Ships of the Line vs. The Soviet Union (Old Theory)
Moderator: Vympel
- The Yosemite Bear
- Mostly Harmless Nutcase (Requiescat in Pace)
- Posts: 35211
- Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
- Location: Dave's Not Here Man
Ships of the Line vs. The Soviet Union (Old Theory)
Basicly the tactical doctorine of the Star Trek Galaxy comes down to the WWI and before British Empire's "Ships of the Line", with Defiants as the battlecruiser, only just beginning to start work on carriers, etc. The whole way of their designs, tactics, and operation seems to echo that.
The Galactic Empire Tends to respond with the Quanity has a Quality all it's own doctrine of the Post WWII Russian Navy. The massive salvo's of turbolaser overkill, ungodly numbers of TIE's, echo the missile volly's and fighter hoards of the Soviet Union.
Even if the weapon's weren't so much deadlier, from a tactical standpoint the Federation is hopelessly outclassed. Many of their casualties against the Dominion were showing that they were facing a foe that knew how to use small craft. Even the Federation & Dominion fighters aren't really fighters, their PT boats.
The Galactic Empire Tends to respond with the Quanity has a Quality all it's own doctrine of the Post WWII Russian Navy. The massive salvo's of turbolaser overkill, ungodly numbers of TIE's, echo the missile volly's and fighter hoards of the Soviet Union.
Even if the weapon's weren't so much deadlier, from a tactical standpoint the Federation is hopelessly outclassed. Many of their casualties against the Dominion were showing that they were facing a foe that knew how to use small craft. Even the Federation & Dominion fighters aren't really fighters, their PT boats.
The scariest folk song lyrics are "My Boy Grew up to be just like me" from cats in the cradle by Harry Chapin
- The Yosemite Bear
- Mostly Harmless Nutcase (Requiescat in Pace)
- Posts: 35211
- Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
- Location: Dave's Not Here Man
- Grand Admiral Thrawn
- Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
- Posts: 5755
- Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
- Location: Canada
- The Yosemite Bear
- Mostly Harmless Nutcase (Requiescat in Pace)
- Posts: 35211
- Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
- Location: Dave's Not Here Man
WWI British warships
Pardon me for jumping in here (I am new) but a couple of questions...
If you allow the Kirov to use nukes I would agree with you but if you limit her to conventional warheads it is unlikely she could sink the Dreadnought.
Dreadnoughts or super dreadnaughts as the later classes (Queen Elizabeth Class, Revenge and so forth were designed to take many heavy shell hits (The warspite survived over 30 heavy shell hits with no lose in fighting abilitly at Jutland and the Kirov only carries 40 missiles in her magazine.
On the other hand if the Dreadnought coud close to effective range (about 20,000 yards) or 40,000 years for more modern ships (HMS Renown hit a Italian Battleship at 42,000 yards in WW2)..Just my 2 cents but I think the Imperial Ships are like the British Battleship, big powerrful and slow against a force made up of cruisers and destroyers..they can hit the ships but unlikely they can do much damage...but there are several instances recorded of Battleships (The Imperials engaging cruisers (Star Fleet) and the Battleships sink the cruisers with two or three shots)....
Chris
If you allow the Kirov to use nukes I would agree with you but if you limit her to conventional warheads it is unlikely she could sink the Dreadnought.
Dreadnoughts or super dreadnaughts as the later classes (Queen Elizabeth Class, Revenge and so forth were designed to take many heavy shell hits (The warspite survived over 30 heavy shell hits with no lose in fighting abilitly at Jutland and the Kirov only carries 40 missiles in her magazine.
On the other hand if the Dreadnought coud close to effective range (about 20,000 yards) or 40,000 years for more modern ships (HMS Renown hit a Italian Battleship at 42,000 yards in WW2)..Just my 2 cents but I think the Imperial Ships are like the British Battleship, big powerrful and slow against a force made up of cruisers and destroyers..they can hit the ships but unlikely they can do much damage...but there are several instances recorded of Battleships (The Imperials engaging cruisers (Star Fleet) and the Battleships sink the cruisers with two or three shots)....
Chris
- Ghost Rider
- Spirit of Vengeance
- Posts: 27779
- Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
- Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars
Huh...Imperial Star Destroyers are shown to be quite fast for something of that much bulk.
And as for the Federation...so far they are not really in the same league...by a long shot.
As for the match up...like GAT said seconds.
I mean the Federation does not make a warship(I mean I remember some time ago how a people would rework the Federation to a more militaristic design.) and truly the make pleasure cruisers with a huge amount of anemities and call it a warship because it's go a few more guns.
And as for the Federation...so far they are not really in the same league...by a long shot.
As for the match up...like GAT said seconds.
I mean the Federation does not make a warship(I mean I remember some time ago how a people would rework the Federation to a more militaristic design.) and truly the make pleasure cruisers with a huge amount of anemities and call it a warship because it's go a few more guns.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!
Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all
Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all
Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
Dreadnought
I don't think you can say that the Dreadnought would sink in seconds...'
Here is a link to the Operation Crossroads History Site:
http://www.history.navy.mil/ac/bikini/bikini2.htm
This was a test conducted after WWII where 2 atomtic bombs were dropped on a fleet of surplus naval ships including several battleships just a few years younger than the dreadnought and they all survived both tests.....The point being Battleships were designed to fight Battleships..ships like the Kirov were designed to fight a different emeny (The idea was for them to stand at long rnage from our carrier battlegroups and overshelm them with missile fire..
The idea that one missile can sink a warship got some support in the battle of the Falkians when the HMS sheffield was hit with an exocert missile and sunk but that was a modern warship not a battlewagon..
I beleive that the Imperial ship SDS would easily defeat a ST ship one on one but not in a matter of seconds....
Chris[/url]
Here is a link to the Operation Crossroads History Site:
http://www.history.navy.mil/ac/bikini/bikini2.htm
This was a test conducted after WWII where 2 atomtic bombs were dropped on a fleet of surplus naval ships including several battleships just a few years younger than the dreadnought and they all survived both tests.....The point being Battleships were designed to fight Battleships..ships like the Kirov were designed to fight a different emeny (The idea was for them to stand at long rnage from our carrier battlegroups and overshelm them with missile fire..
The idea that one missile can sink a warship got some support in the battle of the Falkians when the HMS sheffield was hit with an exocert missile and sunk but that was a modern warship not a battlewagon..
I beleive that the Imperial ship SDS would easily defeat a ST ship one on one but not in a matter of seconds....
Chris[/url]
- Ghost Rider
- Spirit of Vengeance
- Posts: 27779
- Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
- Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars
But calculations show that a GCS does not even have the shield power to resist a single MTL.
Literally one shot=one kill
When raw math tells you that your ship can only resist so many Mega Tons...and something with Giga Tons is coming towards you.
Literally one shot=one kill
When raw math tells you that your ship can only resist so many Mega Tons...and something with Giga Tons is coming towards you.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!
Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all
Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all
Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
I think the topic was on the doctrine of the federation vs the empire, the mainline cruisers and battleships of the feddies being like the Soverigan/galaxy and cruisers like the ambassadar and nebula.
the imperial fleet I think you had nailed down though. However the sheer technical difference made the federation fleet rather unsuited to even survive engagement with imperial forces.
the imperial fleet I think you had nailed down though. However the sheer technical difference made the federation fleet rather unsuited to even survive engagement with imperial forces.
"a single death is a tragedy, a million deaths are a statistic"-Joseph Stalin
"No plan survives contact with the enemy"-Helmuth Von Moltke
"Women prefer stories about one person dying slowly. Men prefer stories of many people dying quickly."-Niles from Frasier.
"No plan survives contact with the enemy"-Helmuth Von Moltke
"Women prefer stories about one person dying slowly. Men prefer stories of many people dying quickly."-Niles from Frasier.
Dreadnought
That is true
One shot and burning starsship (if there is anything left to burn)
One shot and burning starsship (if there is anything left to burn)
Re: WWI British warships
You are gravely mistaken.macman wrote:
If you allow the Kirov to use nukes I would agree with you but if you limit her to conventional warheads it is unlikely she could sink the Dreadnought.
The Dreadnought armor belt is pathetic by modern missile penetration standards.Dreadnoughts or super dreadnaughts as the later classes (Queen Elizabeth Class, Revenge and so forth were designed to take many heavy shell hits (The warspite survived over 30 heavy shell hits with no lose in fighting abilitly at Jutland and the Kirov only carries 40 missiles in her magazine.
Belt:4-11 inches midship: 98mm-270mm, 2.5 inches end: 61mm approx
Deck: 3 inches altogehter: 74mm
Turrets: 270mm face
Conning tower: 270mm face
Modern anti-tank missiles a fraction of the size of Kirov's Granit (SHIPWRECK) can penetrate all of that with ease- starting fires and dooming the ship. The Vikhr-M is rated at 900mm RHA penetration. The much more massive SHIPWRECK will cut through it like a knife through butter. There's a reason why they don't bother with these massive armor belts anymore. The same is true of the Iowa battleship cultists who think it can shrug off modern anti-ship missile hits are clearly ignorant.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
Forgive the conversion error. I was accidentally putting in 24.5 instead of 25.4. Still, it makes no difference.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
Dreadnought
I do not disagree that these weapons would penterate the armor, my point is that these ships were designed to take many hits like this and still survive and function.....
The main reason that Battleships are not used anymore (except they are quite good at shore bombardment is that aircraft can overwhelm and sink any Battleship long before it gets in range...a good case being the Yamato at the end of WW2....
thanks
The main reason that Battleships are not used anymore (except they are quite good at shore bombardment is that aircraft can overwhelm and sink any Battleship long before it gets in range...a good case being the Yamato at the end of WW2....
thanks
Re: Dreadnought
A hit from an early 20th century 12 inch shell (I'm presuming that the Dreadnought had the armor to stand up to its own guns) and a 1980s supersonic missile that weighs 7,000kg isn't exactly equivalent. One hit would be enough to render her combat ineffective.macman wrote:I do not disagree that these weapons would penterate the armor, my point is that these ships were designed to take many hits like this and still survive and function.....
That's what I usually hear, Sea Skimmer may have more on that matter- suffice to say that the battleship in WW2 was by no means the sitting duck she was popularly made out to be- a surprising number remained in service after WW2 but a burning issue was the cost of upgrading them- proposals often including removing some of the 16'' turrets on the Iowa for example, which would cost an enormous amount.The main reason that Battleships are not used anymore (except they are quite good at shore bombardment is that aircraft can overwhelm and sink any Battleship long before it gets in range...a good case being the Yamato at the end of WW2....
thanks
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Another clueless battleship fan. I've slaughtered so many its no longer fun. But since this one doesn’t seem very rapid I'll be nice and explain things and his massive errors in detail.
Total weight of heavy shellfire, 11,622 approximately pounds
Total weight of explosives contained within: approximately 430 pounds
Now lets compare that with Kirov's main armament, the P-700
P-700 weight: 15,000 pounds
P-700 warhead: 1,650 pounds
So a single P-700 impact has a greater punch then all the fire Warspite took at Jutland. Furthermore between 1/3 and ½ of that weight is rocket fuel. Most will be unburned on impact and will be ignited and spread by the blast though out the ship. This alone will be fatal, the equipment needed effectively fight rocket fuel fires will no t exist until the mid 60's, and as it is a WW1 warship would be hard pressed to cope with AVGAS fires.
Kirov does not carry 40 missiles. She has 20 P-700 anti ship missiles, 96 S-300's which can be fired as SSM's as well, 40 Osa's, which can also be, used as SSM's and 2 Metel missiles which delivery small torpedoes. They can also be used against surface ships.
Renown didn't hit a battleship or anything at 42,000 yards. Her guns can only reach out to 28,000 yards and in any case the longest range hit by a capital vessel on another was at about 26,000 yards.
Here is how the battle is going to really go. One of Kirov's Ka-27's finds the battleship about 100 miles off. Kirov launches one P-700 missile against it. The missile blasts though the belt armor and causes massive damage along with a huge fire. The crew begins abandoning ship about 10 minutes later and within a half hour the fires have reached the magazines and destroy the already combat ineffective ship.
Hell even without her P-700's Kirov can start the same massive fires with LOS S-300 fire and if you take away missiles completely she can still just fire a couple 21 inch torpedoes over the side and blow the thing out of the water. A single hit would snap the keel and that's the end of it.
Even ignoring all that, the AT-6 missiles her helicopters can carry could easily destroy every main battery turret and leave the ship defenseless against anything bigger then a pre 1900 torpedo boat.
Incorrect. She will utterly ass rape the Dreadnought, and nineteen other cap ships of her vintage with P-700's. Then it's another eight or so with S-300's, then a couple more with torpedoes. The Kirov has the ability to wipe out the entire British Grand Fleet battleline.macman wrote: If you allow the Kirov to use nukes I would agree with you but if you limit her to conventional warheads it is unlikely she could sink the Dreadnought.
Actually Warspite took 15 hits from 11.1 and 12-inch guns at Jutland. She suffered the loss of one main battery gun, several secondary guns and extensive damage above the armor deck.Dreadnoughts or super dreadnaughts as the later classes (Queen Elizabeth Class, Revenge and so forth were designed to take many heavy shell hits (The warspite survived over 30 heavy shell hits with no lose in fighting abilitly at Jutland and the Kirov only carries 40 missiles in her magazine
Total weight of heavy shellfire, 11,622 approximately pounds
Total weight of explosives contained within: approximately 430 pounds
Now lets compare that with Kirov's main armament, the P-700
P-700 weight: 15,000 pounds
P-700 warhead: 1,650 pounds
So a single P-700 impact has a greater punch then all the fire Warspite took at Jutland. Furthermore between 1/3 and ½ of that weight is rocket fuel. Most will be unburned on impact and will be ignited and spread by the blast though out the ship. This alone will be fatal, the equipment needed effectively fight rocket fuel fires will no t exist until the mid 60's, and as it is a WW1 warship would be hard pressed to cope with AVGAS fires.
Kirov does not carry 40 missiles. She has 20 P-700 anti ship missiles, 96 S-300's which can be fired as SSM's as well, 40 Osa's, which can also be, used as SSM's and 2 Metel missiles which delivery small torpedoes. They can also be used against surface ships.
The max reach of her guns is 18,000 yards, however the fire control cannot cope with targets at over about 10,000. Kirov on the other hand can reach out 200 miles with her P-700's. Only the best of guns can pass 40,000 yards, and even then you need a Blindfire gunnery radar to get hits beyond 30,000. Those won't be around till early 1944 and many nation didn't have them until the 50's.On the other hand if the Dreadnought coud close to effective range (about 20,000 yards) or 40,000 years for more modern ships (HMS Renown hit a Italian Battleship at 42,000 yards in WW2)
Renown didn't hit a battleship or anything at 42,000 yards. Her guns can only reach out to 28,000 yards and in any case the longest range hit by a capital vessel on another was at about 26,000 yards.
Here is how the battle is going to really go. One of Kirov's Ka-27's finds the battleship about 100 miles off. Kirov launches one P-700 missile against it. The missile blasts though the belt armor and causes massive damage along with a huge fire. The crew begins abandoning ship about 10 minutes later and within a half hour the fires have reached the magazines and destroy the already combat ineffective ship.
Hell even without her P-700's Kirov can start the same massive fires with LOS S-300 fire and if you take away missiles completely she can still just fire a couple 21 inch torpedoes over the side and blow the thing out of the water. A single hit would snap the keel and that's the end of it.
Even ignoring all that, the AT-6 missiles her helicopters can carry could easily destroy every main battery turret and leave the ship defenseless against anything bigger then a pre 1900 torpedo boat.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Federation vs. the Empire isn't Dreadnought against the Kirov. Its more like Kuznetsov loaded with rocket laden Ka-50's against the 1571 Islamic galley fleet at Lepanto.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Now there's a cool mental image.
I wonder what would happen if the Kirov was out of missiles and closed to gun range?
AK-130
twin 130mm/70 (5.1 inch) on triaxially stabilized mounts
Range: 23,000m or 25.150 yards
Fire control system: MP-184 Fire Control Radar System, which include a 2-band radar, low light TV, laser designator, system for selecting moving targets and an ESM system. This system has a range of 75 km (41 nm). The system provides the integration of all of the shipboard radars, exact measurement of all parameters of movement for all air, sea and land targets, exact bearing to the target, correction of shooting by splashes and automatic tracking of shells.
Projectile type: F-44 High Explosive round. weight, 33.4kg, muzzle velocity 850m/s or 2,788f/s.
So, would the Kirov with its inferior gun firepower but far superior FCS and about equal range destroy the Dreadnought with well placed hits?
I wonder what would happen if the Kirov was out of missiles and closed to gun range?
AK-130
twin 130mm/70 (5.1 inch) on triaxially stabilized mounts
Range: 23,000m or 25.150 yards
Fire control system: MP-184 Fire Control Radar System, which include a 2-band radar, low light TV, laser designator, system for selecting moving targets and an ESM system. This system has a range of 75 km (41 nm). The system provides the integration of all of the shipboard radars, exact measurement of all parameters of movement for all air, sea and land targets, exact bearing to the target, correction of shooting by splashes and automatic tracking of shells.
Projectile type: F-44 High Explosive round. weight, 33.4kg, muzzle velocity 850m/s or 2,788f/s.
So, would the Kirov with its inferior gun firepower but far superior FCS and about equal range destroy the Dreadnought with well placed hits?
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
- The Yosemite Bear
- Mostly Harmless Nutcase (Requiescat in Pace)
- Posts: 35211
- Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
- Location: Dave's Not Here Man
Same weapon. It is also a common misconception that the Granit (SS-N-19 SHIPWRECK) is related to the Bazalt (SS-N-12 SANDBOX)- this is NOT the case.Tsyroc wrote:Is the P-700 the same as the SS-N-19 or is it a new upgrade?
Either way, it is going to blow the crap out of a WWI battleship.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
SANDBOX has twice the warhead for starters...Vympel wrote:Same weapon. It is also a common misconception that the Granit (SS-N-19 SHIPWRECK) is related to the Bazalt (SS-N-12 SANDBOX)- this is NOT the case.Tsyroc wrote:Is the P-700 the same as the SS-N-19 or is it a new upgrade?
Either way, it is going to blow the crap out of a WWI battleship.
Kirov doesnt have AK-130, it has dual AK-100 mounts. It was the later three which mounted AK-130
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Really? 1500kg HE then? Fwar.Sea Skimmer wrote:
SANDBOX has twice the warhead for starters...
True, I was thinking of its three companions rather than the first of class- Kirov/Admiral Ushakov is so different from them anyway.Kirov doesnt have AK-130, it has dual AK-100 mounts. It was the later three which mounted AK-130
Speaking of which- do the Soviets call their own ships he or she?
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
It's evidently something like 1250 kilograms in some versions rather then the often-reported 1000. Not really twice, but a really freaked big difference anyway.Vympel wrote:Really? 1500kg HE then? Fwar.Sea Skimmer wrote:
SANDBOX has twice the warhead for starters...
True, I was thinking of its three companions rather than the first of class- Kirov/Admiral Ushakov is so different from them anyway.Kirov doesnt have AK-130, it has dual AK-100 mounts. It was the later three which mounted AK-130
Speaking of which- do the Soviets call their own ships he or she?
All Russian ships are he, and they also call submarines ships rather then boats. So everything is he.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Not even ships of the line, more like "The salve control matrix has an inverse stamina drain, we need to recalibrate the wipe drive assembly and drum conducts to prevent an overload."THe Yosemite Bear wrote:Your right it's closer to the ships of line of another century...
Scotty: The Sails and the Mainmast cannna take the strain...
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
- The Yosemite Bear
- Mostly Harmless Nutcase (Requiescat in Pace)
- Posts: 35211
- Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
- Location: Dave's Not Here Man