PurpleTattoo wrote:
Proof of what? That an unarmed man can cause massive damage to another unarmed man? Do I really need to provide proof for that?
Nice dodge, but it won't work. Dalton specifically asked for proof that a human of moderate strength can cause the
same injuries to a 60+ year old man with his bare hands.
In other words, prove that a human of moderate strength can severe a persons foot with his bare hands.
I'm afraid I don't really understand you. To be perfectly scientific controled experiments would be the best. Have the person and the chimp do exactly the same thing. You know the drill.
Now we're talking perfectly scientific. That's irrelevant. The results can be observed and tested. That makes it scientific. The fact that the injuries occured and people witnessed the Chimp doing that makes it scientific. You don't need lab testing to confirm whether or not a human can bench 50lbs, you just need a demonstration.
Btw, the man in that account was seriously wounded by not literally riped to pieces. But I doubt the chimps it question were giving it their all...
His foot was severed.
sev·er ( P ) Pronunciation Key (svr)
v. sev·ered, sev·er·ing, sev·ers
v. tr.
To set or keep apart; divide or separate.
To cut off (a part) from a whole.
To break up (a relationship, for example); dissolve. See Synonyms at separate.
Now unless severed has a different meaning medically, then the foot was ripped off.