Star destroyer qualities

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
montypython
Jedi Master
Posts: 1130
Joined: 2004-11-30 03:08am

Star destroyer qualities

Post by montypython »

What are the strengths and weaknesses of all the known Star destroyer designs? (no 'SSD' types et al)
User avatar
NRS Guardian
Jedi Knight
Posts: 531
Joined: 2004-09-11 09:11pm
Location: Colorado

Post by NRS Guardian »

1. Venator SD:
Strengths: Carries lots of starfighters, good HTLs, dedicated warship, and can land on a planet.
Weaknesses: Weak hull due to all the holes for docking bays and those big docking ports.
2. Victory I SD:
Strengths: Lots of missiles, can enter the atmosphere, good armament, dedicated warship, and good multi-role capability.
Weaknesses: Slow and depends on its missiles too much.
3. Victory II SD:
Strengths: Dedicated warship, good multi-role capability, and good armament.
Weaknesses: Slow.
4. Imperator SD:
Strengths: Jack-of-all-trades, heavy armament, heavy end of destroyer range.
Weaknesses: Master-of-none, expensive for a destroyer, somewhat inefficient, and can't enter an atmosphere easily.
5. Tector SD:
Strengths: Better protected than ISD, specialized for ship-to-ship combat, and few weak points.
Weaknesses: Few fighters or troops.
6. Dominator SD:
Strengths: Grav-well generators and ISD hull.
Weaknesses: Less power available for weapons and shields, fewer weapons, and requires support when faced by other destroyers.
7. Rejuvenator SD:
Strengths: Grav-well generators hidden inside hull and ISD hull.
Weaknesses: Less power available for weapons.
8. Republic SD:
Strengths: Cheaper and quicker to build than ISD, fewer crew than ISD, and good multi-role capability. Same number of fighters as ISD.
Weaknesses: Slightly weaker than ISD, 1/3 endurance of ISD, 1/3 number of troops as ISD.
9. Nebula/Defender SD:
Strengths: Slightly stronger than ISD and specialized for ship-to-ship combat.
Weaknesses: Only 6 months endurance, not many troops, and one squadron fewer fighters than ISD.
10. Endurance Star Carrier:
Strengths: Lots of fighters, decent command facilities, and decent armament for a carrier.
Weaknesses: Not designed for ship-to-ship combat and weak spots due to docking bays.
"It is not necessary to hope in order to persevere."
-William of Nassau, Prince of Orange

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.10
User avatar
Alan Bolte
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2611
Joined: 2002-07-05 12:17am
Location: Columbus, OH

Post by Alan Bolte »

In addition to the above, we should probably go into the various known or possibly ISD subtypes, as well as the Allegience "SSD", which is just a big destroyer rather than a dreadnaught.

Why is there a carrier on that list?
Any job worth doing with a laser is worth doing with many, many lasers. -Khrima
There's just no arguing with some people once they've made their minds up about something, and I accept that. That's why I kill them. -Othar
Avatar credit
User avatar
Crossroads Inc.
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9233
Joined: 2005-03-20 06:26pm
Location: Defending Sparkeling Bishonen
Contact:

Post by Crossroads Inc. »

Shouldn't the Acclamator be up there?
Praying is another way of doing nothing helpful
"Congratulations, you get a cookie. You almost got a fundamental English word correct." Pick
"Outlaw star has spaceships that punch eachother" Joviwan
Read "Tales From The Crossroads"!
Read "One Wrong Turn"!
User avatar
Gildor
Redshirt
Posts: 36
Joined: 2005-10-15 06:34pm
Location: Lurking

Post by Gildor »

That being a troopship, I would think the Acclamator would need to be excluded, unless we count her as a Star Frigate.
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

Imperial Acclamators in Empire at War are designated 'frigates'. My guess is they're of the Mk. II variant.
User avatar
Lord Pounder
Pretty Hate Machine
Posts: 9695
Joined: 2002-11-19 04:40pm
Location: Belfast, unfortunately
Contact:

Re: Star destroyer qualities

Post by Lord Pounder »

montypython wrote:What are the strengths and weaknesses of all the known Star destroyer designs? (no 'SSD' types et al)
Define SSD please, Executor Class or bigger? Allegiance? the Shockwave Class?
RIP Yosemite Bear
Gone, Never Forgotten
User avatar
montypython
Jedi Master
Posts: 1130
Joined: 2004-11-30 03:08am

Re: Star destroyer qualities

Post by montypython »

Lord Pounder wrote:
montypython wrote:What are the strengths and weaknesses of all the known Star destroyer designs? (no 'SSD' types et al)
Define SSD please, Executor Class or bigger? Allegiance? the Shockwave Class?
SSD generally meaning Executor, Sovereign or Eclipse type vessels.
User avatar
The Original Nex
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1593
Joined: 2004-10-18 03:01pm
Location: Boston, MA

Post by The Original Nex »

SSD is generally any ship larger than the mile long ISD.
User avatar
Einhander Sn0m4n
Insane Railgunner
Posts: 18630
Joined: 2002-10-01 05:51am
Location: Louisiana... or Dagobah. You know, where Yoda lives.

Post by Einhander Sn0m4n »

Can't a Venator enter an atmosphere as well? In fact, I rather plainly remember seeing Venators landed on a planet's surface a few times...
Image Image
User avatar
Old Plympto
Jedi Master
Posts: 1488
Joined: 2003-06-30 11:21pm
Location: Interface 2037 Ready For Inquiry
Contact:

Post by Old Plympto »

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Can't a Venator enter an atmosphere as well? In fact, I rather plainly remember seeing Venators landed on a planet's surface a few times...
There was a Venator seen on the ground in the background in one of the establishing shots of Karchiro on Kashyyyk in ROTS.

Not to mention the one taking off from Coruscant with Obi-Wan aboard.
User avatar
Captain tycho
Has Elected to Receive
Posts: 5039
Joined: 2002-12-04 06:35pm
Location: Jewy McJew Land

Post by Captain tycho »

Are there any official pictures of a Tector SD? I'd love to see one.
Captain Tycho!
The worst fucker ever!
The Best reciever ever!
User avatar
Crossroads Inc.
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9233
Joined: 2005-03-20 06:26pm
Location: Defending Sparkeling Bishonen
Contact:

Post by Crossroads Inc. »

Captain tycho wrote:Are there any official pictures of a Tector SD? I'd love to see one.
This might fit the bill ;)
Praying is another way of doing nothing helpful
"Congratulations, you get a cookie. You almost got a fundamental English word correct." Pick
"Outlaw star has spaceships that punch eachother" Joviwan
Read "Tales From The Crossroads"!
Read "One Wrong Turn"!
User avatar
Noble Ire
The Arbiter
Posts: 5938
Joined: 2005-04-30 12:03am
Location: Beyond the Outer Rim

Post by Noble Ire »

Crossroads Inc. wrote:
Captain tycho wrote:Are there any official pictures of a Tector SD? I'd love to see one.
This might fit the bill ;)
A bit too many fighters for the role in question, me thinks. :wink:
The Rift
Stanislav Petrov- The man who saved the world
Hugh Thompson Jr.- A True American Hero
"In the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." - President Barack Obama
"May fortune favor you, for your goals are the goals of the world." - Ancient Chall valediction
User avatar
NRS Guardian
Jedi Knight
Posts: 531
Joined: 2004-09-11 09:11pm
Location: Colorado

Post by NRS Guardian »

Alan Bolte wrote: Why is there a carrier on that list?
I put the Endurance up there because it shares the same hull as the Nebula/Defender SD, and the Venator which is pretty much a carrier is up there too.
"It is not necessary to hope in order to persevere."
-William of Nassau, Prince of Orange

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.10
User avatar
NRS Guardian
Jedi Knight
Posts: 531
Joined: 2004-09-11 09:11pm
Location: Colorado

Post by NRS Guardian »

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Can't a Venator enter an atmosphere as well? In fact, I rather plainly remember seeing Venators landed on a planet's surface a few times...
NRS Guardian wrote:1. Venator SD:
Strengths: Carries lots of starfighters, good HTLs, dedicated warship, and can land on a planet.
Weaknesses: Weak hull due to all the holes for docking bays and those big docking ports.
Edit: emphasis mine.
"It is not necessary to hope in order to persevere."
-William of Nassau, Prince of Orange

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.10
User avatar
NRS Guardian
Jedi Knight
Posts: 531
Joined: 2004-09-11 09:11pm
Location: Colorado

Post by NRS Guardian »

Captain tycho wrote:Are there any official pictures of a Tector SD? I'd love to see one.
Here's a good picture of the Tector. http://www.theforce.net/swtc/Pix/dvd/zs ... yless4.jpg
And here is where it is described. http://www.theforce.net/swtc/dagger.html#destroyer5
"It is not necessary to hope in order to persevere."
-William of Nassau, Prince of Orange

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.10
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

Here's a good picture of the Tector. http://www.theforce.net/swtc/Pix/dvd/zs ... yless4.jpg
And here is where it is described. http://www.theforce.net/swtc/dagger.html#destroyer5
[McEwok (Arkady Hodge)]That's an "objectivist lie" and you know it. The picture is obviously meant to be a ventral hull refitted to act as a dorsal ISD hull. Even though I don't have any proof or official quotes to support my theory.[/McEwok (Arkady Hodge)]
:P
User avatar
NRS Guardian
Jedi Knight
Posts: 531
Joined: 2004-09-11 09:11pm
Location: Colorado

Post by NRS Guardian »

11. Allegiance SD:
Strengths: Bigger, faster, more heavily armed version of Tector, specialized for ship-to-ship combat, and few weak points.
Weaknesses: Few if any fighters, requires escort and support, designed for heavy fleet engagements, and no planetary assault capability except for BDZ.
12. Providence SD (Invisible Hand):
Strengths: Good fighter complement, lots of torpedoes, capable of BDZs, good command facilities.
Weaknesses: Large broadside hanger bay weak point, too dependent on missile armament, and droid crewed.
13. Recusant destroyer:
Strengths: Raider and support ship, powerful armament, fast, cheap, and easy to mass produce.
Weaknesses: Raider and support ship, not dedicated warship, droid crewed, skeletal or structurally weak, small reactor for a destroyer, and dependent on numerical superiority.
14. Harrow SD:
Strengths: Essentially a modernized KDY designed VSDII, dedicated warship, and good multi-role ship.
Weaknesses: Smaller destroyer design.
"It is not necessary to hope in order to persevere."
-William of Nassau, Prince of Orange

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.10
User avatar
Alan Bolte
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2611
Joined: 2002-07-05 12:17am
Location: Columbus, OH

Post by Alan Bolte »

I love how the only support for that idea is that the other ships in view are 'upright'.
Any job worth doing with a laser is worth doing with many, many lasers. -Khrima
There's just no arguing with some people once they've made their minds up about something, and I accept that. That's why I kill them. -Othar
Avatar credit
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

Allegiance SD
The Allegiance ships are SSDs, I'm afraid.
User avatar
Crossroads Inc.
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9233
Joined: 2005-03-20 06:26pm
Location: Defending Sparkeling Bishonen
Contact:

Post by Crossroads Inc. »

I've always thought they where a size between the two, I mean, there 'only' about twice the size of a standard ISD. Whats the size classifacation for a Star Dreadnaught (since its silly calling them SSD)
Praying is another way of doing nothing helpful
"Congratulations, you get a cookie. You almost got a fundamental English word correct." Pick
"Outlaw star has spaceships that punch eachother" Joviwan
Read "Tales From The Crossroads"!
Read "One Wrong Turn"!
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

I've always thought they where a size between the two, I mean, there 'only' about twice the size of a standard ISD. Whats the size classifacation for a Star Dreadnaught (since its silly calling them SSD)
Thanks to the ICS, ITW and CLOSW factbooks, we have more terms to thow around other than SD and SSD:

Allegiance ships would probably the extreme lower limit of SSDs (thus being Imperial Star Cruisers), while the Executor ships would constitute the extreme upper limit (being Star Dreadnoughts, i.e heavily armed Star Battleships)

For more info, see the Ship Classification article on SW Wiki (the one under lock-down). :P
User avatar
Glimmervoid
Jedi Master
Posts: 1344
Joined: 2005-01-29 09:00am
Location: Some were in the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm.
Contact:

Post by Glimmervoid »

VT-16 wrote:
I've always thought they where a size between the two, I mean, there 'only' about twice the size of a standard ISD. Whats the size classifacation for a Star Dreadnaught (since its silly calling them SSD)
Thanks to the ICS, ITW and CLOSW factbooks, we have more terms to thow around other than SD and SSD:

Allegiance ships would probably the extreme lower limit of SSDs (thus being Imperial Star Cruisers), while the Executor ships would constitute the extreme upper limit (being Star Dreadnoughts, i.e heavily armed Star Battleships)

For more info, see the Ship Classification article on SW Wiki (the one under lock-down). :P
Are you sure swtc says it is a Star Destroyer. I guess Saxton decided to draw the line between cruiser and destroyer after the Allegiance. Though of course since he has not put it in a book its still debatable were the line really is.
Image
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

The ITW:OT said:
"Super Star Destroyer" -- a term that covers many warship classes bigger than a Star Destroyer, from Star Cruisers to ultimate Star Dreadnaughts like Executor.
The Allegiance is referred to as an SSD in Dark Empire.

Since its class constitute the smallest SSDs seen so far, I'd say they fall into the Star Cruiser category.
Post Reply