Ace Pace wrote:52,00 is..alot?
AA has more. And AA is free.
AA has a fair amount, and it's free, both of which are bonus points for it, but it doesn't have more than BF2 when it comes to features. The maps are smaller, I haven't yet found one that supports 64 people well, it's graphics aren't quite up to the same level (they're still good, mind you), and BF2 has the vehicle aspect that AA doesn't.
Now, as far as realism, no, BF2 isn't amazingly realistic. You can see this right away when two rifles using the same caliber round do massively different amounts of damage. You can jump amazingly high, and until recently, dolphin diving was an amazingly abused tactic. Medics can bring people from death back to full health with shock paddles, there's no bullet drop, etc so forth and so on.
That said, it's realism light. It has just enough realism to be fun and feel realistic. This isn't a game where you can shrug off a direct hit from a grenade, turn around, a blast someone with a rocket launcher while jumping like a maniac. It's also not a game where a single bullet from any gun will kill you, or where you spawn once and that's it until the next round.
Personally, I like the blend, I think it works well, and I really enjoy the game. I'm not saying other mixes don't work, I'm also a huge fan of Rainbow Six (pre-Lockdown) and UT 2004.