How to deal with "Science came from religion dumbasses&

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
Maraxus
Padawan Learner
Posts: 309
Joined: 2004-10-10 04:13pm
Location: University of California at Santa Barbara

How to deal with "Science came from religion dumbasses&

Post by Maraxus »

I'm currently engaged in a debate with a pseudo-fundy who claimed that religion spawned science.

I'm aware that this is not true, but i cannot find any strong historical fact contradicting this statement.

If anyone could help, it would be greatly appreciated.
OmegaGuy
Retarded Spambot
Posts: 1076
Joined: 2005-12-02 09:23pm

Post by OmegaGuy »

The burden of proof is on him. Ask him to prove that science came from religion with actual historical facts.
Image
User avatar
Admiral Johnason
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2552
Joined: 2003-01-11 05:06pm
Location: The Rebel cruiser Defender

Post by Admiral Johnason »

Look at the constant bickering between scientists and the Christian Churches for the past 1,500 years. While some scientists have come from the Church (Mendel and others like him,) I have rarely heard of the Churches suppoerting science.
Liberals for Nixon in 3000: Nixon... with carisma and a shiny robot body.

never negoiate out of fear, but never fear to negoiate.

Captian America- Justice League

HAB submarine commander-
"We'll break you of your fear of water."
User avatar
wilfulton
Jedi Knight
Posts: 976
Joined: 2005-04-28 10:19pm

Post by wilfulton »

I hear large mallets also work wonders. :lol:


Seriously, some people are just irrational, and arguing with them is simply a wasted effort. If he wants to think science came from religion, so be it. Not like he'd recognize science if it bit him on the ass anyway.
Gork the Ork sez: Speak softly and carry a Big Shoota!
User avatar
Hotfoot
Avatar of Confusion
Posts: 5835
Joined: 2002-10-12 04:38pm
Location: Peace River: Badlands, Terra Nova Winter 1936
Contact:

Post by Hotfoot »

The Church LOVES the big bang. It's a nice "moment of creation" that fits in nicely with their views of creation.
Do not meddle in the affairs of insomniacs, for they are cranky and can do things to you while you sleep.
Image
The Realm of Confusion
"Every time you talk about Teal'c, I keep imagining Thor's ass. Thank you very much for that, you fucking fucker." -Marcao
SG-14: Because in some cases, "Recon" means "Blow up a fucking planet or die trying."
SilCore Wiki! Come take a look!
User avatar
SWPIGWANG
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1693
Joined: 2002-09-24 05:00pm
Location: Commence Primary Ignorance

Post by SWPIGWANG »

I don't think origin means much in terms validity compared to content anyways.
User avatar
Morilore
Jedi Master
Posts: 1202
Joined: 2004-07-03 01:02am
Location: On a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.

Re: How to deal with "Science came from religion dumbas

Post by Morilore »

Maraxus wrote:I'm currently engaged in a debate with a pseudo-fundy who claimed that religion spawned science.

I'm aware that this is not true, but i cannot find any strong historical fact contradicting this statement.

If anyone could help, it would be greatly appreciated.
First, ask him to define his terms. What does he mean by "religion," "spawned," and "science?" Is he referring to the institutions, the individuals practicing both, or the mindsets? If he's referring to either of the first two then he may actually be correct, but it means nothing, since the church had its claws in everything (in Europe) back then. Science's greatest contributions to humanity occured when the scientific method matured fully; this mindset is utterly contradictory to any religious one.
"Guys, don't do that"
User avatar
PrinceofLowLight
Jedi Knight
Posts: 903
Joined: 2002-08-28 12:08am

Post by PrinceofLowLight »

The church did indeed run the precursor to the modern European universities. What of it? No organization is a monoloth. There is absolutely no contradiction in the idea that there were proto-scientists in the early church despite the fact that its doctrines and major figures were against the scientific method. Especially when you combine that with the fact that the church had something of a monopoly on formal education at this time, anyone who would be in a position to learn and apply early scientific methods would have to have had a religious education.
"Remember, being materialistic means never having to acknowledge your feelings"-Brent Sienna, PVP

"In the unlikely event of losing Pascal's Wager, I intend to saunter in to Judgement Day with a bookshelf full of grievances, a flaming sword of my own devising, and a serious attitude problem."- Rick Moen

SD.net Rangers: Chicks Dig It
User avatar
Trytostaydead
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3690
Joined: 2003-01-28 09:34pm

Post by Trytostaydead »

Hold it hold it guys. He said religion, not the church. There was science and religion far before the church ever came around.
User avatar
Boyish-Tigerlilly
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3225
Joined: 2004-05-22 04:47pm
Location: New Jersey (Why not Hawaii)
Contact:

Post by Boyish-Tigerlilly »

Sometimes, religion can be a motivational catalyse for moving into science. Many scientifically inclined indivdiuals during the Enlightenment and Scientific Revolution of the 17th-18th centuries were influenced by their conception of God and nature, but that's not to say religion gave birth to it entirely.

Ideas don't usually pop out of nowhere. Although they did not invent the scientific method, and the mentality of region does diverge from scientific thought, some people were motivated to explore scientific methods and concepts to better understand/verifiy their religions.

In specific, this was the case of Isaac Newton and many Deists. It didn't spawn science, but it, in some ways, gave inspiration for it as it developed (for some individuals).

What does he mean when he says it spawned it?
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Post by Patrick Degan »

Tell Mr. Religion to read up on the ancient Ionians —particularly Democritus of Abdera.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
Zac Naloen
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5488
Joined: 2003-07-24 04:32pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Zac Naloen »

Well its true that Isaac Newton were attempting to prove the existance of god with their investigations. But they just ended up doing more to disprove him... kinda says something doesn't it?
Image
Member of the Unremarkables
Just because you're god, it doesn't mean you can treat people that way : - My girlfriend
Evil Brit Conspiracy - Insignificant guy
User avatar
drachefly
Jedi Master
Posts: 1323
Joined: 2004-10-13 12:24pm

Post by drachefly »

I know a guy whose interest in the physical universe led him to become a rocket scientist and a priest. He is still both.

I'd say that a spirit of inquiry can lead one to either religion or science or both; but that neither of those two caused the other.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

The people who argue that science comes from religion because its early practitioners were religious should also realize that by this logic, criticism of religion also comes from religion. After all, virtually all of the Enlightenment period critics of religion were in fact raised in a religious environment.

That fact alone should dispel the idiotic notion that science cannot possibly be in conflict with religion due to the fact that many of its early practitioners were religious. After all, by that fucked-up logic, criticism of religion is not in conflict with religion either.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Sriad
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3028
Joined: 2002-12-02 09:59pm
Location: Colorado

Post by Sriad »

Zac Naloen wrote:Well its true that Isaac Newton were attempting to prove the existance of god with their investigations. But they just ended up doing more to disprove him... kinda says something doesn't it?
Wait, how many Isaac Newtons were there? :wink:

17-18th century religi-scientists tried to get closer to God via higher understanding of his works. Reading the (fictionalized) historical scientists in the Baroque Cycle helped me understand how it all might have worked.
User avatar
Zac Naloen
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5488
Joined: 2003-07-24 04:32pm
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Zac Naloen »

Sriad wrote:
Zac Naloen wrote:Well its true that Isaac Newton were attempting to prove the existance of god with their investigations. But they just ended up doing more to disprove him... kinda says something doesn't it?
Wait, how many Isaac Newtons were there? :wink:

17-18th century religi-scientists tried to get closer to God via higher understanding of his works. Reading the (fictionalized) historical scientists in the Baroque Cycle helped me understand how it all might have worked.

Woops, i blame that accidental pluralisation on a lingering hang over.
Image
Member of the Unremarkables
Just because you're god, it doesn't mean you can treat people that way : - My girlfriend
Evil Brit Conspiracy - Insignificant guy
WTR
Redshirt
Posts: 22
Joined: 2006-04-20 07:22am

Post by WTR »

Weren't a lot of things like using leeches and maggots and herbs all wrapped up in religious stuff?
"Verily unto taketh this maygikal plant and...blah blah blah..healed by the Great <insert Diety of healing here>.." when all it really is is just the plant doing it's thing. Like garlic and lemons are good for colds.
WTR
Redshirt
Posts: 22
Joined: 2006-04-20 07:22am

Post by WTR »

Take this horrible tasting brew, I'll now dance around and rattle some chicken bones...I mean the bones of Saint Heebiejeebie and you'll be cured in a few days. That'll be 10 shekels.
WTR
Redshirt
Posts: 22
Joined: 2006-04-20 07:22am

Post by WTR »

As to science, well just look at Gallileo and how much crap he had to go through? Religions should just stick to that herbal stuff and leave the mathmatical science to the scientists. :roll:
User avatar
Ghost Rider
Spirit of Vengeance
Posts: 27779
Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars

Post by Ghost Rider »

Stop fucking spamming.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!

Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all

Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
WTR
Redshirt
Posts: 22
Joined: 2006-04-20 07:22am

Post by WTR »

Sorry.
User avatar
Wicked Pilot
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 8972
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm

Post by Wicked Pilot »

Hotfoot wrote:The Church LOVES the big bang. It's a nice "moment of creation" that fits in nicely with their views of creation.
Too bad your average fundie has no idea of the history of Big Bang, it's first proposers, and it's battle with the atheist popular Steady State. On an issue concerning the origins of the universe the Christian backed theory trumped the atheist one and the fundies shun it as if it were a newly wed interracial gay couple burning the American flag. They won, Lemaitre was right, Hoyle was wrong, what a bunch of morons.
The most basic assumption about the world is that it does not contradict itself.
User avatar
SyntaxVorlon
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5954
Joined: 2002-12-18 08:45pm
Location: Places
Contact:

Re: How to deal with "Science came from religion dumbas

Post by SyntaxVorlon »

Maraxus wrote:I'm currently engaged in a debate with a pseudo-fundy who claimed that religion spawned science.

I'm aware that this is not true, but i cannot find any strong historical fact contradicting this statement.

If anyone could help, it would be greatly appreciated.
Modern science developed in the 17th century under the guise of learning about "Our Lord's wondrous mechanism 'nature'". Boyle and Newton and Kepler and so on were all religious and in a sense western science developed out of an interest in physico-theology.

But, as has been stated, so what? The fact that religious people were the first scientists doesn't mean that modern science is inherently religious or makes claims that favor any specific religion. Your response to this twit should be, 'so what?'
The people who argue that science comes from religion because its early practitioners were religious should also realize that by this logic, criticism of religion also comes from religion. After all, virtually all of the Enlightenment period critics of religion were in fact raised in a religious environment.
Oh much earlier than that, biblical exegesis of the variety that Maimonides(RMBM circa. 12thC) created was based around the idea that you can't take the scriptures too seriously because they were written in the language of man. This may not sound that critical but it is this sort of thinking that allows people to question the unquestionable holy book.
Post Reply