The official 'Make your own propoganda thread'-large images!

AMP: sci-fi art, regular art, pictures, photos, comics, music, etc.

Moderator: Beowulf

Post Reply
User avatar
Captain tycho
Has Elected to Receive
Posts: 5039
Joined: 2002-12-04 06:35pm
Location: Jewy McJew Land

The official 'Make your own propoganda thread'-large images!

Post by Captain tycho »

Here's mine. I know it's not very good, I basically just took an ingame Winter Assault screen shot and ran it through GIMP.


Image
Okay then, heretics, lets see your propoganda! (about anything :P )
Captain Tycho!
The worst fucker ever!
The Best reciever ever!
User avatar
Captain tycho
Has Elected to Receive
Posts: 5039
Joined: 2002-12-04 06:35pm
Location: Jewy McJew Land

Post by Captain tycho »

Here's another :twisted:

Image
Captain Tycho!
The worst fucker ever!
The Best reciever ever!
User avatar
Bounty
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10767
Joined: 2005-01-20 08:33am
Location: Belgium

Post by Bounty »

A looong time ago, I submitted this for a TrekBBS avatar contest - which is why it's so small/crappy, the filesize limit was 60k.

It's from the MU episode of Enterprise :

Image
User avatar
Captain tycho
Has Elected to Receive
Posts: 5039
Joined: 2002-12-04 06:35pm
Location: Jewy McJew Land

Post by Captain tycho »

Nice little gif there. Whats that star ship at the end, though?
Captain Tycho!
The worst fucker ever!
The Best reciever ever!
User avatar
Bounty
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10767
Joined: 2005-01-20 08:33am
Location: Belgium

Post by Bounty »

Captain tycho wrote:Nice little gif there. Whats that star ship at the end, though?
Never named. It was part of the opening credits of ENT, flying over the moon. From EAS :
1) The starship shows up in the opening credits of Enterprise just before the NX-01. The ship can be seen only from behind, but with its old-style rocket engines it is obviously supposed to be less advanced than Enterprise.
2) It has been suggested that this might be supposed to be the SS Valiant (considering that the opening credits shows major breakthroughs in space flight), but any proof is missing. The design was initially often identified as "Moon shuttle". While it is true that the shuttle is seen above the Moon surface, why would it need warp nacelles? It has also been suggested that the engine pods are actually not warp nacelles. But then the ship wouldn't fit into the design lineage at all. Moreover, the existence of large and brightly lit (sublight) engine exhausts leaves no other interpretation than the pods being warp nacelles.
Post Reply