Michael Jackson is nuts
Moderator: Edi
-
Stormbringer
- King of Democracy
- Posts: 22678
- Joined: 2002-07-15 11:22pm
I saw the entire sequence on the news. He is a truly sick fuck. Alot of the fans who stood under the balcony was outraged about it too during intervievs later with the press.
Violets are red and roses are blue, if you open up photoshop and fuck with the hue!
"Killboy. 35 missions flown, 35 replacement Fighta-Bommerz, an' 35 major bionik surgery procedures.
67 Konfirmed kills, includin' 43 actually belongin' to the enemy--
'E may 'ave been a total madboy, but 'e knew 'ow to get the job done."
~Kommander Uzgob (AKA "Maverork"), Deff Skwadron.
"Killboy. 35 missions flown, 35 replacement Fighta-Bommerz, an' 35 major bionik surgery procedures.
67 Konfirmed kills, includin' 43 actually belongin' to the enemy--
'E may 'ave been a total madboy, but 'e knew 'ow to get the job done."
~Kommander Uzgob (AKA "Maverork"), Deff Skwadron.
-
Vertigo1
- Defender of the Night
- Posts: 4720
- Joined: 2002-08-12 12:47am
- Location: Tennessee, USA
- Contact:
Yeah, he's almost as bad as Maria Carey. Remember all those tapes Stern played a while back?Damaramu wrote:You want fucked up, read about him in Howard Stern's book Miss America. Very fucking funny...and just shows exactly how much of a paranoid nutjob MJ is.
"I once asked Rebecca to sing Happy Birthday to me during sex. That was funny, especially since I timed my thrusts to sync up with the words. And yes, it was my birthday." - Darth Wong
Leader of the SD.Net Gargoyle Clan | Spacebattles Firstone | Twitter
Leader of the SD.Net Gargoyle Clan | Spacebattles Firstone | Twitter
-
Stormbringer
- King of Democracy
- Posts: 22678
- Joined: 2002-07-15 11:22pm
MAriah Carey at least seemed a nervous breakdown. Wacko Jacko just isn't wired right in the head.Vertigo1 wrote:Yeah, he's almost as bad as Maria Carey. Remember all those tapes Stern played a while back?Damaramu wrote:You want fucked up, read about him in Howard Stern's book Miss America. Very fucking funny...and just shows exactly how much of a paranoid nutjob MJ is.
-
TrailerParkJawa
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5850
- Joined: 2002-07-04 11:49pm
- Location: San Jose, California
-
Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
How is "Michael Jackson is nuts" even remotely recent news?
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
-
GrandMasterTerwynn
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 6787
- Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
- Location: Somewhere on Earth.
Re: Michael Jackson is nuts
You're saying this like it wasn't obvious.Durran Korr wrote:http://us.ent4.yimg.com/entertainment.y ... on.sff.jpg
This guy shouldn't be raising kids, I'm sorry.
Tales of the Known Worlds:
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
-
Stormbringer
- King of Democracy
- Posts: 22678
- Joined: 2002-07-15 11:22pm
-
TrailerParkJawa
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5850
- Joined: 2002-07-04 11:49pm
- Location: San Jose, California
-
Einhander Sn0m4n
- Insane Railgunner
- Posts: 18630
- Joined: 2002-10-01 05:51am
- Location: Louisiana... or Dagobah. You know, where Yoda lives.
The towel he placed on the head of the child especially scares me. Has he mutilated the face of his poor child to look like his? I wouldn't put it past him.
BoTM / JL / MM / HAB / VRWC / Horseman
I'm studying for the CPA exam. Have a nice summer, and if you're down just sit back and realize that Joe is off somewhere, doing much worse than you are.
-
Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi
- What Kind of Username is That?
- Posts: 9254
- Joined: 2002-07-10 08:53pm
- Location: Back in PA
-
Patrick Degan
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 14847
- Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
- Location: Orleanian in exile
-
CmdrSweevo
- Requiescat in Pace
- Posts: 128
- Joined: 2002-08-27 05:53am
From today's Telegraph:
***
Jackson blunders again as children wear veils to zoo
By Nicole Martin
(Filed: 21/11/2002)
Michael Jackson's suitability as a parent was further called into question yesterday after he was photographed at Berlin Zoo with two children, believed to be his older son and daughter, with their faces shrouded.
Michael Jackson with two children hidden by scarves during a visit to Berlin Zoo
Only a day after he provoked criticism by dangling his baby son over a hotel balcony, the singer was seen holding hands with children whose faces were almost totally obscured by cerise veils.
The children were believed to have been Prince Michael Junior, five, and Paris Michael Katherine, four, who were born during his marriage to his second wife, Debbie Rowe, whom he later divorced.
The singer admitted in a statement that he had made a "terrible mistake" when he swung his third son, Prince Michael II, over a hotel balcony 60ft above street level.
"I made a terrible mistake," he said. "I got caught up in the excitement of the moment. I would never intentionally endanger the lives of my children." Fans watched in astonishment as the smiling singer showed off his youngest child by dangling him over the balcony.
Initially delighted at catching a glimpse of the nine-month-old boy, they became concerned as his father held him precariously with one arm.
Then the singer appeared in danger of losing his grip, prompting some fans to hold out their arms as if expecting the child to fall.
Recovering his grip, he eventually brought the child, whose face was covered throughout the incident with a towel, to safety, to the relief of the 200 fans who had gathered below outside the Adlon Hotel.
The NSPCC moved quickly to condemn the singer's behaviour, saying that it sent out a dangerous message to other parents.
"We would advise anyone not to put babies or children at potential risk by dangling them over a balcony," a spokesman said. "We are of course concerned that people will copy the behaviour of someone so influential."
Michele Elliot, director of the children's charity Kidscape, said she found it ironic that Jackson had launched a child protection charity, Heal the Children, 18 months ago, but was prepared to endanger his own child's life.
"When I saw the pictures I was almost speechless," she said. "No responsible and mature parent should ever jeopardise their child's life just because they are carried away by the excitement of an occasion. We should question whether such people are fit to be a parent."
She said the latest pictures at the zoo suggested that Jackson was passing on his own insecurities to his children, which could cause them considerable harm.
"These children must be thinking that the world is a very scary place if they have to cover their faces when they go out," she said.
The mother of Jackson's third child has never been named. His first wife was Lisa Marie Presley, Elvis Presley's only child. Uri Geller, the psychic spoon bender and close friend of Jackson, defended the singer saying he was acting the "proud father" when he held his child over the balcony.
He said he had spoken to Jackson, who was his best man at a ceremony to renew his wedding vows, and said he was "devastated" by the furore surrounding his behaviour. Dismissing as nonsense suggestions that the singer was unfit to be a parent, he said Jackson was "overcome with passion" to show off his son.
"All of this happened because the fans were singing, 'We want to see your children'. As a proud father he thought, 'Let me show you my baby'," he said.
"He was overcome with passion and unfortunately he put the baby over the railings. That was a bad error of judgment and he knows it."
***
Gah! Poor kids.
***
Jackson blunders again as children wear veils to zoo
By Nicole Martin
(Filed: 21/11/2002)
Michael Jackson's suitability as a parent was further called into question yesterday after he was photographed at Berlin Zoo with two children, believed to be his older son and daughter, with their faces shrouded.
Michael Jackson with two children hidden by scarves during a visit to Berlin Zoo
Only a day after he provoked criticism by dangling his baby son over a hotel balcony, the singer was seen holding hands with children whose faces were almost totally obscured by cerise veils.
The children were believed to have been Prince Michael Junior, five, and Paris Michael Katherine, four, who were born during his marriage to his second wife, Debbie Rowe, whom he later divorced.
The singer admitted in a statement that he had made a "terrible mistake" when he swung his third son, Prince Michael II, over a hotel balcony 60ft above street level.
"I made a terrible mistake," he said. "I got caught up in the excitement of the moment. I would never intentionally endanger the lives of my children." Fans watched in astonishment as the smiling singer showed off his youngest child by dangling him over the balcony.
Initially delighted at catching a glimpse of the nine-month-old boy, they became concerned as his father held him precariously with one arm.
Then the singer appeared in danger of losing his grip, prompting some fans to hold out their arms as if expecting the child to fall.
Recovering his grip, he eventually brought the child, whose face was covered throughout the incident with a towel, to safety, to the relief of the 200 fans who had gathered below outside the Adlon Hotel.
The NSPCC moved quickly to condemn the singer's behaviour, saying that it sent out a dangerous message to other parents.
"We would advise anyone not to put babies or children at potential risk by dangling them over a balcony," a spokesman said. "We are of course concerned that people will copy the behaviour of someone so influential."
Michele Elliot, director of the children's charity Kidscape, said she found it ironic that Jackson had launched a child protection charity, Heal the Children, 18 months ago, but was prepared to endanger his own child's life.
"When I saw the pictures I was almost speechless," she said. "No responsible and mature parent should ever jeopardise their child's life just because they are carried away by the excitement of an occasion. We should question whether such people are fit to be a parent."
She said the latest pictures at the zoo suggested that Jackson was passing on his own insecurities to his children, which could cause them considerable harm.
"These children must be thinking that the world is a very scary place if they have to cover their faces when they go out," she said.
The mother of Jackson's third child has never been named. His first wife was Lisa Marie Presley, Elvis Presley's only child. Uri Geller, the psychic spoon bender and close friend of Jackson, defended the singer saying he was acting the "proud father" when he held his child over the balcony.
He said he had spoken to Jackson, who was his best man at a ceremony to renew his wedding vows, and said he was "devastated" by the furore surrounding his behaviour. Dismissing as nonsense suggestions that the singer was unfit to be a parent, he said Jackson was "overcome with passion" to show off his son.
"All of this happened because the fans were singing, 'We want to see your children'. As a proud father he thought, 'Let me show you my baby'," he said.
"He was overcome with passion and unfortunately he put the baby over the railings. That was a bad error of judgment and he knows it."
***
Gah! Poor kids.
-
Spanky The Dolphin
- Mammy Two-Shoes
- Posts: 30776
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
- Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
He's a loon. This is established objective fact. He should be locked up. And how the fuck did he do that to his face, I've always wanted to know that.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
-
Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi
- What Kind of Username is That?
- Posts: 9254
- Joined: 2002-07-10 08:53pm
- Location: Back in PA
-
Spanky The Dolphin
- Mammy Two-Shoes
- Posts: 30776
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
- Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
Yeah, but why doesn't he just give them kids versions of those surgical masks that he often wore?
Something that covers their whole fucking head, giving their identities away anyway just seems idiotic.
Something that covers their whole fucking head, giving their identities away anyway just seems idiotic.
I believe in a sign of Zeta.
[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]
"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
-
Patrick Degan
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 14847
- Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
- Location: Orleanian in exile
-
Spanky The Dolphin
- Mammy Two-Shoes
- Posts: 30776
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
- Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
-
Jim Raynor
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2922
- Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am
Still doesn't explain why he had to cover the baby's head with one. God, he was more concerned with keeping the towel on than making sure he wasn't endangering his life. Do most people even care what a baby looks like? I think he's just pushing his own ugly looks onto his kids, like THEY'RE the ones who need to wear masks.Damaramu wrote:I'm pretty sure the shrouds are to protect his childrens' identities. He probably doesn't want their faces appearing in tabloids and shit.