OpenOffice

GEC: Discuss gaming, computers and electronics and venture into the bizarre world of STGODs.

Moderator: Thanas

User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Under Linux OpenOffice is actually faster and less memory intensive than MS Office would be in Windows. That can't be said when using it with XP, but it was optimised for Unix systems I believe.
User avatar
Xon
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6206
Joined: 2002-07-16 06:12am
Location: Western Australia

Post by Xon »

Pu-239 wrote:
ggs wrote:OpenOffice also requires vastly more CPU & memory todo the equivalent thing in MS Office.

We are talking about the difference of a few seconds for MS office and minutes for OpenOffice on the same hardware for some operations
Hm? Which ones?
linky
Here is a comparison with the standard 16-sheet SXC and XML sample file I've been using. The sample is in compressed XML format because it is smaller and easier for you to download. You'll have to convert the XML file to XLS and the SXC file to ODS to run the following test yourself.

Even when dealing with what is essentially the same data, OpenOffice Calc uses up 211 MBs of private unsharable memory while Excel uses up 34 MBs of private unsharable memory. The fact that OpenOffice.org Calc takes about 100 times the CPU time explains the kind of drastic results we were getting where Excel could open a file in 2 seconds while Calc would take almost 3 minutes. Most of that massive speed difference is due to XML being very processor intensive, but Microsoft still handles its own XML files about 7 times faster than OpenOffice.org handles OpenDocument ODS format and uses far less memory than OpenOffice.org.
"Okay, I'll have the truth with a side order of clarity." ~ Dr. Daniel Jackson.
"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." ~ Stephen Colbert
"One Drive, One Partition, the One True Path" ~ ars technica forums - warrens - on hhd partitioning schemes.
User avatar
Yogi
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2163
Joined: 2002-08-22 03:53pm
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by Yogi »

In addition, Open Office Calc cannot import Excel macros.
I am capable of rearranging the fundamental building blocks of the universe in under six seconds. I shelve physics texts under "Fiction" in my personal library! I am grasping the reigns of the universe's carriage, and every morning get up and shout "Giddy up, boy!" You may never grasp the complexities of what I do, but at least have the courtesy to feign something other than slack-jawed oblivion in my presence. I, sir, am a wizard, and I break more natural laws before breakfast than of which you are even aware!

-- Vaarsuvius, from Order of the Stick
User avatar
Pu-239
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4727
Joined: 2002-10-21 08:44am
Location: Fake Virginia

Post by Pu-239 »

Hm, yeah, OO2 does take many minutes to open the sxw file on Linux. Don't have Office2k3 for comparison though.

ah.....the path to happiness is revision of dreams and not fulfillment... -SWPIGWANG
Sufficient Googling is indistinguishable from knowledge -somebody
Anything worth the cost of a missile, which can be located on the battlefield, will be shot at with missiles. If the US military is involved, then things, which are not worth the cost if a missile will also be shot at with missiles. -Sea Skimmer


George Bush makes freedom sound like a giant robot that breaks down a lot. -Darth Raptor
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Anyone use KOffice? What's that like?
User avatar
The Grim Squeaker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10319
Joined: 2005-06-01 01:44am
Location: A different time-space Continuum
Contact:

Post by The Grim Squeaker »

And is Abiword any better?
I understand that it's built in dictionary is the best of the open source bunch.?
Photography
Genius is always allowed some leeway, once the hammer has been pried from its hands and the blood has been cleaned up.
To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often.
User avatar
Edi
Dragonlord
Dragonlord
Posts: 12461
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:27am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Post by Edi »

Compared to Open Office 2.0 (which is out of beta and into the stable versions now), the 1.x series sucked. And it was still better than MS Office 2000 and earlier. I've been using OO for two years now, and no problems at all. Haven't used much more than just the basic features, but it's been good.

Macros and such don't transfer over from MS Office, though, they get all fucked up, so if you have a macro intensive and complex thing like the Tome for Dominions 2 (a user made reference document to for that strat game), the guys who made it basically had to do it all over for an Open Office version.

Edi
Warwolf Urban Combat Specialist

Why is it so goddamned hard to get little assholes like you to admit it when you fuck up? Is it pride? What gives you the right to have any pride?
–Darth Wong to vivftp

GOP message? Why don't they just come out of the closet: FASCISTS R' US –Patrick Degan

The GOP has a problem with anyone coming out of the closet. –18-till-I-die
User avatar
BloodAngel
Padawan Learner
Posts: 356
Joined: 2005-05-25 10:47pm
Location: DON'T GET TOO CLOSE OR ELSE!!!

Post by BloodAngel »

Is there any difference between the 1.x and 2.0 formats of OO that warrant a change? Because OO 1.1.5 is doing quite nicely for me at the moment...
Blood Angel, the Hidden Name of Who You Know.

Zadius: "Done. I get turned on by shit. Nothin' else. 8)"
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29211
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Post by General Zod »

Edi wrote:Compared to Open Office 2.0 (which is out of beta and into the stable versions now), the 1.x series sucked. And it was still better than MS Office 2000 and earlier. I've been using OO for two years now, and no problems at all. Haven't used much more than just the basic features, but it's been good.

Macros and such don't transfer over from MS Office, though, they get all fucked up, so if you have a macro intensive and complex thing like the Tome for Dominions 2 (a user made reference document to for that strat game), the guys who made it basically had to do it all over for an Open Office version.

Edi
Doesn't Open Office disable macros from the outright due to security issues anyway?
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
User avatar
Pu-239
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4727
Joined: 2002-10-21 08:44am
Location: Fake Virginia

Post by Pu-239 »

BloodAngel wrote:Is there any difference between the 1.x and 2.0 formats of OO that warrant a change? Because OO 1.1.5 is doing quite nicely for me at the moment...
For one thing, better document recovery.
The Windows version looks awful though (I hate that Office2k3 look- hideous curvy look). Of course, aesthetics aren't really that important, but eh.

Hm, disabling OO Java drastically improves startup time.

ah.....the path to happiness is revision of dreams and not fulfillment... -SWPIGWANG
Sufficient Googling is indistinguishable from knowledge -somebody
Anything worth the cost of a missile, which can be located on the battlefield, will be shot at with missiles. If the US military is involved, then things, which are not worth the cost if a missile will also be shot at with missiles. -Sea Skimmer


George Bush makes freedom sound like a giant robot that breaks down a lot. -Darth Raptor
Post Reply