SDN The gathering cards?

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2005-11-10 09:12pm

In further honor of this date, the cards I have made to represent myself on various boards:

In even further honor of this date:

Soontir C'boath · Post by **Soontir C'boath** » 2005-11-10 09:31pm

If I may.

A picture of Lord Yu to be used.

When put into play add a +0/+1 counter to Soontir. Add a counter every two turns until Soontir is put out of play by graveyard or back to the hand.

"His post gradually gets better every hour he's awake but he's still incoherent as Lord Yu."

If there's any/all changes you like to make that you think fits me, they're fine with me.

Noble Ire · Post by **Noble Ire** » 2005-11-10 09:52pm

Soontir C'boath · Post by **Soontir C'boath** » 2005-11-10 10:00pm

To clarify, this is Lord Yu.

Sorry about the mix-up.

Heheh, that's goood.

Edit: Oopse, I meant "posts" too. See what I mean, my mind is sooo not here.

Noble Ire · Post by **Noble Ire** » 2005-11-10 10:13pm

Sorry, generally if I don't recognize a reference, I just assume its their avatar.

brianeyci · Post by **brianeyci** » 2005-11-10 10:56pm

Anybody do the Kung-fu master yet?

<edit>Removed some of the abilities to make the card easier to read.</edit>

Brian

Tekore · Post by **Tekore** » 2005-11-10 11:07pm

brianeyci wrote:Anybody do the Kung-fu master yet?
-Picture-

Brian

I'm sorry, but I can't read all the text on the card.

-Nice cards BTW.

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2005-11-11 02:41am

Purging ASVSers
BBB

1 black destroy target original ASVS member.
must activate enchant ment at least once a turn.
if there are no original ASVSers then demote ASVSer turned Moderator or higher.

brianeyci · Post by **brianeyci** » 2005-11-11 10:29am

Brian

Vanas · Post by **Vanas** » 2005-11-14 02:33pm

Just a quick little one I thought up. I'm not up on the rules, and just can't get the symbols to work. Comments/thoughts? The idea is that the target becomes hard to kill, but every one wants them dead.

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2005-11-14 02:56pm

It should be an enchant creature if it's supposed to be attached to creatures.

Glimmervoid · Post by **Glimmervoid** » 2005-11-14 03:05pm

Rogue 9 wrote:It should be an enchant creature if it's supposed to be attached to creatures.

No it should be
Card Name
Enchantment – Aura
Enchant creature
Rest of text.

Vanas · Post by **Vanas** » 2005-11-14 05:41pm

Is that better? Does it need anything else? (other than symbols, which I can't seem to add)

Noble Ire · Post by **Noble Ire** » 2005-11-14 06:29pm

Vanas wrote:Is that better? Does it need anything else? (other than symbols, which I can't seem to add)

You can insert Symbols like so:

<T> (Tap sign)
<X> (X)
<R> (Red mana)
<U> (Blue mana)
<B> (Black mana)

and so on.

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2005-11-14 06:31pm

of course <*> and <w> work for white manna

Noble Ire · Post by **Noble Ire** » 2006-01-01 08:48pm

I apologize for the necro, but I figured the changes being undertaken by our leadership deserve immortalization in card form.

Lonestar · Post by **Lonestar** » 2006-01-01 09:57pm

Man, that's Brillant.

CDiehl · Post by **CDiehl** » 2006-01-01 11:41pm

I have an idea for a card of myself, but it's based on my LARP character, who has a good number of special abilities. I figure I can get at least four or five cards by dividing up those abilities. Should I go for it, or is it too much?

Noble Ire · Post by **Noble Ire** » 2006-01-02 12:15am

CDiehl wrote:I have an idea for a card of myself, but it's based on my LARP character, who has a good number of special abilities. I figure I can get at least four or five cards by dividing up those abilities. Should I go for it, or is it too much?

What does it entail? I could help in the design, if you need me to.

Exonerate · Post by **Exonerate** » 2006-01-02 12:42am

Glimmervoid wrote:
Rogue 9 wrote:It should be an enchant creature if it's supposed to be attached to creatures.
No it should be
Card Name
Enchantment – Aura
Enchant creature
Rest of text.

Wtf when did Auras make Enchant Creatures obsolete?

Post by **Surlethe** » 2006-01-02 01:02am

Noble Ire wrote:I apologize for the necro, but I figured the changes being undertaken by our leadership deserve immortalization in card form.
<snib>

So ... what's a peon?

CDiehl · Post by **CDiehl** » 2006-01-02 01:14am

What does it entail? I could help in the design, if you need me to.

Well, the skills I've chosen for the cards, of which there's 5 versions, work a particular way and aren't all that flexible. Also, in translating the skills into Magic terms, they get a little elaborate, using counters a lot, Some of them might be designed to address situations that wouldn't be found in Magic. Also, some of the cards have up to 5 different abilities, so I might have to edit them down. I'll PM the write-ups I've done to you, so I don't clutter the thread.

Noble Ire · Post by **Noble Ire** » 2006-01-02 01:42am

Surlethe wrote:
Noble Ire wrote:I apologize for the necro, but I figured the changes being undertaken by our leadership deserve immortalization in card form.
<snib>
So ... what's a peon?

Those of lower status or worth; underlings, or menial workers.

In other words, us.

Post by **Surlethe** » 2006-01-02 01:45am

Noble Ire wrote:Those of lower status or worth; underlings, or menial workers.

In other words, us.

Well, yes. In terms of cards, though; are you just going to have every card not a Senator+ be a peon?

Noble Ire · Post by **Noble Ire** » 2006-01-02 01:51am

Surlethe wrote:
Noble Ire wrote:Those of lower status or worth; underlings, or menial workers.

In other words, us.
Well, yes. In terms of cards, though; are you just going to have every card not a Senator+ be a peon?

If you hadn't noticed, not every SDN series MtG card here is entirely functional, or effective.

Nevertheless, I suppose I could remedy the probelm with a few new cards. I'll get back to you on that.