Death Star fired at a star.

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Shogoki
Jedi Knight
Posts: 859
Joined: 2002-09-19 04:42pm
Location: A comfortable chair

Death Star fired at a star.

Post by Shogoki »

Well, lets asume a star much like ours, we know the super laser's output is orders of magnitud the required power to destroy an earth sized planet, so what kind of effect does that have when fired agains a star? Ultra mega sun flares? does it dissrupt the sun enough for it to eventually become a very dim star, what happens?
User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

I think we've done this before, and IIRC, the consensus was that more or less little would actually happen.
Image
I believe in a sign of Zeta.

[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]

"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
User avatar
Icehawk
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1852
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:16pm
Location: Canada

Post by Icehawk »

Actually, in one of the novels, think it might of been "Labyrinth of Evil" it was mentioned that a prototype of the death star or at least its main weapon was fired at a star and it caused a massive solar eruption which was big enough to spew ejecta all the way to one of the planets in the system which resulted in the local population being wiped out.
"The Cosmos is expanding every second everyday, but their minds are slowly shrinking as they close their eyes and pray." - MC Hawking
"It's like a kids game. A morbid, blood-soaked Tetris game..." - Mike Rowe (Dirty Jobs)
User avatar
Elheru Aran
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13073
Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
Location: Georgia

Post by Elheru Aran »

Not quite. The consensus was that bad shit *might* happen; you are, after all, dumping a hell of a lot of energy into there... however, a star is already producing astronomical amounts of energy, a few more E^10's of joules isn't going to do that much. :P
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
User avatar
Noble Ire
The Arbiter
Posts: 5938
Joined: 2005-04-30 12:03am
Location: Beyond the Outer Rim

Post by Noble Ire »

Icehawk wrote:Actually, in one of the novels, think it might of been "Labyrinth of Evil" it was mentioned that a prototype of the death star or at least its main weapon was fired at a star and it caused a massive solar eruption which was big enough to spew ejecta all the way to one of the planets in the system which resulted in the local population being wiped out.
Medstar 2: Jedi Healer, actually. Wiped out the Equanii homeworld, IIRC.
The Rift
Stanislav Petrov- The man who saved the world
Hugh Thompson Jr.- A True American Hero
"In the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." - President Barack Obama
"May fortune favor you, for your goals are the goals of the world." - Ancient Chall valediction
Lukedanieljames
Padawan Learner
Posts: 240
Joined: 2005-08-23 01:21pm

Post by Lukedanieljames »

The gravitational binding energy of a star is 10e41, a trillion times more powerful than 1 superlast shot
User avatar
Eframepilot
Jedi Master
Posts: 1007
Joined: 2002-09-05 03:35am

Post by Eframepilot »

Actually one superlaser shot is about 1e38 joules, "only" 1/10,000th of the figure you gave for the star's gravitational binding energy.

Even with the bare-bones minimum estimate of 1e32 joules that ignores the speed of the explosion, the Death Star still puts out many orders of magnitude more energy than a star does in a year. That would definitely cause an enormous disruption like a nova event; it could very well blow off the outer layers of the star entirely.
Shogoki
Jedi Knight
Posts: 859
Joined: 2002-09-19 04:42pm
Location: A comfortable chair

Post by Shogoki »

Like Eframepilot suggests, i think there would be more than moderate consequences, but unsure of the effects. More importantly, could firing the super laser at a sun be a quick and effective way to capture most of the equipment and mineral resourses in an entire system? This is ignoring the loss of life, obviously.
User avatar
Cykeisme
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2416
Joined: 2004-12-25 01:47pm
Contact:

Post by Cykeisme »

As Eframepilot said, it might blow off significant amounts of material from the outer layers of the star.
Of course, since the energy is injected into what is relatively a highly localized point, perhaps the material will be ejected from a more localized area on the star (rather than the mass coming uniformly across the star's surface).

I assume this is what happened to the Equanii homeworld. The superlaser test fired from the vicinity of the planet caused a wave of solar matter to be released back in its general direction. Some of it exceeded the star's escape velocity, and it fried the world on its way outsystem.


While the Death Star puts out orders of magnitude more enegy than a star does in a significant period of time, I'm not sure what the significance of this fact is. Even if a star put out no energy at all, the Death Star would still have to work on counteracting its gravitational binding energy the same way, would it not?
"..history has shown the best defense against heavy cavalry are pikemen, so aircraft should mount lances on their noses and fly in tight squares to fend off bombers". - RedImperator

"ha ha, raping puppies is FUN!" - Johonebesus

"It would just be Unicron with pew pew instead of nom nom". - Vendetta, explaining his justified disinterest in the idea of the movie Allspark affecting the Death Star
OmegaGuy
Retarded Spambot
Posts: 1076
Joined: 2005-12-02 09:23pm

Post by OmegaGuy »

A star is a lot less dense than a planet, isn't it possible the beam would just go right through the star and come out the other side?
User avatar
Kane Starkiller
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1510
Joined: 2005-01-21 01:39pm

Post by Kane Starkiller »

OmegaGuy wrote:A star is a lot less dense than a planet, isn't it possible the beam would just go right through the star and come out the other side?
Actually the sun's core has a density of 150,000kg/m3 or 27 times denser than Earth.
As for the beam effects the sun already contains 10^41J of energy in the form of heat and radiation so the input of 10^38J would do no appreciable "damage" to the sun.
But if the forces of evil should rise again, to cast a shadow on the heart of the city.
Call me. -Batman
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

You'd get a CME. Beyond that, not much.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
Lukedanieljames
Padawan Learner
Posts: 240
Joined: 2005-08-23 01:21pm

Post by Lukedanieljames »

according to this site, the superlaser has a power of about 4e32 J, i'm not sure where your getting 10e38, regardless, its not enough power

its not like we're saying, "its almost enough power" or its "50% of the power needed"

its between 10,000 and 1.8 trillion times not enough power, huge difference
User avatar
The Nomad
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1839
Joined: 2002-08-08 11:28am
Location: Cheeseland

Post by The Nomad »

Lukedanieljames wrote: the superlaser has a power of about 4e32 J,
Power is measured in watts, dolt.
It's the absolute possible minimum energy dished out by the DS, and equivalent to the gravitational binding energy of the planet ( the minimum amount of energy imparted so that it doesn't reform through gravity ).
See here
i'm not sure where your getting 10e38,
Kinematic analysis of Alderaan's fragments being tossed around at c-fractional velocities.
See here

regardless, its not enough power
True enough.
RThurmont
Jedi Master
Posts: 1243
Joined: 2005-07-09 01:58pm
Location: Desperately trying to find a local restaurant that serves foie gras.

Post by RThurmont »

Can the superlaser be left "on" for a sustained length of time, and if so, would prolonged exposure to a superlaser make any difference in terms of the effect?
"Here's a nickel, kid. Get yourself a better computer."
User avatar
Spice Runner
Jedi Knight
Posts: 767
Joined: 2004-07-10 05:40pm
Location: At a space station near you

Post by Spice Runner »

What about tractor beams? Does the SW universe have sufficiently powerful tractor beam tecnology to be able to rip apart a star?
User avatar
Icehawk
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1852
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:16pm
Location: Canada

Post by Icehawk »

RThurmont wrote:Can the superlaser be left "on" for a sustained length of time, and if so, would prolonged exposure to a superlaser make any difference in terms of the effect?
Nope, Death Star shots only last a few seconds and then they have a significant recharge time before they can build up the energy for another shot. The DS2 was able to do lower yield shots to take out heavy cap ships in one blast but even that had something like a 2-5 minute recharge time between each shot IIRC.
What about tractor beams? Does the SW universe have sufficiently powerful tractor beam tecnology to be able to rip apart a star?
They don't need to, they built the Sun Crusher which was a relatively small ship that fired technobabble torpedoes which were able to cause stars to go supernova.
"The Cosmos is expanding every second everyday, but their minds are slowly shrinking as they close their eyes and pray." - MC Hawking
"It's like a kids game. A morbid, blood-soaked Tetris game..." - Mike Rowe (Dirty Jobs)
Marko Dash
Jedi Knight
Posts: 719
Joined: 2006-01-29 03:42am
Location: south carolina, USA
Contact:

Post by Marko Dash »

Spice Runner wrote:What about tractor beams? Does the SW universe have sufficiently powerful tractor beam tecnology to be able to rip apart a star?

centerpoint maybe, but not a normal anti-ship one
If a black-hawk flies over a light show and is not harmed, does that make it immune to lasers?
User avatar
Cos Dashit
Jedi Knight
Posts: 659
Joined: 2006-01-30 03:29pm
Location: Skipping around the edge of an event horizon.

Post by Cos Dashit »

Cykeisme wrote:As Eframepilot said, it might blow off significant amounts of material from the outer layers of the star.
Of course, since the energy is injected into what is relatively a highly localized point, perhaps the material will be ejected from a more localized area on the star (rather than the mass coming uniformly across the star's surface).
If material did indeed blow off the sun, what effect would it have on the Death Star?
Please forgive any idiotic comments, stupid observations, or dumb questions in above post, for I am but a college student with little real world experience.
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Spice Runner wrote:What about tractor beams? Does the SW universe have sufficiently powerful tractor beam tecnology to be able to rip apart a star?
We have no idea the strength of SW tractor beams. I can't even think of how you would figure them out beyond comparing the force a ship being pulled in would exert via its engines. Hopefully some day Dr Saxton will put up something expalining some other method to do it, or somesuch.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Cos Dashit wrote:
Cykeisme wrote:As Eframepilot said, it might blow off significant amounts of material from the outer layers of the star.
Of course, since the energy is injected into what is relatively a highly localized point, perhaps the material will be ejected from a more localized area on the star (rather than the mass coming uniformly across the star's surface).
If material did indeed blow off the sun, what effect would it have on the Death Star?
None whatso ever. The first Death Star survived getting pasted with the debris from Alderaan. This is significantly more momentum and energy then one would see from a CME. Particularily the energy part, in fact its mroe then the power of the entire star.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Cykeisme
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2416
Joined: 2004-12-25 01:47pm
Contact:

Post by Cykeisme »

Icehawk wrote:
RThurmont wrote:Can the superlaser be left "on" for a sustained length of time, and if so, would prolonged exposure to a superlaser make any difference in terms of the effect?
Nope, Death Star shots only last a few seconds and then they have a significant recharge time before they can build up the energy for another shot. The DS2 was able to do lower yield shots to take out heavy cap ships in one blast but even that had something like a 2-5 minute recharge time between each shot IIRC.
Aye, the fact that the Death Star is stated to require roughly a day between planet-killing shots implies that its hypermatter power generators take that much time to charge energy-storage capacitors (the exact nature we can only guess) of some sort.

So assuming the superlaser itself can handle the heat and stress from firing a longer blast, the limitation to how long the superlaser can be left "on" is the same limitation for the total amount of energy we can inject into a target at once: the capacity of the capacitors that feed the superlaser.
"..history has shown the best defense against heavy cavalry are pikemen, so aircraft should mount lances on their noses and fly in tight squares to fend off bombers". - RedImperator

"ha ha, raping puppies is FUN!" - Johonebesus

"It would just be Unicron with pew pew instead of nom nom". - Vendetta, explaining his justified disinterest in the idea of the movie Allspark affecting the Death Star
User avatar
Wyrm
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2206
Joined: 2005-09-02 01:10pm
Location: In the sand, pooping hallucinogenic goodness.

Post by Wyrm »

"CME"?
Darth Wong on Strollers vs. Assholes: "There were days when I wished that my stroller had weapons on it."
wilfulton on Bible genetics: "If two screaming lunatics copulate in front of another screaming lunatic, the result will be yet another screaming lunatic. 8)"
SirNitram: "The nation of France is a theory, not a fact. It should therefore be approached with an open mind, and critically debated and considered."

Cornivore! | BAN-WATCH CANE: XVII | WWJDFAKB? - What Would Jesus Do... For a Klondike Bar? | Evil Bayesian Conspiracy
User avatar
DesertFly
has been designed to act as a flotation device
Posts: 1381
Joined: 2005-10-18 11:35pm
Location: The Emerald City

Post by DesertFly »

Coronal Mass Ejection

Material from the star's corona (the outer layer.)
Proud member of the no sigs club.
Lukedanieljames
Padawan Learner
Posts: 240
Joined: 2005-08-23 01:21pm

Post by Lukedanieljames »

Ender wrote:
Cos Dashit wrote:
Cykeisme wrote:As Eframepilot said, it might blow off significant amounts of material from the outer layers of the star.
Of course, since the energy is injected into what is relatively a highly localized point, perhaps the material will be ejected from a more localized area on the star (rather than the mass coming uniformly across the star's surface).
If material did indeed blow off the sun, what effect would it have on the Death Star?
None whatso ever. The first Death Star survived getting pasted with the debris from Alderaan. This is significantly more momentum and energy then one would see from a CME. Particularily the energy part, in fact its mroe then the power of the entire star.
are you saying the deathstar could literally fly into a star without damage?

And where is the proof of this claim that CME would not harm the deathstar?
Post Reply