Very Simple, NO Spoilers Wanted, Question about ROTS

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply

Better than AOTC?

Yes
19
70%
No
0
No votes
About the same
0
No votes
I just need an option to vote for so I can see the graph
8
30%
 
Total votes: 27

User avatar
StarshipTitanic
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4475
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:41pm
Location: Massachusetts

Very Simple, NO Spoilers Wanted, Question about ROTS

Post by StarshipTitanic »

Simply put, do spoilers indicate if it will be better or worse than AOTC? All I want are opinions, not "Yeah, because they reveal Palpatine banged Shimi and he's Vader's daddy." Thank you, you may begin.
"Man's unfailing capacity to believe what he prefers to be true rather than what the evidence shows to be likely and possible has always astounded me...God has not been proven not to exist, therefore he must exist." -- Academician Prokhor Zakharov

"Hal grabs life by the balls and doesn't let you do that [to] hal."

"I hereby declare myself master of the known world."
User avatar
SCRawl
Has a bad feeling about this.
Posts: 4191
Joined: 2002-12-24 03:11pm
Location: Burlington, Canada

Post by SCRawl »

It's all pretty subjective, of course. After all, I thought that the trailers for TPM indicated that the movie would be fantastic. Ditto for AotC. Needless to say, with the benefit of hindsight, I'm a little disappointed.

Nevertheless, from what I've seen (and I've seen quite a bit), RotS looks like the best of the prequels.
73% of all statistics are made up, including this one.

I'm waiting as fast as I can.
Kurgan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4069
Joined: 2002-08-19 08:13pm

Post by Kurgan »

Good point... I mean I'm not a spoiler guy (but even if I were I'd admit that), reading what happens and seeing it happen on screen are two different things. What looks like an awesome scene on paper might fall flat, or good dialouge could be delivered badly. Or something that appears boring on screen may end up looking awesome.

And behind the scenes stuff can change in post production, so it's really anyone's guess.

I have a question for the spoiler indulgent though... if you did the same thing for TPM and AOTC, did it raise or lower your expectations for those films when you actually saw them? And did you end up disappointed more than if you hadn't seen the spoilers or not? I'm just curious...
User avatar
SCRawl
Has a bad feeling about this.
Posts: 4191
Joined: 2002-12-24 03:11pm
Location: Burlington, Canada

Post by SCRawl »

I took different spoiler policies into my countdowns to TPM and AotC. For TPM, I saw everything, up to and including reading the comic book before I saw the film. For AotC, I jealously guarded myself against hearing more than a whisper of what was coming. And while I was still overwhelmed by the fanboyish "oh my god I've been waiting forever for this" feelings while actually watching the movies, in the light of reason I still felt disappointed, in both cases. Is it possible that I set myself up for disappointment? that any films, no matter how excellent, would have been found wanting? It's possible. I also think that there's room for improvement in what we actually saw.

As I've said numerous times, though, I'm willing to give George the benefit of the doubt until I've digested all six parts. Only then can I pass my judgement.
73% of all statistics are made up, including this one.

I'm waiting as fast as I can.
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Re: Very Simple, NO Spoilers Wanted, Question about ROTS

Post by Stofsk »

StarshipTitanic wrote:Simply put, do spoilers indicate if it will be better or worse than AOTC?
Yes. Simple answer.

AOTC wasn't bad, it was better than TPM. ROTS looks to be better than both.
Image
User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

All of the spoilers and leaks that I've had access to, including a massive amount of footage and reading the script itself, indicates that the film is leagues above the first two, and simply amazing at parts.

Regarding current critical response, the film is getting mostly positive to rave reviews from all over.

Rotten Tomatoes currently has thirteen reviews tallied, eleven of them positive and only two negative, and a freshness rating of 85%. MF.com currently tracks sixteen positive reviews versus three negative ones (about 84%). Bill Hunt of The Digital Bits gave the film a B+, ranking it third out of the six behind ESB and ANH.

EDIT: RT is now at 14/2 positive, making 88%.
Image
I believe in a sign of Zeta.

[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]

"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
User avatar
Lord Pounder
Pretty Hate Machine
Posts: 9695
Joined: 2002-11-19 04:40pm
Location: Belfast, unfortunately
Contact:

Post by Lord Pounder »

The story well set up now, unless the actors really drop the ball it can't go wrong. We've been told for years that Anakin was a good man who fell. Now we finally get to see his fall, how can that be bad?
RIP Yosemite Bear
Gone, Never Forgotten
User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

Rotten Tomatoes is now at 16/2 or 89% positive.
Image
I believe in a sign of Zeta.

[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]

"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
Post Reply