Lord Revan wrote:Aren't the youngling all pre-teen or early teen so differences between male and female wouldn't be so distinct as in older Jedi (especially with the generic Padawan haircut).
The female Padawans could also have been trained seperately. Perhaps something to do with the Jedi not wanting the Padawans to get too used to emotion. Imagine trying to control the emotions of a couple of score of mixed-sex teenagers as they were all hitting puberty.
Stofsk wrote:Being weaker and having poorer reflexes don't matter at all, since both can be increased and strengthened through repetition.
Not to the same extent that a man's reflexes can be trained to. Yes, a well-trained woman can beat a poorly-trained man, however a well-trained man is more likely to win than a well-trained woman. In the end, the final product is limited by the strength of the materials, and in physical aspects, women are inferior to men.
Women's sport shows this very well. If you watch professional sport, theer are very few sports in which women can realistically compete on an even footing with men. These sports would include diving and pool. Even taking into account the differences in training and opportunity given to men, the men are still stronger. Tennis and golf are two sports in which, while the men earn money, the women still get enough to use the sport as their sole income, and in both of these the top men can still easily outclass the top women; this is not because the women lack the training or skill to compete to their full potential, but is because women are fundamentally physically weaker than men.
Even in shooting, which could be considered to be a non-active sport, women are generally not as good as men because their depth perception is not as good (male eyes are more frontal so the man can be a better hunter; womens eyes are farther to the sides, giving women a wider range of vision, but less accurate depth perception).
It's the 'distracting male comrades' part that is the real problem, but if the men of the unit are brought up to consider women as equals (which is what feminism strives to emphasise) then this may not be an insurmountable problem.
It's not necessarily a matter of considering women to be equals - men are biologically wired to consider women to be "childbearers" and this cannot be completely suppressed by society. I consider women to be the intellectual equals of men, however I do not consider them to be the physical equals of men, mainly because they aren't.
Speaking of biology, taking women along to wars also involves a logistical challenge. Perhaps in the SW galaxy, women all have something implanted in them so they don't have periods, but if they don't things could get messy so to speak. Despite what some people (people unrelated to you) may think, women can't control their menstrual cycle, and various changes may set it off. Some women will go overseas for a year and not have a period for three months because of the change. Others will go overseas for three weeks and have heavy bleeding for half that time because of the change. Then consider that there's probably a different number of women in each group, and that if women stay are close enough to each other for a period of time then (or so I've heard) their menstrual cycles change so that they all coincide with each other....
So no, I wouldn't consider women to be inferior to men even if you consider war in the equation. There are plenty of different jobs in the military, and if the soldier in question can keep up with her male colleagues then good for her.
I never said women were intrinsically inferior to men. I said they were inferior to men in some areas - which are generally physical ares. Yes, there are many different jobs in the military, however Star Wars mainly portrays the front-line fighting roles, which are the ones that women are less likely to be in because women are not as effective in those particular roles.
(I'd like to say that it's because women are smart enough to stay home and let the men get killed instead of them, but that's just trite.)
Since they blasted her in the back repeatedly, I don't think they really cared if her arse was cute.
I was using it as an example of a distraction. Sorry if I wasn't clear enough. Remember though that codie didn't seem to care that Obi-Wan was his friend and comrade either, nor did any of the other clones care that they's been fighting alongside the Jedi they were killing just moments before they shot them. From this one might gather that the clones attitudes towards the Jedi they were with before Order 66 was executed and the attitudes towards the Jedi were with after Order 66 was execute d are independent.
Or one might not, because as we all know, a cute arse can save you from anything, just so long as it has a libido.
Something I was thinking of, isn't Palpatine a major female hater? Given that he had spent something like half a decade preparing the Republic to become his empire, wouldn't you say that the lack of females in high places is also a direct consequence of his success in swaying all aspects of life. He doesn't like females in the least, and the fact that we still see a large number of female (albiet unnamed) senators is not damning the movie of sexism, but the character of Palpatine (who was sexist as written).
I always figured that if that prejudice did exist in the Empire (remember, we do only have the Rebels word for it, and they may have mistaken being oppressed for being a Rebel for being oppressed for being a woman or an alien), then it was mainly because Palpatine wanted to keep as much of the Empire's population poorly-educated as possible - so he encouraged people to scare aliens out of the good schools (because they're the ones responsible for all your problems; not me) and to keep their daughters at home where they could learn to become good housekeepers, after which they could come out and breed more storm troopers for the storm trooper farms.
I know that Intelligence does not automatically equate to not being sexist, but Palpatine would have what? A 20 int minimum and at least a 22 in Wisdom. That's high enough that he wouldn't cut out the services of such a large proportion of the Empire's population unless he saw some benefit to it, and I imagine the benefit to increasing racism and sexism would be to make the human males, who occupy most of the important positions in the Empire, enjoy the way that they're on top of almost everything in the Imperial system.
That's just my take on the matter in any case. It could just be something I made up in my mind because Palpatine is cool. I've been known to do that before. Given that in FFX-2 I chose who I sided with by who had the cutest leader, this can be rather arbitrary.