If You're a Christian, Muslim or Jew - You are Wrong

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29211
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Post by General Zod »

Battlehymn Republic wrote:
If you're going to ridicule religion, it's only fair you do it to all of them, or at least all of them with a fair amount of people who kill in the name of that religion. If Hindus and Sikhs ran the world, it's possible that there would be as much people killing and dying over religion as there are now, if not more.
This is quite possibly one of the most retarded arguments I've heard. You don't ridicule someone for something they might do. If one religion promotes more idiotic values than another, then OF COURSE I'm going to mock that religion more than the other one.

It really does help if you actually listen to the reasons that people are mocking said religions, as opposed to making blanket generalisations and assuming it's simply because it's a religion.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
User avatar
Battlehymn Republic
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1824
Joined: 2004-10-27 01:34pm

Post by Battlehymn Republic »

General Zod wrote:
Battlehymn Republic wrote:
If you're going to ridicule religion, it's only fair you do it to all of them, or at least all of them with a fair amount of people who kill in the name of that religion. If Hindus and Sikhs ran the world, it's possible that there would be as much people killing and dying over religion as there are now, if not more.
You don't ridicule someone for something they might do. If one religion promotes more idiotic values than another, then OF COURSE I'm going to mock that religion more than the other one.
Sorry, I assumed that there was an equal amount of ridicule for most monotheistic religions here, as opposed to say, Buddhists and Jainists.

However, what this leads to is a discussion of comparing Hinduism and Sikhism to the Abrahamic religions in seeing how many of the same idiotic values (or at least different values that are as idiotic). wolveraptor is the only one so far who have actually gone into detail about what Hindus believe in.

There's another point about the number of a religion's followers correlating to the amount of violence done in the name of that religion, but that's for another debate.
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29211
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Post by General Zod »

Battlehymn Republic wrote:
However, what this leads to is a discussion of comparing Hinduism and Sikhism to the Abrahamic religions in seeing how many of the same idiotic values (or at least different values that are as idiotic). wolveraptor is the only one so far who have actually gone into detail about what Hindus believe in.
You couldn't have used google to find out what the basics of the religions were about yourself instead of waiting for someone to explain it to you?
There's another point about the number of a religion's followers correlating to the amount of violence done in the name of that religion, but that's for another debate.
A percentile increase, maybe. But the fewer violent practices a religion espouses, the less likely people are to do violent things in the name of that religion. It's not exactly rocket science to figure it out.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
User avatar
Battlehymn Republic
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1824
Joined: 2004-10-27 01:34pm

Post by Battlehymn Republic »

General Zod wrote:
Battlehymn Republic wrote:
However, what this leads to is a discussion of comparing Hinduism and Sikhism to the Abrahamic religions in seeing how many of the same idiotic values (or at least different values that are as idiotic). wolveraptor is the only one so far who have actually gone into detail about what Hindus believe in.
You couldn't have used google to find out what the basics of the religions were about yourself instead of waiting for someone to explain it to you?
Yes, but that wouldn't be a discussion then, wouldn't it?

Okay, this is off-topic. I'll withdraw and there can always be an actual discussion sometime in the future, in a different thread.
General Zod wrote:
Battlehymn Republic wrote:
There's another point about the number of a religion's followers correlating to the amount of violence done in the name of that religion, but that's for another debate.
A percentile increase, maybe. But the fewer violent practices a religion espouses, the less likely people are to do violent things in the name of that religion. It's not exactly rocket science to figure it out.
Right, I'm just questioning if Hinduism or Sikhism epouse less religious violence. But that would go into specifics, and in retrospect I guess we should just do a different thread about that. Sometime later, after I read more on the specifics. I'm not exactly sure of the current status of Hinduism, but the current massacres in Gujarat aren't exactly showing the religion in a very favorable light...
User avatar
Magnetic
Jedi Knight
Posts: 626
Joined: 2005-07-08 11:23am

Post by Magnetic »

Darth Wong wrote:The "dyed in the wool" people are idiots. Nothing would convince them, because they don't like to think. That's why they only know how to repeat themselves ad nauseum, while ignoring what you're saying.

Therefore, criticizing certain kinds of tactics is a complete waste of breath. You might as well debate in clicking sounds for all the good it would do against these people. Don't you fucking get it yet?

I understand what you're saying. I'm just offering what I know to be true and what happens within the Christian circle. Doctrination is hard to overcome, and I ought to know. I still struggle with it.

And in a way, I do feel I can criticize the article because it just appears to be someone's opinion. There doesn't seem to be evidence to back up any claims. And he is entitles to his opinions. I'm just saying that the average Christian will look at it as such. It's the way things like this goes. For the most part, if you're on one side of the fence, it will offend you. If you're on the other side, you'll cheer for the person.
--->THIS SPACE FOR RENT<---
User avatar
Magnetic
Jedi Knight
Posts: 626
Joined: 2005-07-08 11:23am

Post by Magnetic »

A quote from the article:
There are maniacal Christians who are praying for the end of time. Who are hoping that most of the world's population is wiped off the face of the Earth by their vengeful and murderous God.
I know that most DO pray for Christ returning, but only the smallest handful are hoping that "the world's population would be wiped off the face of the Earth...."

It's the reason why the work hard sending missionaries everwhere . . . in order to fullfill the 'Great Commission'.
--->THIS SPACE FOR RENT<---
User avatar
Molyneux
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7186
Joined: 2005-03-04 08:47am
Location: Long Island

Post by Molyneux »

Magnetic wrote:A quote from the article:
There are maniacal Christians who are praying for the end of time. Who are hoping that most of the world's population is wiped off the face of the Earth by their vengeful and murderous God.
I know that most DO pray for Christ returning, but only the smallest handful are hoping that "the world's population would be wiped off the face of the Earth...."

It's the reason why the work hard sending missionaries everwhere . . . in order to fullfill the 'Great Commission'.
The fact that they believe that a "just and loving God" WOULD wipe out the majority of the world's population if they don't follow the right religion is a pretty ringing indictment of their mental fogging on this issue, though.
Ceci n'est pas une signature.
User avatar
Magnetic
Jedi Knight
Posts: 626
Joined: 2005-07-08 11:23am

Post by Magnetic »

Molyneux wrote:
Magnetic wrote:A quote from the article:
There are maniacal Christians who are praying for the end of time. Who are hoping that most of the world's population is wiped off the face of the Earth by their vengeful and murderous God.
I know that most DO pray for Christ returning, but only the smallest handful are hoping that "the world's population would be wiped off the face of the Earth...."

It's the reason why the work hard sending missionaries everwhere . . . in order to fullfill the 'Great Commission'.
The fact that they believe that a "just and loving God" WOULD wipe out the majority of the world's population if they don't follow the right religion is a pretty ringing indictment of their mental fogging on this issue, though.
Yes. . . . .that has been one of the many questions I've brought up on the Christian forum. I haven't had a lot of answers from them about that other than the common response. :?
--->THIS SPACE FOR RENT<---
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Magnetic wrote:I understand what you're saying. I'm just offering what I know to be true and what happens within the Christian circle. Doctrination is hard to overcome, and I ought to know. I still struggle with it.
So? It's about changing the tenor of a debate. I've "won" debates with Christians by putting them on the defensive with tactics like this. Not by making them admit that God is evil, but by putting them on the defensive. So a debate that originally started with some jackass Bible thumper demanding that "we put God back into the schools" ends up with him desperately defending his faith and pitifully trying to argue that "well, religion still has a place in society". He can have that point; simply by putting him on the defensive, I took his original point away from him. He doesn't even try to argue it. And then at the end, after relentlessly hammering on the worthiness of his religion to exist at all, you magnaminously pull back a little bit and grant him the "concession" that religion still has a valid place in society outside the taxpayer-funded public schools, so that he thinks the two of you reached a healthy compromise. And yes, I've done this in real-life many times.
And in a way, I do feel I can criticize the article because it just appears to be someone's opinion. There doesn't seem to be evidence to back up any claims.
You need "evidence" for a claim that a doctrine based solely on the authority of self-proclaimed "prophets" is bullshit?
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
EmperorSolo51
Jedi Knight
Posts: 886
Joined: 2002-07-04 05:25pm
Location: New Hampshire

Post by EmperorSolo51 »

Molyneux wrote:
The fact that they believe that a "just and loving God" WOULD wipe out the majority of the world's population if they don't follow the right religion is a pretty ringing indictment of their mental fogging on this issue, though.
According to Most Low Church Protestant's, Yes. But High Church Protestants and Catholics believe in the notion of the Virtuous Pagan. This belief means that one needs not hear the word of Christ to be saved by him but does Good Works in his name even though A pagan would not know him. This means that the some of the saving Graces of Christ given to Christians would be extended to Jews, Muslims, Hindus, etc.
User avatar
Spice Runner
Jedi Knight
Posts: 767
Joined: 2004-07-10 05:40pm
Location: At a space station near you

Post by Spice Runner »

I don't want to go too far off topic here but,
Battlehymn Republic wrote: However, what this leads to is a discussion of comparing Hinduism and Sikhism to the Abrahamic religions in seeing how many of the same idiotic values (or at least different values that are as idiotic). wolveraptor is the only one so far who have actually gone into detail about what Hindus believe in.
I can speak as a former believer in hinduism. Now I am a happy deist/athest. :D Most of my family are quite fundamentalist in the sense of the word. I have seen several similarities to faiths such as Christianity especially in the subjects of sex and homosexuality. It is considered proper only after marriage and even then only for procreation. I have indeed read that very idea it in the holy book the Gita. Also another thing is the ridiculous amount of rituals. There are fucking rituals for every damn thing you can think of. All in all my family is somewhat tolerant of other religions and ideas (except those that don't recongnize a god, big surprize :roll:) Hindus don't believe in hell so there's none of that fire and brimstone schtick. However there is the idea of karma and reincarnation that is used to pressure those who don't conform. Finally the idea of not eating beef or meat in general is quite stupid. It may have made sense in ancient times when cows were an important source for milk, maybe not even then. People still follow these and other pointless religious customs because it says so in ancient texts.

There are also several modern sects that several friends I know belong to that have tried to espuse the idea of intellectual faith (an oxymoron if I've ever see one!). The idea behind this is to spead the Hindu faith through intellectual discourse and reason. They have revisionist views of ancient religious texts. These guys are fairly new and have a following of several million in India. But the thing about them that makes me mad is that they are like goddammed evangelists in that they active spread their version of the faith by actively seeking out new followers. The thing about this group is that they try to dominate the lives of their followers. Each and every moment must be devoted to swadhyay. (thats their name) Normally I wouldn't be concerned about them, but unfortunenately several friends and family members are members. They have tried several times to convert me to their way of religion But I keep feigning interest and avoiding them. I have though off telling them to simply fuck off, but then I risk hurting their feelings.

Right, I'm just questioning if Hinduism or Sikhism epouse less religious violence. But that would go into specifics, and in retrospect I guess we should just do a different thread about that. Sometime later, after I read more on the specifics. I'm not exactly sure of the current status of Hinduism, but
I can tell you about blind hatred towards muslims many of the more fundie Hindus have. much of my family members and friends of my parents (mostly the older generation) here in the U.S. and back in India have a mistrust towards muslims in general. I'm thinking that it may have been passed on through the generations. Now my mother is as extreme as they come. She does believe and has told me so on numerous occasion that all Muslims should be killed or sterilized because its in their nature to be evil and terrorists. However the younger generations are much more tolerant and understanding.

Back in India the Hindu extremists and the political parties such as the BJP they sponsor do have and active dislike Muslims. They do all they can to flame this hatred. I do remember reading about the government of Gujarat being under the administration of such hatemongerers for the past few years. under the leadership of Modi. However recently elections in India have put a new government into place. So hopefully things will change. (On the national level at least if not rural areas of which much of India still is comprised of.)
User avatar
Spice Runner
Jedi Knight
Posts: 767
Joined: 2004-07-10 05:40pm
Location: At a space station near you

Post by Spice Runner »

Addendum, I know that I rambled on in the above post, but to summarize I think Hinduism is just as bigoted and ass backwards as any of the Abrahamic faiths. I am damned glad that I left it long ago.
User avatar
Plekhanov
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3991
Joined: 2004-04-01 11:09pm
Location: Mercia

Post by Plekhanov »

EmperorSolo51 wrote:
Molyneux wrote:The fact that they believe that a "just and loving God" WOULD wipe out the majority of the world's population if they don't follow the right religion is a pretty ringing indictment of their mental fogging on this issue, though.
According to Most Low Church Protestant's, Yes. But High Church Protestants and Catholics believe in the notion of the Virtuous Pagan.
They do? Evidence for this bizare assertion please.
This means that the some of the saving Graces of Christ given to Christians would be extended to Jews, Muslims, Hindus, etc.
Can even you be this delusional? The entire history of the Catholic Church is that of the churches power structure claiming a monopoly on salvation with Catholic clergymen being the only way to access God if this isn't the case why would excommunication even be a threat?

The bible is pretty fucking clear that "good works" mean nothing and that faith in Jesus is ultimately all that matters, take for example this extremely well known phrase:
Your self obsessed 'god' wrote:I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
Also how about you address my earlier point which you ignored that even your ‘moderate’ Christian beliefs impel you to discriminate against homosexuals by for example denying them the right to marry thus harming them.
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12267
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Post by Surlethe »

Plekhanov wrote:[quote="EmperorSolo51]According to Most Low Church Protestant's, Yes. But High Church Protestants and Catholics believe in the notion of the Virtuous Pagan.
They do? Evidence for this bizare assertion please. [/quote]

I haven't yet found any online evidence for this, but I do recall from my confirmation class a similar assertion: that God recognizes the good works of people who have not been directly saved by Jesus and does not send them off to hell. Perhaps the harrowing of hell is an example of this?

If I find more evidence beyond anecdotal, I shall certainly post it.
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
Crown
NARF
Posts: 10615
Joined: 2002-07-11 11:45am
Location: In Transit ...

Post by Crown »

Surlethe wrote:
Plekhanov wrote:[quote="EmperorSolo51]According to Most Low Church Protestant's, Yes. But High Church Protestants and Catholics believe in the notion of the Virtuous Pagan.
They do? Evidence for this bizare assertion please.
I haven't yet found any online evidence for this, but I do recall from my confirmation class a similar assertion: that God recognizes the good works of people who have not been directly saved by Jesus and does not send them off to hell. Perhaps the harrowing of hell is an example of this?

If I find more evidence beyond anecdotal, I shall certainly post it.[/quote]

I'm pretty sure that Pope John Paul II said that the Dalai Lama was going to hell despite his good work for his pagan beliefs.
Image
Η ζωή, η ζωή εδω τελειώνει!
"Science is one cold-hearted bitch with a 14" strap-on" - Masuka 'Dexter'
"Angela is not the woman you think she is Gabriel, she's done terrible things"
"So have I, and I'm going to do them all to you." - Sylar to Arthur 'Heroes'
User avatar
Crown
NARF
Posts: 10615
Joined: 2002-07-11 11:45am
Location: In Transit ...

Post by Crown »

Blah, quote tag mix up! :P
Image
Η ζωή, η ζωή εδω τελειώνει!
"Science is one cold-hearted bitch with a 14" strap-on" - Masuka 'Dexter'
"Angela is not the woman you think she is Gabriel, she's done terrible things"
"So have I, and I'm going to do them all to you." - Sylar to Arthur 'Heroes'
User avatar
CaptJodan
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2217
Joined: 2003-05-27 09:57pm
Location: Orlando, Florida

Post by CaptJodan »

So apparently the real trick is to simply live in a society which has no access to Christianity, and thus you will probably be saved if you do good works. Because if you live in a Christian based society, where you have the opportunity to know God, and you reject him, but are otherwise a good person, then you're going to hell. There's logic for you.
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12267
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Post by Surlethe »

Crown wrote:Blah, quote tag mix up! :P
That was my fault; sorry. If a mod could please kindly fix them?
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12267
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Post by Surlethe »

Crown wrote:I'm pretty sure that Pope John Paul II said that the Dalai Lama was going to hell despite his good work for his pagan beliefs.
Hmm. Interesting; I may be wrong, then.
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
UCBooties
Jedi Master
Posts: 1011
Joined: 2004-10-15 05:55pm
Location: :-P

Post by UCBooties »

CaptJodan wrote:So apparently the real trick is to simply live in a society which has no access to Christianity, and thus you will probably be saved if you do good works. Because if you live in a Christian based society, where you have the opportunity to know God, and you reject him, but are otherwise a good person, then you're going to hell. There's logic for you.
Actualy, that would mean the best possible scenario would be to wipe out all knowledge of Christianity, turning salvation into a completely merit based affair. Then good people would be saved for heaven and ass-holes, no matter what their moral philosophy, would go straight to hell. Good system I think. I guess the big man dropped the ball.
Image
Post 666: Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 12:51 am
Post 777: Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 6:49 pm
Post 999: Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 11:19 am
User avatar
Battlehymn Republic
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1824
Joined: 2004-10-27 01:34pm

Post by Battlehymn Republic »

Spice Runner wrote:Addendum, I know that I rambled on in the above post, but to summarize I think Hinduism is just as bigoted and ass backwards as any of the Abrahamic faiths. I am damned glad that I left it long ago.
Thus you have supported my claim that certain non-Abrahamic religions are as dangerous, objectible, etc., and that there is plenty of blame to go around when talking about religions that cause harm.

That is the point I was making, and so I don't really need to post in this thread again.
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29211
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Post by General Zod »

Battlehymn Republic wrote:
Spice Runner wrote:Addendum, I know that I rambled on in the above post, but to summarize I think Hinduism is just as bigoted and ass backwards as any of the Abrahamic faiths. I am damned glad that I left it long ago.
Thus you have supported my claim that certain non-Abrahamic religions are as dangerous, objectible, etc., and that there is plenty of blame to go around when talking about religions that cause harm.

That is the point I was making, and so I don't really need to post in this thread again.
I suppose it never occured to you that the reason Christianity and other Abrahamic religions get targeted the most is because 1) not only do they have the highest number of followers in the world, but 2) their history has caused much, much more suffering than many other religions. Regardless of the fact that other religions can and will promote causing harm and idiocy.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
User avatar
Battlehymn Republic
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1824
Joined: 2004-10-27 01:34pm

Post by Battlehymn Republic »

General Zod wrote:I suppose it never occured to you that the reason Christianity and other Abrahamic religions get targeted the most is because 1) not only do they have the highest number of followers in the world, but 2) their history has caused much, much more suffering than many other religions. Regardless of the fact that other religions can and will promote causing harm and idiocy.
I would try to argue this, but then this would veer into the realm of alternate history, which is like using sci-fi science to debate actual science.

And again, it's more of my false perception that the atrocities of non-Abrahamic religions don't get any criticism in places like these. But I was wrong, because they apparently do get criticism, but it just doesn't happen a lot, especially since there's only like three Hindu nations and two Sikh provinces in existence.
So, never mind.
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12267
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Post by Surlethe »

Battlehymn Republic wrote:
General Zod wrote:I suppose it never occured to you that the reason Christianity and other Abrahamic religions get targeted the most is because 1) not only do they have the highest number of followers in the world, but 2) their history has caused much, much more suffering than many other religions. Regardless of the fact that other religions can and will promote causing harm and idiocy.
I would try to argue this, but then this would veer into the realm of alternate history, which is like using sci-fi science to debate actual science.
How exactly does a debate centering around actual history veer into alternate history, pray tell?
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
Spice Runner
Jedi Knight
Posts: 767
Joined: 2004-07-10 05:40pm
Location: At a space station near you

Post by Spice Runner »

Non Abrahamic religions don't get much criticizm because they were, for the most part contained to their respective regions throughout history. For example you often hear about the abysmal status of women in Islamic countries, however you don't hear too much about smaller localized religions who also have shoddy histories on their treatment of women and girls.
Post Reply