[EugenicHegemony] Income Tax debate advice

EugenicHegemony · Post by **EugenicHegemony** » 2006-01-22 01:22am

Plekhanov wrote:Just two more questions EugenicHegemony, do you really think the way that you’ve ‘debated’ here today is the best way to go about recruiting people for your revolution?

Do you generally find that your wall of ignorance style or arguing is successful in converting people to your cause?

I had no intention of doing anything when I came here I similarly have no intention of doing anything with my life, and am having fun living in my parents basement, dreaming of fucking my mother in the ass with you all watching...do you want me to turn on my webcam so you can see me sucking off my dog?

Post by **Surlethe** » 2006-01-22 01:23am

So, EugenicHarmony, are you going to provide the evidence I asked for?

EugenicHegemony · Post by **EugenicHegemony** » 2006-01-22 01:23am

The Spartan wrote:
EugenicHegemony wrote:Don't be a literal dick. The things that have been changed for the betterment of all will stay. The constitution s I said, is there more to keep this government in check. when they abuse it or pass things like the PA 1-2, it's a useless piece of parchment. They need that power taken from them.
Emphasis mine. Who the fuck do you think tells the goverment that they've overstepped they're bounds you idiot? It's the Supreme Court. That's the sole reason the exist: to interpret the Constitution and inform the Congress and/or President that a particular law has gone over the line.

Who decides what stays for the betterment of all? You?!

And how do you propose to eliminate them when the original Consititution includes them as a basic and necessary component you fucking idiot?

With my 17 ideas there would be no way for this government to overstep anything it'd also be a recipe for living in an agrarian state barely one step into the industrial age, but meh.

EugenicHegemony · Post by **EugenicHegemony** » 2006-01-22 01:24am

Surlethe wrote:So, EugenicHarmony, are you going to provide the evidence I asked for?

What evidence do you want coz I aint got none ya hear?

EugenicHegemony · Post by **EugenicHegemony** » 2006-01-22 01:25am

I'll come back tomorrow if I'm still allowed on to the computer. I'm going upstairs now to see if my mom will let me fuck her brains out , not that it'd take much since they do run in the family.

see ya

Plekhanov · Post by **Plekhanov** » 2006-01-22 01:25am

EugenicHegemony wrote:
Plekhanov wrote:Just two more questions EugenicHegemony, do you really think the way that you’ve ‘debated’ here today is the best way to go about recruiting people for your revolution?

Do you generally find that your wall of ignorance style or arguing is successful in converting people to your cause?
I had no intention of doing anything when I came here, and am having fun fucking with you all.

Really and were you just having 'fun' when you initially typed all that crap into your blog, and found all those wingnut essays and sites you linked to or did you actually mean it then?

SirNitram · Post by **SirNitram** » 2006-01-22 01:25am

EugenicHegemony wrote:
Plekhanov wrote:Just two more questions EugenicHegemony, do you really think the way that you’ve ‘debated’ here today is the best way to go about recruiting people for your revolution?

Do you generally find that your wall of ignorance style or arguing is successful in converting people to your cause?
I had no intention of doing anything when I came here, and am having fun fucking with you all.

I love it when they admit they're such no-life losers they purposefully troll boards. I mean, what? You're too pathetic to get a date? It's Saturday Night! The only people home are married folk and permavirgins.

And Keevan, because I swear to god the guy's undead.

The Spartan · Post by **The Spartan** » 2006-01-22 01:28am

EugenicHegemony wrote:Seasoned nothing. We don't need them deciding on what the constitution means. Jefferson's law of aggressing is something we should all follow. That would take care of 90% of it.

You think the Christian fundy nutfuckers are going to let that happen for even a second? They of course won't, and since they're representatives are the ones more or less dominating the goverment and that said representatives will be making laws with no Supreme Court to tell them that they're violating the Constitution how long do you think it will be before we devolve into a Christian theocracy?

Once again, how do you propose to eliminate the Supreme Court from this idiocy of your when you want to go by the "original Constitution" and they are an integral part of it? Oh, right, you want to unilateraly eliminate anything that isn't for the embetterment of all, because you don't have the slightest fucking clue what you're talking about.

Post by **Surlethe** » 2006-01-22 01:28am

EugenicHegemony wrote:
Plekhanov wrote:Just two more questions EugenicHegemony, do you really think the way that you’ve ‘debated’ here today is the best way to go about recruiting people for your revolution?

Do you generally find that your wall of ignorance style or arguing is successful in converting people to your cause?
I had no intention of doing anything when I came here, and am having fun fucking with you all.

Ah-hah. I now know the answer to my question; it's been nice flaming you, fuckwit. I'm sorry I was so civil to begin with, because you're admittedly a shit-for-brains lying asshole troll, you mindless, gibbering, gum-flapping imbecilic retard. Your ideas don't rate worth an ounce of weasel semen, and you're so stupid you lower the average IQ of the universe through your very existence. If you were a real man at all, you'd admit you've been beaten, but because you're nothing more than a child playing at being a grown up, and failing miserably, you've got nothing whatsoever worthwhile about it, and no doubt will, with your dazzlingly nonexistent intellect, inadequately perform at any task beyond typing with a single finger at the computer. So long, fucktard.

Post by **Surlethe** » 2006-01-22 01:31am

EugenicHegemony wrote:I'll come back tomorrow if I'm still allowed on. I'm going out.

see ya

By "out", I'm sure you mean "to the bathroom to masturbate over my stained copy of Atlas Shrugged", asshole troll.

The Spartan · Post by **The Spartan** » 2006-01-22 01:32am

EugenicHegemony wrote:With my 17 ideas there would be no way for this government to overstep anything.

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! You're still on about that horseshit? Let's see, eliminate tax... and get rid of education.... drop roads since those are paid with taxes... no more prisons to hold the criminals(those pesky taxes)... no firefighters... no police... no public transportation... jesus you're right, they wouldn't be able to overstep anything because they're be no fucking goverment anything you idiot.

Without taxes who the fuck enforces the laws? Who protects the citizens?

Jesus fucking Christ you could drown in a rain storm by looking up! Is your name Terry or something?!

Post by **Surlethe** » 2006-01-22 01:33am

The Spartan wrote:Without taxes who the fuck enforces the laws? Who protects the citizens?

And I do believe that's his ideal society. See the problem with anarcho-capitalism now?

Plekhanov · Post by **Plekhanov** » 2006-01-22 01:33am

SirNitram wrote:
EugenicHegemony wrote:
Plekhanov wrote:Just two more questions EugenicHegemony, do you really think the way that you’ve ‘debated’ here today is the best way to go about recruiting people for your revolution?

Do you generally find that your wall of ignorance style or arguing is successful in converting people to your cause?
I had no intention of doing anything when I came here, and am having fun fucking with you all.
I love it when they admit they're such no-life losers they purposefully troll boards. I mean, what? You're too pathetic to get a date? It's Saturday Night! The only people home are married folk and permavirgins.

And Keevan, because I swear to god the guy's undead.

Unless this guy just happened across that blog he linked to, read and remembered much of it, really got into character and took his name from it I don’t think he was just trolling. Maintaining a rather verbose wingnut blog just to maintain an online identity to troll with would seem rather extreme behaviour.

I tend to think he really does believe that shit and just can’t take it when people fail to be convinced by all his cutting and pasting.

Keevan_Colton · Post by **Keevan_Colton** » 2006-01-22 01:43am

Ah, I think that ought to do for now on the horsemanizing...unless he makes it back before getting banned for deliberately trolling of course.

The Spartan · Post by **The Spartan** » 2006-01-22 01:59am

Surlethe wrote:
The Spartan wrote:Without taxes who the fuck enforces the laws? Who protects the citizens?
And I do believe that's his ideal society. See the problem with anarcho-capitalism now?

Never was a time when I didn't see the problem with it.

Ironic that he is a perfect example of why his ideal society won't work... well, that and the whole bit about it being a totally unworkable system. But why quibble over minutiae?

Post by **Surlethe** » 2006-01-22 02:20am

The Spartan wrote:
Surlethe wrote:
The Spartan wrote:Without taxes who the fuck enforces the laws? Who protects the citizens?
And I do believe that's his ideal society. See the problem with anarcho-capitalism now?
Never was a time when I didn't see the problem with it.

I never doubted for a second.

Ironic that he is a perfect example of why his ideal society won't work... well, that and the whole bit about it being a totally unworkable system. But why quibble over minutiae?

I'm still slightly confused over whether he intentionally pulled those contradictions off, or whether he is actually that stupid, because if I were going to try to troll about anarchism, I'd try to make it believable at first.

Knife · Post by **Knife** » 2006-01-22 02:28am

I'm a conservative, and I think it's funny how this moron thinks the coutnry shoud work. Yeah, a bunch of farmers, working on vastly differnent land, and thinking of their own land, should be the prevailing concept of goverment in the country?

Go back to your farm, asshole. Even conservatives like me would like to drag this whole country into this centuary, kicking and screaming if need be.

Land and property is good. Society is better. You didn't enter this world by yourself, nor did you get to adulthood by yourself. You owe society a debt, and in your positon you should strive to further *advance* civilization. Not keep the status quo. ADVANCE! Asshole, not regress.

Keevan_Colton · Post by **Keevan_Colton** » 2006-01-22 02:33am

Since he was kind enough to cite his blog as evidence...

I give you, the troll:

Knife · Post by **Knife** » 2006-01-22 02:41am

BTW, ooh, another Blog! How original, it must be true if it's on a Blog!

Noble Ire · Post by **Noble Ire** » 2006-01-22 04:05am

A attestation of the troll's worldview, and hopefully, his final testament:

I hate anarchists.

Knife · Post by **Knife** » 2006-01-22 04:08am

Bwhahahahahahahhaha!

Agreed. I hate anarchists.

Post by **Beowulf** » 2006-01-22 05:28am

Anarchists - the first against the wall if their dreams come true.

The Spartan · Post by **The Spartan** » 2006-01-22 09:27am

Surlethe wrote:I'm still slightly confused over whether he intentionally pulled those contradictions off, or whether he is actually that stupid, because if I were going to try to troll about anarchism, I'd try to make it believable at first.

I'm betting on door number 2. If he didn't genuinely believe the bullshit he was spouting I get the feeling, like you, that he would have tried to make it at least internally consistent.

Or, as the quote that gets kicked around here a lot goes, "Never attribute to malice what can be explained with incompetence." Or mind numbing stupidity.

Lord Revan · Post by **Lord Revan** » 2006-01-22 10:57am

It kind of funny that in real life countries in state of anarchy seems going ecomocally worse then even some real life communist states (like China) if anarchy was ecomacally better then anything else.

Post by **Surlethe** » 2006-01-22 01:21pm

The Spartan wrote:
Surlethe wrote:I'm still slightly confused over whether he intentionally pulled those contradictions off, or whether he is actually that stupid, because if I were going to try to troll about anarchism, I'd try to make it believable at first.
I'm betting on door number 2. If he didn't genuinely believe the bullshit he was spouting I get the feeling, like you, that he would have tried to make it at least internally consistent.

Or, as the quote that gets kicked around here a lot goes, "Never attribute to malice what can be explained with incompetence." Or mind numbing stupidity.

He's like Jake99 in that respect, though not as crazy, and on the polar opposite end of the political spectrum. I wonder if he'll be back.