Math Help: Hole to the center of the Earth
Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
-
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1725
- Joined: 2004-12-16 04:01am
Math Help: Hole to the center of the Earth
I'm having trouble wrapping my head around this problem. In it, there is a hole drilled to the center of the Earth, and an object is dropped into it. Assuming the Earth has constant density and there is no air resistance, what would be the object's velocity as it reached the center? I'm supposed to find it using conservation of energy as well as using a first-order differential equation involving dv/dr.
I understand how Gauss' Law affects the acceleration, in that the effective mass of the planet drops linearly as the object's distance from the center decreases, but I'm having trouble expressing this mathematically. Can anyone help?
I understand how Gauss' Law affects the acceleration, in that the effective mass of the planet drops linearly as the object's distance from the center decreases, but I'm having trouble expressing this mathematically. Can anyone help?
dv/dr? That's not how I'd go. Well, I trust you see how to do it with potential energy, right?
The differential energy gain from pulling out will be the force of gravity at that location times dr. You know how to get the force of gravity at any location using Gauss' law (you said as much). So integrate this differential energy gain. That's the energy method, basically.
dv/dr... I'm not seeing it. It has units of inverse time... a frequency. Well, that connects to another solution I was thinking of...
Once you do the previous part you'll note that the potential inside is that of a simple harmonic oscillator. So you can use the energy of an SHO given this 'spring constant' and amplitude.
The differential energy gain from pulling out will be the force of gravity at that location times dr. You know how to get the force of gravity at any location using Gauss' law (you said as much). So integrate this differential energy gain. That's the energy method, basically.
dv/dr... I'm not seeing it. It has units of inverse time... a frequency. Well, that connects to another solution I was thinking of...
Once you do the previous part you'll note that the potential inside is that of a simple harmonic oscillator. So you can use the energy of an SHO given this 'spring constant' and amplitude.
-
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1725
- Joined: 2004-12-16 04:01am
dv/dr seems weird to me, too, but it's in the question.drachefly wrote:dv/dr? That's not how I'd go. Well, I trust you see how to do it with potential energy, right?
The differential energy gain from pulling out will be the force of gravity at that location times dr. You know how to get the force of gravity at any location using Gauss' law (you said as much). So integrate this differential energy gain. That's the energy method, basically.
dv/dr... I'm not seeing it. It has units of inverse time... a frequency. Well, that connects to another solution I was thinking of...
Once you do the previous part you'll note that the potential inside is that of a simple harmonic oscillator. So you can use the energy of an SHO given this 'spring constant' and amplitude.
I feel silly for having to ask this, but how would one do CoE? The only thing I could think of is an integral of -G*m*4/3*pi*rho*r^2, since M as a function of r is (4/3)*pi*r^3. Is this correct?Suppose that a hole has been drilled through the center of the Earth, and that an object is dropped into this hole. Write a first-order differential equation for the object's velocity, v as a function of the distance r from the Earth's center (i.e., an equation involvind dv/dr), and solve it to determine the speed the object achieves as it reaches the center of the Earth.
- SpacedTeddyBear
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: 2002-08-20 11:54pm
- Location: San Jose, Ca
You actually don't need to do any calculus for this problem. Set the density of the earth and the density of some spherical element inside the earth equal to one another. Solve for the mass of the spherical element. Once you do that, plug that into the force between two masses. You should get something that is inversly proportional the radius of the Earth^3* the distance from the center. Then set that equal to m*a.
- SpacedTeddyBear
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: 2002-08-20 11:54pm
- Location: San Jose, Ca
- Xenophobe3691
- Sith Marauder
- Posts: 4334
- Joined: 2002-07-24 08:55am
- Location: University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
- Contact:
- Eframepilot
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1007
- Joined: 2002-09-05 03:35am
-
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1725
- Joined: 2004-12-16 04:01am
Wouldn't that only be true if Earth was an actual point-source? The amount of force the object feels actually decreases as it gets closer to the center, not increases as it would normally, so I wouldn't think you can use the same equation.Eframepilot wrote:Using conservation of energy, just use regular mgh as potential energy at the surface and equate to kinetic energy at the center, where the gravitational potential will be zero.
I'm pretty sure I don't have to use a specific equation unless it's the only one that works. Is that the best way to get an equation involving dv/dr?Xenophobe3691 wrote:Is the Diff Eq. you have to use a = v*(dv/dr)?
-
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1725
- Joined: 2004-12-16 04:01am
- Eframepilot
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1007
- Joined: 2002-09-05 03:35am
The best part about using energy is that it's always conserved under a conservative force like gravity, so the amount of potential energy of the object at the surface will be equal to the amount of kinetic energy of the object at the center. The equation P.E. = mgh is only valid at the surface, where g = GM/r^2, but that's the only place you need to use it.Grandmaster Jogurt wrote:Wouldn't that only be true if Earth was an actual point-source? The amount of force the object feels actually decreases as it gets closer to the center, not increases as it would normally, so I wouldn't think you can use the same equation.Eframepilot wrote:Using conservation of energy, just use regular mgh as potential energy at the surface and equate to kinetic energy at the center, where the gravitational potential will be zero.
You are correct that grav PE is -GMm/r, but you were about to integrate over the Force, and that has an extra r in the denominator.Grandmaster Jogurt wrote:Wait a second, isn't Gravitational PE -GMm/r? Where's the r^2 coming from? :?drachefly wrote:Not quite. r^3 / r^2 != r^2
And of course Kuroneko is right. This time, his solution was genuinely obvious and simple. Not that I'd normally choose to do it that way anyway...