consequence of Anakin being a mama's boy?Mange the Swede wrote:Because of the fact that the Jedi Order didn't condone attachments. Anakin had to let go of his attachment to his mother (something he never did). That is at least what I think.GuppyShark wrote:Hi guys,
Is the subject of Shmi Skywalker's slavery and lack of rescue from this fate ever covered in the novellisations?? In AotC Anakin is concerned for her welfare but Obi-Wan seems to give it little weight. Why was she not rescued earlier?
[img=right]http://www.tallguyz.com/imagelib/chmeesig.jpg[/img]My guess might be excellent or it might be crummy, but
Mrs. Spade didn't raise any children dippy enough to
make guesses in front of a district attorney,
an assistant district attorney, and a stenographer.
Sam Spade, "The Maltese Falcon"
Operation Freedom Fry
Mrs. Spade didn't raise any children dippy enough to
make guesses in front of a district attorney,
an assistant district attorney, and a stenographer.
Sam Spade, "The Maltese Falcon"
Operation Freedom Fry
Re: Shmi's Freedom
Well, Anakin has another, more intimate attachment.Chmee wrote:So .... the death & destruction wrought by the Emperor and Vader is all a consequence of Anakin being a mama's boy?Mange the Swede wrote:Because of the fact that the Jedi Order didn't condone attachments. Anakin had to let go of his attachment to his mother (something he never did). That is at least what I think.GuppyShark wrote:Hi guys,
Is the subject of Shmi Skywalker's slavery and lack of rescue from this fate ever covered in the novellisations?? In AotC Anakin is concerned for her welfare but Obi-Wan seems to give it little weight. Why was she not rescued earlier?
- GuppyShark
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: 2005-03-13 06:52am
- Location: South Australia
Re: Shmi's Freedom
Surely it would be easier for Anakin to let go of her if she wasn't a slave on a desert world run by gangsters.Mange the Swede wrote:Because of the fact that the Jedi Order didn't condone attachments. Anakin had to let go of his attachment to his mother (something he never did). That is at least what I think.GuppyShark wrote:Hi guys,
Is the subject of Shmi Skywalker's slavery and lack of rescue from this fate ever covered in the novellisations?? In AotC Anakin is concerned for her welfare but Obi-Wan seems to give it little weight. Why was she not rescued earlier?
It still strikes me as appallingly shortsighted... and the Jedi die for it.
- Chris OFarrell
- Durandal's Bitch
- Posts: 5724
- Joined: 2002-08-02 07:57pm
- Contact:
Yes and no.
Thanks to Qui-Gon she got her freedom, she was able to pay off Watto with a helishly valuable crystal powercore of some kind, she got it to Lairs who used it to buy her, then set her free. She lived happily with him for years...then she was taken by the sand people that morning and Anikin, sensing her distress came charging to the rescue...only to see her die and cause him to slaughter everyone in the area.
Sad actualy. If she had stayed a slave, she probably would not have died and Anikin would have probably never turned. Funny how things work out sometimes...
Thanks to Qui-Gon she got her freedom, she was able to pay off Watto with a helishly valuable crystal powercore of some kind, she got it to Lairs who used it to buy her, then set her free. She lived happily with him for years...then she was taken by the sand people that morning and Anikin, sensing her distress came charging to the rescue...only to see her die and cause him to slaughter everyone in the area.
Sad actualy. If she had stayed a slave, she probably would not have died and Anikin would have probably never turned. Funny how things work out sometimes...
- GuppyShark
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2830
- Joined: 2005-03-13 06:52am
- Location: South Australia