40k battlefield idea.

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2006-02-03 02:55am

which of these two monster battle fields would you most want to play with.

1. an exact 28mm scale replica of Gettysburg and Imperial Guard units are allowed to deploy on top of spyglass hill.

2. an exact 28mm scale replica of Stalingrad, snipers may be considered IC and deploy anywhere.

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2006-02-03 03:14am

Stalingrad is not only more befitting of a 40k setting, but it'd make for much more interesting gameplay as well.

Gettysburg was really just a huge field.

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2006-02-03 05:29am

Stalingrad, because playing on a field would be dull-ass boring: might as well just play on an empty tabletop.

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2006-02-03 05:49am

actually there is a lot of topography at Gettysburg you darn iowans. Infact the North Held the Highground, the south held some forests, and there was a small town involved in that battle.

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2006-02-03 05:52am

It would still be relatively boring and dull compared to a city.

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2006-02-03 05:56am

well spy glass hill, two round tops used for the artillery, the town of gettysburg, all the farms, the rivers, the stone fences, the forest which the south used for cover, several ridges,

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2006-02-03 05:57am

I'm getting the impression that I simply didn't supply the answer you wanted...

But allow me to repeat myself: Stalingrad is more interesting than Gettysburg.

Azazal · Post by **Azazal** » 2006-02-03 07:25am

Wait a few months for the new City of Death supliment and then you're all set for Stalingrad