Super STEAMTANK sketches! + New tank.
Moderator: Beowulf
- TheMuffinKing
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2368
- Joined: 2005-07-04 03:34am
- Location: Ultima ratio regum
- Contact:
Super STEAMTANK sketches! + New tank.
Sketches and doodles of steam powered TANKS!
The year: 1860, The place: alternate universe, The scenario: Ominous steampuffs on the horizon...
The year: 1860, The place: alternate universe, The scenario: Ominous steampuffs on the horizon...
Last edited by TheMuffinKing on 2005-11-02 05:57am, edited 1 time in total.
- Ford Prefect
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 8254
- Joined: 2005-05-16 04:08am
- Location: The real number domain
- Gil Hamilton
- Tipsy Space Birdie
- Posts: 12962
- Joined: 2002-07-04 05:47pm
- Contact:
Those things need alot more valves and dials and whirring bronze gadgets. Plus the guy visible and working dozens of levers to drive the thing.
"Show me an angel and I will paint you one." - Gustav Courbet
"Quetzalcoatl, plumed serpent of the Aztecs... you are a pussy." - Stephen Colbert
"Really, I'm jealous of how much smarter than me he is. I'm not an expert on anything and he's an expert on things he knows nothing about." - Me, concerning a bullshitter
"Quetzalcoatl, plumed serpent of the Aztecs... you are a pussy." - Stephen Colbert
"Really, I'm jealous of how much smarter than me he is. I'm not an expert on anything and he's an expert on things he knows nothing about." - Me, concerning a bullshitter
- TheMuffinKing
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2368
- Joined: 2005-07-04 03:34am
- Location: Ultima ratio regum
- Contact:
Good preliminary drawings, I can't wait until you really get into it, I've seen the quality you're capable of.
I admit that while my tastes are usually more high tech I'm willing to make exceptions when it comes to steam power
I admit that while my tastes are usually more high tech I'm willing to make exceptions when it comes to steam power
Does it follow that I reject all authority? Perish the thought. In the matter of boots, I defer to the authority of the boot-maker - Mikhail Bakunin
Capital is reckless of the health or length of life of the laborer, unless under compulsion from society - Karl Marx
Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not harvesting. We allow them to disperse because we've been ignorant of their value - R. Buckminster Fuller
The important thing is not to be human but to be humane - Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
Nova Mundi, my laughable attempt at an original worldbuilding/gameplay project
Capital is reckless of the health or length of life of the laborer, unless under compulsion from society - Karl Marx
Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not harvesting. We allow them to disperse because we've been ignorant of their value - R. Buckminster Fuller
The important thing is not to be human but to be humane - Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
Nova Mundi, my laughable attempt at an original worldbuilding/gameplay project
- That NOS Guy
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: 2004-12-30 03:14am
- Location: Back in Chinatown, hung over
- The Jazz Intern
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 459
- Joined: 2005-03-17 07:15pm
- Location: In a box. A very big box.
- TheMuffinKing
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2368
- Joined: 2005-07-04 03:34am
- Location: Ultima ratio regum
- Contact:
- TheMuffinKing
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2368
- Joined: 2005-07-04 03:34am
- Location: Ultima ratio regum
- Contact:
That looks awesome. It's probably just the sloping armour on the front, but I'm getting 40k vibes from this one.
Does it follow that I reject all authority? Perish the thought. In the matter of boots, I defer to the authority of the boot-maker - Mikhail Bakunin
Capital is reckless of the health or length of life of the laborer, unless under compulsion from society - Karl Marx
Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not harvesting. We allow them to disperse because we've been ignorant of their value - R. Buckminster Fuller
The important thing is not to be human but to be humane - Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
Nova Mundi, my laughable attempt at an original worldbuilding/gameplay project
Capital is reckless of the health or length of life of the laborer, unless under compulsion from society - Karl Marx
Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not harvesting. We allow them to disperse because we've been ignorant of their value - R. Buckminster Fuller
The important thing is not to be human but to be humane - Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
Nova Mundi, my laughable attempt at an original worldbuilding/gameplay project
- Captain tycho
- Has Elected to Receive
- Posts: 5039
- Joined: 2002-12-04 06:35pm
- Location: Jewy McJew Land
- Typhonis 1
- Rabid Monkey Scientist
- Posts: 5791
- Joined: 2002-07-06 12:07am
- Location: deep within a secret cloning lab hidden in the brotherhood of the monkey thread
- Elheru Aran
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 13073
- Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
- Location: Georgia
Just a note. You *really* want some armour on the sides there, covering the drive train-- that's just begging for some daring infantryman to run up with a satchel charge and blow it to pieces.
Aside from that, very cool idea you've got going. Even looks halfway possible...
Aside from that, very cool idea you've got going. Even looks halfway possible...
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37389
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Very cool looking, one of them could use a flamethrower, the only steam tank built in real life used one as its main armament, steam pressure is excellent for operating such a weapon.
A satchel charge isn’t going to work real well with 1860 explosive technology, I’d be way more concerned about a cannon ball going through the boiler, with the resulting release of scalding high pressure steam.Elheru Aran wrote:Just a note. You *really* want some armour on the sides there, covering the drive train-- that's just begging for some daring infantryman to run up with a satchel charge and blow it to pieces.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
That was my concern. It looks wicked, but that boiler is exposed as hell except from the front, and even a stray shot that dings that could cause all sorts of shit to happen, not least of which is the venting of scalding steam, potentially into the crew or accompanying troops. Still, it's a cool design and very period.Sea Skimmer wrote:Very cool looking, one of them could use a flamethrower, the only steam tank built in real life used one as its main armament, steam pressure is excellent for operating such a weapon.
A satchel charge isn’t going to work real well with 1860 explosive technology, I’d be way more concerned about a cannon ball going through the boiler, with the resulting release of scalding high pressure steam.Elheru Aran wrote:Just a note. You *really* want some armour on the sides there, covering the drive train-- that's just begging for some daring infantryman to run up with a satchel charge and blow it to pieces.
MFS Angry Wookiee - PRFYNAFBTFC
"We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." -Richard Dawkins
"We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." -Richard Dawkins
- The Jazz Intern
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 459
- Joined: 2005-03-17 07:15pm
- Location: In a box. A very big box.
- TheMuffinKing
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2368
- Joined: 2005-07-04 03:34am
- Location: Ultima ratio regum
- Contact:
I'd like to offer some advice - but I'm afraid people will start throwing rotten fruit and grenades at me for being a spoilsport...
If you want criticism, feel free to ask; otherwise, I'll just shut up.
Advice and constructive criticism is welcome. I'm looking for inexpensive ways to improve my works.
Well, OK then; refering to the "finished" tank:
1) The drive train. This looks like you're using reciprocating engines, which looks nice and is fine for the intended period.
But they're big, heavy, and weak; it appears rather unlikely that a reci would be able to move an armed and armored vehicle through any other terrain than along a nice and not too steep road.
I see four solutions here:
a) ignore it.
b) switch to turbines; they are a quarter-century too "modern", and don't give you that proper "steam locomotive" feel, but they should work.
c) give up the off-road mobility, and make an armored road locomotive; this would probably use normal wheels, since tracks are unnecessary on roads, and create extra roll resistance.
d) give up the armor (and most likely the armament), and make it an off-road tractor; since it's supposed to be a tank, that's no good.
2) Put armor over the boiler, and any steam lines. These things are dangerous.
3) Lose the turret. It's extra weight that's not absolutely necessary, and as such a bad idea for a terminally underpowered AFV.
*ducks*
1) The drive train. This looks like you're using reciprocating engines, which looks nice and is fine for the intended period.
But they're big, heavy, and weak; it appears rather unlikely that a reci would be able to move an armed and armored vehicle through any other terrain than along a nice and not too steep road.
I see four solutions here:
a) ignore it.
b) switch to turbines; they are a quarter-century too "modern", and don't give you that proper "steam locomotive" feel, but they should work.
c) give up the off-road mobility, and make an armored road locomotive; this would probably use normal wheels, since tracks are unnecessary on roads, and create extra roll resistance.
d) give up the armor (and most likely the armament), and make it an off-road tractor; since it's supposed to be a tank, that's no good.
2) Put armor over the boiler, and any steam lines. These things are dangerous.
3) Lose the turret. It's extra weight that's not absolutely necessary, and as such a bad idea for a terminally underpowered AFV.
*ducks*
- TheMuffinKing
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2368
- Joined: 2005-07-04 03:34am
- Location: Ultima ratio regum
- Contact:
Good points. I hadn't even considered turbines, but now I have a new design brewing in my head...) The drive train. This looks like you're using reciprocating engines, which looks nice and is fine for the intended period.
But they're big, heavy, and weak; it appears rather unlikely that a reci would be able to move an armed and armored vehicle through any other terrain than along a nice and not too steep road.
I see four solutions here:
a) ignore it.
b) switch to turbines; they are a quarter-century too "modern", and don't give you that proper "steam locomotive" feel, but they should work.
c) give up the off-road mobility, and make an armored road locomotive; this would probably use normal wheels, since tracks are unnecessary on roads, and create extra roll resistance.
d) give up the armor (and most likely the armament), and make it an off-road tractor; since it's supposed to be a tank, that's no good.
2) Put armor over the boiler, and any steam lines. These things are dangerous.
3) Lose the turret. It's extra weight that's not absolutely necessary, and as such a bad idea for a terminally underpowered AFV.
*ducks*
Armoring the boiler is definately a good idea and will be implemented in future designs.
(whines)But I like the turret!(whines) Realistically I agree that the turret may not be necessary, especially when period warfare seemed focused more on artillery and massed infantry. I had a "landship" sort of philosophy in mind with this beast and thought of it as a battleship on tracks focused on battlefield domination. Hence the rotationg turret as a means to project force in a 360 degree arc and suppressing the enemy in ways fixed weapons just couldn't do.
- Elheru Aran
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 13073
- Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
- Location: Georgia
When one considers that this vehicle, with all its size and armour, likely wouldn't be moving too fast, a turret is actually a pretty good idea; it makes the most use out of the limited number of guns that this tank has. It's not like a WWI tank, with machine guns bristling out of any available orifice; it's more along the design ethos of a WWII tank, IMO (feel free to correct me, Muffin). With this, not only do you capitalize upon being able to fire in different directions, you can also fire to the sides-- which may be important if you get surrounded by enemy units, and as this tank wouldn't be going too fast, that's a situation that'd happen pretty easily if the bad guys counter-charged.
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
- The Dark
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7378
- Joined: 2002-10-31 10:28pm
- Location: Promoting ornithological awareness
I could almost see it using a pair of barbettes (or "sponsons") like the early British tanks, though. It would allow paired fire forward, and one gun to each side, without the added height and mass of a turret. This is a fairly good painting of a Mark V of 1918, which actually is almost identical to the prototype Mark I of January 1916. While they carried a pair of 6pdr cannon and four 8mm machineguns, an earlier steam tank might carry a pair of 3pdr and either a Nordenfelt or Gatling style machinegun (hey, I'm brainstorming here ).
BattleTech for SilCoreStanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
- TheMuffinKing
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2368
- Joined: 2005-07-04 03:34am
- Location: Ultima ratio regum
- Contact:
I could almost see it using a pair of barbettes (or "sponsons") like the early British tanks, though. It would allow paired fire forward, and one gun to each side, without the added height and mass of a turret. This is a fairly good painting of a Mark V of 1918, which actually is almost identical to the prototype Mark I of January 1916. While they carried a pair of 6pdr cannon and four 8mm machineguns, an earlier steam tank might carry a pair of 3pdr and either a Nordenfelt or Gatling style machinegun (hey, I'm brainstorming here ).
I was thinking of the mkIV tanks when I drew this, but I omitted the sponsons for more armor. I felt with this design that slightly less firepower was counterbalanced with greater protection. Armament wasn't really focused on this tank, just guns that look cool.