Yeah, Shaman's not that good, but it's better than the Straith (ha! found it!). Better than the Velacia, too, which is surprising since it only costs 85% as much. Icarus is also junk considering the price, since it's got a bad gun layout and isn't that quick.Vympel wrote:Oh crap forgot about that thing .... what's worse is there's a huge period of the game where you're stuck with that piece of shit that's only one step up from it ... the Shaman IIRC.The Dark wrote:The first starfighter you can purchase in Privateer 2. 2 gun hardpoints, 2 missile hardpoints, and 2 systems hardpoints, crap armor, crap shields, crap maneuverability, and crap speed. If I can find the name, I'll post it.
Worst Non-ST/SW Starfighter Ever?
Moderator: NecronLord
- The Dark
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7378
- Joined: 2002-10-31 10:28pm
- Location: Promoting ornithological awareness
BattleTech for SilCoreStanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
What was the best, most expensive fighter again? IIRC it looked really wierd and the name sucked.The Dark wrote:Yeah, Shaman's not that good, but it's better than the Straith (ha! found it!). Better than the Velacia, too, which is surprising since it only costs 85% as much. Icarus is also junk considering the price, since it's got a bad gun layout and isn't that quick.Vympel wrote:Oh crap forgot about that thing .... what's worse is there's a huge period of the game where you're stuck with that piece of shit that's only one step up from it ... the Shaman IIRC.The Dark wrote:The first starfighter you can purchase in Privateer 2. 2 gun hardpoints, 2 missile hardpoints, and 2 systems hardpoints, crap armor, crap shields, crap maneuverability, and crap speed. If I can find the name, I'll post it.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
- The Dark
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7378
- Joined: 2002-10-31 10:28pm
- Location: Promoting ornithological awareness
Duress was most expensive and most maneuverable, but I preferred the Freij Mk II since it had slightly more damage taking ability. Freij Mk II with 2 Kraven Mk IV and 3 Mass Ion Cannon...Vympel wrote:What was the best, most expensive fighter again? IIRC it looked really wierd and the name sucked.The Dark wrote: Yeah, Shaman's not that good, but it's better than the Straith (ha! found it!). Better than the Velacia, too, which is surprising since it only costs 85% as much. Icarus is also junk considering the price, since it's got a bad gun layout and isn't that quick.
BattleTech for SilCoreStanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
That's right! The FRIDGE!!!!! It ruled.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
- Frank Hipper
- Overfiend of the Superego
- Posts: 12882
- Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
- Location: Hamilton, Ohio?
- Peregrin Toker
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 8609
- Joined: 2002-07-04 10:57am
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
I hate going off topic, but Soviet fighter jets' main advantage were not that they looked sinister, but that they usually were much more nimble than contemporary NATO fighters due to the fact that USA and USSR governments set different requirements to plane manufacturers until the late 1960s. (the Fishbed prototype was build in 1956 if I recall correctly)Frank Hipper wrote:The Ruskies have ALWAYS built pretty!Vympel wrote:Bah! Su-27 OWNZZZZZZZZZZZZ your MiG-21!Frank Hipper wrote: And I always thought MIG-21s were perty perty airplanes.
On the sci-fi fighters:
I think that many qualify as ugliest, but is this poll is about practicality??
If it's about practicality, I vote for..... well, the Dark Eldar's Razorwing from Warhammer 40K. It's almost twice as big as it's sister, the Raven, but is only marginally more powerfully armed. However, it looks much cooler.
"Hi there, would you like to have a cookie?"
"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
Re: Worst Non-ST/SW Starfighter Ever?
Amen to that. I regularly went Devil Ray hunting in it (the Black Devestator is a bit better since you get a tachyon gun rather than the Stormfire - no fixed ammo load). Those five turrets are just gravy (especially when I replaced whem with tachyon turrets in WCPEDIT ) and the plasma gun rocks.Alyeska wrote:It was somewhat slower then the Shrike, had greater shields, armor, turret defenses. Its main gun could kill enemy fighters instantly (which I did multiple times), does not have to worry about running out of Torpedoes near as much as the Shrike, and carried more torpedoes.Eleas wrote:The Devastator Bomber from Wing Commander Prophecy. Slow, wallowing pos that's almost impossible to maneuver. Strong weapons and armor that helps nothing at all. Weaponry and technology based on misconceptions of WC 4. And soooo ugly...Mike_6002 wrote:For me the Zeypher 109 Raider (B5) with it's huge target profile, weak ass 20 millejoule 42mm bolters, and it manuvers like a pregant Bantha (mandatory SW joke)
It is superior to the Shrike in almost every single way.
Then again, I've always enjoyed flying heavy fighters or bombers in space combat sims.
Yeah, the Shrike was the true successor to the Thud VII, but I still didn't enjoy flying it that much. The Black Shrike was better but rather underpowered (not enough juice for the guns).Vympel wrote:The Shrike was more like the MAGNIFICENT, AWESOME, BOW DOWN AND WORSHIP THUNDERBOLT VII than a bomber. The Shrike was much easier to fight in IMO.
Worst fighter- the Hellcat. Like YUK. Piece of crap.
- Moonshadow
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 244
- Joined: 2002-09-29 02:54am
- The Dark
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7378
- Joined: 2002-10-31 10:28pm
- Location: Promoting ornithological awareness
Staying off-topic the main reason for that was that USSR pilots were expected to do a lot more work than NATO pilots. Most MiGs used compressed-air systems rather than hydraulics for things like the landing gear. It saved weight, but made routine landings more of a hassle. While an American pilots just had to remember "flip switch," a Russian pilot had to remember something along the lines of "flip switch, press toggle, wait for light to turn on, flip another switch." It was a matter of building a plane with no extra weight, even though pilot stress went up and pilot effectiveness overall went down. Many early MiGs also lacked radar (the Fresco comes to mind), which also saved weight, though they had to be vectored to a target by ground control. It also followed the different philosophies of the air forces. The Russians were dogfighters, who preferred to engage in close range turning fights. The Americans were following the traditions of the P-38 and P-47 by designing "boom and zoom" fighters that would streak in on a target, hit, and fly away to outside of weapons range, turn, and attack again. The F-4 Phantom and F-8 Crusader were both quicker than contemporary Russian jets, and could pull equivalent turns, but couldn't hold the turns due to mass. It was a different design philosophy and technological capability that led to the differences.Simon H.Johansen wrote: I hate going off topic, but Soviet fighter jets' main advantage were not that they looked sinister, but that they usually were much more nimble than contemporary NATO fighters due to the fact that USA and USSR governments set different requirements to plane manufacturers until the late 1960s. (the Fishbed prototype was build in 1956 if I recall correctly)
BattleTech for SilCoreStanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
true, both the Su-27 and it's baby brother the mig-29 are very Attarctive jets, then again so is their america counterparts, the F-15 and F-18.The Ruskies have ALWAYS built pretty!
"a single death is a tragedy, a million deaths are a statistic"-Joseph Stalin
"No plan survives contact with the enemy"-Helmuth Von Moltke
"Women prefer stories about one person dying slowly. Men prefer stories of many people dying quickly."-Niles from Frasier.
"No plan survives contact with the enemy"-Helmuth Von Moltke
"Women prefer stories about one person dying slowly. Men prefer stories of many people dying quickly."-Niles from Frasier.
- EmperorMing
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 3432
- Joined: 2002-09-09 05:08am
- Location: The Lizard Lounge
Re: Worst Non-ST/SW Starfighter Ever?
Eleas wrote:Weaponry and technology based on misconceptions of WC 4
How can they be misconceptions if they're in game?
That are probably superior to mainstream fighters of the same era.Vendetta wrote:The ones from the Wing Commander movie.
They're LIGHTNINGS. ROYAL AIR FORCE BRITISH AEROSPACE LIGHTNINGS. Here, a pic . . .Sea Skimmer wrote: What do you want for kit bashed East German MiG-21's? Opps...
And because I feel like it, an anime one!
That's the wrong way to tickle Mary, that's the wrong way to kiss!
Don't you know that, over here lad, they like it best like this!
Hooray, pour les français! Farewell, Angleterre!
We didn't know how to tickle Mary, but we learnt how, over there!
Don't you know that, over here lad, they like it best like this!
Hooray, pour les français! Farewell, Angleterre!
We didn't know how to tickle Mary, but we learnt how, over there!
Re: Worst Non-ST/SW Starfighter Ever?
The precedents of WC4 were ignored in WC:P in favor of ideas that were uneccessary, silly or just plain stupid. IMHO. WC4 was the best game in the series - WC:P was just pathetic.Bob McDob wrote:Eleas wrote:Weaponry and technology based on misconceptions of WC 4
How can they be misconceptions if they're in game?
Then again, I'm biased.
Björn Paulsen
"Travelers with closed minds can tell us little except about themselves."
--Chinua Achebe
"Travelers with closed minds can tell us little except about themselves."
--Chinua Achebe
Re: Worst Non-ST/SW Starfighter Ever?
I still don't like it though.Alyeska wrote: It was somewhat slower then the Shrike, had greater shields, armor, turret defenses. Its main gun could kill enemy fighters instantly (which I did multiple times), does not have to worry about running out of Torpedoes near as much as the Shrike, and carried more torpedoes.
It is superior to the Shrike in almost every single way.
Björn Paulsen
"Travelers with closed minds can tell us little except about themselves."
--Chinua Achebe
"Travelers with closed minds can tell us little except about themselves."
--Chinua Achebe
-
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 179
- Joined: 2002-07-09 03:25pm
- Location: In the bag
Re: Worst Non-ST/SW Starfighter Ever?
And I don't like the Missile Boat. Doesn't make it a bad design.Eleas wrote:I still don't like it though.Alyeska wrote: It was somewhat slower then the Shrike, had greater shields, armor, turret defenses. Its main gun could kill enemy fighters instantly (which I did multiple times), does not have to worry about running out of Torpedoes near as much as the Shrike, and carried more torpedoes.
It is superior to the Shrike in almost every single way.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
- Mike_6002
- Village Idiot
- Posts: 710
- Joined: 2002-11-14 12:59pm
- Location: Modifed ISD II Tyrant II buried underneth Hamilton, Ontario
You hate Missle Boats, better not be the SW version, or you will die a painful death involving, A Missle Boats, Proton Bombs, And A Psychotic Canadian, Got it?
Member of The Cleaners (Scout, Sniper, Silent Assassain) <Origins of The Cleaners Pending>
"We are the Cleaners! Prepare to Die!" -The Cleaners Offical Motto
"Take what you can get in life" -Me
I'm fuckin insane wh00t wh00t and darn proud
#1 Fan of LT. Hit-Man
Member of Task Force Lennox
Remember to hug a moderator at least once a day
"We are the Cleaners! Prepare to Die!" -The Cleaners Offical Motto
"Take what you can get in life" -Me
I'm fuckin insane wh00t wh00t and darn proud
#1 Fan of LT. Hit-Man
Member of Task Force Lennox
Remember to hug a moderator at least once a day
The SW Missile Boat can kiss my ass. Its just as bad as the Sun Crusher. A game of oneupsmanship that went wild.Mike_6002 wrote:You hate Missle Boats, better not be the SW version, or you will die a painful death involving, A Missle Boats, Proton Bombs, And A Psychotic Canadian, Got it?
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
- Mike_6002
- Village Idiot
- Posts: 710
- Joined: 2002-11-14 12:59pm
- Location: Modifed ISD II Tyrant II buried underneth Hamilton, Ontario
This is about non-ST/SW put on the other boardsAlyeska wrote:The SW Missile Boat can kiss my ass. Its just as bad as the Sun Crusher. A game of oneupsmanship that went wild.Mike_6002 wrote:You hate Missle Boats, better not be the SW version, or you will die a painful death involving, A Missle Boats, Proton Bombs, And A Psychotic Canadian, Got it?
God you SB people somehow never cease to amaze me in the of logic and common sense, is there like a device that the moment you has a 90% that sucks out the brain
Don't answer people, get back on the thread heading people
I don't like hijackers
Member of The Cleaners (Scout, Sniper, Silent Assassain) <Origins of The Cleaners Pending>
"We are the Cleaners! Prepare to Die!" -The Cleaners Offical Motto
"Take what you can get in life" -Me
I'm fuckin insane wh00t wh00t and darn proud
#1 Fan of LT. Hit-Man
Member of Task Force Lennox
Remember to hug a moderator at least once a day
"We are the Cleaners! Prepare to Die!" -The Cleaners Offical Motto
"Take what you can get in life" -Me
I'm fuckin insane wh00t wh00t and darn proud
#1 Fan of LT. Hit-Man
Member of Task Force Lennox
Remember to hug a moderator at least once a day
So opinion makes people stupid eh? Wll your not exactly ranking very high at the moment.Mike_6002 wrote:This is about non-ST/SW put on the other boardsAlyeska wrote:The SW Missile Boat can kiss my ass. Its just as bad as the Sun Crusher. A game of oneupsmanship that went wild.Mike_6002 wrote:You hate Missle Boats, better not be the SW version, or you will die a painful death involving, A Missle Boats, Proton Bombs, And A Psychotic Canadian, Got it?
God you SB people somehow never cease to amaze me in the of logic and common sense, is there like a device that the moment you has a 90% that sucks out the brain
Don't answer people, get back on the thread heading people
I don't like hijackers
BTW, I didn't bring up the topic of ships you dislike rather then ships that suck because of design.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."