Difference between PT vs OT Vader

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Rommie2006
Padawan Learner
Posts: 331
Joined: 2005-02-12 08:32am

Difference between PT vs OT Vader

Post by Rommie2006 »

It's pretty obvious that between ROTS and ANH, Vader undergone a distinct transformation in his character from "Whiny-Anakinish" Vader to Darth Vader, "da Man" that we all have come to known for a long time.

Most interestingly, I have observed the change in relationship between Vader & Palpatine.

In ROTS, Anakin/Vader & Palpatine were very close friends. They had a mentor-student relationship and Anakin/Vader had... dare I say a reverence for Palpatine? (At least this is what I got when watching the PT).

However, by the time of OT-era, Anakin/Vader is clearly plotting to overthrow the Emperor, evidently by his attempt to convert Luke and rule the galaxy as "Father & Son".

So why this change in relationship between Vader & Palpatine? I know it is the Sith way for the student to destroy the Master. But did anything happen in between? Perhaps those with extensive EU knowledge can shed some light...
User avatar
Ma Deuce
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4359
Joined: 2004-02-02 03:22pm
Location: Whitby, Ontario

Post by Ma Deuce »

However, by the time of OT-era, Anakin/Vader is clearly plotting to overthrow the Emperor, evidently by his attempt to convert Luke and rule the galaxy as "Father & Son".
He may have desired to overthrow Palpatine from the beginning. You might recall that in ROTS just before his battle with Obi-Wan, Anakin attempted to convince Padme to join him by saying they could overthrow the Emperor and rule the galaxy together, essentially the same argument he made to Luke over 20 years later.
Image
The M2HB: The Greatest Machinegun Ever Made.
HAB: Crew-Served Weapons Specialist


"Making fun of born-again Christians is like hunting dairy cows with a high powered rifle and scope." --P.J. O'Rourke

"A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself." --J.S. Mill
LongVin
Morally Bankrupt Asshole
Posts: 806
Joined: 2005-12-19 11:08pm

Post by LongVin »

Its probably just Anakins personality to be power hungry. It starts to exhibit itself in TPM but that could be written off because of a childs ambition. But as we get into AOTC and ROTS Anakin becomes a whiny little runt anytime something doesn't go his way or he can't do anything.

Note the "I will be the most powerful Jedi ever!" speech.
User avatar
KhyronTheBackstabber
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1673
Joined: 2002-09-06 03:52am
Location: your Mama's house

Post by KhyronTheBackstabber »

Anakin/Vader never struck me as power hungry. He always seemed to want order, stability, and to put an end to all the atrocities in the galaxy. The power for him was just a means to an end. Unfortunately for him, he was never taught the old sayings about "Absolute power", and what the road to Hell is paved with.

As for the change in the relationship, I think Vader recognized Palpatine's interest in Luke for what it was...someone who is stronger in the force to be Vader's replacement, just like he replaced Dooku. So, Vader tried to cut Palp off at the pass.
Image
MM's Zentraedi Warlord/CF's Original Predacon/JL's Mad Titan
User avatar
Shadow WarChief
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 1340
Joined: 2002-07-04 06:29am
Location: San Francisco

Post by Shadow WarChief »

KhyronTheBackstabber wrote: As for the change in the relationship, I think Vader recognized Palpatine's interest in Luke for what it was...someone who is stronger in the force to be Vader's replacement, just like he replaced Dooku. So, Vader tried to cut Palp off at the pass.
Remember though, it was Vader that came up with the idea of converting Luke.

"If he could be turned, he could become a powerful ally"
Image
Rommie2006
Padawan Learner
Posts: 331
Joined: 2005-02-12 08:32am

Post by Rommie2006 »

Shadow WarChief wrote:
KhyronTheBackstabber wrote: As for the change in the relationship, I think Vader recognized Palpatine's interest in Luke for what it was...someone who is stronger in the force to be Vader's replacement, just like he replaced Dooku. So, Vader tried to cut Palp off at the pass.
Remember though, it was Vader that came up with the idea of converting Luke.

"If he could be turned, he could become a powerful ally"
Which too implied that Vader was likely plotting behind Palpatine's back shortly after he knew that his son existed. Why else converted Luke, if not to rule the galaxy as "Father & Son"?

It just strikes me as strange really. Palpatine was in Anakin's inner circle of friends (not that he had many in the first place). To list down Anakin's close friends would be - Padme, Obi-Wan and Palpatine.
Pcm979
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 4092
Joined: 2002-10-26 12:45am

Post by Pcm979 »

*Cough* Might I point out that he set a bit of a precedent by killing the other two? :wink:
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12269
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Post by Surlethe »

I was just speculating about this; I think, at some point, Anakin learned Palpatine engineered the entire clone war. Remember, at the end of RotS, all Anakin knows is Palpatine is a Sith Lord, not that he started all the unrest in the first place. So, I was thinking, at some point between RotS and ANH, Vader learns Palpatine was behind the entire war, and has a bit of a falling-out with him.

I'm not sure if my speculation is addressed at all in the EU, and I'm sure if it is, somebody will correct me.
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
Ghost Rider
Spirit of Vengeance
Posts: 27779
Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars

Post by Ghost Rider »

Surlethe wrote:I was just speculating about this; I think, at some point, Anakin learned Palpatine engineered the entire clone war. Remember, at the end of RotS, all Anakin knows is Palpatine is a Sith Lord, not that he started all the unrest in the first place. So, I was thinking, at some point between RotS and ANH, Vader learns Palpatine was behind the entire war, and has a bit of a falling-out with him.

I'm not sure if my speculation is addressed at all in the EU, and I'm sure if it is, somebody will correct me.
He does in Dark Lord.

The big thing is they bring up in Dark Lord is that the Sith philosophy is a teacher and student, A teacher to rule, a student to covet. And no real falling out, given that in ROTS he wanted to kill the old bag.
Rommie2006 wrote:It's pretty obvious that between ROTS and ANH, Vader undergone a distinct transformation in his character from "Whiny-Anakinish" Vader to Darth Vader, "da Man" that we all have come to known for a long time.

Most interestingly, I have observed the change in relationship between Vader & Palpatine.

In ROTS, Anakin/Vader & Palpatine were very close friends. They had a mentor-student relationship and Anakin/Vader had... dare I say a reverence for Palpatine? (At least this is what I got when watching the PT).

However, by the time of OT-era, Anakin/Vader is clearly plotting to overthrow the Emperor, evidently by his attempt to convert Luke and rule the galaxy as "Father & Son".

So why this change in relationship between Vader & Palpatine? I know it is the Sith way for the student to destroy the Master. But did anything happen in between? Perhaps those with extensive EU knowledge can shed some light...
You did watch RoTS right?

Where he goes "I can kill him, we can take over!" Does not sound like a man who holds friendship highly anymore. As a Jedi Anakin was his friend, when he fully embraced becoming a Sith and saw Padme as a way to intiate the rule of two...he changed his tune faster then a whore and $1000.

So his RoTJ choice was not so out of the blue and if people think so, watch RoTS again.

Also his RoTJ choice is easy.

1. He was all but pacifying the Emperor in ESB...the novel states this practically. EU defends it, and honestly Lucas was eazsily steering this direction given he gave the seeds as far back as RoTS.

2. Here was the greatest Jedi since him, and his son to boot. And given Anakin's propensity to family, this was not an oppurtunity to let go.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!

Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all

Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
User avatar
Cykeisme
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2416
Joined: 2004-12-25 01:47pm
Contact:

Post by Cykeisme »

It's already been stated; the difference between PT Vader's and OT Vader's views are a non-issue, because there isn't any difference. The OP somehow forgot about Vader's offer to Padme to kill Sidious and rule the galaxy as husband and wife.


Regarding Surlethe's postulation and Ghost Rider mentioning that it's detailed in Dark Lord.. I did wonder about that myself, whether Vader discovered the truth about the Clone Wars.
Dark Lord seems to be packed full of important facts, cool scenes with Vader being badass, and generally everyone here thinks it's a good book. I really have to read it :D
"..history has shown the best defense against heavy cavalry are pikemen, so aircraft should mount lances on their noses and fly in tight squares to fend off bombers". - RedImperator

"ha ha, raping puppies is FUN!" - Johonebesus

"It would just be Unicron with pew pew instead of nom nom". - Vendetta, explaining his justified disinterest in the idea of the movie Allspark affecting the Death Star
User avatar
Ghost Rider
Spirit of Vengeance
Posts: 27779
Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars

Post by Ghost Rider »

Cykeisme wrote:It's already been stated; the difference between PT Vader's and OT Vader's views are a non-issue, because there isn't any difference. The OP somehow forgot about Vader's offer to Padme to kill Sidious and rule the galaxy as husband and wife.


Regarding Surlethe's postulation and Ghost Rider mentioning that it's detailed in Dark Lord.. I did wonder about that myself, whether Vader discovered the truth about the Clone Wars.
Dark Lord seems to be packed full of important facts, cool scenes with Vader being badass, and generally everyone here thinks it's a good book. I really have to read it :D
It's a decent book that covers a few niggling issues. Particularly how does Anakin/Vader actually become Darth Vader and not whinier bitch in suit, how does Palpatine deflect the accusations and insure that Vader becomes a proper Sith.

Also it dealt with some bits like Clones disobeying Order 66 as well as Jedi completely getting the warning completely wrong as well as when Obi Wan finds out whether or not Anakin survived Mustafar.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!

Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all

Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12238
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

IMHO the major difference between Vader in ROTS (both pre- and post-suit) and Vader in the OT is maturity.

Anakin and Vader in the PT act are niave about their powers and the results of their actions and whiny when they don't get what they want.

Darth Vader in the OT has had about 20 Years to think what his inpatience and impulsiveness caused so he isn't that impulsive (though if possible has even shorter temper then he had before) and used his powers to max effect rather then wasting them on needless displays of power.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12269
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Post by Surlethe »

Lord Revan wrote:IMHO the major difference between Vader in ROTS (both pre- and post-suit) and Vader in the OT is maturity.

Anakin and Vader in the PT act are niave about their powers and the results of their actions and whiny when they don't get what they want.

Darth Vader in the OT has had about 20 Years to think what his inpatience and impulsiveness caused so he isn't that impulsive (though if possible has even shorter temper then he had before) and used his powers to max effect rather then wasting them on needless displays of power.
Small detail: I wouldn't equate short temper with impulsiveness; just because somebody loses his temper doesn't mean he'll automatically act impulsively because of that. I would think that during the OT he still has a temper about as long as PT, but 20 years of training and conditioning have led him to immediately channel the anger into Dark Side force-boosts, as opposed to PT Anakin, who has Jedi conditioning against anger to inspire guilt to work through before he actually admits to himself he's angry.
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12238
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

Surlethe wrote:
Lord Revan wrote:IMHO the major difference between Vader in ROTS (both pre- and post-suit) and Vader in the OT is maturity.

Anakin and Vader in the PT act are niave about their powers and the results of their actions and whiny when they don't get what they want.

Darth Vader in the OT has had about 20 Years to think what his inpatience and impulsiveness caused so he isn't that impulsive (though if possible has even shorter temper then he had before) and used his powers to max effect rather then wasting them on needless displays of power.
Small detail: I wouldn't equate short temper with impulsiveness; just because somebody loses his temper doesn't mean he'll automatically act impulsively because of that. I would think that during the OT he still has a temper about as long as PT, but 20 years of training and conditioning have led him to immediately channel the anger into Dark Side force-boosts, as opposed to PT Anakin, who has Jedi conditioning against anger to inspire guilt to work through before he actually admits to himself he's angry.
when I was talking about Temper I was talking about Vader's habit of executing those who displease him, but exessive impulsive behavior of PT Anakin/Vader has mostly if not totally gone away.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12269
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Post by Surlethe »

Lord Revan wrote:when I was talking about Temper I was talking about Vader's habit of executing those who displease him, but exessive impulsive behavior of PT Anakin/Vader has mostly if not totally gone away.
My mistake. Still, he has twenty years of men saying "how high?" when he says "jump" to become a perfectionist regarding detailed execution of his orders. :wink:
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
Zwinmar
Jedi Master
Posts: 1107
Joined: 2005-03-24 11:55am
Location: nunyadamnbusiness

Post by Zwinmar »

I dont know if this means anything but: in the ROTS video game, there is an alternate ending were after Anakin kills Obi-wan he kills Palpatine
User avatar
Ghost Rider
Spirit of Vengeance
Posts: 27779
Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars

Post by Ghost Rider »

Zwinmar wrote:I dont know if this means anything but: in the ROTS video game, there is an alternate ending were after Anakin kills Obi-wan he kills Palpatine
Which is to appease people in wondering.

He tells Padme that they can take over. Like I said, you need look no further then the source itself. Hells, the RoTS novel goes into more detail about his plans for galatic domination and the death of one old geezer.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!

Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all

Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12269
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Post by Surlethe »

Ghost Rider wrote:
Zwinmar wrote:I dont know if this means anything but: in the ROTS video game, there is an alternate ending were after Anakin kills Obi-wan he kills Palpatine
Which is to appease people in wondering.

He tells Padme that they can take over. Like I said, you need look no further then the source itself. Hells, the RoTS novel goes into more detail about his plans for galatic domination and the death of one old geezer.
I heard somewhere pre-burnination Anakin would be quite capable of offing Palpatine: didn't George Lucas say Anakin would have been twice as powerful as Palpy, had he not been crisped?
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
Ghost Rider
Spirit of Vengeance
Posts: 27779
Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars

Post by Ghost Rider »

Surlethe wrote:
Ghost Rider wrote:
Zwinmar wrote:I dont know if this means anything but: in the ROTS video game, there is an alternate ending were after Anakin kills Obi-wan he kills Palpatine
Which is to appease people in wondering.

He tells Padme that they can take over. Like I said, you need look no further then the source itself. Hells, the RoTS novel goes into more detail about his plans for galatic domination and the death of one old geezer.
I heard somewhere pre-burnination Anakin would be quite capable of offing Palpatine: didn't George Lucas say Anakin would have been twice as powerful as Palpy, had he not been crisped?
He thinks of it, and he puts it into RoTS with Palpatine believing this train of thought.

Another bit is in Dark Lord, Palpatine still knows Anakin is just as bad ass crispy then he is non, just that he took such a blow to his ego and psyche, that he wasn't as confident as before.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!

Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all

Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
User avatar
Coyote
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 12464
Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
Contact:

Post by Coyote »

"They are here. My son is with them."

"Are you sure?"

"I have felt him."

"Strange that I have not... I wonder if your feelings in this matter are clear?"

Sounds like there's been a bit of a wariness between them for awhile. As Palpatine gets on in years and doesn't get out much anymore it is only a matter of time before Vader starts gets ideas. And as surely as Vader was maneuvering Luke to take out Palpy, so too was Palpy trying to manipulate Luke against dear ol' dad:

"Now, use you hatred! Strike him down and take your father's place at my side!"
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."


In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!

If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Post by Knife »

My observation of the PT/OT Vader has more to do with his student/Master relationship with Palpatine.

He was very defiant as a student with Obi Wan, and yet, 20 down the road, he's basically Palpy's bitch. Some where in there, Skywalker did some changing. I just can't see Jedi Anakin as subserviant to Obi as Sith Anakin was to Palpatine.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
User avatar
DesertFly
has been designed to act as a flotation device
Posts: 1381
Joined: 2005-10-18 11:35pm
Location: The Emerald City

Post by DesertFly »

I don't think he was more subserviant as much as he just learned to better hide his feelings. Vader seems much less brash and impulsive in every area than Anakin, and that includes emotional control.
Proud member of the no sigs club.
Trogdor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2553
Joined: 2003-08-08 02:44pm
Location: Strong Badia

Post by Trogdor »

Zwinmar wrote:I dont know if this means anything but: in the ROTS video game, there is an alternate ending were after Anakin kills Obi-wan he kills Palpatine
That ending doesn't quite make sense. If Anakin had emerged from his duel with Obi-Wan victorious and undamaged, he would have at least waited awhile to try and kill Palps. Remember, his main reason for stopping Mace from killing him was because he believed Palpy had the power to save Padme and his kids. Certainly Anakin would've delayed any attempts at seizing the throne until after Padme had given birth.
"I want to mow down a bunch of motherfuckers with absurdly large weapons and relative impunity - preferably in and around a skyscraper. Then I want to fight a grim battle against the unlikely duo of the Terminator and Robocop. The last level should involve (but not be limited to) multiple robo-Hitlers and a gorillasaurus rex."--Uraniun235 on his ideal FPS game

"The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant compared to the power of the Force."--Darth Vader
User avatar
Mad
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1923
Joined: 2002-07-04 01:32am
Location: North Carolina, USA
Contact:

Re: Difference between PT vs OT Vader

Post by Mad »

Rommie2006 wrote:Most interestingly, I have observed the change in relationship between Vader & Palpatine.

In ROTS, Anakin/Vader & Palpatine were very close friends. They had a mentor-student relationship and Anakin/Vader had... dare I say a reverence for Palpatine? (At least this is what I got when watching the PT).

However, by the time of OT-era, Anakin/Vader is clearly plotting to overthrow the Emperor, evidently by his attempt to convert Luke and rule the galaxy as "Father & Son".

So why this change in relationship between Vader & Palpatine? I know it is the Sith way for the student to destroy the Master. But did anything happen in between? Perhaps those with extensive EU knowledge can shed some light...
Aside from the fact that has been pointed out, that Darth Vader in RotS wanted to defeat Palpatine, if Vader discovered that Palpatine had set up everything in those 20 years, it could certainly lead to a change in a point of view.

In RotS, he was ready to turn Palpatine in. But Mace didn't trust him. Anakin panicked because he feared he was losing his only opportunity to keep Padme alive. Of course, during his panic he killed Mace, and immediately asked "what have I done?" And after that, he felt he had no choice but to obey Palpatine if he wanted to keep Padme alive. After Padme died, though, the situation changed.

At some point, Vader likely figured that had he not joined Palpatine, Padme would be dead but at least Anakin wouldn't be mostly machine. As such, Palpatine would have meant even less to Anakin than he did when he offered to overthrow the Sith Lord so that he and Padme could rule the galaxy. But because of the Emperor's power, taking him on directly wouldn't necessarily be that good of an idea, Vader would have figured.

Also, while Vader said that the Jedi were evil from his point of view, he also knew that the Sith were evil. Vader wanted to end suffering, not cause it like Palpatine had. So overthrowing the Empire and starting his own rule, where people wouldn't have to suffer, would be the best course of action as he saw it.

Of course, we know that his view on things was distorted, but I'd expect that his reasoning followed those lines given what he had observed.
Later...
User avatar
Tychu
Jedi Master
Posts: 1260
Joined: 2002-07-28 01:20am
Location: Deer Park, Long Island, New York
Contact:

Post by Tychu »

Surlethe wrote:I was just speculating about this; I think, at some point, Anakin learned Palpatine engineered the entire clone war. Remember, at the end of RotS, all Anakin knows is Palpatine is a Sith Lord, not that he started all the unrest in the first place. So, I was thinking, at some point between RotS and ANH, Vader learns Palpatine was behind the entire war, and has a bit of a falling-out with him.

I'm not sure if my speculation is addressed at all in the EU, and I'm sure if it is, somebody will correct me.
its pretty clear that Anakin should know that the Clone Wars was all a ruse. When Palpatine sends Anakin to Mustafar to destroy the Sepratists thats one clue right there. I dont know, miracuosly Palpatine knows where they are. And 2 when Anakin gets to Mustafar, Nute Gunray says that we had assurances from Lord Sidious that will be freed. thats 2. Anakin has to be one of the stupidest people if he didnt figure out there. To bad for the galaxy that Anakin already made the Clone Wars about the Empire vs Jedi.
"Boring Conversation anyway" Han Solo

"What kinda archeologist carries a weapon........Bad Example" Colonel Jack O'Neil

"My name is Olo... Hans Olo" -Dr. Daniel Jackson

"Well you did make the Farmingdale Run in less than 12 parsecs" --Personal Quote

"Just popped out for lunch" - Rowan Atkinson as Mr. Bean
Post Reply