Show trial for Trooper TK12746

[Vicious]

If I get banned or get a title, it doesn't matter. I will still have gotten to post on SD.net (for better or worse), which was what I wanted to do. I enjoyed my time on here. I hoped that it would go better, and aside from the Windu vs Palpatine thing I thought it did go well. Regardless of what happen, i had fun and I learned some things about SW.

So, did you learn that spewing the same thing over and over then lying in a public forum is utterly moronic and makes you look full of shit? Not even a fucking apology for your gross misconduct.

[Noble Ire]

I have noted this type of behavior on many an occasion, not to mention a lot of excessive Empire wanking. Nevertheless, he has contributed at times to discussions in a constructive manner. Seeing as there is no middle ground for punishment, I shall abstain from passing judgement.

[Trooper TK12746]

I don't think I will get out of this. But regardless, I had fun while I posted on the site. And I don't think I broke the rule about lying.

[Trooper TK12746]

Thanks Sabacc. I have participated in far more than two threads GrandMasterTerwynn.

[Darth Wong]

I don't think I will get out of this. But regardless, I had fun while I posted on the site. And I don't think I broke the rule about lying.

Why are you so stubbornly insistent on denying that which everyone can plainly see? Is it that difficult for you to simply admit that you fucked up? What particular personality defect do you suffer from, which makes you behave in this manner?

[Soontir C'boath]

Being that it appears it is only this thread that he is acting like a cracked ass; I suggest a title.

[The Dark]

Guilty. Minimum sentence of VI mandatory. Recommend sentence of temporary ban plus VI.

[Trooper TK12746]

And the stuff I learned was about the THrawn trilogy and the DE series. I have admitted myself wrong in other threads. TO you (Vicious) in fact. I just don't think I was lying in that thread.

[Trooper TK12746]

What is a VI sentence?

[Vicious]

I don't think I will get out of this. But regardless, I had fun while I posted on the site. And I don't think I broke the rule about lying.

I am not a liar. I kept repeating the statements that i had said earlier and responded to claims that I had said the novelization supported Palpy having two lightsabers at the fight with Windu (not just having two). By the fifth page it was no longer about the points, it was about people who said I was a liar and my counters.

*ahem*

I have provided evidence that the second lightsaber does exist. I have not claimed that the novelization proved that it was in the WIndu fight. I believe it would be in the Windu fight because there is no point in haveing a backup if it is unavailible should hte primary fail. I do think he had it in the WIndu fight, but I didn't say the novelization proves it. I provided quotes earlier from the novelization that stated the existence of the second lightsaber, it isn't mythical.

READ THE WHOLE FUCKING THING!

[Vicious]

Err, crap. Screwed up tags. The first Trooper quote was meant to be outside Ghost Rider's. Sorry.

[GrandMasterTerwynn]

Thanks Sabacc. I have participated in far more than two threads GrandMasterTerwynn.

But what matters is that in the thread that prompted your show-trial, you've been exposed for a backpedalling liar who refuses to admit it, in spite of having the times when you lied and contradicted yourself thrown in your face, repeatedly.

People who pull that shit repeatedly in a thread, and then are absolutely unapologetic about it, and play this innocence-abused "who me?" act when confronted over it will, very likely, pull that sort of shit again in a different thread when things get really involved.

[Vicious]

And the stuff I learned was about the THrawn trilogy and the DE series. I have admitted myself wrong in other threads. TO you (Vicious) in fact. I just don't think I was lying in that thread.

Where? About the games not being canon? I know that, dipwad. That doesn't mean you didn't act like a total assclown in the Palps vs Windu thread. I stand by my decision.

[Darth Wong]

The fact that someone only acts like a complete jack-ass in regards to one particular pet subject is no excuse.

[Trooper TK12746]

Suit yourselves.

[Frank Hipper]

Guilty as hell.

[Darth Wong]

And again, you continue to post but you refuse to admit that which is glaringly obvious. You say you never used the novelization as proof that Palpatine had a second sabre on him during the Windu fight, yet everyone can see that you did. And when challenged with quotes to this effect, you cannot explain this little problem, nor do you even try. Instead, you simply deny, deny, deny.

Seriously, what is motivating you to behave in this way? Do you think that people will come around and agree with you if you keep repeating yourself? Is it some point of ridiculous teenaged pride?

[Trooper TK12746]

I do counter specific quotes. Yes, part of it is pride. I don't liked being called a liar. But it is also that I didn't mean my statements that way. I always meant that the novelization supported the fact that Palpatine did in fact have a holdout lightsaber. I believe he would have had it during his fight with Windu. But i didn't claim that the novelization supported that belief. Just that it made the belief possible by confirming the existence of a second lightsaber.
And I do hope that some people will see it my way. At least one other person did.

[Durandal]

On the SD.Net bulletin board system, the denizens are represented by two separate yet equally important groups: The moderators who investigate crime, and the administrators who prosecute the offenders. These are their stories.

[Trooper TK12746]

Just curious, but who said I was innocent? If it was just because you felt like voting me innocent don't answer.

[Darth Wong]

But i didn't claim that the novelization supported that belief.

Liar:

Now show me the quote where it says that he has two holdout lightsabres on him at all times.

<snip novel quotes>
That was what you asked for wasn't it?

I demanded novel quotes to prove your claim, you provided some which didn't, and then you said "that was what you asked for, wasn't it?" You claimed that the novelization supported your argument, and now you insist that you never said any such thing. You are a liar. An especially stupid one too, since the evidence is clear.

[Vicious]

I do counter specific quotes. Yes, part of it is pride. I don't liked being called a liar. But it is also that I didn't mean my statements that way. I always meant that the novelization supported the fact that Palpatine did in fact have a holdout lightsaber. I believe he would have had it during his fight with Windu. But i didn't claim that the novelization supported that belief. Just that it made the belief possible by confirming the existence of a second lightsaber.
And I do hope that some people will see it my way. At least one other person did.

You fucking assclown, of course we knew he had a backup lightsaber. He used it against Yoda, dipshit. Or do you assume we think someone went down and fetched Palpatine's lightsaber from the undercity of Coruscant? The reason you're getting sentenced is because you subsequently lied about saying the novelization supported him having in the fight with Mace. Then you lied again when we called you on it, you fucktard. If you didn't mean what you said, then why did you say it so many fucking times?

[Flagg]

I do counter specific quotes. Yes, part of it is pride. I don't liked being called a liar. But it is also that I didn't mean my statements that way. I always meant that the novelization supported the fact that Palpatine did in fact have a holdout lightsaber. I believe he would have had it during his fight with Windu. But i didn't claim that the novelization supported that belief. Just that it made the belief possible by confirming the existence of a second lightsaber.
And I do hope that some people will see it my way. At least one other person did.

You fucking assclown, of course we knew he had a backup lightsaber. He used it against Yoda, dipshit. Or do you assume we think someone went down and fetched Palpatine's lightsaber from the undercity of Coruscant? The reason you're getting sentenced is because you subsequently lied about saying the novelization supported him having in the fight with Mace. Then you lied again when we called you on it, you fucktard. If you didn't mean what you said, then why did you say it so many fucking times?

Maybe he has tourrets syndrome. You know, to accompany his downs syndrome.

[HemlockGrey]

I voted "no" because I don't think he should be banned, but yeah, he is being a schmuck.

[GrandMasterTerwynn]

I do counter specific quotes. Yes, part of it is pride. I don't liked being called a liar. But it is also that I didn't mean my statements that way. I always meant that the novelization supported the fact that Palpatine did in fact have a holdout lightsaber. I believe he would have had it during his fight with Windu. But i didn't claim that the novelization supported that belief. Just that it made the belief possible by confirming the existence of a second lightsaber.
And I do hope that some people will see it my way. At least one other person did.

Let's try this again since you have the reading comprehension skills and information retention abilities of an AOL netrat.

Those are not facts, Palpatine had his lightsaber (holdout) in his robes and would have deflected any attempt by Mace Windu to stab him. And WIndu was at the point of exhaustion as well according to the novelization.

Emphasis mine.