G70 AKA Geforce 7800 Specs

GEC: Discuss gaming, computers and electronics and venture into the bizarre world of STGODs.

Moderator: Thanas

Post Reply
User avatar
Ace Pace
Hardware Lover
Posts: 8456
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:04am
Location: Wasting time instead of money
Contact:

G70 AKA Geforce 7800 Specs

Post by Ace Pace »

The Inq wrote:G70, Geforce 7800 GTX final specs out

302 million transistors, eight vertex shaders


By Fuad Abazovic: Wednesday 15 June 2005, 09:49
WE MANAGED to get the final remaining details about the soon to be launched Geforce 7800 GTX. We revealed most of it already, but here we go again.

The chip is made using a 110 nanometre process and will have 302 million transistors. So far, this is the biggest chip ever built for graphics use. As we revealed before, the chip will be clocked at 430MHz and will use 1200MHz memory with a 256 bit GDRR3 interface.

It will have eight vertex shader units and will be able to process 24 pixels per clock. Nvidia claims that it has 24 pipelines.
Some senior editors are referring to this chip as NV47 as it's nothing more than the NV47 was supposed to be, an NV40 with more pipelines and two more vertex shaders.

The peak fill rate of the card is 6.88 Billion/second (16 ROPs at 430 MHz). Bilinear-filtered texel fill rate is 10.32 billion/second when all 24 pipelines work at the full 430MHz.

The peak power consumption of the chip is 100 to 110W, all the information and benchmarks of the Geforce 7800 Ultra or two cards under SLI will be revealed at six in the morning European time, on the 22nd of June. µ
Personally its strong, we might see some benchs(other Inq article quotes 7000+ 3dmark05 scores, but 3dMark isn't that impressive) when nVida actully announces the cards.
Brotherhood of the Bear | HAB | Mess | SDnet archivist |
User avatar
The Grim Squeaker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10319
Joined: 2005-06-01 01:44am
Location: A different time-space Continuum
Contact:

Post by The Grim Squeaker »

Wonder what ATI's response will be other than increasing the amount of 512MB cards will be :?
Photography
Genius is always allowed some leeway, once the hammer has been pried from its hands and the blood has been cleaned up.
To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often.
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22465
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Re: G70 AKA Geforce 7800 Specs

Post by Mr Bean »

Eh eh? Thats it, No massive hundred Mthz jump? No DDR3? No magic flying fucking pixies!?

Ah well can't be helped, hope this is a spoof

So how much exactly things faster does this have compared to the 6800?

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
User avatar
Ace Pace
Hardware Lover
Posts: 8456
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:04am
Location: Wasting time instead of money
Contact:

Post by Ace Pace »

the .303 bookworm wrote:Wonder what ATI's response will be other than increasing the amount of 512MB cards will be :?
The R520, which apprently has no relationship to the R500 in the Xbox360.

The R520 is another evolution from the R400(X800), which is itself evolved from the R300(9700).

Bean, rumours go from anywhere 1.5 times the 6800Ultra, to 2 times without SLI.

But since inhouse its being called the NV47(what the current new card should have been) unofficially atleast, I don't expect it will be anything more then a refresh or a minor improvement.
Brotherhood of the Bear | HAB | Mess | SDnet archivist |
User avatar
InnocentBystander
The Russian Circus
Posts: 3466
Joined: 2004-04-10 06:05am
Location: Just across the mighty Hudson

Re: G70 AKA Geforce 7800 Specs

Post by InnocentBystander »

Mr Bean wrote:Eh eh? Thats it, No massive hundred Mthz jump? No DDR3? No magic flying fucking pixies!?

Ah well can't be helped, hope this is a spoof

So how much exactly things faster does this have compared to the 6800?
The correct question is "how much cheaper will this make all the other cards?" :D
User avatar
SPOOFE
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3174
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:34pm
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Contact:

Post by SPOOFE »

The correct question is "how much cheaper will this make all the other cards?"
GeForce 6800 can already be had for under $200. I bet by the end of the summer we see 'em drop below $150, with the GT's getting close to the $200 mark.
The Great and Malignant
User avatar
White Haven
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6360
Joined: 2004-05-17 03:14pm
Location: The North Remembers, When It Can Be Bothered

Re: G70 AKA Geforce 7800 Specs

Post by White Haven »

Mr Bean wrote:Eh eh? Thats it, No massive hundred Mthz jump? No DDR3? No magic flying fucking pixies!?

Ah well can't be helped, hope this is a spoof

So how much exactly things faster does this have compared to the 6800?

...you mean other than the DDR3 that the eixsting high-end cards already use?
Image
Image
Chronological Incontinence: Time warps around the poster. The thread topic winks out of existence and reappears in 1d10 posts.

Out of Context Theatre, this week starring Darth Nostril.
-'If you really want to fuck with these idiots tell them that there is a vaccine for chemtrails.'

Fiction!: The Final War (Bolo/Lovecraft) (Ch 7 9/15/11), Living (D&D, Complete)Image
User avatar
SPOOFE
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3174
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:34pm
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Contact:

Post by SPOOFE »

GDDR3 and DDR3 aren't exactly the same thing, though the difference eludes me... and I don't know why you'd want regular DDR3 RAM over GDDR3, either.
The Great and Malignant
User avatar
Vendetta
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10895
Joined: 2002-07-07 04:57pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

Post by Vendetta »

the .303 bookworm wrote:Wonder what ATI's response will be other than increasing the amount of 512MB cards will be :?
ATI are running a new unified pixel and vertex shader pipeline. Which is how Windows Graphic Foundation is going to work. This puts them a generation ahead when Longhorn hits, and is apparently already proving to be very fast and adaptable (the first chip to use it will be XENOS, the X360 GPU, which will be close to the basis of the R600).

They're also working on X interconnections, using diagonal interconnects, rather than right angled wiring, which will apparently make layouts cheaper

R520 is going to be more of a keeping up with the joneses part, it will be much like G70, an incremental advance, not a major boost.
User avatar
Arrow
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2283
Joined: 2003-01-12 09:14pm

Post by Arrow »

The currently known *rumored* specs aren't exactly impressive. I'm hoping to see major architectural improvements

I'm going to be skipping this generation at any rate - my 6800GT can play every game I have (including the BF2 demo) at 1920x1200 with at least 2 AA and 8 AF at smooth frame rates (FryCry is the worst, dipping to 20 FPS in some spots, and HL consistantly stays over 30, at 4 AA).
Artillery. Its what's for dinner.
User avatar
SPOOFE
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3174
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:34pm
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Contact:

Post by SPOOFE »

the first chip to use it will be XENOS, the X360 GPU, which will be close to the basis of the R600
You sure? I thought the Xenos chip was a very, very heavily modified R500-series part.
The Great and Malignant
User avatar
Ace Pace
Hardware Lover
Posts: 8456
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:04am
Location: Wasting time instead of money
Contact:

Post by Ace Pace »

The Xenos(AKA Xbox360) chip is apprently vastly differant from the PC graphics chip with a similer name.

The R500 has the unified shader architecture.
The R520 for the PC apprently does not.
Brotherhood of the Bear | HAB | Mess | SDnet archivist |
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Beyond3D has an excellent article on the Xenos GPU.
Post Reply