SDN The gathering cards?

Chardok · Post by **Chardok** » 2005-09-26 04:17pm

Noble Ire wrote:
I WITHDRAW MY OBJECTION!
Um, no problem.

I think that was from My cousin Vinny. Something like that. Anyway, I wasn't *really* yelling.

Noble Ire · Post by **Noble Ire** » 2005-09-26 04:19pm

Lord Revan · Post by **Lord Revan** » 2005-09-26 04:50pm

Noble Ire wrote:snip

nice, BTW where did you get that Revan pic it's really nice.

Noble Ire · Post by **Noble Ire** » 2005-09-26 05:00pm

Lord Revan wrote:
Noble Ire wrote:snip
nice, BTW where did you get that Revan pic it's really nice.

Google Image search, second or third page for Revan. It was part of a fan-made wallpaper.

Col. Crackpot · Post by **Col. Crackpot** » 2005-09-26 05:38pm

holy shit! these are awesome!

Wyrm · Post by **Wyrm** » 2005-09-26 06:24pm

Finally, it's the card you've all been waiting for!

Why do you need to sacrifice a donkey? They are Racist Donkey-Raping Son of a Whores, aren't they?

Post by **Zaia** » 2005-09-26 06:29pm

Wyrm wrote:They are Racist Donkey-Raping Son of a Whores, aren't they?

I believe the plural form of that would be Racist Donkey-Raping Sons of a Whore (or Sons of Whores, depending on your preference). Point being, more than one 'son.'

Lord Zentei · Post by **Lord Zentei** » 2005-09-26 06:45pm

One point: Lands never have a casting cost. You might want to make that into an Enchantment.

sketerpot · Post by **sketerpot** » 2005-09-26 06:49pm

Zaia wrote:Just a friendly reminder not to quote pictures, guys. You can say, "Ooh, cool, thanks!" without wasting bandwidth, 'k? Thanks.

Does quoting pictures waste bandwidth? Surely the pictures are only downloaded once, and every use of them refers to the same already-downloaded picture. At least, they're only downloaded once for the same page. And most photo hosts have cache settings set up so that the pictures will be cached on your computer on multiple pages as well. Quoting pictures wastes screen space, but it shouldn't dramatically increase bandwidth used.

Is there something I'm not getting?

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2005-09-26 06:54pm

sketerpot wrote:
Zaia wrote:Just a friendly reminder not to quote pictures, guys. You can say, "Ooh, cool, thanks!" without wasting bandwidth, 'k? Thanks.
Does quoting pictures waste bandwidth? Surely the pictures are only downloaded once, and every use of them refers to the same already-downloaded picture. At least, they're only downloaded once for the same page. And most photo hosts have cache settings set up so that the pictures will be cached on your computer on multiple pages as well. Quoting pictures wastes screen space, but it shouldn't dramatically increase bandwidth used.

Is there something I'm not getting?

Mostly as rule we made up because it can cause problems and for some users the extra time to load all the images can get laggy.

Same reason we prefer people inlining huge images.

Lord Zentei · Post by **Lord Zentei** » 2005-09-26 06:57pm

Lord Zentei wrote:One point: Lands never have a casting cost. You might want to make that into an Enchantment.

Also: I doubt the WCOTC losers really qualify for banding, weren't those guys rather uncoordinated in their invesion?

Wyrm · Post by **Wyrm** » 2005-09-26 07:01pm

Lord Zentei wrote:One point: Lands never have a casting cost. You might want to make that into an Enchantment.

Fixed.

Also, I fixed Strategic Defense Instatute to spell AdmiralKanos correctly.

EDIT: Maybe I'll remove banding from the final version...

Akhlut · Post by **Akhlut** » 2005-09-26 07:08pm

Damn, man, I must give props for a job-well-done.

How long did that take you?

DrkHelmet · Post by **DrkHelmet** » 2005-09-26 07:10pm

Akhlut wrote:Damn, man, I must give props for a job-well-done. How long did that take you?

*cries*

You missed me!

Post by **Zaia** » 2005-09-26 07:21pm

sketerpot wrote:
Zaia wrote:Just a friendly reminder not to quote pictures, guys. You can say, "Ooh, cool, thanks!" without wasting bandwidth, 'k? Thanks.
Does quoting pictures waste bandwidth? Surely the pictures are only downloaded once, and every use of them refers to the same already-downloaded picture. At least, they're only downloaded once for the same page. And most photo hosts have cache settings set up so that the pictures will be cached on your computer on multiple pages as well. Quoting pictures wastes screen space, but it shouldn't dramatically increase bandwidth used.

Is there something I'm not getting?

I went through part of this thread and deleted about six or seven quoted pictures with comments like, "Cool, thanks!" under them. It serves no purpose to slow down the loading time for other users simply because the person saying thanks is too lazy to take two seconds to adjust the quote.

Plus, if people keep quoting it, as the rules state, it'll screw up the formatting of the thread.

Enlightenment, in [url=http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=10681]AMP Forum Rules[/url], wrote:When posting into this forum, please be follow these guidelines.

Do not quote inline images. It serves no purpose and can widen the thread as each quote is indented.

Keep the links in the quote (as links) if you want, or snip them, but don't leave them as quoted images.

Post by **Zaia** » 2005-09-26 07:24pm

DrkHelmet wrote:
Akhlut wrote:Damn, man, I must give props for a job-well-done. How long did that take you?
*cries*

You missed me!

Yours is already in the thread so stop spamming.

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2005-09-26 07:26pm

I'm seeing some duplicates.

Tasoth · Post by **Tasoth** » 2005-09-26 07:43pm

RAR! I'm on the band wagon. And I do hope phasing is the ability from weatherlight. Meh.

Chardok · Post by **Chardok** » 2005-09-26 07:49pm

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:I'm seeing some duplicates.

Think of them not as duplicates, but as "series I" and "series II" ala Marvel cards.

Grandmaster Jogurt · Post by **Grandmaster Jogurt** » 2005-09-26 08:11pm

Chardok wrote:
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:I'm seeing some duplicates.
Think of them not as duplicates, but as "series I" and "series II" ala Marvel cards.

No, there's actual duplicates, such as the two Fundamentalist Moron cards (the protesters and the bunny) that are both there twice. Since they only load once, though, it doesn't really hurt anything.

Tasoth · Post by **Tasoth** » 2005-09-26 08:13pm

RAR! Yet another one. In case you can't read that last bit, it's 'Sacrifice RPG Collection, Pay X life: Target player takes damage equal to twice sacrificed life.'

Flavor text is: When all else fails, throw them off something high.

The Spartan · Post by **The Spartan** » 2005-09-26 08:21pm

I don't suppose someone could make one up for me, to satisfy my curiosity?

Or am I still yet too obscure a member?

Not sure what all I could add to help with the creation of the stats but as for a quote; how about, "Is your name Terry?"

Chardok · Post by **Chardok** » 2005-09-26 08:22pm

Grandmaster Jogurt wrote:No, there's actual duplicates, such as the two Fundamentalist Moron cards (the protesters and the bunny) that are both there twice. Since they only load once, though, it doesn't really hurt anything.

Sorry, I didn't notice that. I thought he was referring to my Spanky card Vs. Noble's (Or wyrm's) Spanky Card. My bad entirely.

Chardok · Post by **Chardok** » 2005-09-26 08:23pm

Lets try to keep the commentary in the other thread and keep this one nice and clean for cards only, like the member pic thread. Can a mod move these comments to the other thread?

Losonti Tokash · Post by **Losonti Tokash** » 2005-09-26 08:30pm

If someone would be so kind...

Losonti Tokash
Summoning cost: 1 blue
1/1 Creature - Lurker

Tap, Pay 1 colorless - Post to thread.

If this ability is used, flip a coin. If heads, then the post contributes to the thread. If tails, the post is spam and you must remove Losonti Tokash from play for 2 turns.

"..."