I mentioned this in the vent thread, but I thought it bore relevance here. (If it's more at home in PSW, please relocate it.)
The AMT/Ertl Shuttle Tydirium kit seems to be based on the set design from RotJ (at least Saxton seems to agree). I wonder if it can't be modified to better match the flight miniature. I'm thinking about building a new dorsal fin to match the shape and proportions of the miniature, and I'm seriously considering adjusting the droop angle of the cockpit module.
Should I go ahead with either or both of these modifications? What other changes should be made? Does anyone believe the Lambda class possesses a v/g cockpit module, or is it purely a gaffe between the set and mini?
For reference, here's one built up with lights (and a huge Rebel insignia):
http://www.starshipmodeler.org/gallery8/nm_rshuttle.htm
In addition, what's the consensus on dimensions? Saxton seems to lean towards the 80'4" height for docking mode.
Lambda class shuttle kit
Moderator: Beowulf
- Frank Hipper
- Overfiend of the Superego
- Posts: 12882
- Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
- Location: Hamilton, Ohio?
- Firefox
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1546
- Joined: 2005-03-01 12:29pm
- Location: Wichita, Kansas
- Contact:
I agree with the v/g bit. After thinking about it, it doesn't make a lick of sense to equip a spacecraft that has shields to improve aerodynamic performance with a system for about the same reason the Concorde uses it.
As for the kit, it's probably going to be a compromise. New fin, but unless I can correct the nose's angle, it'll have to stay where it is. Plus, the cockpit needs a lot of work.
As for the kit, it's probably going to be a compromise. New fin, but unless I can correct the nose's angle, it'll have to stay where it is. Plus, the cockpit needs a lot of work.
-
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 3481
- Joined: 2002-07-09 12:51pm
If it's a shuttle, it won't constantly have its shields up. So it could very well be for aerodynamic purposes.Firefox wrote:I agree with the v/g bit. After thinking about it, it doesn't make a lick of sense to equip a spacecraft that has shields to improve aerodynamic performance with a system for about the same reason the Concorde uses it.
Who's the more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him? -Obi-Wan Kenobi
"In the unlikely event that someone comes here, hates everything we stand for, and then donates a big chunk of money anyway, I will thank him for his stupidity." -Darth Wong, Lord of the Sith
Proud member of the Brotherhood of the Monkey.
"In the unlikely event that someone comes here, hates everything we stand for, and then donates a big chunk of money anyway, I will thank him for his stupidity." -Darth Wong, Lord of the Sith
Proud member of the Brotherhood of the Monkey.
- Firefox
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1546
- Joined: 2005-03-01 12:29pm
- Location: Wichita, Kansas
- Contact:
Not if the shuttle has a poor aerodynamic shape. Do you think those slabs for wings and dorsal fin would pass as aerofoils? Unless it's at low subsonic, it'd need shields to augment its atmospheric performance.IRG CommandoJoe wrote:If it's a shuttle, it won't constantly have its shields up. So it could very well be for aerodynamic purposes.
-
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 3481
- Joined: 2002-07-09 12:51pm
Hmm...one wonders why they make wings at all then if it depends upon shields to alter its aerodynamics.
Who's the more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him? -Obi-Wan Kenobi
"In the unlikely event that someone comes here, hates everything we stand for, and then donates a big chunk of money anyway, I will thank him for his stupidity." -Darth Wong, Lord of the Sith
Proud member of the Brotherhood of the Monkey.
"In the unlikely event that someone comes here, hates everything we stand for, and then donates a big chunk of money anyway, I will thank him for his stupidity." -Darth Wong, Lord of the Sith
Proud member of the Brotherhood of the Monkey.