Incomprehensibly sucky movies

OT: anything goes!

Moderator: Edi

User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Post by Patrick Degan »

Lord Zentei wrote:Further dishonourable mention goes to "Zed" starring Sean Connery. Basically, Connery (as the title character) plays a kill-crazed superhuman in a post apocalyptic setting. He finds his way into a colony of highly intelligent immortals, whose society has become decadent. What followrs is an hour and a half of insipid, low budget, directionless "trying to be arty-farty but failing at it" bollocks. As one reviewer said "the best thing about the movie is seeing Sean Connery in diapers for two hours" or words to that effect.
The movie was Zardoz; Zed was the name of Connery's character. While Connery's worst film, it's light years ahead of utter shit like Battlefield Dearth, which is just about as unwatchable as any film can be.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
Lord Zentei
Space Elf Psyker
Posts: 8742
Joined: 2004-11-22 02:49am
Location: Ulthwé Craftworld, plotting the downfall of the Imperium.

Post by Lord Zentei »

Patrick Degan wrote:
Lord Zentei wrote:Further dishonourable mention goes to "Zed" starring Sean Connery. Basically, Connery (as the title character) plays a kill-crazed superhuman in a post apocalyptic setting. He finds his way into a colony of highly intelligent immortals, whose society has become decadent. What followrs is an hour and a half of insipid, low budget, directionless "trying to be arty-farty but failing at it" bollocks. As one reviewer said "the best thing about the movie is seeing Sean Connery in diapers for two hours" or words to that effect.
The movie was Zardoz; Zed was the name of Connery's character. While Connery's worst film, it's light years ahead of utter shit like Battlefield Dearth, which is just about as unwatchable as any film can be.
Ah, yes: been a while since I saw it.

As for Battlefield Earth - I have no plans to do so.
CotK <mew> | HAB | JL | MM | TTC | Cybertron

TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet

And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel! :mrgreen: -- Asuka
User avatar
Erik von Nein
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1747
Joined: 2005-06-25 04:27am
Location: Boy Hell. Much nicer than Girl Hell.
Contact:

Post by Erik von Nein »

Flagg wrote:Mission to Mars was godawful, and the same is true of Red Planet.
But I have to say the worst movie I can think of right now is Deep Blue Sea. Dear god was that bad. It had a convoluted setup, a downright retarded plot, and the morons who made it obviously never read a fucking book about sharks considering the fact that the 'tiger shark' was exactly the same as the mako sharks, they just happened to have stripes. There is so much about that movie that I hate.
Wasn't that also the movie that had the shark swim backwards as proof of it's super intellegence? Christ, people! Sharks are physically incapable of swimming backwards! It's not a matter of intellegence! Dumbfucks.

Actually, that whole movie was an insult to science.
"To make an apple pie from scratch you must first invent the universe."
— Carl Sagan

Image
User avatar
SylasGaunt
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5267
Joined: 2002-09-04 09:39pm
Location: GGG

Post by SylasGaunt »

It's been a while since I saw it but it wasn't ever touted that the shark swam backwards due to an intelligence boost. They were mutant sharks, and in fact as I recall the characters actually say that it should have been impossible.
User avatar
Erik von Nein
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1747
Joined: 2005-06-25 04:27am
Location: Boy Hell. Much nicer than Girl Hell.
Contact:

Post by Erik von Nein »

SylasGaunt wrote:It's been a while since I saw it but it wasn't ever touted that the shark swam backwards due to an intelligence boost. They were mutant sharks, and in fact as I recall the characters actually say that it should have been impossible.
They weren't mutated enough, since they still looked like normal sharks. They'd have to have fins capable of making a sweeping motion backwards, like how fish swim backwards. They're fins were still more or less stuck on "straight out" like most sharks. It's still retarded.
"To make an apple pie from scratch you must first invent the universe."
— Carl Sagan

Image
User avatar
Flagg
CUNTS FOR EYES!
Posts: 12797
Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.

Post by Flagg »

Erik von Nein wrote:
Flagg wrote:Mission to Mars was godawful, and the same is true of Red Planet.
But I have to say the worst movie I can think of right now is Deep Blue Sea. Dear god was that bad. It had a convoluted setup, a downright retarded plot, and the morons who made it obviously never read a fucking book about sharks considering the fact that the 'tiger shark' was exactly the same as the mako sharks, they just happened to have stripes. There is so much about that movie that I hate.
Wasn't that also the movie that had the shark swim backwards as proof of it's super intellegence? Christ, people! Sharks are physically incapable of swimming backwards! It's not a matter of intellegence! Dumbfucks.

Actually, that whole movie was an insult to science.
Yeah, I was going to bring that up, but it strikes me as pretty nitpicky compared to the overall celluloid abortion that was Deep Blue Sea.
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan

You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to
Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan

He who can,
does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
Post Reply