[Psyborg] Size of the Star Wars Galixy?

Psyborg · Post by **Psyborg** » 2006-02-27 08:06pm

SirNitram wrote:
Psyborg wrote:Why don't you prove that the average galixy is larger than 10,000LY across.
Because you made the claim.

D. R. 6

If you are asked for evidence to support a claim you've made, you should either produce this evidence or concede the point until such time as you can produce this evidence. People who consistently ignore requests for evidence to support their claims (particularly contentious claims) are not looked upon kindly here.

For ever astronimy web site it lists at least some info on the size distribution of galixies. For every one of 100,000LY there are 100 less than 10,000LY across. For every one of 10,000 there are 100 of ~1,000LY. You do any kind of analysis you like but the numbers will show that the average is less than 10,000LY across.
I see you're not going to support your claim, so you were, in fact, lying again.

So far it has all been from memory. I have to leave for the rest of the week but when I get back I will post links and text from some of the various astronomical web sites. It never occured to me that all of the space fans on this board would be ignorant of these facts. Back next Friday or saterday after noon. GAG.

Lord Zentei · Post by **Lord Zentei** » 2006-02-27 08:06pm

Psyborg wrote:
Lord Zentei wrote:
Psyborg wrote:I did not say minimalist ever. My possition is that modest could not be used by normal people to discribe a galixy that is in the top one percent of galixies by size. 120,000LY is certainly deep into the 99 %tile and as such no rational person could call it "Modest" could they?
There are 6 or 7 types of spiral galaxy and they come in all sizes. so if there is some canon deffinition of which type of spiral galaxy it is then modest must mean smaller than average. One of the other poster's stated that "Modest" could also mean "Average". I do not see how any of the deffinitions posted so far might be construed to mean this but if it is and the average is less than 10,000LY across, how does that help your side?
Unless it is a given that it is a spiral galaxy.

Wait a sec: I can't seem to see anything of mine in all this mess... Why does my name appear in the quote tag?

SirNitram · Post by **SirNitram** » 2006-02-27 08:08pm

Psyborg wrote:So far it has all been from memory.

Then you admit to violating a posted rule you implicitly agreed to follow by posting here.

I have to leave for the rest of the week but when I get back I will post links and text from some of the various astronomical web sites.

Actually, I doubt you will. The reason is, I now have your confession to breaking the rules of this site, and you can rest assured it will be presented to the Senate for consideration in your banning.

It never occured to me that all of the space fans on this board would be ignorant of these facts. Back next Friday or saterday after noon. GAG.

The facts are simply not what you hallucinate them to be. It's that simple; we're not ignorant, you're just a liar.

Post by **Surlethe** » 2006-02-27 08:09pm

Psyborg wrote:So far it has all been from memory. I have to leave for the rest of the week but when I get back I will post links and text from some of the various astronomical web sites. It never occured to me that all of the space fans on this board would be ignorant of these facts. Back next Friday or saterday after noon. GAG.

I suspect you will never be back. I suggest you please find the links and texts now; otherwise, I will verbally tear your scrotum from your body and cram it down your throat.

RedImperator · Post by **RedImperator** » 2006-02-27 08:09pm

Surlethe wrote:You know, it appears psyborg is mechanically going through the thread and selectively replying to various rebuttals; am I incorrect in presuming this is a common troll technique?

I know he seems to be completely ignoring direct orders from two supermods. Perhaps he thinks Nitram and I are playing around. I'd be happy to disabuse him, as I'm sure Nitram would be.

RedImperator · Post by **RedImperator** » 2006-02-27 08:12pm

Psyborg wrote:So far it has all been from memory. I have to leave for the rest of the week but when I get back I will post links and text from some of the various astronomical web sites. It never occured to me that all of the space fans on this board would be ignorant of these facts. Back next Friday or saterday after noon. GAG.

Your ban poll is only going to have a three day timer. Your account will be locked down and your corpse will be on display in Parting Shots before you return from your imaginary vacation. You basically have tonight to back up your claims, and then the poll goes up.

Sonnenburg · Post by **Sonnenburg** » 2006-02-27 08:22pm

If only there were an astrophysicist who could comment on the size of the Star Wars galaxy....

+http://www.theforce.net/swtc/astro.html#galaxy

Batman · Post by **Batman** » 2006-02-27 08:25pm

Eek. More of this dreaded 'evidence' filth. Boo, Chuck, boo.
*throws rotten tomato batarang at Sonnenburg in Psywusses' name*

Post by **Surlethe** » 2006-02-27 08:25pm

Sonnenburg wrote:If only there were an astrophysicist who could comment on the size of the Star Wars galaxy....

+http://www.theforce.net/swtc/astro.html#galaxy

But that's not valid! Everybody knows Saxton inflated the figures to make Wars look better than Trek!

Achilles · Post by **Achilles** » 2006-02-27 08:28pm

Ban Poll? I gave him the honor of my sword....off to the river Styx with you psytroll. Ignore supermods, refuse to give evidence despite repeated demands and now a mythical vacation? You won't have eyes tonight, you won't have ears or a tongue and all the dead will know this is Psyborg the fool who thought he trolled SD.Net.

The Ban Hammer has fallen.

Lord Zentei · Post by **Lord Zentei** » 2006-02-27 08:28pm

Surlethe wrote:
Sonnenburg wrote:If only there were an astrophysicist who could comment on the size of the Star Wars galaxy....

+http://www.theforce.net/swtc/astro.html#galaxy
But that's not valid! Everybody knows Saxton inflated the figures to make Wars look better than Trek!

The bullshit they will come up with.

Post by **Surlethe** » 2006-02-27 08:30pm

Buh-bye, psyborg. Have fun on your permanent vacation.

Lord Zentei · Post by **Lord Zentei** » 2006-02-27 08:31pm

Achilles wrote:Ban Poll? I gave him the honor of my sword....off to the river Styx with you psytroll. Ignore supermods, refuse to give evidence despite repeated demands and now a mythical vacation? You won't have eyes tonight, you won't have ears or a tongue and all the dead will know this is Psyborg the fool who thought he trolled SD.Net.

The Ban Hammer has fallen.

Hallowed are the admins...

RedImperator · Post by **RedImperator** » 2006-02-27 08:32pm

Off to Parting Shots we go. Banaton 2006 rolls right along, and what a fine time we're all having.

Told you so, Psyborg.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2006-02-28 02:19pm

No doubt this retard from Rockford Illinois will now run around saying that he was banned for being a Trekkie rather than being shitcanned for dishonesty. It seems to be a popular lie among trolls.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2006-03-04 03:51am

Guess what: retard boy just E-mailed me:

George Gilewski wrote:Name: George Gilewski
E-Mail: geogil@sbcglobal.net
Subject: Why was I banned?

Dont you give any sort of warning before you dismiss someone?

I responded as follows:

I wrote:You had plenty of warning, moron. You were warned repeatedly to stop breaking the rule about either providing evidence or conceding until such time as you can do so. Grow a brain.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

[Psyborg] Size of the Star Wars Galixy?

Re: Since it is very hard to prove the negitive,

Re: Since it is very hard to prove the negitive,

Re: Since it is very hard to prove the negitive,

Re: Since it is very hard to prove the negitive,