DEBATE: Jehovah's Witnesses vs.Y'all (Note to mods inside)

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

LadyBarbara wrote:No, dear. I have each issue bound according to year in books. It's called reading. :roll:
No, when it's JW "literature", it's called brainwashing. I've attended a JW service, for research purposes. I honestly could not think of a single facet of that service which was not textbook brainwashing technique.

PS. There was a porno story on alt.sex.stories a few years ago about an incredibly slutty woman who liked to involve herself in gangbangs with strangers. It was called "LadyBarbara" :wink:
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Durandal
Bile-Driven Hate Machine
Posts: 17927
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:26pm
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Contact:

Post by Durandal »

Perhaps this was her rebellious phase?
Damien Sorresso

"Ever see what them computa bitchez do to numbas? It ain't natural. Numbas ain't supposed to be code, they supposed to quantify shit."
- The Onion
User avatar
Archaic`
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1647
Joined: 2002-10-01 01:19am
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:

Post by Archaic` »

Now this is suprising. I hadn't expected Barb to find and read this debate. Did you follow me Barb, or did you just find this on your own?

Ladies and Gentleman, Barb here is the JW I was debating on that other forum that I mentioned earlier in this thread, just FYI.

In any case, just why did you bother with that nitpick Barb? It's not the the JW's haven't had a long long history of false prophecies of the end of the world, including but not limited to the one pointed out above. (I'll go check and see if the quote is correct or not, but as the 1975 prophecy is already a known fact anyway, so it's not as if it makes a difference.)
Veni Vidi Castravi Illegitimos
User avatar
Sokar
Jedi Master
Posts: 1369
Joined: 2002-07-04 02:24am

Post by Sokar »

Ah.....I love the scent of Death Cults in the morning..........
BotM
LadyBarbara
Redshirt
Posts: 36
Joined: 2002-08-18 08:29pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA

Post by LadyBarbara »

Actually, Archaic, BenRG introduced me to this forum. I don't follow you all over the 'net. :wink:

Regarding 1975: Jehovah's Witnesses have made errors in their beliefs in the past, much as the Catholic Church did when it charged Galileo with heresy for his scientific studies. However, the Witnesses do not claim to be prophets. Increased knowledge gained through studying the Bible often requires adjustments in one's thinking. Jehovah's Witnesses are humbly willing to make those adjustments. And when I see an untruth about my religious beliefs, I correct it, Archaic.

Since everyone on this board attacks anyone who dares question the almighty doctrine of evolution, why shouldn't I be allowed equal time to explain my beliefs? I also noticed that you opted out of the debate on UPN. I'm surprised you used exams as the reason, though, since you told me that your IQ was in the 180s and you didn't have to study. Whatever.

Why bother debating? Most of you here seem to have already formed your own opinions about Jehovah's Witnesses. Why bother explaining when nobody's willing to listen? Even Jesus suggested that his disciples "shake the dust off their feet" after speaking to people who were unresponsive.
Faith is better than belief for belief is when someone else does the thinking. --R. Buckminster Fuller

Wit has truth in it; wisecracking is simply calisthenics with words. --Dorothy Parker
User avatar
Boba Fett
Jedi Master
Posts: 1239
Joined: 2002-11-22 11:54am
Location: Lost in my fantasies...

Post by Boba Fett »

@LadyBarbara: I've just one question...Why do you JWs must visit other people's house and bother them with your beliefs?
Tolerate other people's beliefs. That's what Christians always failed to do.
Don't force your point of view on other people.

Why don't you just sit back and wait for the people to go to you? Like little lambs? :roll:

Ps: No offence, just curiosity... (an atheist who believes in himself :D )
Image
Visit Darksaber's X-Wing Station

Member of BotM and HAB
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

LadyBarbara wrote:Actually, Archaic, BenRG introduced me to this forum. I don't follow you all over the 'net. :wink:

Regarding 1975: Jehovah's Witnesses have made errors in their beliefs in the past, much as the Catholic Church did when it charged Galileo with heresy for his scientific studies. However, the Witnesses do not claim to be prophets. Increased knowledge gained through studying the Bible often requires adjustments in one's thinking. Jehovah's Witnesses are humbly willing to make those adjustments. And when I see an untruth about my religious beliefs, I correct it, Archaic.
Only if that untruth is demonstrated through Scripture. What if it's demonstrated through something silly like logic and observation?
Since everyone on this board attacks anyone who dares question the almighty doctrine of evolution, why shouldn't I be allowed equal time to explain my beliefs?
Evolution is a well-grounded scientific theory, not a "doctrine". Stop performing psychological projection.
I also noticed that you opted out of the debate on UPN. I'm surprised you used exams as the reason, though, since you told me that your IQ was in the 180s and you didn't have to study. Whatever.
Or perhaps he got tired of repetitive bullshit.
Why bother debating? Most of you here seem to have already formed your own opinions about Jehovah's Witnesses. Why bother explaining when nobody's willing to listen? Even Jesus suggested that his disciples "shake the dust off their feet" after speaking to people who were unresponsive.
And what of the possibility that you're wrong, your whole religion is full of shit, the Bible is nothing but worthless hearsay, and Jesus was a deranged lunatic? Why do you assume people are being unreasonable if they won't accept your unsupported and unsupportable doctrines, or warm up to your intrusive door-to-door salesmanship practices?
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
LadyBarbara
Redshirt
Posts: 36
Joined: 2002-08-18 08:29pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA

Post by LadyBarbara »

The answer to Boba Fett's question is at Matthew 28:19, 20. Jesus himself could have sat atop a mountain and waited for the faithful to come to him. But he didn't; instead, he preached throughout Galilee and Judea. We are simply following his instructions. And if someone says, "Not interested," we leave.

However, we continue calling on people because we also realize that circumstances change. Many people suddenly became more religiously minded after Sept 11th. But then that interest petered out, mostly because they didn't have any faith to back it up.

Regarding 1975: Jehovah's Witnesses have made errors in their beliefs in the past, much as the Catholic Church did when it charged Galileo with heresy for his scientific studies. However, the Witnesses do not claim to be prophets. Increased knowledge gained through studying the Bible often requires adjustments in one's thinking. Jehovah's Witnesses are humbly willing to make those adjustments. And when I see an untruth about my religious beliefs, I correct it, Archaic.

[Only if that untruth is demonstrated through Scripture. What if it's demonstrated through something silly like logic and observation?

That untruth was posted as fact. I corrected it. I also notice that the person who initially made that assertation hasn't made any others.

Since everyone on this board attacks anyone who dares question the almighty doctrine of evolution, why shouldn't I be allowed equal time to explain my beliefs?

Evolution is a well-grounded scientific theory, not a "doctrine". Stop performing psychological projection.

Yes, Mr. Wong. A theory, not a fact.
I also noticed that you opted out of the debate on UPN. I'm surprised you used exams as the reason, though, since you told me that your IQ was in the 180s and you didn't have to study. Whatever.
Or perhaps he got tired of repetitive bullshit.

Perhaps. I don't know his reasons, really. I guess we all get tired of repetitive b.s., don't we?

Why bother debating? Most of you here seem to have already formed your own opinions about Jehovah's Witnesses. Why bother explaining when nobody's willing to listen? Even Jesus suggested that his disciples "shake the dust off their feet" after speaking to people who were unresponsive.

And what of the possibility that you're wrong, your whole religion is full of shit, the Bible is nothing but worthless hearsay, and Jesus was a deranged lunatic? Why do you assume people are being unreasonable if they won't accept your unsupported and unsupportable doctrines, or warm up to your intrusive door-to-door salesmanship practices?

Maybe we'll all find out after Judgment Day, Mr. Wong. I don't assume anyone is being unreasonable if they reject what I have to say. Why do you assume that anyone who disagrees with you is unreasonable or stupid?
Faith is better than belief for belief is when someone else does the thinking. --R. Buckminster Fuller

Wit has truth in it; wisecracking is simply calisthenics with words. --Dorothy Parker
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

LadyBarbara wrote:
Yes, Mr. Wong. A theory, not a fact.
HAHAHAHAHAH- how many times have we all heard this drivel? Evolution is both a fact and a theory. The theory of gravity is also a theory. Do you doubt gravity exists? :roll: Evolution has been observed- this makes it a fact- the theory discusses it's mechanisms. Theory is an explanation of observations- facts.
Maybe we'll all find out after Judgment Day, Mr. Wong. I don't assume anyone is being unreasonable if they reject what I have to say. Why do you assume that anyone who disagrees with you is unreasonable or stupid?
I won't speak for Mike, but religious people are fundamentally irrational. If they admit this, I have no problem with it- this is what 'faith' is based on- an irrational belief with no evidence whatsoever.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Colonel Olrik
The Spaminator
Posts: 6121
Joined: 2002-08-26 06:54pm
Location: Munich, Germany

Post by Colonel Olrik »

LadyBarbara wrote:The answer to Boba Fett's question is at Matthew 28:19, 20. Jesus himself could have sat atop a mountain and waited for the faithful to come to him. But he didn't; instead, he preached throughout Galilee and Judea. We are simply following his instructions. And if someone says, "Not interested," we leave.
Only after a great deal of insistence and forcing me to shut the door in their faces. Parasitical leaches. Catholics do not behave that way. Stop speaking for all the christians, as your sect has nothing to do with the majority feelings and ideas.
However, we continue calling on people because we also realize that circumstances change. Many people suddenly became more religiously minded after Sept 11th. But then that interest petered out, mostly because they didn't have any faith to back it up.
Good job, taking advantage of people's natural despair faced with the lost of loved ones. After regaining rationality, people simply start thinking again.

That untruth was posted as fact. I corrected it. I also notice that the person who initially made that assertation hasn't made any others.
I dare you to try to defend the Biblical creation of Earth against Science.
Since everyone on this board attacks anyone who dares question the almighty doctrine of evolution, why shouldn't I be allowed equal time to explain my beliefs?
Defend them, back up your ideas, do not preach.
Yes, Mr. Wong. A theory, not a fact.
Your understanding of the definition of theory in science is serioulsy lacking.
Why bother debating? Most of you here seem to have already formed your own opinions about Jehovah's Witnesses. Why bother explaining when nobody's willing to listen? Even Jesus suggested that his disciples "shake the dust off their feet" after speaking to people who were unresponsive.
That's because all of them, until date, possess the knowledge of a high school junior, in therms of science.
Maybe we'll all find out after Judgment Day, Mr. Wong. I don't assume anyone is being unreasonable if they reject what I have to say. Why do you assume that anyone who disagrees with you is unreasonable or stupid?
Yes, the final argument. You've led a good life and all, but because you don't follow my particular version of god you'll rot in hell.
User avatar
Darth Servo
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8805
Joined: 2002-10-10 06:12pm
Location: Satellite of Love

Post by Darth Servo »

LadyBarbara wrote:The answer to Boba Fett's question is at Matthew 28:19, 20. Jesus himself could have sat atop a mountain and waited for the faithful to come to him. But he didn't; instead, he preached throughout Galilee and Judea. We are simply following his instructions.
Ah, what a lovely appeal to authority fallacy that doesn't actually address the real issue (red herring fallacy).
And if someone says, "Not interested," we leave.
Bullshit. Most JWs I've seen will keep pestering until the door is slammed in their face and sometimes not even then (sticking their foot in the door). Your missionaries will do anything dishonest to get in the home (like telling the person that your kid needs to use the restroom).
However, we continue calling on people because we also realize that circumstances change. Many people suddenly became more religiously minded after Sept 11th. But then that interest petered out, mostly because they didn't have any faith to back it up.
Using that trajedy to inflate your church's numbers? Thats disgusting.
Regarding 1975: Jehovah's Witnesses have made errors in their beliefs in the past, much as the Catholic Church did when it charged Galileo with heresy for his scientific studies.
The Catholics eventually admitted they were wrong. The JWs just removed the false doctrine from their literature and tried to deny ever having taught any such ridiculous thing.
However, the Witnesses do not claim to be prophets.
Then don't claim to speak for God. Don't claim that your interpretation of scripture is superior to anyone else's.
Increased knowledge gained through studying the Bible often requires adjustments in one's thinking.
No, it often causes one to stop thinking.
Jehovah's Witnesses are humbly willing to make those adjustments. And when I see an untruth about my religious beliefs, I correct it, Archaic.
Name one instance when the JWs openly admitted they were wrong instead of quietly revising history after the fact?
That untruth was posted as fact. I corrected it. I also notice that the person who initially made that assertation hasn't made any others.
You have done nothign of the sort. I noticed you failed to answer data_link's question of whether your Watchtower was an original print or a revised edition after the fact. Kind of hard to miss since his post was the last one on page 13.
Since everyone on this board attacks anyone who dares question the almighty doctrine of evolution, why shouldn't I be allowed equal time to explain my beliefs?
By all means, explain your beliefs. You have that freedom of speech guaranteed by the U.S. constitution (which the JW's refuse to support or acknowledge because of their irrational doctrine of Satan controling all governments). Just keep in mind that the people on this board also have the freedom to criticise those beliefs as well thanks to that same freedom of speech. Keep in mind that you will need to back them up with reasoning and evidence and NO, quoting scripture is NOT evidence.
Yes, Mr. Wong. A theory, not a fact.
Do you know the difference between the layman's definition of 'theory' and the scientific one?
Perhaps. I don't know his reasons, really. I guess we all get tired of repetitive b.s., don't we?
Then stop coming by our homes.
Why bother debating? Most of you here seem to have already formed your own opinions about Jehovah's Witnesses. Why bother explaining when nobody's willing to listen? Even Jesus suggested that his disciples "shake the dust off their feet" after speaking to people who were unresponsive.
Do you have any idea what it actually means to shake off the dust of one's feet?
Even IF someone on this board were to accept the Bible because of your preaching, WHY should he accept the JW interpretation of it? Given the thousands of different christian churches out there, why should any of us accept yours?
Maybe we'll all find out after Judgment Day, Mr. Wong. I don't assume anyone is being unreasonable if they reject what I have to say. Why do you assume that anyone who disagrees with you is unreasonable or stupid?
The JWs have been saying that Judgment day will happen any day now for over a hundred years with at least half a dozen predicted "end of the world" dates come and gone with nothing. Even the Bible itself (with all of its problems) is quite clear that no one knows when the end of the world will be, yet the JW have given several different dates throughout the religion's history and every single one of them has been wrong. Most people are tired of waiting. Either put up or shut up.
Last edited by Darth Servo on 2002-12-16 02:22pm, edited 2 times in total.
"everytime a person is born the Earth weighs just a little more."--DMJ on StarTrek.com
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com

"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

LadyBarbara wrote:And if someone says, "Not interested," we leave.
Did it ever occur to you that by not coming to you of their own accord, most people are already saying "not interested?" It is inherently intrusive to bother someone in his own home; I don't like telemarketers, and I don't like door-to-door salesmen of any kind, regardless of whether they're selling vacuum cleaners or religious cults like yours.
However, we continue calling on people because we also realize that circumstances change. Many people suddenly became more religiously minded after Sept 11th. But then that interest petered out, mostly because they didn't have any faith to back it up.
Interesting theory. Why do you discard the possibility that interest petered out because they realized they don't like your cult, and it isn't helping them?
Yes, Mr. Wong. A theory, not a fact.
A theory and a fact. Learn to read.
Maybe we'll all find out after Judgment Day, Mr. Wong.
Judgement Day's been called off. Didn't you watch T2? Oh, wait; you actually take silly fiction like that seriously, don't you?
I don't assume anyone is being unreasonable if they reject what I have to say. Why do you assume that anyone who disagrees with you is unreasonable or stupid?
I don't. However, when someone chooses to defend an unreasonable or stupid doctrine, it is perfectly reasonable to conclude that he or she is unreasonable and/or stupid.

Why is it that everyone with a moronic idea to sell trots out that "you just think everyone who disagrees with you is stupid" strawman? Did it ever occur to you that perhaps your cult really is stupid and irrational? I reiterate: I attended a JW service for research purposes, and it was downright scary how thoroughly they employ brainwashing techniques.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Wicked Pilot
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 8972
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm

Post by Wicked Pilot »

LadyBarbara wrote:Yes, Mr. Wong. A theory, not a fact.
AH HA HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAA

Image

Image
The most basic assumption about the world is that it does not contradict itself.
User avatar
Lord_Xerxes
Jedi Knight
Posts: 768
Joined: 2002-08-22 02:21am

Post by Lord_Xerxes »

Darth Wong wrote:
LadyBarbara wrote:And if someone says, "Not interested," we leave.
Did it ever occur to you that by not coming to you of their own accord, most people are already saying "not interested?" It is inherently intrusive to bother someone in his own home; I don't like telemarketers, and I don't like door-to-door salesmen of any kind, regardless of whether they're selling vacuum cleaners or religious cults like yours.
However, we continue calling on people because we also realize that circumstances change. Many people suddenly became more religiously minded after Sept 11th. But then that interest petered out, mostly because they didn't have any faith to back it up.
This has become an issue at the Wawa that am I an assitant manager at. Recently, a wave of church-goers have been bombarding our nightshift employees (after we/they have made it clear that we aren't intrested) with their religious doctrine. They have been shoving pamphlets at us, and one went even so far as to take it upon himself to hang on up infront of our register without our permission. This solicitation is not welcomed, and if pressed any further, I will contact the police for it, as it has gone beyond just solicitation and become harrassment.

Several times now, myself, and my co-workers have made it clear to these people that we are not intrested, and asked them kindly to leave. One went so far as to say that he would not, and then my co-worker told the man nicely that if he did not leave and continued his preaching, he would be forced to call the police. The man then told him he would have to. When my co-worker left the register to move for the phone, the church-goer began spouting his gospel again, something like "You know Jesus loves all his children, even those" and my co-worker cut him off with "Ah Jesus loves kissing my ass. Now get the fuck out of my store."

If we have made it apparent that we are not intrested, why do they continue to press their luck. Being that these pamphlets are marked with the same address of the same church, and that I have kept several as evidence, they are asking for a law suit.

Referring to the Sept 11 thing, and some pointed out that they were using this tradegy to try and sell their religion, allow me to quote my website. This same group did the same to us:
gotdoom.com wrote: Speaking of god, it's already been documented on these pages before how I hate when people try to push religion on other people. I hate when people try to force-feed it down your throat, even after you expressed that you do not wish them to do so.

Recently, this issue has arisen once more. It appears that a certain church down the road from our Wa has taken it upon themselves to have a holy mission to come and purge this place of infidels by spreading "His good word" and converting us to sheep-dom. Basically, they've been soliciting and harrassing our night crew for several weeks now.

It seems to have all taken off shortly after that night where the woman tried so desperately to sell religion to me (see Page 5 of my journal). Ever since then, it seems that a continous weekly stream of these religious types keep comming in to try and force their god down our throats. None of our night workers appreciate it, and all of them are sick and tired of it.

The first blow came when a man gave me a pamphlet that was nothing short of propaganda. The world hasn't seen brain-washing and shit-tactics like this since the nazi's. The pamphlet was so offensive that it actually further damaged Christianity's standings in my mind. The entire angle of the pamplet was based around 9-11 (as far as the cover work goes), and made it seem like it was a response to what had happened. But really, all that was was a ploy to get someone to read the inside to try and melt their brain and turn them into a mindless zombie. "
Take a gander: "
gotdoom.com/journal8.html (you can see a picture of the pamphlet there, halfway down the page)
gotdoom.com wrote: "Yes, "What if YOU had been here?" with a big picture of the smoking, flamming towers. And one might think this is a direct response to 9-11, but it isn't. On the inside it goes on to say "WHAT IF YOU had bee in the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001? What would have happened to YOU? YOU could have died, and YOU would have had to face GOD."

And then it goes on to quote passages from the bible, and ramble on about sin and redemption. It has nothing to do with 9-11. And it doesn't even seem to mention the fact that if god was so forgiving and loving then why did he allow this to happen in the first place? It uses 9-11 as propoganda to try and threaten or fear you into accepting their religon. It basically says, You're fucked, because terroists blew up the building you were in, but you're fucked even more if you don't accept our god! The next time terrorists blow up a building, make sure you have been saved!

Have they sunk that low that they need to use a tragic event to promote themselves? Apparently.

This was only the first of several blows. Over the course of last night, we have recieved at least 3 more pamphlets from the same place, a fourth yesterday from a different church. And all of them were given to me, pratically forced into my hand, on a night I worked register. Considering the fact that I have only worked register once a week for the last month, that means that the ratio of me working register and they trying to force-feed their religion down my throat is a 100% of the time I work the register!

One day, they even went so far as to get tape from our deli and hang up their pamphlet infront of our register, without our permission! This is nothing but harrassment and soliciting. I brought it up to th emanager, and she has informed us that if they continue to persue these actions after we have asked them nicely to stop, then we can call the police. And I will. And I will press charges.

What the fuck is wrong with these people? Are they not getting the fucking point?! I don't like your religion. It's not for me. Stop shoving it down my throat! Do you see me in your church EVER? No! Then stop distributing your propaganda in my store, because it's quite obvious that we aren't intrested!"

These people need to go fuck themselves. Just because I wear all black (and now rightfully so at work as well as home, because our managerial uniforms are black) and because I listen to heavy metal music and wear a pentacle (and not a pentagram, as most people think it is) does not mean I am infidel. Just because your religion is right for you does not mean it's right for everyone else, and it doesn't give you the right to push it on everyone else. You don't see me trying to make you an agnostic. I don't come up to you and try to spoon-feed my beliefs down your throat. I will defend myself if you attack me with your completely illogical beliefs that can easily disproved by science and logic.

But to each his own.

Once again, I demand, "Keep thy religion to thyself."
"And as I promised, I said I would read from the bible..." "...And if we could turn our bible to Pslams..."Happy shall he be that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones." (Pslams 137:9) So let me ask you a question? Who is the worst influence, God or Marilyn Manson?" "God!" "And if that's not the best fucking example, God HIMSELF killed his own MOTHER FUCKING SON!"-Marilyn Manson

"Don't fuck with a Jedi Master, son..." -M.H in J.A.S.B.S.B
Achieved ultimate Doom (post 666) on Mon Aug 18, 2003 10:38 pm
User avatar
Sir Sirius
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2975
Joined: 2002-12-09 12:15pm
Location: 6 hr 45 min R.A. and -16 degrees 43 minutes declination

Post by Sir Sirius »

Religion's Misguided Missiles by Richard Dawkins
A good article about 9/11 and religion.
Image
User avatar
Durandal
Bile-Driven Hate Machine
Posts: 17927
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:26pm
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Contact:

Post by Durandal »

For God loved the world so much that he sat back and let Muslim extremists hijack planes and fly them into skyscrapers full of innocent people, even when he had the power to prevent it. Ditto for the Holocaust, the Crusades and the Inquisitions and every other evil to befall humanity.

If there is a God, he obviously hates us very much. So I say, "Fuck him, I feel like jerking off."
Damien Sorresso

"Ever see what them computa bitchez do to numbas? It ain't natural. Numbas ain't supposed to be code, they supposed to quantify shit."
- The Onion
LadyBarbara
Redshirt
Posts: 36
Joined: 2002-08-18 08:29pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA

Post by LadyBarbara »

I noticed you failed to answer data_link's question of whether your Watchtower was an original print or a revised edition after the fact. Kind of hard to miss since his post was the last one on page 13.

It was an original print.

Also, my Webster's unabridged dictionary defines "Theory" as "a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact." Therefore, evolution cannot both be a fact and a theory.

And actually, the Witnesses did not use 9/11 to gain new members. We experienced some resurgence in interest, but as I stated, if the person really doesn't have faith, the interest doesn't hold. My mother happened to be going from door-to-door as the events of that day unfolded; given the fact that most people were glued to their TV sets, she and the others elected to go home. My point? They didn't continue in their missionary work because of the events of 9/11. They certainly didn't exploit them for any sort of benefit.

Judgement Day's been called off. Didn't you watch T2? Oh, wait; you actually take silly fiction like that seriously, don't you?

I don't debate silly fiction, Mr. Wong. It's entertainment and nothing more.

I don't. However, when someone chooses to defend an unreasonable or stupid doctrine, it is perfectly reasonable to conclude that he or she is unreasonable and/or stupid.

What was I defending? I was merely pointing out that the Watchtower magazine never commented that Armageddon was coming in 1975. That was completely and totally without basis and I pointed that out.

I am amazed at the criticism on my debating style, considering most of this thread consists of nothing more than ad hominem attacks against me.

Then don't claim to speak for God. Don't claim that your interpretation of scripture is superior to anyone else's.

We don't. We invite anyone interested to open their own copy of the Bible and see for themselves. A person chooses to believe what the Bible says or not; it really is a matter of individual choice. What I'm curious about is why so many of you hate people who do believe in the Bible? Where does this hatred come from?

[/b]
Faith is better than belief for belief is when someone else does the thinking. --R. Buckminster Fuller

Wit has truth in it; wisecracking is simply calisthenics with words. --Dorothy Parker
User avatar
Colonel Olrik
The Spaminator
Posts: 6121
Joined: 2002-08-26 06:54pm
Location: Munich, Germany

Post by Colonel Olrik »

LadyBarbara wrote: Also, my Webster's unabridged dictionary defines "Theory" as "a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact." Therefore, evolution cannot both be a fact and a theory.
Therefore, you don't have a clue about scientific method. Have you ever heard of the theory of relativity? Pretty well verified, still called theory. Fact is: There are stars. Theory is: how they were created. Your dicionary definition does not apply.

I don't debate silly fiction, Mr. Wong. It's entertainment and nothing more.
So, your judgement day is for real, despite being the idea of only a small, sad sect inspired in one of the World's religions?
We don't. We invite anyone interested to open their own copy of the Bible and see for themselves. A person chooses to believe what the Bible says or not; it really is a matter of individual choice. What I'm curious about is why so many of you hate people who do believe in the Bible? Where does this hatred come from?
Because there are people who try to enforce at schools ideas that go against science, logic and moral. Like creationism.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

LadyBarbara wrote:Also, my Webster's unabridged dictionary defines "Theory" as "a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact." Therefore, evolution cannot both be a fact and a theory.
So gravity cannot be both a fact and a theory either, eh? What kind of idiot attempts to contradict scientific definitions with colloquial dictionary definitions in a debate about science?
Judgement Day's been called off. Didn't you watch T2? Oh, wait; you actually take silly fiction like that seriously, don't you?
I don't debate silly fiction, Mr. Wong. It's entertainment and nothing more.
If you don't debate silly fiction, then why do you take the Bible so seriously?
What was I defending? I was merely pointing out that the Watchtower magazine never commented that Armageddon was coming in 1975. That was completely and totally without basis and I pointed that out.
An issue I don't particularly care about. I was talking about your ignorant comments about evolution.
I am amazed at the criticism on my debating style, considering most of this thread consists of nothing more than ad hominem attacks against me.
Really! Do you know what an ad-hominem attack is? Are you aware that even the most vicious insult is not necessarily an ad-hominem fallacy unless it is used to dismiss one of your arguments without proper rebuttal of its logic and/or facts?

I'm tired of people who use "ad hominem" as a blunt instrument to knock down any criticism or rebuttal which is not politely worded. The only one guilty of a fallacy here is you: look up "style over substance" sometime.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
HemlockGrey
Fucking Awesome
Posts: 13834
Joined: 2002-07-04 03:21pm

Post by HemlockGrey »

I was going to point out the whole 'Christians can believe in evolution too' bit, as I usually do to fundies I encounter, but then I realized 'Hey, these are JW's; and, being a non-JW Christian, I'm just Joe Blasphemer, and God knows they won't listen to reason. Why fucking bother?"
The End of Suburbia
"If more cars are inevitable, must there not be roads for them to run on?"
-Robert Moses

"The Wire" is the best show in the history of television. Watch it today.
User avatar
SeebianWurm
Padawan Learner
Posts: 300
Joined: 2002-11-20 09:51pm
Contact:

Post by SeebianWurm »

Darth Wong wrote:
LadyBarbara wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:Judgement Day's been called off. Didn't you watch T2? Oh, wait; you actually take silly fiction like that seriously, don't you?
I don't debate silly fiction, Mr. Wong. It's entertainment and nothing more.
If you don't debate silly fiction, then why do you take the Bible so seriously?
WongPoints++;
[ Ye Olde Coked-Up Werewolf of the Late Knights ]

Fuck fish.
User avatar
Darth Servo
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8805
Joined: 2002-10-10 06:12pm
Location: Satellite of Love

Post by Darth Servo »

Darth Servo wrote:Do you know the difference between the layman's definition of 'theory' and the scientific one?
LadyBarbara wrote:Also, my Webster's unabridged dictionary defines "Theory" as "a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact." Therefore, evolution cannot both be a fact and a theory.
So it looks like the answer to my question is, "No, I don't have a fucking clue what the difference is between the layman's definition of 'theory' and the scientific one because I'm an uneducated idiot."

Why am I not surprised. :roll:
Darth Servo wrote:Then don't claim to speak for God. Don't claim that your interpretation of scripture is superior to anyone else's.
We don't. We invite anyone interested to open their own copy of the Bible and see for themselves. A person chooses to believe what the Bible says or not; it really is a matter of individual choice. What I'm curious about is why so many of you hate people who do believe in the Bible? Where does this hatred come from?
Yes, you do. Every single JW I've ever met has insisted that the Watchtower Bible and Tract society is "God's true religion," that only JWs know the "true meaning of scripture" and every other church on the face of the Earth is a concoction of Satan and its followers will be destroyed on Judgment Day.

You say you believe what the Bible says, but since the Bible is 100% WORDS, it MUST be interpreted in some manner, and those interpretations range from "100% literal truth" to "worthless bullshit" with many, many, many flavors in between. I ask again, why is your interpretation of scripture better than anyone elses?
"everytime a person is born the Earth weighs just a little more."--DMJ on StarTrek.com
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com

"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
User avatar
Perinquus
Virus-X Wannabe
Posts: 2685
Joined: 2002-08-06 11:57pm

Post by Perinquus »

C.S.Strowbridge wrote:
Durran Korr wrote:
Caesar didn't seem to have a problem with Cleopatra (the real Cleopatra did not look like Elizabeth Taylor, just in case you've never seen pictures of real Egyptians), and that's pretty fucking high- profile if you ask me.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Cleopatra wasn't exactly a real Egyptian, was she? I thought she was more of Greek descent.
AFAIK, Cleopatra was from black, not arabian. (Which is how I would clasify Egyptians.)
Cleopatra was from the Ptolemaic dynasty. Ptolemy was one of Alexander the Great's generals, and was a Macedonian Greek. According to Egyptian law, the pharoahs were forced to take their consorts from their immediate family, since royal blood was felt to be too lofty to mix with the "impure" blood of common folk. Thus the Ptolemy's "kept it in the family". There probably was some admixture with the native Hamito-Semitic Egyptians nonetheless, but Cleopatra was almost certainly not black.
User avatar
Archaic`
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1647
Joined: 2002-10-01 01:19am
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:

Post by Archaic` »

LadyBarbara wrote:Actually, Archaic, BenRG introduced me to this forum. I don't follow you all over the 'net. :wink:
*Shrugs* Fair enough. Given that neither of you have posted here in a long time, it was a fair enough assumption.

In any case....
Image

You were right. It wasn't the issue of April 1st. It was the issue of May 1st, 1968. Page 273. So much for your nitpick.
Veni Vidi Castravi Illegitimos
LadyBarbara
Redshirt
Posts: 36
Joined: 2002-08-18 08:29pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA

Post by LadyBarbara »

This is a quote from paragraph 8 of the May 1, 1968, Watchtower:

"Does this mean that the year 1975 will bring the battle of Armageddon? No one can say with certainty what any particular year will bring. Jesus said: "Concerning that day or the hour nobody knows." [Mark 13:32]."

My point was that the quote attributed to the 5/1/68 Watchtower was completely incorrect. Next time try reading the articles that often accompany the charts, Archaic.
Faith is better than belief for belief is when someone else does the thinking. --R. Buckminster Fuller

Wit has truth in it; wisecracking is simply calisthenics with words. --Dorothy Parker
Post Reply