[Vote] Ban BlkBrryTheGreat?

SirNitram · Post by **SirNitram** » 2006-07-11 11:53am

Here's a cyst on the ass of our community. BlkBrry remains the same pathetic, annoying twat he's always been, and as his troll type always shows, he's crawled out to throw a shitfit, and will soon be sinking beneath the waves until his next petulant attempt at debate.

Here is his latest travesty against debating.

We've got the usual from him.. Irrelevent personal attacks to dismiss someone's reply which is then defended as a 'Flame', assertions demonstrating an ethical code more in line with a two year old than anything else, readily contradicting himself when it suits his argument(Dismissing a mod as 'Emotionally damaged', then declaring emotional damage is nothing more than 'Hurting someone's feelings', and shouldn't factor into ethical discussions), and to top it off, declares he'll ignore his opponent instead of supporting his argument.

There's more travesties, as I'm sure anyone can guess from his WTPF title.[/b]

Post by **Surlethe** » 2006-07-11 12:06pm

Skimming through his posting history, we find:

Here is another little flame-up, on intellectual property. And here, he asked for his title off. Here's a little trolling split from the Christopher Reeve tribute thread. Digging back in the HoS a bit further, Violation of IvP. I would think that, yes, he has a history of such behavior (simply confirming that I'd actively discourage lifting the WTPF).

EDIT: For anyone who needs a direct reference to an administrative warning, Darth Wong said, "I had no idea you so desperately wanted to be banned." here. I think that's pretty clear as far as warnings go.

GrandMasterTerwynn · Post by **GrandMasterTerwynn** » 2006-07-11 12:09pm

SirNitram wrote:Here's a cyst on the ass of our community. BlkBrry remains the same pathetic, annoying twat he's always been, and as his troll type always shows, he's crawled out to throw a shitfit, and will soon be sinking beneath the waves until his next petulant attempt at debate.

Here is his latest travesty against debating.

We've got the usual from him.. Irrelevent personal attacks to dismiss someone's reply which is then defended as a 'Flame', assertions demonstrating an ethical code more in line with a two year old than anything else, readily contradicting himself when it suits his argument(Dismissing a mod as 'Emotionally damaged', then declaring emotional damage is nothing more than 'Hurting someone's feelings', and shouldn't factor into ethical discussions), and to top it off, declares he'll ignore his opponent instead of supporting his argument.

There's more travesties, as I'm sure anyone can guess from his WTPF title.[/b]

Well, the WTPF title hasn't worked, and neither has a Horsemanizing of his posts and a rather clear warning that his tactics have the potential for getting him banned. And boy, having had five shots of Bombay Sapphire in 30 minutes last night really puts me in a sour mood this morning. So, without further ado, I say banninate.

Post by **Edi** » 2006-07-11 12:24pm

The troll just can't take a fucking hint, so I agree that a good old-fashioned burning at the stake is in order. Ban the asshole.

Edi

Post by **Surlethe** » 2006-07-11 12:27pm

I move to edit a poll into the original post of this thread to ban the troll. I'm also in favor of prejudicial termination.

Post by **Dalton** » 2006-07-11 12:40pm

I fully support any and all punitive measures against him.

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2006-07-11 12:40pm

Post quality can only go up with him out.

Post by **LadyTevar** » 2006-07-11 03:44pm

I second the motion to turn this into a Ban Poll, so I can vote him kicked so soundly off the board his mother feels the asswhoopin'.

Capsaicin · Post by **Capsaicin** » 2006-07-11 03:46pm

Poll options added, and thread title changed to reflect that.

Post by **LadyTevar** » 2006-07-11 04:01pm

Thank you Capsicin
*HugglesCuddles*

Gil Hamilton · Post by **Gil Hamilton** » 2006-07-11 04:05pm

Send him to the gallows. It's the next logical step.

Ender · Post by **Ender** » 2006-07-11 05:51pm

so long jackass

Keevan_Colton · Post by **Keevan_Colton** » 2006-07-11 05:59pm

We hadnt already?

Knife · Post by **Knife** » 2006-07-11 06:03pm

He's not worth the effort to try to defend. Ban.

Sonnenburg · Post by **Sonnenburg** » 2006-07-11 06:49pm

BlkBrry "I'd Like To Buy A Vowel" The Great can be sent to the bushel basket in the sky as far as I'm concerned.

phongn · Post by **phongn** » 2006-07-11 11:12pm

I haven't liked him in quite awhile ... kick him out.

Connor MacLeod · Post by **Connor MacLeod** » 2006-07-11 11:33pm

*thumbs down*

Knife · Post by **Knife** » 2006-07-12 12:46am

Seems fairly clear cut at this point in time.

Post by **Surlethe** » 2006-07-12 12:54am

I'm pretty sure twenty is a majority. Let's ban the motherfucker.

Post by **Mr Bean** » 2006-07-12 01:26am

With twenty votes for and the user in question posting a "goodbye" thread
http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic. ... highlight=

I move for implentation of the ban post haste.

Unless of course you wish for Mr BlkBrry a chance to pad his Parting shots thread to a sufficent length first before applying the ban stick.

Stuart Mackey · Post by **Stuart Mackey** » 2006-07-12 04:11am

One has to admire his sense of timeing; He has escaped banning so many times by only just not crossing the line, and when he does cross the line, he 'retires' just before the straw lands on the camels back.
Oh..ban.

Post by **Coyote** » 2006-07-12 08:37am

Belated, but bydie-bye to m'sieu BlckBerry. You had your chance and more.

RedImperator · Post by **RedImperator** » 2006-07-12 11:17am

Mr Bean wrote:With twenty votes for and the user in question posting a "goodbye" thread
http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic. ... highlight=

I move for implentation of the ban post haste.

Unless of course you wish for Mr BlkBrry a chance to pad his Parting shots thread to a sufficent length first before applying the ban stick.

Why would that thread go into Parting Shots? This is the thread where the killshot will be, this is the thread that will be put there.

Post by **Mr Bean** » 2006-07-12 11:25am

RedImperator wrote:
Mr Bean wrote:With twenty votes for and the user in question posting a "goodbye" thread
http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic. ... highlight=

I move for implentation of the ban post haste.

Unless of course you wish for Mr BlkBrry a chance to pad his Parting shots thread to a sufficent length first before applying the ban stick.
Why would that thread go into Parting Shots? This is the thread where the killshot will be, this is the thread that will be put there.

The first parting shots threads and some of the newer ones are the threads in question which got "insert user" banned in the first place. If we don't have one of those great threads(IE say Stim's challange, ban me I dare you) we use this thread which is a collection of some of the best of that users worst.

Capsaicin · Post by **Capsaicin** » 2006-07-12 01:17pm

He has been felled.

This thread will now be moved to Parting Shots, as it decided his fate. Anyone wishing to read his goodbye thread may do so courtesy of Mr Bean's link provided above.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

[Vote] Ban BlkBrryTheGreat?

Ban, title, revoke, or do nothing?

[Vote] Ban BlkBrryTheGreat?

Re: [Discussion] BlkBrryTheGreat