Fine Molds 1:72 Millennium Falcon
Moderator: Beowulf
- Firefox
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1546
- Joined: 2005-03-01 12:29pm
- Location: Wichita, Kansas
- Contact:
Fine Molds 1:72 Millennium Falcon
Here.
I have my doubts it will be the correct 115' version. The 88' measurement, like the Executor's 5-mile blooper, is too widespread.
I have my doubts it will be the correct 115' version. The 88' measurement, like the Executor's 5-mile blooper, is too widespread.
- Spanky The Dolphin
- Mammy Two-Shoes
- Posts: 30776
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
- Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
- Spanky The Dolphin
- Mammy Two-Shoes
- Posts: 30776
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
- Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
- Firefox
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1546
- Joined: 2005-03-01 12:29pm
- Location: Wichita, Kansas
- Contact:
A couple of test shots of various parts are available. Refresh the page if the images don't load at first. This looks awesome.
- Lord Zentei
- Space Elf Psyker
- Posts: 8742
- Joined: 2004-11-22 02:49am
- Location: Ulthwé Craftworld, plotting the downfall of the Imperium.
Re: Fine Molds 1:72 Millennium Falcon
I thought the 12.8 km blooper was more common, but yeah.Firefox wrote:Here.
I have my doubts it will be the correct 115' version. The 88' measurement, like the Executor's 5-mile blooper, is too widespread.
Anyway, it looks nice.
CotK <mew> | HAB | JL | MM | TTC | Cybertron
TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet
And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel! -- Asuka
TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet
And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel! -- Asuka
- Frank Hipper
- Overfiend of the Superego
- Posts: 12882
- Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
- Location: Hamilton, Ohio?
The quest for accuracy in models is sometimes more apparent in modelers than in model manufacturers...I have a "1/700th" scale kit of the ship in my sig, I've recently learned that it's about .045" too short, which is pretty considerable in 1/700th scale.Firefox wrote:Damn. Apparently the model's going to be only 16.7" long. That's 100' in 1:72. Still too small.
And I was sooo happy with it before I found that out.
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
- Firefox
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1546
- Joined: 2005-03-01 12:29pm
- Location: Wichita, Kansas
- Contact:
I've had my share of such experiences. Aside from size discrepancies, the shape of a particular model can be way off. My Minicraft 1:144 Shuttle was a horrid piece of plastic, and not even covering it with putty and resculpting did a good job.Frank Hipper wrote:The quest for accuracy in models is sometimes more apparent in modelers than in model manufacturers...I have a "1/700th" scale kit of the ship in my sig, I've recently learned that it's about .045" too short, which is pretty considerable in 1/700th scale.
And I was sooo happy with it before I found that out.
Hell, I'm in the process of fixing up an Academy 1:300 XB-70. The size is correct, but the windshield, inlets and nozzles are horrid. And don't get me started on the undercarriage.
- Spanky The Dolphin
- Mammy Two-Shoes
- Posts: 30776
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
- Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
Well, even if it's a little too small scale-wise, that's still a pretty big model.Firefox wrote:Damn. Apparently the model's going to be only 16.7" long. That's 100' in 1:72. Still too small.
I believe in a sign of Zeta.
[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]
"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
- Frank Hipper
- Overfiend of the Superego
- Posts: 12882
- Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
- Location: Hamilton, Ohio?
I would hesitate to recommend the Dragon 1/700 USS Arizona; despite some glowing reviews (inexpensive, comes with photo etch, die-cast metal turrets, highly detailed "rubberized" control tops and cranes, brass barrels), the bow profile resembles the Arizona in no way, and the forecastle deck is about half again as wide as it should be.Firefox wrote:I've had my share of such experiences. Aside from size discrepancies, the shape of a particular model can be way off. My Minicraft 1:144 Shuttle was a horrid piece of plastic, and not even covering it with putty and resculpting did a good job.
Hell, I'm in the process of fixing up an Academy 1:300 XB-70. The size is correct, but the windshield, inlets and nozzles are horrid. And don't get me started on the undercarriage.
The bow can be easily fixed, the forecastle is totally beyond any hope of correction.
As to this Millenium Falcon kit, anyone notice that it looks like it's going to have a "poseable" upper turret? Playtime ahoy...
Probably going to be about 120 bucks or more, though.
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.