What's your Favorite Theoretical Physicist?

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12267
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Post by Surlethe »

Battlehymn Republic wrote:
Surlethe wrote:The good Sir Isaac. Had an idea, and then invented the math to describe it: he single-handedly developed calculus. Alone. What a fucking genius.
Er, what about Leibniz?
IIRC, Newton developed it on his own years before Leibniz, but kept it in a drawer along with the rest of his physical work because he was a perfectionist and afraid of being laughed out of London.

In any case, they developed it independently of each other.
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
The Wookiee
Lex Wookos
Posts: 1650
Joined: 2003-05-29 04:17am
Location: Tearing your arms off

Post by The Wookiee »

Battlehymn Republic wrote:
Surlethe wrote:The good Sir Isaac. Had an idea, and then invented the math to describe it: he single-handedly developed calculus. Alone. What a fucking genius.
Er, what about Leibniz?
Pretty much simultaneous development IIRC. Leibniz also helped define which symbols meant what.

Both were wacky in their own right, though...Leibniz had his monadology and Newton was, as mentioned, an alchemist.

EDIT: I like Einstein. He had a great sense of humor.
Image
"I suggest a new strategy, Artoo: Let The Wookiee win."
SDnet BBS Administrator: Service With A Roar (And A Hydrospanner)
Knight of the Order of the Galactic Empire


Do not taunt The Wookiee.
User avatar
Spambot Jedi
Redshirt
Posts: 18
Joined: 2005-04-24 04:47pm

Post by Spambot Jedi »

Dead: Hamilton

Alive and Kicking: Weinberg--don't really know anything about the man or his work, but the avatar should explain that choice :D
WyrdNyrd
Jedi Knight
Posts: 693
Joined: 2005-02-01 05:02am

Post by WyrdNyrd »

The Wookiee wrote: Pretty much simultaneous development IIRC. Leibniz also helped define which symbols meant what.
Yeah, if I recall my decade-old calculus classes correctly, Leibniz's symbology was vastly superior to Newton's, and is the system we use today.

In fact, because of the controversy of who's discovery calculus was, and the British/Continental rivalry that it evoked, English mathematicians used Newton's clumsy "fluxion" notation exclusively. This allowed the Continental mathematicians to surpass them, thanks partly to the more elegant dx/dy-style notation they used.
User avatar
Spambot Jedi
Redshirt
Posts: 18
Joined: 2005-04-24 04:47pm

Post by Spambot Jedi »

WyrdNyrd wrote: Leibniz's symbology was vastly superior to Newton's
Somebody has been watching a little too much Boondock Saints, methinks.
Kettch
Padawan Learner
Posts: 202
Joined: 2002-10-29 11:03pm
Location: Ellington CT, USA

Post by Kettch »

Erwin Shrödinger:

Hi honey, just came back from the party capital of Europe (Vienna). I blew the mistresses' mind w/ great sex & blew every physicst's mind w/ my equation!

Oh yeah, at my age I'm supposed to be over the hill (over 40)

And honey, where's your cat? I need him for something.
WyrdNyrd
Jedi Knight
Posts: 693
Joined: 2005-02-01 05:02am

Post by WyrdNyrd »

Spambot Jedi wrote:
WyrdNyrd wrote: Leibniz's symbology was vastly superior to Newton's
Somebody has been watching a little too much Boondock Saints, methinks.
Very funny.

No, I did not mean "symbolism", although I do suspect that "symbology" may not actually be a word. I knew what I meant, and the rest of you should have just read my mind :wink:
Post Reply