More on the SW TV show (Lucas + McCallum)

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Mark S
The Quiet One
Posts: 3304
Joined: 2002-07-25 10:07pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Post by Mark S »

I don't think the Empire would have seen the exhaust port as a flaw. You have to exhaust somehow and their computers were probably telling them that the chance of an explosive getting in there was incredibly low. None of the rebels really thought they could make that shot.
Writer's Guild 'Ghost in the Machine'/Decepticon 'Devastator'/BOTM 'Space Ape'/Justice League 'The Tick'
"The best part of 'believe' is the lie."
It's always the quiet ones.
User avatar
Freeman's Trigger-Finger
Youngling
Posts: 104
Joined: 2004-11-15 02:29pm
Location: In the Death Star's laundry shoot!

Post by Freeman's Trigger-Finger »

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:That completely contradicts.
Not really. While I said that the Death Star 1 was capable of great destructiveness and was a fear throughout the galaxy, it still had faults, faults which resulted in it's eventuall destruction. Now, if the Imperial army could construct a Death Star with all the same properties of the Death Star 1 in terms of power, but with tighter defences and no revealing weak spots, then it serves as a much superior station.

What I was saying was that, until such a superior DS finalised construction, or until it was planned and able bodied enough to go into commision, then it certainly is worth the effort of retaining and operating the DS1, since it's expendable anyway if worst comes to worst (which it did), and it still retaines great power.
They told me there was nothing out there, nothing but fear. But the night my parents were murdered I caught a glimpse of something, and I've looked for it ever since. I went around the world, searched in all the shadows, and there is something out there in the darkness...something terrifying, something that will not stop until it has revenge. Me -- Batman, Batman Begins
User avatar
Mad
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1923
Joined: 2002-07-04 01:32am
Location: North Carolina, USA
Contact:

Post by Mad »

Regarding the Death Star, here's an explanation I posted on SB.com about a month ago:

First off, the senate was around until ANH. It took around 20 years to completely remove remnants of the Old Republic from the Imperial government. As a result, keeping big projects hidden may have been far more difficult. After ANH, the Empire was at its height and had more opportunities to keep projects hidden.

Next, management issues may have come into play. In real life, bad management can make a project go from a few months to years. And the later in a project design flaws are discovered, the more time-consuming it is to fix them. If the original plans to the Death Star were flawed or poorly designed and those issues weren't caught until they started constructing the thing, the time lost would easily have been tremendous with all the re-working required to account for changes to the plans and what has arleady been built just to fix the problem. (This is why various project management and related courses stress finding issues with the project as early as possible, because it costs big bucks to fix them later.)

By the time of ANH, the Imperial design teams would have had knowledge as to the problems encountered with the first Death Star, and probably a much better project management methodology.

Since the original plans seemed to be designed by aliens, at least some redesign may have been required to make things more comfortable for an all-human crew. And those changes wouldn't necessarily be trivial. (Height of the room too low to be comfortable for a human? Lots of things would likely have to be changed to fix that.)
Later...
User avatar
Diamedes
Youngling
Posts: 67
Joined: 2002-07-27 10:16pm
Location: Long Island

Post by Diamedes »

Or just flatout distrust on the part of the Geonosian's led to them giving Dooku subpar plans.
Look at that S-car go.
Kurgan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4069
Joined: 2002-08-19 08:13pm

Post by Kurgan »

Simple: the Empire hired the Duke Nukem Forever team to build the first Death Star. After it's failure, they were all sacked, and replaced by a more competent team...
User avatar
Crossroads Inc.
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9233
Joined: 2005-03-20 06:26pm
Location: Defending Sparkeling Bishonen
Contact:

Post by Crossroads Inc. »

Kurgan wrote:Simple: the Empire hired the Duke Nukem Forever team to build the first Death Star. After it's failure, they were all sacked, and replaced by a more competent team...
Of course!!! That would Explaine Everything!
Praying is another way of doing nothing helpful
"Congratulations, you get a cookie. You almost got a fundamental English word correct." Pick
"Outlaw star has spaceships that punch eachother" Joviwan
Read "Tales From The Crossroads"!
Read "One Wrong Turn"!
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Vympel wrote:What, the Death Star taking 20 years to build? It was always obvious to me ever since I first heard about it as a legitimate plot point. I just don't get why anyone cares.
Its really fucking stupid, but what can you do? Saxton's waving it off as the Seperatists' realization of the concept and not the final model, and its possible for any number of reasons it is not the ANH Tarkin Death Star, but its also obvious that's not the intent.

Oh well, fuck the intent. As long as they don't harp on the stupid in this show and the EU, I won't care.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Mad wrote:Regarding the Death Star, here's an explanation I posted on SB.com about a month ago:

First off, the senate was around until ANH. It took around 20 years to completely remove remnants of the Old Republic from the Imperial government. As a result, keeping big projects hidden may have been far more difficult. After ANH, the Empire was at its height and had more opportunities to keep projects hidden.

Next, management issues may have come into play. In real life, bad management can make a project go from a few months to years. And the later in a project design flaws are discovered, the more time-consuming it is to fix them. If the original plans to the Death Star were flawed or poorly designed and those issues weren't caught until they started constructing the thing, the time lost would easily have been tremendous with all the re-working required to account for changes to the plans and what has arleady been built just to fix the problem. (This is why various project management and related courses stress finding issues with the project as early as possible, because it costs big bucks to fix them later.)

By the time of ANH, the Imperial design teams would have had knowledge as to the problems encountered with the first Death Star, and probably a much better project management methodology.

Since the original plans seemed to be designed by aliens, at least some redesign may have been required to make things more comfortable for an all-human crew. And those changes wouldn't necessarily be trivial. (Height of the room too low to be comfortable for a human? Lots of things would likely have to be changed to fix that.)
The major problem with this is they're ought not to be a pretty recognizable framework of the station like there seems to be. That's way too much structural strata to represent these problems or a few months of a twenty-year construction cycle. The apparent film content would tend to argue away from the intent itself. :roll: Meh, hardly the first time THAT has happened.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
YT300000
Sith'ari
Posts: 6528
Joined: 2003-05-20 12:49pm
Location: Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Post by YT300000 »

Crossroads Inc. wrote:
Kurgan wrote:Simple: the Empire hired the Duke Nukem Forever team to build the first Death Star. After it's failure, they were all sacked, and replaced by a more competent team...
Of course!!! That would Explaine Everything!
No it wouldn't. I mean, they eventually finished the Death Star, so it can't have been George Broussard.
Name changes are for people who wear women's clothes. - Zuul

Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash

Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
Jim Raynor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2922
Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am

Post by Jim Raynor »

VT-16 wrote:You do realize which part of that article certain people here will be focusing on, right? :P
I know which part Darkstar will be focusing on:
"It's a different world unto itself between episodes three (Revenge of the Sith) and four (Star Wars: A New Hope)."
:D
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10303
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Post by Solauren »

Actually, the 20 year construction time of the Death Star is not a big deal.

Okay, they've designed the Death Star. And built the frame.

Great. Wonderful.

Do you really think the Death Star is using STOCK parts?
Hell, I'm willing to bet, since it was one of the biggest constructs in Star Wars (Han; it's to big to be a space station) sort of artificial planets, alot of it's systems required massively reinforced parts, that required redesigns.

Also, up until the Clone Wars, Star wars was in a state of technical stagnancy, right?

Suddenly, the various industries had the Emperor going 'hey, I need a new system designed to these specifications'

Also, redesigns are common on any large project.

The frame we will see at the end of Revenge of the Sith might not have been the full Death Star frame. For all we know, that's the initial 10 kilometer shell around the core.

Also, there where probably lots of unforeseen problems.

Imagine if during the first test fire of the Superlaser, turns out the conductors couldn't take the energy output and basically shorted out the entire Death Star because the material in use had never been tested at that power level? You'd then have to come up with the materials to take it, and refit the Death Star.

Combine that with buercractic stalling, unions (I have no trouble picturing a 5 year strike slowing the Death Star construction down), and other problems, and well, you get the idea.

The second death Star wouldn't have had those problems, because when your a dictator, you can just go 'okay, execute the strikers', 'you're stalling, you're dead', 'unsafe work conditions? Which is worse, your work conditions, or talking to Lord Vader?'
Rommie2006
Padawan Learner
Posts: 331
Joined: 2005-02-12 08:32am

Post by Rommie2006 »

The Death Star taking 20yrs to build?
WHAT THE FUCK is Lucas thinking?

Is this gonna screw our calculations on the Empire's industrial capacity?
I can forsee the rabid trekkies nitpicking on this point.
I hope Lucas is not gonna tell me the DS2 took 30yrs to build!

Oh come on man! The 20 yrs explanation better not be attributed to the Empire's lack of industrial capacity!
User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

If you ever bothered to pay attention here within the last month, you would see that it doesn't.
Image
I believe in a sign of Zeta.

[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]

"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

Its really fucking stupid, but what can you do?
JESUS FUCKING ROLLED-UP CHRIST!!!!

Have you even been reading this thread before the usual DS-construction whinefest? There´s already plenty of good explanations why it took so long in contrast with the DS II (which wasn´t even finished at the time). Why is there still a problem with this? You´d think this was a positive detail, the Empire´s ability to rapidly adapt and improve a design once in total control of resources. 8)
Ravengrim
Worthless Trolling Palm-Fucker
Posts: 45
Joined: 2005-04-09 09:03pm
Location: thors_son@verizon.net

Post by Ravengrim »

Well first off, and Im sure Mike can vouch for this, whenever something goes from the engineer's original designs to the actual contruction tons of things pop up that just cant be accounted for no matter how well the planning. That goes double for something as massive for the Death Star. So 20 years to
1) Convert the station designs from a Geonosian habitable station to a human habitable station (that is a lot of redesign, from the walkways to the cafeterias to the bathrooms)
2) Design or actually create the tech required to make the thing work.
3) Computer test the shit out of it
4) Gather materials, facilities and manpower, all secretly
5) Begin construction and allow time for complications
Im not an engineer so there are probably more things that I didnt think of. Even if a lot of those things were happening at the same time, it still would take a long time. I dont think 20 years is that unreasonable. As an aside, it took GM 10 years to get a reliable working model of their new variable-ratio transmission because of one part they couldnt get right.
I'm a worthless twat.
Admiral_K
Worthless Trolling Palm-Fucker
Posts: 560
Joined: 2002-08-09 01:51pm

Post by Admiral_K »

For comparison, didn't the Enterprise D take 20 years to construct?

First production runs typically take longer because problems are encountered and solved etc.
Kurgan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4069
Joined: 2002-08-19 08:13pm

Post by Kurgan »

That's still quite a dramatic improvement... 20 years for a 160 km station, and then 6 months for a 900 km one (that wasn't even finished at that size and supposedly "non-operational" even though that was just bad intel)!

It's almost six times bigger, surely there'd be more problems with an even bigger station, plus one without the design flaw of the first (though you could just blast your way through this one, but you had to do more work to destroy it).
User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Post by Master of Ossus »

Kurgan wrote:That's still quite a dramatic improvement... 20 years for a 160 km station, and then 6 months for a 900 km one (that wasn't even finished at that size and supposedly "non-operational" even though that was just bad intel)!

It's almost six times bigger, surely there'd be more problems with an even bigger station, plus one without the design flaw of the first (though you could just blast your way through this one, but you had to do more work to destroy it).
The EU implies that they had to use a quickfix solution to the exhaust port, where they just split it up into lots and lots of smaller ones. Also, the station would've been closed when construction ended, so there would've been no way to destroy it with fighters.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
User avatar
Eframepilot
Jedi Master
Posts: 1007
Joined: 2002-09-05 03:35am

Post by Eframepilot »

Considering that the Separatists intended to build the Death Star themselves with resources that would be a small fraction of the Empire's at their peak and that the Separatists almost certainly didn't expect their ultimate weapon to take 20 years to finish, it is the 20 year construction time of the 1st Death Star that is the bizarre anomaly and says nothing against the Empire's industrial capacity. Maybe the first three Death Stars were blown up by Rebels, the fourth was completed but hijacked by time travelers for use in some ancient conflict and the fifth... stayed up? Until Luke blew it up, that is.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27383
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

I'm voting for B5 esque string of death stars. The Death Star, the Death Star Two and the Third Death Star got blown up, and the Fourth Death Star disappeared through a time hole shortly after construction. :lol:
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Nephtys
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6227
Joined: 2005-04-02 10:54pm
Location: South Cali... where life is cheap!

Post by Nephtys »

NecronLord wrote:I'm voting for B5 esque string of death stars. The Death Star, the Death Star Two and the Third Death Star got blown up, and the Fourth Death Star disappeared through a time hole shortly after construction. :lol:
So the Fourth blows up Yavin in a distant past after a good couple of two-parter episodes? Alright, Death Star 5. Our last, best hope for tyrany.
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

Who was it that said the Empire was building two smaller DSs at Coruscant while the DS II was being built? Was it in the ROTJ novelization? (I remember the concept art but not any canon reference).

If they could do that, maybe they built several smaller DSs while the DS I was being built as well. Like Torpedo Spheres, only with a central laser?
User avatar
Old Plympto
Jedi Master
Posts: 1488
Joined: 2003-06-30 11:21pm
Location: Interface 2037 Ready For Inquiry
Contact:

Post by Old Plympto »

VT-16 wrote:Who was it that said the Empire was building two smaller DSs at Coruscant while the DS II was being built? Was it in the ROTJ novelization? (I remember the concept art but not any canon reference).
Ralph McQuarrie's Art of the Star Wars Universe (or some title like that) book.
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

So, ideas in that book counts as canon? (I know of things like Tibannopolis, Aldera and a Jawa fortress hailing from McQuarrie´s art, but I was just wondering.)
User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

The book is part of the EU, afterall.
Image
I believe in a sign of Zeta.

[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]

"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
Post Reply