Praxis wrote:I think it will be minor, unless they totally revamp the game engine for use with the Rev controller, all it will do is make it so that, say, you do gestures to perform the same moves you'd press buttons for, for example. Or other little improvements like that.
We'll have to wait for a true Revolution Zelda game for a redefined experience.
Cool, though.
You wouldn't have to revamp the entire engine just to make it interact with the revo controller, in fact they likely wouldn't have to modify the engine at all (unless they were very stupid about how they designed the engine). The engine generally handles graphics and sometimes physics as well, but interacting with controllers is handled elsewhere in the game code and is no where near as major an issue an issue to modify as a modifying the engine (not to mention completely revamping it).
In fact, I would suspect that the hard part would not be getting revo controller support in the game, it would be in modifying all the scripts that control what happens in the game so that events play out appropriately in response to the new input, completely different input. In-game events are set up to work in a certain way based on the input, either how the events are manipulated by the player or the events themselves would likely have to be significantly modified in order to support the revo controller.
However, this may be a moot point because I suspect they had this in the works for quite a while. There was a good chance they were either planning this are at least anticipating it as a possibility from an early enough stage that much of the actual game content was originally made so that it would be compatible with the revo controller. If this is the case they would have been adding revo support as they went along, or at least making it as easy as possible to add it later if need be, so few real re-writes of code would be necessary.
When two opposite points of view are expressed with equal intensity, the truth does not necessarily lie exactly halfway between them. It is possible for one side to be simply wrong.
-Richard Dawkins