Revenge At A Price
Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
- Metatwaddle
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1910
- Joined: 2003-07-07 07:29am
- Location: Up the Amazon on a Rubber Duck
- Contact:
I'd probably inject myself, but only because I wouldn't be thinking clearly. It's not a moral thing to do, obviously.
Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things... their number is negligible and they are stupid. --Dwight D. Eisenhower
No. Mostly because I have never been much for revenge for its own sake, not when it is only me that has been wounded/slighted/whatever.
Now if those thugs had hurt my wife, it would be an enirely different matter.
Now if those thugs had hurt my wife, it would be an enirely different matter.
If at first you don't succeed, maybe failure is your style
Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Thus Aristotle laid it down that a heavy object falls faster then a light one does.
The important thing about this idea is not that he was wrong, but that it never occurred to Aristotle to check it.
Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Thus Aristotle laid it down that a heavy object falls faster then a light one does.
The important thing about this idea is not that he was wrong, but that it never occurred to Aristotle to check it.
- Albert Szent-Györgyi de Nagyrápolt
-
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 159
- Joined: 2006-02-17 11:40am
- Admiral Valdemar
- Outside Context Problem
- Posts: 31572
- Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
- Location: UK
The virus works only on the genetics of the host it's originally injected into, hence, once it's in you, the best way to produce more off-spring is to force an embryo into genetic relatives so the virus is not a risk here. The issue is that, in order to propagate your kind (which you will soon after you've had your revenge), your best bet is to use your family as hosts for similar organisms, so inevitably, your family gets dragged into this potentially, and being ripped apart by a gestating freak in your chest is not nice.nickolay1 wrote:Can the purified form of this virus propagate through airborne transmission? If that's the case, I'd do it, because dying would most certainly lead to the discovery of the injector on my corpse and its subsequent analysis. This would possibly cause the infection of several other individuals, who would potentially be able to do far more damage than I.
It's also an RNA virus, so forget any cures which would nullify the choice in this moral quandary anyway (not that I expect anyone would catch you and treat you, the G-Virus makes you pretty much an endlessly mutating beast so you'd adapt to anything short of a C4 surprise).
I could add another factor into this, that being if you do inject yourself, you accidentally unleash the T-Virus as Birkin did. In which case, it'd be a simpler decision given you'd condemn an entire city to plague to be sanitised by a nuke strike. Though on the plus side, street crime plummets that year.
The results do surprise me somewhat here, though it was more biased towards a "yes" vote last night.
So... You'd inject your wife with this stuff so she can carry out revenge?haard wrote:No. Mostly because I have never been much for revenge for its own sake, not when it is only me that has been wounded/slighted/whatever.
Now if those thugs had hurt my wife, it would be an enirely different matter.
>>Your head hurts.
>>Quaff painkillers
>>Your head no longer hurts.
>>Quaff painkillers
>>Your head no longer hurts.
- Dooey Jo
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 2002-08-09 01:09pm
- Location: The land beyond the forest; Sweden.
- Contact:
So will I just become a mindless zombie, or will I become unable to not kill and infect things, but retain some form of self-awareness? Because... ah, I'll probably take the shot anyway. It's probably better than dying; at least that's what I'm going to think while lying there.
"Nippon ichi, bitches! Boing-boing."
Mai smote the demonic fires of heck...
Faker Ninjas invented ninjitsu
Mai smote the demonic fires of heck...
Faker Ninjas invented ninjitsu
Well, if you're like Birkin, you'll become a rapidly mutating bioweapon singlemindedly trying to reproduce and kill for nourishment. Think zombie, but with a sense of self-preservation and enough rudimentary intelligence to follow prey.Dooey Jo wrote:So will I just become a mindless zombie, or will I become unable to not kill and infect things, but retain some form of self-awareness? Because... ah, I'll probably take the shot anyway. It's probably better than dying; at least that's what I'm going to think while lying there.
- Admiral Valdemar
- Outside Context Problem
- Posts: 31572
- Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
- Location: UK
No. For simplicity's sake, the autoinjector is foolproof and won't shatter or anything.nickolay1 wrote:That wasn't exactly my intended question. Is there any possibility of others being infected if I don't inject myself and simply die? For example, those performing forensic analysis?
As for what you become, everything Birkin did, pretty much. Your body will go on adapting at amazing speed to any stimuli and so your mind deteriorates too as your form alters endlessly. Any idea of regret after the fact is not going to happen with an animalistic mind.
No, if they killed my wife I'd inject myself to carry out revenge if that was the only way.defanatic wrote:So... You'd inject your wife with this stuff so she can carry out revenge?haard wrote:No. Mostly because I have never been much for revenge for its own sake, not when it is only me that has been wounded/slighted/whatever.
Now if those thugs had hurt my wife, it would be an enirely different matter.
I would not sacrefice my family or my humanity for revenge against my would-be murderers, but I would sacrefice a whole lot of things, including myself, to avenge my wife.
If at first you don't succeed, maybe failure is your style
Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Thus Aristotle laid it down that a heavy object falls faster then a light one does.
The important thing about this idea is not that he was wrong, but that it never occurred to Aristotle to check it.
Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Thus Aristotle laid it down that a heavy object falls faster then a light one does.
The important thing about this idea is not that he was wrong, but that it never occurred to Aristotle to check it.
- Albert Szent-Györgyi de Nagyrápolt
I might add that I will probably feel different once I have kids...
If at first you don't succeed, maybe failure is your style
Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Thus Aristotle laid it down that a heavy object falls faster then a light one does.
The important thing about this idea is not that he was wrong, but that it never occurred to Aristotle to check it.
Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Thus Aristotle laid it down that a heavy object falls faster then a light one does.
The important thing about this idea is not that he was wrong, but that it never occurred to Aristotle to check it.
- Albert Szent-Györgyi de Nagyrápolt
- Admiral Valdemar
- Outside Context Problem
- Posts: 31572
- Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
- Location: UK
So you'd dispell with your normal moral obligations if it was your significant other who was attacked as opposed to yourself? Would the added risk of the same problems occurring not warrant simply letting the police try and do their job rather than go with your own brand of vigilantism?haard wrote:
No, if they killed my wife I'd inject myself to carry out revenge if that was the only way.
I would not sacrefice my family or my humanity for revenge against my would-be murderers, but I would sacrefice a whole lot of things, including myself, to avenge my wife.
Yes.Admiral Valdemar wrote:
So you'd dispell with your normal moral obligations if it was your significant other who was attacked as opposed to yourself?
No, not for me, even if they were imprisoned (which was not really clear from the original question, "the scum /../ whom no office of the law will punish properly.".Admiral Valdemar wrote: Would the added risk of the same problems occurring not warrant simply letting the police try and do their job rather than go with your own brand of vigilantism?
Suffice to say, I would not really care for justice, but vengeance. While I agree with the idea of the state monopoly on violence, and I understand that the society would have to (at least try to) punish me, it would not change the fact that I would seek revenge.
Of course, I'd normally do that in a more mundane way (5.65 probably), but if the choice was the virus or no vengeance, I do think I would chose the virus.
If at first you don't succeed, maybe failure is your style
Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Thus Aristotle laid it down that a heavy object falls faster then a light one does.
The important thing about this idea is not that he was wrong, but that it never occurred to Aristotle to check it.
Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Thus Aristotle laid it down that a heavy object falls faster then a light one does.
The important thing about this idea is not that he was wrong, but that it never occurred to Aristotle to check it.
- Albert Szent-Györgyi de Nagyrápolt
- SylasGaunt
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5267
- Joined: 2002-09-04 09:39pm
- Location: GGG
- Admiral Valdemar
- Outside Context Problem
- Posts: 31572
- Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
- Location: UK
Interesting. Why?haard wrote:
Yes.
You have the usual chances of conviction, so they could get off from a technicality or get a lousy sentence. Either way, depending on your mentality, some would rather beat the living shit out of these people as opposed to letting justice take its course.
No, not for me, even if they were imprisoned (which was not really clear from the original question, "the scum /../ whom no office of the law will punish properly.".
I'm curious as to why you'd go that route when it was a loved one attacked, but not yourself. The consequences are the same near enough with other innocents likely targets no matter who is harmed. You make the case that your wife is a special situation that demands relentless vengeance without limits, while your death would pass by without such violent repercussions.Suffice to say, I would not really care for justice, but vengeance. While I agree with the idea of the state monopoly on violence, and I understand that the society would have to (at least try to) punish me, it would not change the fact that I would seek revenge.
Of course, I'd normally do that in a more mundane way (5.65 probably), but if the choice was the virus or no vengeance, I do think I would chose the virus.
We never really find out, but if it goes the way you went, you still have your family becoming what you are and anyone else being torn asunder by your pseudocopies.SylasGaunt wrote:
IIRC that only happens to incompatible hosts.
Well, I do not agree that the consequenses are the same - not even similar, to me.Admiral Valdemar wrote:Interesting. Why?haard wrote:
Yes.
You have the usual chances of conviction, so they could get off from a technicality or get a lousy sentence. Either way, depending on your mentality, some would rather beat the living shit out of these people as opposed to letting justice take its course.haard wrote:
No, not for me, even if they were imprisoned (which was not really clear from the original question, "the scum /../ whom no office of the law will punish properly.".
I'm curious as to why you'd go that route when it was a loved one attacked, but not yourself. The consequences are the same near enough with other innocents likely targets no matter who is harmed. You make the case that your wife is a special situation that demands relentless vengeance without limits, while your death would pass by without such violent repercussions.Suffice to say, I would not really care for justice, but vengeance. While I agree with the idea of the state monopoly on violence, and I understand that the society would have to (at least try to) punish me, it would not change the fact that I would seek revenge.
Of course, I'd normally do that in a more mundane way (5.65 probably), but if the choice was the virus or no vengeance, I do think I would chose the virus.
If I die, I die, and it is for others to handle that. Of course I do not want to die, and I would fight to survive but 'after the fact', so to speak, I do not require vengeance. Suffice to say, I am not one to hold a grudge. I dislike people from time to time, I just don't have any urge to hurt them.
Not that I am perfect in this matter - I love sparring both verbal and physical, and in the heat of battle you sometimes overstep the bounds.
Now all this changes when it comes to my wife. Why? No easy answer.
(below this, I've been writing and revriting for half an hour... so much thought, so little text )
Lots of reasons I can think of, but the true one is that I feel that way; when I think of anyone hurting her, I feel hate.
Vengeance would not be for her obviously, since she was dead, but for me.
If at first you don't succeed, maybe failure is your style
Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Thus Aristotle laid it down that a heavy object falls faster then a light one does.
The important thing about this idea is not that he was wrong, but that it never occurred to Aristotle to check it.
Economic Left/Right: 0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Thus Aristotle laid it down that a heavy object falls faster then a light one does.
The important thing about this idea is not that he was wrong, but that it never occurred to Aristotle to check it.
- Albert Szent-Györgyi de Nagyrápolt
- Guardsman Bass
- Cowardly Codfish
- Posts: 9281
- Joined: 2002-07-07 12:01am
- Location: Beneath the Deepest Sea
Considering that I would be in a state of total mindfucking pain after the attack, I would choose to live, and slaughter the little punks. Although it'll get messy later, maybe I'll start an urban legend that will greatly discourage street crime.
“It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.”
-Jean-Luc Picard
"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
-Margaret Atwood
-Jean-Luc Picard
"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
-Margaret Atwood
- Agent Fisher
- Rabid Monkey
- Posts: 3671
- Joined: 2003-04-29 11:56pm
- Location: Sac-Town, CA, USA, Earth, Sol, Milky Way, Universe
- Oni Koneko Damien
- Sith Marauder
- Posts: 3852
- Joined: 2004-03-10 07:23pm
- Location: Yar Yar Hump Hump!
- Contact:
I'd *like* to choose no. If I were in the mindset I am in now, I would choose no. The thing is, after being beaten, slashed, and left for dead in a cold gutter, I'm fairly certain that adrenaline levels would be hitting a critical plataeu in my body, and thinking clearly would be the last thing I'd be doing. In that situation, I'd probably be reduced to a rather animalistic state of mind: Survive at all costs, which means despite all my sound moral objections now, I'd take the injection anyways because at the time, I'd be mentally incapacitated.
Gaian Paradigm: Because not all fantasy has to be childish crap.
Ephemeral Pie: Because not all role-playing has to be shallow.
My art: Because not all DA users are talentless emo twits.
"Phant, quit abusing the He-Wench before he turns you into a caged bitch at a Ren Fair and lets the tourists toss half munched turkey legs at your backside." -Mr. Coffee
Ephemeral Pie: Because not all role-playing has to be shallow.
My art: Because not all DA users are talentless emo twits.
"Phant, quit abusing the He-Wench before he turns you into a caged bitch at a Ren Fair and lets the tourists toss half munched turkey legs at your backside." -Mr. Coffee
- Oni Koneko Damien
- Sith Marauder
- Posts: 3852
- Joined: 2004-03-10 07:23pm
- Location: Yar Yar Hump Hump!
- Contact:
Holy crap, I just completely tied up the votes at thirty-three each...how's that for a split crowd?
Gaian Paradigm: Because not all fantasy has to be childish crap.
Ephemeral Pie: Because not all role-playing has to be shallow.
My art: Because not all DA users are talentless emo twits.
"Phant, quit abusing the He-Wench before he turns you into a caged bitch at a Ren Fair and lets the tourists toss half munched turkey legs at your backside." -Mr. Coffee
Ephemeral Pie: Because not all role-playing has to be shallow.
My art: Because not all DA users are talentless emo twits.
"Phant, quit abusing the He-Wench before he turns you into a caged bitch at a Ren Fair and lets the tourists toss half munched turkey legs at your backside." -Mr. Coffee
- Guardsman Bass
- Cowardly Codfish
- Posts: 9281
- Joined: 2002-07-07 12:01am
- Location: Beneath the Deepest Sea
Yeah, but are you going to remember that when you are dying, right after fighting an intense struggle with a group of thugs?Agent Fisher wrote:I would choose no. Even though people here may look down upon my beliefs, I believe I'm going somewhere better when I die.
“It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.”
-Jean-Luc Picard
"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
-Margaret Atwood
-Jean-Luc Picard
"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
-Margaret Atwood
- Admiral Valdemar
- Outside Context Problem
- Posts: 31572
- Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
- Location: UK
I would bet "no", given a lot of people start doubting their worldview at times of extreme stress, which getting beaten to death most certainly is. To be in a sound state-of-mind when at Death's door is hard to do, heck, I've had friends who doubted their Christian afterlife when a relative was terminally ill, letalone themselves.Guardsman Bass wrote:Yeah, but are you going to remember that when you are dying, right after fighting an intense struggle with a group of thugs?Agent Fisher wrote:I would choose no. Even though people here may look down upon my beliefs, I believe I'm going somewhere better when I die.
You'd have to be truly apathetic or noble and able to keep a real grip on your sanity to pass up the payback option.