The Younglings - Spoilers

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Spartan
Jedi Knight
Posts: 678
Joined: 2002-09-12 08:25pm
Location: Chicago, Il

The Younglings - Spoilers

Post by Spartan »

I've been thingking about this. There really was no reason for Sidious to order that killing of the younglings. They are young enough to have been taken and converted to the darkside easily. If nothing else it was a waste of material.

Besides, killing lightsabre wielding adults is on thing; what if Anakin had balked at killing the kids. Even Dooku wouldn't have gone that far, in the comics he specifically forbade Grevious from killing younglings and padawans.
"The enemy outnumbers us a paltry three to one. Good odds for any Greek...."

"Spartans. Ready your breakfast and eat hearty--For tonight we dine in hell!" ~ King Leonidas of Sparta.
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Re: The Younglings - Spoilers

Post by Stofsk »

Spartan wrote:I've been thingking about this. There really was no reason for Sidious to order that killing of the younglings. They are young enough to have been taken and converted to the darkside easily. If nothing else it was a waste of material.
Perhaps Anakin thought he was doing them a favour. You know "Better dead than red... er, Sith."

Yes, fucked up, isn't it?
Image
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

Darth.
Vader.
Is.
Evil.

There's a very simple explanation for you.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
GeneralTacticus
Jedi Knight
Posts: 803
Joined: 2004-10-25 05:26am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by GeneralTacticus »

He may have ordered it precisely because there was no need. Killing Mace could be justified (if only in Anakin's mind), in that he had Palpatine at his mercy and was about to kill him, thus denying Anakin the knowledge of how to save Padme. Even killing the adult Jedi could be justified (again, only in Anakin's mind) by saying that they were a threat to the Republic, and had to be eliminated for the good of everybody else. Killing children, though... there's no going back after that. Ever. Once he takes that step, Anakin is (or would be, if not for Luke) a Sith forever.
"The bird let out a slow chicken cackle. It sounded like a chicken, but in her heart she knew it wasn't. In that instant, she completely understood the concept of a chicken that was not a chicken. This looked like a chicken, like most of the Mud People's chickens. But this was no chicken.

"This was evil manifest."

- Terry "Not a fantasy author, honest" Goodkind, bringing unintentional comedy to a bookshop near you since 1994.
User avatar
Spartan
Jedi Knight
Posts: 678
Joined: 2002-09-12 08:25pm
Location: Chicago, Il

Post by Spartan »

He may have ordered it precisely because there was no need. Killing Mace could be justified (if only in Anakin's mind), in that he had Palpatine at his mercy and was about to kill him, thus denying Anakin the knowledge of how to save Padme. Even killing the adult Jedi could be justified (again, only in Anakin's mind) by saying that they were a threat to the Republic, and had to be eliminated for the good of everybody else. Killing children, though... there's no going back after that. Ever. Once he takes that step, Anakin is (or would be, if not for Luke) a Sith forever.
I can except that, it seems like the most likely answer.
"The enemy outnumbers us a paltry three to one. Good odds for any Greek...."

"Spartans. Ready your breakfast and eat hearty--For tonight we dine in hell!" ~ King Leonidas of Sparta.
User avatar
Freeman's Trigger-Finger
Youngling
Posts: 104
Joined: 2004-11-15 02:29pm
Location: In the Death Star's laundry shoot!

Re: The Younglings - Spoilers

Post by Freeman's Trigger-Finger »

Spartan wrote:I've been thingking about this. There really was no reason for Sidious to order that killing of the younglings. They are young enough to have been taken and converted to the darkside easily. If nothing else it was a waste of material.

Besides, killing lightsabre wielding adults is on thing; what if Anakin had balked at killing the kids. Even Dooku wouldn't have gone that far, in the comics he specifically forbade Grevious from killing younglings and padawans.
You seem to be foregetting the rule of two.
They told me there was nothing out there, nothing but fear. But the night my parents were murdered I caught a glimpse of something, and I've looked for it ever since. I went around the world, searched in all the shadows, and there is something out there in the darkness...something terrifying, something that will not stop until it has revenge. Me -- Batman, Batman Begins
User avatar
Gandalf
SD.net White Wizard
Posts: 16366
Joined: 2002-09-16 11:13pm
Location: A video store in Australia

Post by Gandalf »

This is a real long shot, but it could also be to de-sensitise Anakin to the idea of inflicting casualties on the basically defenseless. Theoretically wiping out a few makes him more open to the idea should he have to do it in the future.
"Oh no, oh yeah, tell me how can it be so fair
That we dying younger hiding from the police man over there
Just for breathing in the air they wanna leave me in the chair
Electric shocking body rocking beat streeting me to death"

- A.B. Original, Report to the Mist

"I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately."
- George Carlin
User avatar
Dartzap
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5969
Joined: 2002-09-05 09:56am
Location: Britain, Britain, Britain: Land Of Rain
Contact:

Post by Dartzap »

I have a question, and this might as well be the thread for it: The boy that charges out of the temple when Bail arives, could that have been Whie from Dark Rendevous? he would of been about that age by ROTS, i think...

If this has ben answered already, then could nay of you point in it's direction?
EBC: Northeners, Huh! What are they good for?! Absolutely nothing! :P

Cybertron, Justice league...MM, HAB SDN City Watch: Sergeant Detritus

Days Unstabbed, Unabused, Unassualted and Unwavedatwithabutchersknife: 0
User avatar
Spartan
Jedi Knight
Posts: 678
Joined: 2002-09-12 08:25pm
Location: Chicago, Il

Post by Spartan »

Freeman's Trigger-Finger wrote:
You seem to be foregetting the rule of two.
Bzzat...no. First, off they don't need to be trained, they have no master. Second, the rule of two only applied to the Sith in hiding. Third, the Emeperor has a gazillion dark siders doing his bidding, only one of whom is a Sith.

The rule of two simply does not apply in this case.
"The enemy outnumbers us a paltry three to one. Good odds for any Greek...."

"Spartans. Ready your breakfast and eat hearty--For tonight we dine in hell!" ~ King Leonidas of Sparta.
User avatar
Caius
Padawan Learner
Posts: 362
Joined: 2005-01-31 09:09am
Location: Ontario

Post by Caius »

He had to do it.

It was pure evil, pure darkside and he needed that blood on his hands just to show the sort of things he would do for the emperor and himself to gain the power of the darkside.

If he had shown compassion, it wouldn't have made for a "good" turn to evil, now would it?

Besides it was badass. lol that stupid little kid in the movie deserved it. For some reason he bothered me with that line.
User avatar
Darth Fanboy
DUH! WINNING!
Posts: 11182
Joined: 2002-09-20 05:25am
Location: Mars, where I am a totally bitchin' rockstar.

Post by Darth Fanboy »

I can't believe there's even a thread on this. Palpatine ordered the COMPLETE EXTERMINATION OF ALL JEDI. To Vader, to the clonetroopers. This includes younglings and padwans. It would have been stupid to let them live, even at their young age theyve recieved years of Jedi training, any one of them allowed to live would have been a future threat to the Empire.

I'm not saying what Vader did at the temple was the right thing to do, but it made perfect sense. YOu knew in Episode II after seeing that class full of kids that something bad was going to happen to them, or other younglings come the purge.
"If it's true that our species is alone in the universe, then I'd have to say that the universe aimed rather low and settled for very little."
-George Carlin (1937-2008)

"Have some of you Americans actually seen Football? Of course there are 0-0 draws but that doesn't make them any less exciting."
-Dr Roberts, with quite possibly the dumbest thing ever said in 10 years of SDNet.
User avatar
Ghost Rider
Spirit of Vengeance
Posts: 27779
Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars

Post by Ghost Rider »

Besides...look at what Palpatine told him to do and why.

"Only then will you be strong enough in the Dark Side to save Padme."

After he refers to wiping all the Jedi out in the temple. At this point a bunch of brats weighs nothing to life of his wife, and Anakin isn't going to stop and ask Pals "So if I wipe all but the younglings I'll be strong enough in the dark side, right?"
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!

Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all

Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
Kazuaki Shimazaki
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2355
Joined: 2002-07-05 09:27pm
Contact:

Post by Kazuaki Shimazaki »

Gandalf wrote:This is a real long shot, but it could also be to de-sensitise Anakin to the idea of inflicting casualties on the basically defenseless. Theoretically wiping out a few makes him more open to the idea should he have to do it in the future.
Also, to break past the initial barrier, he would probably have to call on the Dark Side emotions. He might have existing quarrels with all the other Jedi, which he can amplify internally to justify killing them. But the Younglings? He'd have to hate for nothing. This will cause the Dark Side to corrode him faster. The result, of course, we see at Mustafar - a real "trigger-happy" (though he's beyond that) Darth Vader that chokes his wife. Finally, with the death of his wife, he loses all hope. Bingo, one loyal subservient Sith slave.
User avatar
Civil War Man
NERRRRRDS!!!
Posts: 3790
Joined: 2005-01-28 03:54am

Post by Civil War Man »

IIRC, the Iliad had Greek soldiers throwing Trojan babies over the walls of Troy.

When the Christians took Jerusalem during the Crusades, they killed all Muslims within the walls, including women and children.

Why did they kill the children in these cases? So you wouldn't have these kids growing up and start thinking about revenge. They, like Sidious and Vader, wanted extermination, and it is not extermination if you leave anybody alive.
Kazuaki Shimazaki
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2355
Joined: 2002-07-05 09:27pm
Contact:

Re: The Younglings - Spoilers

Post by Kazuaki Shimazaki »

Spartan wrote:I've been thingking about this. There really was no reason for Sidious to order that killing of the younglings. They are young enough to have been taken and converted to the darkside easily. If nothing else it was a waste of material.
Would they really have been converted to the Dark Side easily? They've been stuffed through the years about how the Dark Side is bad, bad, bad and it is better to die than to fall to the Dark Side.

What levers can Palpatine use to get the kids to get him? He used a lot of levers to slowly turn Anakin to the Dark Side, what about the kids?
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

He doesn't want kids. Always two there are, no more, no less.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Stravo
Official SD.Net Teller of Tales
Posts: 12806
Joined: 2002-07-08 12:06pm
Location: NYC

Post by Stravo »

Vympel wrote:He doesn't want kids. Always two there are, no more, no less.
Mara Jade implied that the Emperor was quite a lech at the royal palace. You think he had any kids?
Wherever you go, there you are.

Ripped Shirt Monkey - BOTMWriter's Guild Cybertron's Finest Justice League
This updated sig brought to you by JME2
Image
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

Stravo wrote: Mara Jade implied that the Emperor was quite a lech at the royal palace. You think he had any kids?
:lol: A bit out of context (I meant he doesnt' want any younglings, he's got Anakin, the most powerful Jedi ever), but as for Palpatine being a bit of a lecher, I can't really picture it.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Zed Snardbody
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2449
Joined: 2002-07-11 11:41pm

Post by Zed Snardbody »

Vympel wrote:
Stravo wrote: Mara Jade implied that the Emperor was quite a lech at the royal palace. You think he had any kids?
:lol: A bit out of context (I meant he doesnt' want any younglings, he's got Anakin, the most powerful Jedi ever), but as for Palpatine being a bit of a lecher, I can't really picture it.
Argh! Creepy grandpa! Creepy grandpa! :shock:
The Zen of Not Fucking Up.
User avatar
Xisiqomelir
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1757
Joined: 2003-01-16 09:27am
Location: Valuetown
Contact:

Post by Xisiqomelir »

Ghost Rider wrote:Besides...look at what Palpatine told him to do and why.

"Only then will you be strong enough in the Dark Side to save Padme."
Exactly right. Assisting in the killing of Windu was a good first step, but he needed to do more.
User avatar
Nephtys
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6227
Joined: 2005-04-02 10:54pm
Location: South Cali... where life is cheap!

Post by Nephtys »

And killing Jedi he's worked with isn't evil enough? I mean. He could easilly have just taken down the youth padawans instead of going to the Jedi Preschool up at the council chamber.

I'll attribute the REAL reason to audience shock value, and the 'can't go back' part after you know. Slaying a bunch of six year olds. But really, the Emperor would be better off with a bunch of moderate force-wielders under his thumb. They're not powerful enough to be a threat, while useful as agents.
User avatar
Stormbringer
King of Democracy
Posts: 22678
Joined: 2002-07-15 11:22pm

Post by Stormbringer »

Stravo wrote:
Vympel wrote:He doesn't want kids. Always two there are, no more, no less.
Mara Jade implied that the Emperor was quite a lech at the royal palace. You think he had any kids?
Actually, that was supposedly cover for other, more sinister activities.
Image
User avatar
Xisiqomelir
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1757
Joined: 2003-01-16 09:27am
Location: Valuetown
Contact:

Post by Xisiqomelir »

Nephtys wrote:And killing Jedi he's worked with isn't evil enough?
He still doesn't have Darth Plagueis' "Stop Death" ability :arrow: He still cannot save Padmé :arrow: He needs to become stronger in the Dark Side
User avatar
Glimmervoid
Jedi Master
Posts: 1344
Joined: 2005-01-29 09:00am
Location: Some were in the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm.
Contact:

Post by Glimmervoid »

Vympel wrote:He doesn't want kids. Always two there are, no more, no less.
The rule of two was there to make sure that the Sith still existed when it came time to reveal them selves. Now they have done that it would likely have been abandoned (we know he did train force sensitive to some degree).
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Post by Thanas »

Stravo wrote:
Vympel wrote:He doesn't want kids. Always two there are, no more, no less.
Mara Jade implied that the Emperor was quite a lech at the royal palace. You think he had any kids?
Irek Ismaran
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
Post Reply