More on the SW TV show (Lucas + McCallum)
Moderator: Vympel
I don't think the Empire would have seen the exhaust port as a flaw. You have to exhaust somehow and their computers were probably telling them that the chance of an explosive getting in there was incredibly low. None of the rebels really thought they could make that shot.
Writer's Guild 'Ghost in the Machine'/Decepticon 'Devastator'/BOTM 'Space Ape'/Justice League 'The Tick'
"The best part of 'believe' is the lie."
It's always the quiet ones.
"The best part of 'believe' is the lie."
It's always the quiet ones.
- Freeman's Trigger-Finger
- Youngling
- Posts: 104
- Joined: 2004-11-15 02:29pm
- Location: In the Death Star's laundry shoot!
Not really. While I said that the Death Star 1 was capable of great destructiveness and was a fear throughout the galaxy, it still had faults, faults which resulted in it's eventuall destruction. Now, if the Imperial army could construct a Death Star with all the same properties of the Death Star 1 in terms of power, but with tighter defences and no revealing weak spots, then it serves as a much superior station.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:That completely contradicts.
What I was saying was that, until such a superior DS finalised construction, or until it was planned and able bodied enough to go into commision, then it certainly is worth the effort of retaining and operating the DS1, since it's expendable anyway if worst comes to worst (which it did), and it still retaines great power.
They told me there was nothing out there, nothing but fear. But the night my parents were murdered I caught a glimpse of something, and I've looked for it ever since. I went around the world, searched in all the shadows, and there is something out there in the darkness...something terrifying, something that will not stop until it has revenge. Me -- Batman, Batman Begins
- Mad
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: 2002-07-04 01:32am
- Location: North Carolina, USA
- Contact:
Regarding the Death Star, here's an explanation I posted on SB.com about a month ago:
First off, the senate was around until ANH. It took around 20 years to completely remove remnants of the Old Republic from the Imperial government. As a result, keeping big projects hidden may have been far more difficult. After ANH, the Empire was at its height and had more opportunities to keep projects hidden.
Next, management issues may have come into play. In real life, bad management can make a project go from a few months to years. And the later in a project design flaws are discovered, the more time-consuming it is to fix them. If the original plans to the Death Star were flawed or poorly designed and those issues weren't caught until they started constructing the thing, the time lost would easily have been tremendous with all the re-working required to account for changes to the plans and what has arleady been built just to fix the problem. (This is why various project management and related courses stress finding issues with the project as early as possible, because it costs big bucks to fix them later.)
By the time of ANH, the Imperial design teams would have had knowledge as to the problems encountered with the first Death Star, and probably a much better project management methodology.
Since the original plans seemed to be designed by aliens, at least some redesign may have been required to make things more comfortable for an all-human crew. And those changes wouldn't necessarily be trivial. (Height of the room too low to be comfortable for a human? Lots of things would likely have to be changed to fix that.)
First off, the senate was around until ANH. It took around 20 years to completely remove remnants of the Old Republic from the Imperial government. As a result, keeping big projects hidden may have been far more difficult. After ANH, the Empire was at its height and had more opportunities to keep projects hidden.
Next, management issues may have come into play. In real life, bad management can make a project go from a few months to years. And the later in a project design flaws are discovered, the more time-consuming it is to fix them. If the original plans to the Death Star were flawed or poorly designed and those issues weren't caught until they started constructing the thing, the time lost would easily have been tremendous with all the re-working required to account for changes to the plans and what has arleady been built just to fix the problem. (This is why various project management and related courses stress finding issues with the project as early as possible, because it costs big bucks to fix them later.)
By the time of ANH, the Imperial design teams would have had knowledge as to the problems encountered with the first Death Star, and probably a much better project management methodology.
Since the original plans seemed to be designed by aliens, at least some redesign may have been required to make things more comfortable for an all-human crew. And those changes wouldn't necessarily be trivial. (Height of the room too low to be comfortable for a human? Lots of things would likely have to be changed to fix that.)
Later...
- Crossroads Inc.
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 9233
- Joined: 2005-03-20 06:26pm
- Location: Defending Sparkeling Bishonen
- Contact:
Of course!!! That would Explaine Everything!Kurgan wrote:Simple: the Empire hired the Duke Nukem Forever team to build the first Death Star. After it's failure, they were all sacked, and replaced by a more competent team...
Praying is another way of doing nothing helpful
"Congratulations, you get a cookie. You almost got a fundamental English word correct." Pick
"Outlaw star has spaceships that punch eachother" Joviwan
Read "Tales From The Crossroads"!
Read "One Wrong Turn"!
"Congratulations, you get a cookie. You almost got a fundamental English word correct." Pick
"Outlaw star has spaceships that punch eachother" Joviwan
Read "Tales From The Crossroads"!
Read "One Wrong Turn"!
- Illuminatus Primus
- All Seeing Eye
- Posts: 15774
- Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
- Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Contact:
Its really fucking stupid, but what can you do? Saxton's waving it off as the Seperatists' realization of the concept and not the final model, and its possible for any number of reasons it is not the ANH Tarkin Death Star, but its also obvious that's not the intent.Vympel wrote:What, the Death Star taking 20 years to build? It was always obvious to me ever since I first heard about it as a legitimate plot point. I just don't get why anyone cares.
Oh well, fuck the intent. As long as they don't harp on the stupid in this show and the EU, I won't care.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
- Illuminatus Primus
- All Seeing Eye
- Posts: 15774
- Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
- Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Contact:
The major problem with this is they're ought not to be a pretty recognizable framework of the station like there seems to be. That's way too much structural strata to represent these problems or a few months of a twenty-year construction cycle. The apparent film content would tend to argue away from the intent itself. Meh, hardly the first time THAT has happened.Mad wrote:Regarding the Death Star, here's an explanation I posted on SB.com about a month ago:
First off, the senate was around until ANH. It took around 20 years to completely remove remnants of the Old Republic from the Imperial government. As a result, keeping big projects hidden may have been far more difficult. After ANH, the Empire was at its height and had more opportunities to keep projects hidden.
Next, management issues may have come into play. In real life, bad management can make a project go from a few months to years. And the later in a project design flaws are discovered, the more time-consuming it is to fix them. If the original plans to the Death Star were flawed or poorly designed and those issues weren't caught until they started constructing the thing, the time lost would easily have been tremendous with all the re-working required to account for changes to the plans and what has arleady been built just to fix the problem. (This is why various project management and related courses stress finding issues with the project as early as possible, because it costs big bucks to fix them later.)
By the time of ANH, the Imperial design teams would have had knowledge as to the problems encountered with the first Death Star, and probably a much better project management methodology.
Since the original plans seemed to be designed by aliens, at least some redesign may have been required to make things more comfortable for an all-human crew. And those changes wouldn't necessarily be trivial. (Height of the room too low to be comfortable for a human? Lots of things would likely have to be changed to fix that.)
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
No it wouldn't. I mean, they eventually finished the Death Star, so it can't have been George Broussard.Crossroads Inc. wrote:Of course!!! That would Explaine Everything!Kurgan wrote:Simple: the Empire hired the Duke Nukem Forever team to build the first Death Star. After it's failure, they were all sacked, and replaced by a more competent team...
Name changes are for people who wear women's clothes. - Zuul
Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash
Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash
Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
-
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2922
- Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am
Actually, the 20 year construction time of the Death Star is not a big deal.
Okay, they've designed the Death Star. And built the frame.
Great. Wonderful.
Do you really think the Death Star is using STOCK parts?
Hell, I'm willing to bet, since it was one of the biggest constructs in Star Wars (Han; it's to big to be a space station) sort of artificial planets, alot of it's systems required massively reinforced parts, that required redesigns.
Also, up until the Clone Wars, Star wars was in a state of technical stagnancy, right?
Suddenly, the various industries had the Emperor going 'hey, I need a new system designed to these specifications'
Also, redesigns are common on any large project.
The frame we will see at the end of Revenge of the Sith might not have been the full Death Star frame. For all we know, that's the initial 10 kilometer shell around the core.
Also, there where probably lots of unforeseen problems.
Imagine if during the first test fire of the Superlaser, turns out the conductors couldn't take the energy output and basically shorted out the entire Death Star because the material in use had never been tested at that power level? You'd then have to come up with the materials to take it, and refit the Death Star.
Combine that with buercractic stalling, unions (I have no trouble picturing a 5 year strike slowing the Death Star construction down), and other problems, and well, you get the idea.
The second death Star wouldn't have had those problems, because when your a dictator, you can just go 'okay, execute the strikers', 'you're stalling, you're dead', 'unsafe work conditions? Which is worse, your work conditions, or talking to Lord Vader?'
Okay, they've designed the Death Star. And built the frame.
Great. Wonderful.
Do you really think the Death Star is using STOCK parts?
Hell, I'm willing to bet, since it was one of the biggest constructs in Star Wars (Han; it's to big to be a space station) sort of artificial planets, alot of it's systems required massively reinforced parts, that required redesigns.
Also, up until the Clone Wars, Star wars was in a state of technical stagnancy, right?
Suddenly, the various industries had the Emperor going 'hey, I need a new system designed to these specifications'
Also, redesigns are common on any large project.
The frame we will see at the end of Revenge of the Sith might not have been the full Death Star frame. For all we know, that's the initial 10 kilometer shell around the core.
Also, there where probably lots of unforeseen problems.
Imagine if during the first test fire of the Superlaser, turns out the conductors couldn't take the energy output and basically shorted out the entire Death Star because the material in use had never been tested at that power level? You'd then have to come up with the materials to take it, and refit the Death Star.
Combine that with buercractic stalling, unions (I have no trouble picturing a 5 year strike slowing the Death Star construction down), and other problems, and well, you get the idea.
The second death Star wouldn't have had those problems, because when your a dictator, you can just go 'okay, execute the strikers', 'you're stalling, you're dead', 'unsafe work conditions? Which is worse, your work conditions, or talking to Lord Vader?'
-
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 331
- Joined: 2005-02-12 08:32am
The Death Star taking 20yrs to build?
WHAT THE FUCK is Lucas thinking?
Is this gonna screw our calculations on the Empire's industrial capacity?
I can forsee the rabid trekkies nitpicking on this point.
I hope Lucas is not gonna tell me the DS2 took 30yrs to build!
Oh come on man! The 20 yrs explanation better not be attributed to the Empire's lack of industrial capacity!
WHAT THE FUCK is Lucas thinking?
Is this gonna screw our calculations on the Empire's industrial capacity?
I can forsee the rabid trekkies nitpicking on this point.
I hope Lucas is not gonna tell me the DS2 took 30yrs to build!
Oh come on man! The 20 yrs explanation better not be attributed to the Empire's lack of industrial capacity!
- Spanky The Dolphin
- Mammy Two-Shoes
- Posts: 30776
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
- Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
JESUS FUCKING ROLLED-UP CHRIST!!!!Its really fucking stupid, but what can you do?
Have you even been reading this thread before the usual DS-construction whinefest? There´s already plenty of good explanations why it took so long in contrast with the DS II (which wasn´t even finished at the time). Why is there still a problem with this? You´d think this was a positive detail, the Empire´s ability to rapidly adapt and improve a design once in total control of resources.
-
- Worthless Trolling Palm-Fucker
- Posts: 45
- Joined: 2005-04-09 09:03pm
- Location: thors_son@verizon.net
Well first off, and Im sure Mike can vouch for this, whenever something goes from the engineer's original designs to the actual contruction tons of things pop up that just cant be accounted for no matter how well the planning. That goes double for something as massive for the Death Star. So 20 years to
1) Convert the station designs from a Geonosian habitable station to a human habitable station (that is a lot of redesign, from the walkways to the cafeterias to the bathrooms)
2) Design or actually create the tech required to make the thing work.
3) Computer test the shit out of it
4) Gather materials, facilities and manpower, all secretly
5) Begin construction and allow time for complications
Im not an engineer so there are probably more things that I didnt think of. Even if a lot of those things were happening at the same time, it still would take a long time. I dont think 20 years is that unreasonable. As an aside, it took GM 10 years to get a reliable working model of their new variable-ratio transmission because of one part they couldnt get right.
1) Convert the station designs from a Geonosian habitable station to a human habitable station (that is a lot of redesign, from the walkways to the cafeterias to the bathrooms)
2) Design or actually create the tech required to make the thing work.
3) Computer test the shit out of it
4) Gather materials, facilities and manpower, all secretly
5) Begin construction and allow time for complications
Im not an engineer so there are probably more things that I didnt think of. Even if a lot of those things were happening at the same time, it still would take a long time. I dont think 20 years is that unreasonable. As an aside, it took GM 10 years to get a reliable working model of their new variable-ratio transmission because of one part they couldnt get right.
I'm a worthless twat.
That's still quite a dramatic improvement... 20 years for a 160 km station, and then 6 months for a 900 km one (that wasn't even finished at that size and supposedly "non-operational" even though that was just bad intel)!
It's almost six times bigger, surely there'd be more problems with an even bigger station, plus one without the design flaw of the first (though you could just blast your way through this one, but you had to do more work to destroy it).
It's almost six times bigger, surely there'd be more problems with an even bigger station, plus one without the design flaw of the first (though you could just blast your way through this one, but you had to do more work to destroy it).
- Master of Ossus
- Darkest Knight
- Posts: 18213
- Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
- Location: California
The EU implies that they had to use a quickfix solution to the exhaust port, where they just split it up into lots and lots of smaller ones. Also, the station would've been closed when construction ended, so there would've been no way to destroy it with fighters.Kurgan wrote:That's still quite a dramatic improvement... 20 years for a 160 km station, and then 6 months for a 900 km one (that wasn't even finished at that size and supposedly "non-operational" even though that was just bad intel)!
It's almost six times bigger, surely there'd be more problems with an even bigger station, plus one without the design flaw of the first (though you could just blast your way through this one, but you had to do more work to destroy it).
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul
Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner
"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000
"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner
"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000
"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
- Eframepilot
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1007
- Joined: 2002-09-05 03:35am
Considering that the Separatists intended to build the Death Star themselves with resources that would be a small fraction of the Empire's at their peak and that the Separatists almost certainly didn't expect their ultimate weapon to take 20 years to finish, it is the 20 year construction time of the 1st Death Star that is the bizarre anomaly and says nothing against the Empire's industrial capacity. Maybe the first three Death Stars were blown up by Rebels, the fourth was completed but hijacked by time travelers for use in some ancient conflict and the fifth... stayed up? Until Luke blew it up, that is.
- NecronLord
- Harbinger of Doom
- Posts: 27384
- Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
- Location: The Lost City
I'm voting for B5 esque string of death stars. The Death Star, the Death Star Two and the Third Death Star got blown up, and the Fourth Death Star disappeared through a time hole shortly after construction.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
- Nephtys
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: 2005-04-02 10:54pm
- Location: South Cali... where life is cheap!
So the Fourth blows up Yavin in a distant past after a good couple of two-parter episodes? Alright, Death Star 5. Our last, best hope for tyrany.NecronLord wrote:I'm voting for B5 esque string of death stars. The Death Star, the Death Star Two and the Third Death Star got blown up, and the Fourth Death Star disappeared through a time hole shortly after construction.
Who was it that said the Empire was building two smaller DSs at Coruscant while the DS II was being built? Was it in the ROTJ novelization? (I remember the concept art but not any canon reference).
If they could do that, maybe they built several smaller DSs while the DS I was being built as well. Like Torpedo Spheres, only with a central laser?
If they could do that, maybe they built several smaller DSs while the DS I was being built as well. Like Torpedo Spheres, only with a central laser?
- Old Plympto
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1488
- Joined: 2003-06-30 11:21pm
- Location: Interface 2037 Ready For Inquiry
- Contact:
- Spanky The Dolphin
- Mammy Two-Shoes
- Posts: 30776
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
- Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)