Worst Non-ST/SW Starfighter Ever?

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

User avatar
The Dark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7378
Joined: 2002-10-31 10:28pm
Location: Promoting ornithological awareness

Post by The Dark »

Vympel wrote:
The Dark wrote:The first starfighter you can purchase in Privateer 2. 2 gun hardpoints, 2 missile hardpoints, and 2 systems hardpoints, crap armor, crap shields, crap maneuverability, and crap speed. If I can find the name, I'll post it.
Oh crap forgot about that thing .... what's worse is there's a huge period of the game where you're stuck with that piece of shit that's only one step up from it ... the Shaman IIRC.
Yeah, Shaman's not that good, but it's better than the Straith (ha! found it!). Better than the Velacia, too, which is surprising since it only costs 85% as much. Icarus is also junk considering the price, since it's got a bad gun layout and isn't that quick.
Stanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
BattleTech for SilCore
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

The Dark wrote:
Vympel wrote:
The Dark wrote:The first starfighter you can purchase in Privateer 2. 2 gun hardpoints, 2 missile hardpoints, and 2 systems hardpoints, crap armor, crap shields, crap maneuverability, and crap speed. If I can find the name, I'll post it.
Oh crap forgot about that thing .... what's worse is there's a huge period of the game where you're stuck with that piece of shit that's only one step up from it ... the Shaman IIRC.
Yeah, Shaman's not that good, but it's better than the Straith (ha! found it!). Better than the Velacia, too, which is surprising since it only costs 85% as much. Icarus is also junk considering the price, since it's got a bad gun layout and isn't that quick.
What was the best, most expensive fighter again? IIRC it looked really wierd and the name sucked.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
The Dark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7378
Joined: 2002-10-31 10:28pm
Location: Promoting ornithological awareness

Post by The Dark »

Vympel wrote:
The Dark wrote: Yeah, Shaman's not that good, but it's better than the Straith (ha! found it!). Better than the Velacia, too, which is surprising since it only costs 85% as much. Icarus is also junk considering the price, since it's got a bad gun layout and isn't that quick.
What was the best, most expensive fighter again? IIRC it looked really wierd and the name sucked.
Duress was most expensive and most maneuverable, but I preferred the Freij Mk II since it had slightly more damage taking ability. Freij Mk II with 2 Kraven Mk IV and 3 Mass Ion Cannon... :D
Stanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
BattleTech for SilCore
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

That's right! The FRIDGE!!!!! It ruled.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Frank Hipper
Overfiend of the Superego
Posts: 12882
Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?

Post by Frank Hipper »

Vympel wrote:
Frank Hipper wrote: And I always thought MIG-21s were perty perty airplanes. :D
Bah! Su-27 OWNZZZZZZZZZZZZ your MiG-21!

Image
The Ruskies have ALWAYS built pretty!
Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
User avatar
Peregrin Toker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8609
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:57am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Peregrin Toker »

Frank Hipper wrote:
Vympel wrote:
Frank Hipper wrote: And I always thought MIG-21s were perty perty airplanes. :D
Bah! Su-27 OWNZZZZZZZZZZZZ your MiG-21!

Image
The Ruskies have ALWAYS built pretty!
I hate going off topic, but Soviet fighter jets' main advantage were not that they looked sinister, but that they usually were much more nimble than contemporary NATO fighters due to the fact that USA and USSR governments set different requirements to plane manufacturers until the late 1960s. (the Fishbed prototype was build in 1956 if I recall correctly)

On the sci-fi fighters:

I think that many qualify as ugliest, but is this poll is about practicality??
If it's about practicality, I vote for..... well, the Dark Eldar's Razorwing from Warhammer 40K. It's almost twice as big as it's sister, the Raven, but is only marginally more powerfully armed. However, it looks much cooler.
"Hi there, would you like to have a cookie?"

"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Re: Worst Non-ST/SW Starfighter Ever?

Post by phongn »

Alyeska wrote:
Eleas wrote:
Mike_6002 wrote:For me the Zeypher 109 Raider (B5) with it's huge target profile, weak ass 20 millejoule 42mm bolters, and it manuvers like a pregant Bantha (mandatory SW joke)
The Devastator Bomber from Wing Commander Prophecy. Slow, wallowing pos that's almost impossible to maneuver. Strong weapons and armor that helps nothing at all. Weaponry and technology based on misconceptions of WC 4. And soooo ugly...
It was somewhat slower then the Shrike, had greater shields, armor, turret defenses. Its main gun could kill enemy fighters instantly (which I did multiple times), does not have to worry about running out of Torpedoes near as much as the Shrike, and carried more torpedoes.

It is superior to the Shrike in almost every single way.
Amen to that. I regularly went Devil Ray hunting in it (the Black Devestator is a bit better since you get a tachyon gun rather than the Stormfire - no fixed ammo load). Those five turrets are just gravy (especially when I replaced whem with tachyon turrets in WCPEDIT ;)) and the plasma gun rocks.

Then again, I've always enjoyed flying heavy fighters or bombers in space combat sims.
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Vympel wrote:The Shrike was more like the MAGNIFICENT, AWESOME, BOW DOWN AND WORSHIP THUNDERBOLT VII than a bomber. The Shrike was much easier to fight in IMO.

Worst fighter- the Hellcat. Like YUK. Piece of crap.
Yeah, the Shrike was the true successor to the Thud VII, but I still didn't enjoy flying it that much. The Black Shrike was better but rather underpowered (not enough juice for the guns).
User avatar
Moonshadow
Padawan Learner
Posts: 244
Joined: 2002-09-29 02:54am

Post by Moonshadow »

what about those dumb looking fighters from the begining of the new Lost in Space?
Born of different worlds,woven together by fate, each shall rise to face their destiny- Grandia II, one of many reasons to be a Dreamcaster
User avatar
The Dark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7378
Joined: 2002-10-31 10:28pm
Location: Promoting ornithological awareness

Post by The Dark »

Simon H.Johansen wrote: I hate going off topic, but Soviet fighter jets' main advantage were not that they looked sinister, but that they usually were much more nimble than contemporary NATO fighters due to the fact that USA and USSR governments set different requirements to plane manufacturers until the late 1960s. (the Fishbed prototype was build in 1956 if I recall correctly)
Staying off-topic :D the main reason for that was that USSR pilots were expected to do a lot more work than NATO pilots. Most MiGs used compressed-air systems rather than hydraulics for things like the landing gear. It saved weight, but made routine landings more of a hassle. While an American pilots just had to remember "flip switch," a Russian pilot had to remember something along the lines of "flip switch, press toggle, wait for light to turn on, flip another switch." It was a matter of building a plane with no extra weight, even though pilot stress went up and pilot effectiveness overall went down. Many early MiGs also lacked radar (the Fresco comes to mind), which also saved weight, though they had to be vectored to a target by ground control. It also followed the different philosophies of the air forces. The Russians were dogfighters, who preferred to engage in close range turning fights. The Americans were following the traditions of the P-38 and P-47 by designing "boom and zoom" fighters that would streak in on a target, hit, and fly away to outside of weapons range, turn, and attack again. The F-4 Phantom and F-8 Crusader were both quicker than contemporary Russian jets, and could pull equivalent turns, but couldn't hold the turns due to mass. It was a different design philosophy and technological capability that led to the differences.
Stanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
BattleTech for SilCore
User avatar
starfury
Jedi Master
Posts: 1297
Joined: 2002-07-03 08:28pm
Location: aboard the ISD II Broadsword

Post by starfury »

The Ruskies have ALWAYS built pretty!
true, both the Su-27 and it's baby brother the mig-29 are very Attarctive jets, then again so is their america counterparts, the F-15 and F-18.
"a single death is a tragedy, a million deaths are a statistic"-Joseph Stalin

"No plan survives contact with the enemy"-Helmuth Von Moltke

"Women prefer stories about one person dying slowly. Men prefer stories of many people dying quickly."-Niles from Frasier.
User avatar
EmperorMing
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3432
Joined: 2002-09-09 05:08am
Location: The Lizard Lounge

Post by EmperorMing »

Worst fighter/ interceptor?

The Interceptor form the old TV series U.F.O. Armed with one (1) nuclear warhead.
Image

DILLIGAF: Does It Look Like I Give A Fuck

Kill your God!
User avatar
Bob McDob
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 1590
Joined: 2002-07-25 03:14am

Re: Worst Non-ST/SW Starfighter Ever?

Post by Bob McDob »

Eleas wrote:Weaponry and technology based on misconceptions of WC 4


How can they be misconceptions if they're in game?
Vendetta wrote:The ones from the Wing Commander movie.
That are probably superior to mainstream fighters of the same era.
Sea Skimmer wrote: What do you want for kit bashed East German MiG-21's? Opps...
They're LIGHTNINGS. ROYAL AIR FORCE BRITISH AEROSPACE LIGHTNINGS. Here, a pic . . .

Image

And because I feel like it, an anime one!
That's the wrong way to tickle Mary, that's the wrong way to kiss!
Don't you know that, over here lad, they like it best like this!
Hooray, pour les français! Farewell, Angleterre!
We didn't know how to tickle Mary, but we learnt how, over there!
User avatar
Eleas
Jaina Dax
Posts: 4896
Joined: 2002-07-08 05:08am
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Worst Non-ST/SW Starfighter Ever?

Post by Eleas »

Bob McDob wrote:
Eleas wrote:Weaponry and technology based on misconceptions of WC 4


How can they be misconceptions if they're in game?
The precedents of WC4 were ignored in WC:P in favor of ideas that were uneccessary, silly or just plain stupid. IMHO. WC4 was the best game in the series - WC:P was just pathetic.

Then again, I'm biased. :)
Björn Paulsen

"Travelers with closed minds can tell us little except about themselves."
--Chinua Achebe
User avatar
Eleas
Jaina Dax
Posts: 4896
Joined: 2002-07-08 05:08am
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Worst Non-ST/SW Starfighter Ever?

Post by Eleas »

Alyeska wrote: It was somewhat slower then the Shrike, had greater shields, armor, turret defenses. Its main gun could kill enemy fighters instantly (which I did multiple times), does not have to worry about running out of Torpedoes near as much as the Shrike, and carried more torpedoes.

It is superior to the Shrike in almost every single way.
I still don't like it though. :)
Björn Paulsen

"Travelers with closed minds can tell us little except about themselves."
--Chinua Achebe
johnmarkley
Padawan Learner
Posts: 179
Joined: 2002-07-09 03:25pm
Location: In the bag

Post by johnmarkley »

The Scimitar in the first Wing Commander. Crappy guns, slow as shit, and piss-ugly.
Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Abe Vigoda Knight of the Late Knights of Conan O'Brien
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Re: Worst Non-ST/SW Starfighter Ever?

Post by Alyeska »

Eleas wrote:
Alyeska wrote: It was somewhat slower then the Shrike, had greater shields, armor, turret defenses. Its main gun could kill enemy fighters instantly (which I did multiple times), does not have to worry about running out of Torpedoes near as much as the Shrike, and carried more torpedoes.

It is superior to the Shrike in almost every single way.
I still don't like it though. :)
And I don't like the Missile Boat. Doesn't make it a bad design.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Mike_6002
Village Idiot
Posts: 710
Joined: 2002-11-14 12:59pm
Location: Modifed ISD II Tyrant II buried underneth Hamilton, Ontario

Post by Mike_6002 »

You hate Missle Boats, better not be the SW version, or you will die a painful death involving, A Missle Boats, Proton Bombs, And A Psychotic Canadian, Got it?
Member of The Cleaners (Scout, Sniper, Silent Assassain) <Origins of The Cleaners Pending>

"We are the Cleaners! Prepare to Die!" -The Cleaners Offical Motto

"Take what you can get in life" -Me

I'm fuckin insane wh00t wh00t and darn proud

#1 Fan of LT. Hit-Man

Member of Task Force Lennox

Remember to hug a moderator at least once a day
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Mike_6002 wrote:You hate Missle Boats, better not be the SW version, or you will die a painful death involving, A Missle Boats, Proton Bombs, And A Psychotic Canadian, Got it?
The SW Missile Boat can kiss my ass. Its just as bad as the Sun Crusher. A game of oneupsmanship that went wild.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Mike_6002
Village Idiot
Posts: 710
Joined: 2002-11-14 12:59pm
Location: Modifed ISD II Tyrant II buried underneth Hamilton, Ontario

Post by Mike_6002 »

Alyeska wrote:
Mike_6002 wrote:You hate Missle Boats, better not be the SW version, or you will die a painful death involving, A Missle Boats, Proton Bombs, And A Psychotic Canadian, Got it?
The SW Missile Boat can kiss my ass. Its just as bad as the Sun Crusher. A game of oneupsmanship that went wild.
This is about non-ST/SW put on the other boards

God you SB people somehow never cease to amaze me in the of logic and common sense, is there like a device that the moment you has a 90% that sucks out the brain

Don't answer people, get back on the thread heading people

I don't like hijackers
Member of The Cleaners (Scout, Sniper, Silent Assassain) <Origins of The Cleaners Pending>

"We are the Cleaners! Prepare to Die!" -The Cleaners Offical Motto

"Take what you can get in life" -Me

I'm fuckin insane wh00t wh00t and darn proud

#1 Fan of LT. Hit-Man

Member of Task Force Lennox

Remember to hug a moderator at least once a day
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Mike_6002 wrote:
Alyeska wrote:
Mike_6002 wrote:You hate Missle Boats, better not be the SW version, or you will die a painful death involving, A Missle Boats, Proton Bombs, And A Psychotic Canadian, Got it?
The SW Missile Boat can kiss my ass. Its just as bad as the Sun Crusher. A game of oneupsmanship that went wild.
This is about non-ST/SW put on the other boards

God you SB people somehow never cease to amaze me in the of logic and common sense, is there like a device that the moment you has a 90% that sucks out the brain

Don't answer people, get back on the thread heading people

I don't like hijackers
So opinion makes people stupid eh? Wll your not exactly ranking very high at the moment.

BTW, I didn't bring up the topic of ships you dislike rather then ships that suck because of design.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
Post Reply