Adobe buys Macromedia

GEC: Discuss gaming, computers and electronics and venture into the bizarre world of STGODs.

Moderator: Thanas

Post Reply
User avatar
Praxis
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6012
Joined: 2002-12-22 04:02pm
Contact:

Adobe buys Macromedia

Post by Praxis »

Frankly, I'm shocked there hasn't been any posts on this, but a visual scan and a search revealed nothing.

Adobe bought Macromedia.

http://macromedia.com/macromedia/proom/ ... media.html
http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/invrela ... media.html

Yup.

How long until we see Adobe Flash?
User avatar
Melchior
Jedi Master
Posts: 1061
Joined: 2005-01-13 10:46am

Post by Melchior »

I hope that they continue to market both Freehand and Illustrator, i can't stand Illustrator.
User avatar
YT300000
Sith'ari
Posts: 6528
Joined: 2003-05-20 12:49pm
Location: Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Post by YT300000 »

Great, now Flash will also cost $900. :evil:
Name changes are for people who wear women's clothes. - Zuul

Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash

Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
User avatar
Spacebeard
Padawan Learner
Posts: 473
Joined: 2005-03-21 10:52pm
Location: MD, USA

Post by Spacebeard »

Melchior wrote:I hope that they continue to market both Freehand and Illustrator, i can't stand Illustrator.
Well, they continued to market PageMaker for years after buying it from Aldus, and were selling it in parallel with InDesign for some time. I'd guess that Freehand will get at least one major upgrade before they discontinue it. (I've always preferred Illustrator myself, but it's almost entirely a matter of taste, and of which application one is most used to).

Combined with their recent "product activation" scheme, this definitely eliminates all doubt that Adobe is now the Microsoft of the Mac world, however. There's now zero competition in the graphic design market.
"This war, all around us, is being fought over the very meanings of words." - Chad, Deus Ex
User avatar
Dooey Jo
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3127
Joined: 2002-08-09 01:09pm
Location: The land beyond the forest; Sweden.
Contact:

Post by Dooey Jo »

There's always Jasc's Paintshop Pro, for whatever competition that's worth. But it's not for Mac, as far as I know...


But wow, first Syntrillium and now Macromedia? It's official; Adobe is now evil too... I wonder what will happen if they decide that the flash and shockwave players should cost money...
Image
"Nippon ichi, bitches! Boing-boing."
Mai smote the demonic fires of heck...

Faker Ninjas invented ninjitsu
User avatar
Spacebeard
Padawan Learner
Posts: 473
Joined: 2005-03-21 10:52pm
Location: MD, USA

Post by Spacebeard »

Dooey Jo wrote:There's always Jasc's Paintshop Pro, for whatever competition that's worth. But it's not for Mac, as far as I know...
Even if that were a professional quality application (which it doesn't look to be from brief Googling), it would only serve as competition for Photoshop, which hasn't had realistic competition since Aldus Digital Darkroom was discontinued. With Macromedia gone, Adobe's only competitors on its own tier are Quark (QuarkXPress versus InDesign / FrameMaker), Apple (Final Cut Pro versus Premiere), and maybe Microsoft (Frontpage versus GoLive / Dreamweaver). Illustrator is now uncontested.
But wow, first Syntrillium and now Macromedia? It's official; Adobe is now evil too... I wonder what will happen if they decide that the flash and shockwave players should cost money...
<flamebait> Hopefully they'll die a well deserved death. I think Flash is even more annoying than the HTML blink tag. </flamebait>

Honestly, I don't think they'll do that. Remember that Acrobat Reader has always been free. It's in their interest to ensure that consumers have unfettered access to content, while milking as much money as possible out of producers.
"This war, all around us, is being fought over the very meanings of words." - Chad, Deus Ex
User avatar
Natorgator
Jedi Knight
Posts: 856
Joined: 2003-04-26 08:23pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by Natorgator »

I personally hope that they'll integrate InDesign CS2 with Dreamweaver, which would make an uber web development tool.
User avatar
Crayz9000
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 7329
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:39pm
Location: Improbably superpositioned
Contact:

Post by Crayz9000 »

Natorgator wrote:I personally hope that they'll integrate InDesign CS2 with Dreamweaver, which would make an uber web development tool.
InDesign CS is a publishing tool. Dreamweaver is an HTML development tool. The two are completely different realms.

Adobe has its own Web development tool in the Adobe CS, but it's basically crap compared to Dreamweaver.
A Tribute to Stupidity: The Robert Scott Anderson Archive (currently offline)
John Hansen - Slightly Insane Bounty Hunter - ASVS Vets' Assoc. Class of 2000
HAB Cryptanalyst | WG - Intergalactic Alliance and Spoof Author | BotM | Cybertron | SCEF
User avatar
Natorgator
Jedi Knight
Posts: 856
Joined: 2003-04-26 08:23pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by Natorgator »

Crayz9000 wrote:
Natorgator wrote:I personally hope that they'll integrate InDesign CS2 with Dreamweaver, which would make an uber web development tool.
InDesign CS is a publishing tool. Dreamweaver is an HTML development tool. The two are completely different realms.

Adobe has its own Web development tool in the Adobe CS, but it's basically crap compared to Dreamweaver.
Err, I was referring to GoLive CS2-my mistake. Supposedly it has some really powerful CSS tools, which would be awesome if integrated into Dreamweaver since its CSS tools aren't really that great.
User avatar
Melchior
Jedi Master
Posts: 1061
Joined: 2005-01-13 10:46am

Post by Melchior »

Spacebeard wrote:
Melchior wrote:I hope that they continue to market both Freehand and Illustrator, i can't stand Illustrator.
Well, they continued to market PageMaker for years after buying it from Aldus, and were selling it in parallel with InDesign for some time.
After all, it isn't the first time they own both programs, now that I think about it.
Post Reply