
I need to make a card for myself, but if someone else wants to take a stab at it, go ahead. Use any suitable dragon pic, and make me Legendary Creature - Dragonlord. I'd need to have the Warwolf flag somewhere in there as well.
Edi
Moderator: Beowulf
ROARRR!!!Luzifer's right hand wrote:Funny stuff.
Is there a good website which explains the rules these cards are based on?
Thanks.Lord Zentei wrote: ROARRR!!!
Here, my previous explanation: Linka.
Website with rules: Linka.
Downloads/Editor: Linka.
Rough rule of thumb for homemade cards: [url=http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=7
I tried to do it, but the cuteness factor overwhelmed by MtG editor and it exploded. My desktop is a mess. Little Bat-bits everywhere...
Preliminary version:Bounty wrote:I wonder if someone can MtG me...
Agent Fisher wrote:Do I have to get down on my hands and knees and beg for someone to make a card of me?
Why not just say "Affinity for Pro-Trek debators" since the cost reduction rule is essentially already in existance?Noble Ire wrote:Preliminary version:Bounty wrote:I wonder if someone can MtG me...
http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/3033/bounty6wq.jpg
Do you have a better picture of the Acclamatorprise lying about? Others, I'll just use your avatar.
Yes. Yes you do. And kiss our feet while you're at it.Agent Fisher wrote:Do I have to get down on my hands and knees and beg for someone to make a card of me?
There is a difference between that mechanic and his ability, if a small one. 2 Pro-Trek Debators would be required to fufill the ability if implimented the other way. However, the difference is of little consequence; I suppose I could change it.Lord Zentei wrote:Why not just say "Affinity for Pro-Trek debators" since the cost reduction rule is essentially already in existance?Noble Ire wrote:Preliminary version:Bounty wrote:I wonder if someone can MtG me...
http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/3033/bounty6wq.jpg
Do you have a better picture of the Acclamatorprise lying about? Others, I'll just use your avatar.
I'm aware of that. But it seems a pretty trivial difference, and since the "affinity" mechanic already exists, why not just use that?Noble Ire wrote:There is a difference between that mechanic and his ability, if a small one. 2 Pro-Trek Debators would be required to fufill the ability if implimented the other way. However, the difference is of little consequence; I suppose I could change it.Lord Zentei wrote:Why not just say "Affinity for Pro-Trek debators" since the cost reduction rule is essentially already in existance?Noble Ire wrote: Preliminary version:
http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/3033/bounty6wq.jpg
Do you have a better picture of the Acclamatorprise lying about? Others, I'll just use your avatar.
Edited.
Lord Zentei wrote:Eh, here we go:
[snip]
Pretty basic until you relate what your claims to fame around here are. Otherwise it is a mite hard to judge what abilities to put on it.
* Also a better pic of your avvie might make the card look nicer.
* In debates, how agressive/resilient are you?
* What are the most important points that you like to debate?
OK, I'll see what I can do about it.Agent Fisher wrote:Um, well, uh, you know what? Just put, some, uh, you know what screw it, I havent done anything worth mentioning. Oh, I am the only one on the board to write a Harry Potter fanfiction with guns and bombs and stuff.