Could the SW film be compressed?

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
El Moose Monstero
Moose Rebellion Ambassador
Posts: 3743
Joined: 2003-04-30 12:33pm
Location: The Cradle of the Rebellion... Oop Nowrrth, Like...
Contact:

Could the SW film be compressed?

Post by El Moose Monstero »

I was watching Star Wars with the old man over the past couple of weeks, and he had one resounding criticism which he applied to all of the films. This was that all of them could probably have been compressed into 2 films - I think his main problem for the old trilogy was with all the ewoks, which I think bored him somewhat and he couldn't really see much relevance in all the tribal stuff.

His point seems to become more valid for the prequels, as let's face it, the first one has barely any connection to the others, and wasn't there a GL interview where he said that 60% of the prequel plot was in Ep III?

So my question is, could you compress the 2 trilogies into 2 films? Would too much be lost, what would be cut? Or is the old man simply missing the point, and the extra stuff gives the universe depth in the same manner as Tom Bombadil and all the poetry do for LotR?
Image
"...a fountain of mirth, issuing forth from the penis of a cupid..." ~ Dalton / Winner of the 'Frank Hipper Most Horrific Drag EVAR' award - 2004 / The artist formerly known as The_Lumberjack.

Evil Brit Conspiracy: Token Moose Obsessed Kebab Munching Semi Geordie
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

They'd have to be arduously long films.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
Trooper TK12746
Padawan Learner
Posts: 422
Joined: 2005-05-20 09:20pm
Location: Unknown Regions

Post by Trooper TK12746 »

Compressing it into two films is an exaggeration. Perhaps eliminating the Ewok section of ROTJ and replacing it with something else might work. And TPM can be cut out completely. Although I would miss Darth Maul. but I think five movies would be about all you could cut it down to and still make it interesting and complex.
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Post by Stofsk »

For me, ROTJ slows down considerably when they go trekking through the woods and hanging out with the Ewoks. I just saw it as filler.

For the PT, I just don't see TPM as all that valuable. It has a few memorable scenes, but little else to speak for it. AOTC is much better and serves as a better 'introduction' to the saga IMO.
Image
Trooper TK12746
Padawan Learner
Posts: 422
Joined: 2005-05-20 09:20pm
Location: Unknown Regions

Post by Trooper TK12746 »

Maybe they could make AotC the first of the PT trilogy, then make a film part way through the Clone Wars, then make RotS.\

Replace the Ewoks with commando action by the Rebels and more of the Space battle. Don't destroy the Executor with a stupid fighter crash. Give the galactic spanning Rebel Alliance a bigger fleet.
User avatar
Jaepheth
Jedi Master
Posts: 1055
Joined: 2004-03-18 02:13am
Location: between epsilon and zero

Post by Jaepheth »

Isn't there a flash animation online that's Star Wars in 25 seconds, or something like that?
Children of the Ancients
I'm sorry, but the number you have dialed is imaginary. Please rotate the phone by 90 degrees and try again.
Trooper TK12746
Padawan Learner
Posts: 422
Joined: 2005-05-20 09:20pm
Location: Unknown Regions

Post by Trooper TK12746 »

Maybe, but something that short would only make sense if you have seen the Movies before you viewed the animation.
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

Maybe they could make AotC the first of the PT trilogy, then make a film part way through the Clone Wars, then make RotS.\
According to alot of people, that´s what SW: CW is. :P
Don't destroy the Executor with a stupid fighter crash.
It was never destroyed with only a fighter crash. First came the bombardment from the capital ships, then the concentrated fighter-attack when the shields were down, then the accidental A-Wing.
User avatar
Sam Or I
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1894
Joined: 2002-07-12 12:57am
Contact:

Post by Sam Or I »

The Prequels could easily have been cut down to 1 film. (I could not stand ATOC, even though it got certian plot points out.) The whole thing could have beendone with one long movie. There is no need, we did not need Maul, we did not need Grevious, Dukoo I would argue could have filled all the roles. The whole "Detective" work in ATOC could have been made into a half-hour. TPM was useless, except for introducing Palps starting rise to power. (Qui-Gon is still my favorite Jedi though!!). Remove the wookie scenes from ROTS, more useless stuff.

For the originals, it most it could be shrunk to 2 films. Many will disagree with this, but remove the Destruction of the orginal death star. Wait until the last film to destroy it. You do not need 2 DS, as cool as they are. I would end the first film when luke abandons Yoda to go save his friends. The Ewoks are faily useless as well.

So my opinion, it would make a kick ass Trilogy. Please do no get me wrong, I love te original Trilogy, and 2 out of the 3 prequels. (Hate AOTC) They are not perfect, but they are fun.
pskouson
Redshirt
Posts: 20
Joined: 2005-06-09 04:17am

It all depends...

Post by pskouson »

I guess we have to figure either Lucas was trying to bleed the cash cow and make 6 blockbusters instead of 2, or he thought the stuff in the movies was important to put in there.

If you're asking this question in some kind of objective manner, I guess we'd have to go with Lucas, wouldn't we? I mean it's his story, for crying out loud, not your dad's.

Otherwise, condense it down to however many movies you like.
Post Reply