See through walls?

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
OculusMortis
Redshirt
Posts: 10
Joined: 2005-10-16 12:41pm
Location: Lincoln, UK

See through walls?

Post by OculusMortis »

Well I’m currently working on a Weapon design concept, and I was wondering some of these futuristic films have weapons with Thermal sights which are capable of tracking people through walls, and i was wondering if this is possible with current tech.
Unfortunately a Google search gave me nothing, but i was wondering if any of the insightful and super intelligent residents of SDnet could possibly tell me whether these types of sights are possible? And if so how?
"I'm not crazy. I just have another consciousness in my brain."
"when the pin is pulled, Mr Grenade is not your friend"
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Current generation thermal imaging can see through thin walls, probably breezeblock and single bricks or plywood. For anything like you see in Eraser, you'd need some technobabble. T-rays would probably be better, but the technology is still relatively new. X-rays and muon scanners require a sensor behind the target, so that won't work and ultrasonics can be iffy.
User avatar
LaCroix
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5196
Joined: 2004-12-21 12:14pm
Location: Sopron District, Hungary, Europe, Terra

Post by LaCroix »

Well, a house whose walls let the heat produced by a mere human "shine" trough would be insane expensive to heat in winter. Japanese paperwalls might allow that.

There is a technique to look through clothes using infrared filters and imaging, but that fabric is not nearly as dense as concrete or even wood, so I doubt that would work.

Radar won't work either, lest you use enough power to really fry the house and everything in it.

Technobabble, as far as I'm concerned.
A minute's thought suggests that the very idea of this is stupid. A more detailed examination raises the possibility that it might be an answer to the question "how could the Germans win the war after the US gets involved?" - Captain Seafort, in a thread proposing a 1942 'D-Day' in Quiberon Bay

I do archery skeet. With a Trebuchet.
User avatar
OculusMortis
Redshirt
Posts: 10
Joined: 2005-10-16 12:41pm
Location: Lincoln, UK

Post by OculusMortis »

Thanks for the replies, I was hoping to steer clear of techno babble and use something currently feasible, oh well not too much of a problem.
"I'm not crazy. I just have another consciousness in my brain."
"when the pin is pulled, Mr Grenade is not your friend"
User avatar
GrandMasterTerwynn
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6787
Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
Location: Somewhere on Earth.

Post by GrandMasterTerwynn »

LaCroix wrote:Well, a house whose walls let the heat produced by a mere human "shine" trough would be insane expensive to heat in winter. Japanese paperwalls might allow that.

There is a technique to look through clothes using infrared filters and imaging, but that fabric is not nearly as dense as concrete or even wood, so I doubt that would work.

Radar won't work either, lest you use enough power to really fry the house and everything in it.

Technobabble, as far as I'm concerned.
Not really, ground-penetrating radar doesn't fry the ground it's scanning. You could tune a radar to reflect strongly off of moisture-containing objects (like people,) and metallic objects, while passing through dry, relatively low-density objects, like most residential walls.

You could also use terahertz-frequency radio waves, but we're still at the stage where it takes a massive free-electron laser, a sixty-foot column, and a strong magnetic field just to produce a terahertz source of a relatively feeble twenty watts.
User avatar
LaCroix
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5196
Joined: 2004-12-21 12:14pm
Location: Sopron District, Hungary, Europe, Terra

Post by LaCroix »

Well, I knew that a high- frequency radar would likely penetrate the wall, but I assumed it would penetrate the humans behind it even easier.
I didn't know that ther is a way to make it distinguish between walls and living objects, so I stand corrected.

But there would be a lot more power needed to get a combat-useful range than 20 watts, a 10 watt radar like in motion detectors is only good for ranges of about 10 meters. Even if the concept is placed in the future with higher tech, they would habe a few kW of radar to achieve weapon ranges. A beam of radar in the kW range would certainly produce a microwave-similar effect.

Thats why fighter-crafts have to disable their high-power radar systems on the ground (I have read that in an article.)
A minute's thought suggests that the very idea of this is stupid. A more detailed examination raises the possibility that it might be an answer to the question "how could the Germans win the war after the US gets involved?" - Captain Seafort, in a thread proposing a 1942 'D-Day' in Quiberon Bay

I do archery skeet. With a Trebuchet.
User avatar
Winston Blake
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2529
Joined: 2004-03-26 01:58am
Location: Australia

Post by Winston Blake »

There's this 'X-ray backscatter' thing which i found pretty impressive when i came across it a year or two ago. I think the fundamental idea is seeing X-rays scattered back in the direction of the transmitter, so with sci-fi technology i'm sure you could get something neat.

However, portable Ultra-Wide-Band radio is already being done, although only showing people as 'yellow blobs'. Link
Robert Gilruth to Max Faget on the Apollo program: “Max, we’re going to go back there one day, and when we do, they’re going to find out how tough it is.”
Post Reply