UT-AT? Was that posted before?

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
K. A. Pital
Glamorous Commie
Posts: 20813
Joined: 2003-02-26 11:39am
Location: Elysium

UT-AT? Was that posted before?

Post by K. A. Pital »

So it wasn't a treaded tank after all, but a repulsorlift?
http://www.starwars.com/databank/vehicle/utat/
Lì ci sono chiese, macerie, moschee e questure, lì frontiere, prezzi inaccessibile e freddure
Lì paludi, minacce, cecchini coi fucili, documenti, file notturne e clandestini
Qui incontri, lotte, passi sincronizzati, colori, capannelli non autorizzati,
Uccelli migratori, reti, informazioni, piazze di Tutti i like pazze di passioni...

...La tranquillità è importante ma la libertà è tutto!
Assalti Frontali
User avatar
Mange
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4179
Joined: 2004-03-26 01:31pm
Location: Somewhere in the GFFA

Re: UT-AT? Was that posted before?

Post by Mange »

Stas Bush wrote:So it wasn't a treaded tank after all, but a repulsorlift?
http://www.starwars.com/databank/vehicle/utat/
It was mentioned in the "What's the Story" thread I started:
http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=75237

However, there's no dedicated thread to it.

EDIT: The name and description doesn't make all that much sense, IMHO, especially since the the SPHA-T is quite similar in the basic design.
User avatar
The Dark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7378
Joined: 2002-10-31 10:28pm
Location: Promoting ornithological awareness

Re: UT-AT? Was that posted before?

Post by The Dark »

Mange the Swede wrote:EDIT: The name and description doesn't make all that much sense, IMHO, especially since the the SPHA-T is quite similar in the basic design.
The only part of the description that really seems important is that it's designed to go places the SPHA-T can't, due to have a lower ground pressure and causing less vibration through its movement. Similar concept to the light armored vehicles the American military wants to develop as a supplement/replacement for tanks: it can go where the heavy stuff can't.
Stanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
BattleTech for SilCore
Post Reply