Executor Shields, a debate with a guy on Mediablvd.

Steven Snyder · Post by **Steven Snyder** » 2005-06-17 08:59am

He has said he doesn't want to debate anymore, though giving a load of inane babble about Ray Shielding not being skin tight according to Saxton's site...this however had nothing to do with the question of fighter's flying 'under the shields'.

Ford Prefect · Post by **Ford Prefect** » 2005-06-18 11:36pm

I read his argument and the guy is rather dense. But you did a good job anyway, in my opinion.

Steven Snyder · Post by **Steven Snyder** » 2005-06-20 01:37pm

The jackass continues...

Demaster wrote: Well fulcrum you said you were "not a skilled debator." http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=71413 Your even poorer debating judge. Claiming victory when it not even your to claim? It not for you to judge who is winner of a debate that you are apart of. It is for people who have an unbiased, objective view like EEEcho_42 to judge not you or I. Your words and arguement have to sway or pursuade the crowd. By EEEcho_42 comment your far from it.

If I were to judge a victor, I would say this debate is won by EEEcho_42. He is right, we are arguing over technology and science of a movie that was brought to us by a man who brought to the screen Jar Jar Binks and an eight year old boy who hits on a 14 year girl who reciprocates the boy's advances. There is nothing scientific in Star Wars. The whole universe is fantasy with as much scientific thought as a box of tic tacs.

I have enjoyed the ride (a good arguement, good entertainment, movies that is) but the bus stops here. Guess I should feel slight about the arguement part because you had to ask for help. "So if anyone wants to give me some advice, or take this guy to task, I would love to see it." http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=71413

--------------------

By the way did that guy really try to support an arguement with a comic book? I guess if its part of the Star Wars Universe. Surprise someone did not pull out a coloring book with a picture of Jar Jar on front to support your arguement.

*Scary*

Did you get some good insights from the site? I have not seen you pull any stuff from that site to support your arguement.

I have told him that is refusal to contine is effectively a Concession, but as the previous poster said...the guy is pretty dense.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2005-06-20 01:57pm

Classic sore-loser post. He doesn't even try to argue any real points there; he just tries to score points because you asked for advice. As if that has any bearing on the real issue, which is not some idiotic mano-a-mano confrontation but rather, which one of you has the more valid position. He's trying to say "I'm more manly than you because I didn't ask for help while spewing my incorrect argument!"

LMSx · Post by **LMSx** » 2005-07-05 08:18pm

Snyder, in that last post by mississippi, he was talking about planting the Genesis device in the landing bay, not down the DS1's exhaust port.

Not that the strategy would work much better anyways....