Neurosurgeon creates Geordi's VISOR

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
Netko
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1925
Joined: 2005-03-30 06:14am

Post by Netko »

Or similar to the way kids that never learn to speak later in life can't learn it beyond a very basic level. There was a case of child abuse where the parent(s) locked up their daughter in the basement and never let her out nor did they communicate with her. When she was finaly rescued in her early teenage years, development specialists tried to teach her to speak and understand language in general, but they had very limited succsess since the parts of the brain usualy responsible for it had been retasked.

Unfortunatly, I haven't been able to find the story on google. I belive it is a fairly well known case in the US so maybe someone can remember the details a little better? There were issues with her handling in foster care and disagreements about how to take care of her. Later on, there was also a TV movie made I belive.
User avatar
TheBlackCat
Padawan Learner
Posts: 412
Joined: 2006-02-11 01:01pm
Contact:

Post by TheBlackCat »

WacoKid wrote:I love Oliver Sacks...

Ah, so this is the same principle, for example, because of which if you remove some of a rats whiskers very early on, during its sensitive period (shortly after birth), the "barrels" in the brain that correspond to the removed whiskers will simply not develop?
Exactly. So for instance, if you simply cover the eyes during the critical developmental period then uncover them afterwards, the person will be able to see just fine (at the pre-cortical level) but their ability to process and interpret what they see will be extremely limited. They are recieving visual infromation, but cannot actually understand what they are seeing. This was seen in congenital cataracs that were removed late in life, but not when they are removed in early infancy. There was an early treatment for "lazy eye", where they covered one eye during early infancy. When they removed it, they found that uncovered eye had come to pretty much dominate both sides of the visual cortex. They were effectively blind in the eye that was covered and they completely lacked binocural depth perception, despite the fact that the retina was operating normally. Such changes are not reversible.
When two opposite points of view are expressed with equal intensity, the truth does not necessarily lie exactly halfway between them. It is possible for one side to be simply wrong.
-Richard Dawkins
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

Broomstick wrote:So if someone was born blind, or went blind early, you'd having to perform sight-restoring surgery on them pretty quickly so you wouldn't miss that developmental window. Even people who lost their vision in, say, their early 20's and then regained it 20 or 30 years later (usually due to various medical advances) have a very hard time readjusting to using vision however much they want and are happy to have their vision again. The brain has to relearn things like perspective and how to make three dimensional sense out of the images relayed by the eyes.
This is where stemcell therapy would come in handy I think.

Also what of transplanting eyeballs if those are whats "broken"? I mean the biggest problem is the nerves right? We've got a material that hinders the formation of scarring now and allows nerves to regrow(another thread). It restored sight to lab mice after their visual nerves where severed.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28822
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Post by Broomstick »

His Divine Shadow wrote:
Broomstick wrote:So if someone was born blind, or went blind early, you'd having to perform sight-restoring surgery on them pretty quickly so you wouldn't miss that developmental window. Even people who lost their vision in, say, their early 20's and then regained it 20 or 30 years later (usually due to various medical advances) have a very hard time readjusting to using vision however much they want and are happy to have their vision again. The brain has to relearn things like perspective and how to make three dimensional sense out of the images relayed by the eyes.
This is where stemcell therapy would come in handy I think.
And how would stemcells solve that problem?

It's not simply a matter of adding in new cells - it also involves integrating them into the existing neural networks.
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.

Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.

If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy

Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
User avatar
TheBlackCat
Padawan Learner
Posts: 412
Joined: 2006-02-11 01:01pm
Contact:

Post by TheBlackCat »

His Divine Shadow wrote:Also what of transplanting eyeballs if those are whats "broken"? I mean the biggest problem is the nerves right? We've got a material that hinders the formation of scarring now and allows nerves to regrow(another thread). It restored sight to lab mice after their visual nerves where severed.
It's also a matter of nerves finding the right location. In the rate experiments there was already a path leading to the correct spot that the neurons could follow. In people who have been blind since birth no such pathway exists.
When two opposite points of view are expressed with equal intensity, the truth does not necessarily lie exactly halfway between them. It is possible for one side to be simply wrong.
-Richard Dawkins
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

Broomstick wrote:And how would stemcells solve that problem?

It's not simply a matter of adding in new cells - it also involves integrating them into the existing neural networks.
Yes I know but as I understood it won't they do that on their own then when the patient is learning to see again? I was under the impression that stemcell therapy in this way would mean the stemcells would create fresh neurons that would then integrate and speed up the learning process, or enable it at all to begin with incase it's too late for the brain to naturally re-learn it.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
TheBlackCat
Padawan Learner
Posts: 412
Joined: 2006-02-11 01:01pm
Contact:

Post by TheBlackCat »

His Divine Shadow wrote:Yes I know but as I understood it won't they do that on their own then when the patient is learning to see again? I was under the impression that stemcell therapy in this way would mean the stemcells would create fresh neurons that would then integrate and speed up the learning process, or enable it at all to begin with incase it's too late for the brain to naturally re-learn it.
It's not just a matter of sticking neurons in the brain and expecting them to do the right thing. Development of the cortex is a very specific and directed process. The neurons follow chemical and cellular clues, including chemical gradients and guide cells that do not exist in adults as well as monitoring organizational patterns that have already changed in adults.

It is not just a matter of throwing cells in there and expecting them to do the right thing, cortical neurons cells do very specific things at very specific places at very specific times and in a very specific order following very specific cues. There are many different types of neurons in the cortex, each with very specific roles and connections and many localized in very specific places. Once they are in the correct place they undergo still more specialization. Even with all of this specificity, about half the neurons that form in the mammalian nervous system or useless and kill themselves during development.
When two opposite points of view are expressed with equal intensity, the truth does not necessarily lie exactly halfway between them. It is possible for one side to be simply wrong.
-Richard Dawkins
Post Reply