What if: Episode I Re-released in theaters, would you go?

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

If Episode I came back to theaters, would you pay to see it again?

Yes
27
32%
Maybe, if it were the DVD cut plus CGI Yoda
20
24%
No
37
44%
 
Total votes: 84

Kurgan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4069
Joined: 2002-08-19 08:13pm

What if: Episode I Re-released in theaters, would you go?

Post by Kurgan »

[This is a hypothetical, so don't flame me, I'm not starting rumors.]

But let's say, tomorrow it was announced that Star Wars: Episode I: The Phantom Menace was going to return to theaters once again.

It could be wide release, or it could be limited release, whatever, doesn't matter.

1) Would you pay full price to see it again in the theater?

Or for the first time if you missed it?


2) And for a second question, would it make any difference in your decision if say, instead of the original Theatrical Cut (shown in 1999), Lucas showed a "new version" (or "Special Edition") of the film not previously shown in theaters: that is to say, the "DVD Cut" (released in 2001) plus say, CGI Yoda replacing the muppet Yoda, as so many were hoping to see in some future version?

I mean no other enhancements added, just the version we've all seen on DVD already, but Yoda replaced with a CG character like in Episode III.

Would you go?
fun/fantasy movies existed before the overrated Star Wars came out. What made it seem 'less dark' was the sheer goofy aspect of it: two robots modeled on Laurel & Hardy, and a smartass outlaw with bigfoot co-pilot and their hotrod pizza-shaped ship, and they were sucked aboard a giant Disco Ball. -adw1
Someone asked me yesterday if Dracula met Saruman and there was a fight, who would win. I just looked at this man. What an idiotic thing to say. I mean really, it was half-witted. - Christopher Lee

Image
JKA Server 2024
User avatar
Invictus ChiKen
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1645
Joined: 2004-12-27 01:22am

Post by Invictus ChiKen »

Sure, I try to take in one movie a month just to get out and about and hey at least I know it's better than 90% of what is out there today ^.^
"The real ideological schism in America is not Republican vs Democrat; it is North vs South, Urban vs Rural, and it has been since the 19th century."
-Mike Wong
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

No way. A CGI Yoda would take enjoyment away from the film- i.e. the hilarious, weird muppet Yoda would be gone. Unacceptable.

That is not to say I won't buy the DVD if it comes out- the TPM DVD doesn't look as good as AotC or RotS (can't remember the reasons, but it's there), I wouldn't mind replacing it.

I'd only go see a re-release of TPM if Jar Jar was deleted.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
rhoenix
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1910
Joined: 2006-04-22 07:52pm

Post by rhoenix »

No, I certainly would not. Jar-Jar offended me enough to not ever want to see Episode 1 again. Episodes 2 and 3 were good and better, but not 1.

That being said, Qui-Gon Jinn (spelling?) was nearly my ideal for a Jedi. Even with that, however, I still dislike Jar-Jar that much.
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Post by RedImperator »

No, on account of the fact that I have a policy against paying money to watch bad movies.
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

No.
Image
I believe in a sign of Zeta.

[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]

"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
User avatar
000
Jedi Knight
Posts: 638
Joined: 2004-12-04 09:39pm

Post by 000 »

Nope. Wouldn't see the following two either.
Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi
What Kind of Username is That?
Posts: 9254
Joined: 2002-07-10 08:53pm
Location: Back in PA

Post by Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi »

Nope. I've seen it on DVD enough times to get an impression of the plot, and it's definately not one of those films that holds up well. Started out as merely okay in my book, and then just got more cringe-inducing from there.

Adding or changing around scenes wouldn't make me want to see it, as my problem with the film aren't a Greedo-shoots-first-type thing, but rather with the movie on a whole. They'd need to make an entire new movie and call it Episode I.
BotM: Just another monkey|HAB
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Post by Stofsk »

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi wrote:Nope. I've seen it on DVD enough times to get an impression of the plot, and it's definately not one of those films that holds up well. Started out as merely okay in my book, and then just got more cringe-inducing from there.
I think the first 20 minutes was really well done, it's when they land on Naboo and meet Jar-Jar that things rapidly spiral down to oblivion.
User avatar
SCVN 2812
Jedi Knight
Posts: 812
Joined: 2002-07-08 01:01am
Contact:

Post by SCVN 2812 »

I'd go. There are some wonderful eye candy scenes such as the Pod Race that are quite frankly meant to be seen on the big screen and loose some of their impact on the small screen. As well there are no shortages of good times to get up to take a whiz, like pretty much that whole part with the Gungan city...
Image

"We at Yahoo have a lot of experience in helping people navigate an environment full of falsehoods, random useless information, and truly horrifying pornography. I don't think the human soul will hold any real surprises for us." - The Onion
RThurmont
Jedi Master
Posts: 1243
Joined: 2005-07-09 01:58pm
Location: Desperately trying to find a local restaurant that serves foie gras.

Post by RThurmont »

I would definitely see it either way. TPM is without a doubt the most underrated SW film. Lucas massively miscalculated with Jar Jar Binks-without that idiot blundering around, you would have had a much more widely accepted production. Even with Jar Jar, its still quite a nice film, with the mentor/apprentice dynamic between Jinn and Kenobi, the fascinating and surrealistic appearance of Naboo, the messianic Anakin, Palpatine's plotting, and what not.
"Here's a nickel, kid. Get yourself a better computer."
User avatar
Darth Fanboy
DUH! WINNING!
Posts: 11182
Joined: 2002-09-20 05:25am
Location: Mars, where I am a totally bitchin' rockstar.

Post by Darth Fanboy »

IF the "special Edition" involves the CGI Yoda, a more violent massacre of the Gungans during the Battle of Theed, significantly less JAr JAr, and more Jedi slicing and dicing of droids, then Im down. I actually liked Episode I more than most people do so it isn't much of a stretch.
"If it's true that our species is alone in the universe, then I'd have to say that the universe aimed rather low and settled for very little."
-George Carlin (1937-2008)

"Have some of you Americans actually seen Football? Of course there are 0-0 draws but that doesn't make them any less exciting."
-Dr Roberts, with quite possibly the dumbest thing ever said in 10 years of SDNet.
Jim Raynor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2922
Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am

Post by Jim Raynor »

I probably wouldn't, but not because I hate the movie, which I don't. I don't go to the theater much anyway, and I already own the film and have seen it many times.

I honestly never understood why Jar Jar was such a huge problem for other fans. I didn't mind him when the movie first came out, but I was a lot younger then and less discerning. I find him annoying when I watch the movie now, but he's still just a minor bit character to me. IMO, Jar Jar isn't even as bad as kiddie Anakin taking down enemy ships while yelling "Yippee!" There's so much more to the movie, and a small annoyance like Jar Jar doesn't ruin the whole thing for me.
"They're not triangular, but they are more or less blade-shaped"- Thrawn McEwok on the shape of Bakura destroyers

"Lovely. It's known as impugning character regarding statement of professional qualifications' in the legal world"- Karen Traviss, crying libel because I said that no soldier she interviewed would claim that he can take on billion-to-one odds

"I've already laid out rules for this thread that we're not going to make these evidential demands"- Dark Moose on supporting your claims
User avatar
Ace Pace
Hardware Lover
Posts: 8456
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:04am
Location: Wasting time instead of money
Contact:

Post by Ace Pace »

Yes, since I rather liked the movie.
Brotherhood of the Bear | HAB | Mess | SDnet archivist |
User avatar
Darth Garden Gnome
Official SD.Net Lawn Ornament
Posts: 6029
Joined: 2002-07-08 02:35am
Location: Some where near a mailbox

Post by Darth Garden Gnome »

For the worst of the saga, I most certainly wouldn't.
Leader of the Secret Gnome Revolution
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Post by Havok »

Well I'd certainly go see it before I went and saw AOTC in the theater again.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
Galvatron
Decepticon Leader
Posts: 6662
Joined: 2002-07-12 12:27am
Location: Kill! Smash! Destroy! Rend! Mangle! Distort!

Post by Galvatron »

Nope. Same reason as RedImperator's.
User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

My reason for not seeing it isn't really due to the film itself, but because I saw it in the cinema about three times when it came out and I don't really need to see it in that environment again.

I wouldn't really have a desire to see any of the films in a cinema again, except for maybe the original version of SW or ESB in an arthouse screening, perhaps.
Image
I believe in a sign of Zeta.

[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]

"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

Since I still find TPM entertaining, I would go see. Haven't been let down by a SW film yet. 8)
User avatar
Lord Pounder
Pretty Hate Machine
Posts: 9695
Joined: 2002-11-19 04:40pm
Location: Belfast, unfortunately
Contact:

Post by Lord Pounder »

Yes. You can watch a movie over and over again at home but unless you have you're rich and have your own cinema nothing beats the quality and atmosphere od the silver screen,
RIP Yosemite Bear
Gone, Never Forgotten
User avatar
irishmick79
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 2272
Joined: 2002-07-16 05:07pm
Location: Wisconsin

Post by irishmick79 »

Absolutely not - I thought TPM was a massive pile of shit which was completely undeserving of being a Star Wars film. I was pissed that I paid full price for that turd the first time I saw it.

Honestly, maybe 30 minutes of the movie is actually watchable. I can't stomach any of the scenes with Jake Lloyd or Jar-Jar, which unfortunately encompass most of the damn movie. Liam Neesen is a fine actor, but it looks like he's sleepwalking through the movie, and consequently I felt that Qui Gon Ginn was a very forgettable character. The only scene in the whole damn thing that is worthwhile is the Darth Maul lightsaber duel, and this is sadly chopped up by the unimpressive palace assault plot.

The only way you could ever get me to watch this puddle of fish feces again would be to strap me in a chair and tape my eyes open Clockwork Orange style. This movie is so bad I won't even watch it again at home for free. There's no way in Hell I would fork over money to see The Phantom Menace again.
"A country without a Czar is like a village without an idiot."
- Old Russian Saying
Srynerson
Jedi Knight
Posts: 697
Joined: 2005-05-15 12:45am
Location: Denver, CO

Post by Srynerson »

While the film certainly has its weaknesses, there are too many scenes that only truly come to life on the big screen to pass up the opportunity to see it again, so "yes."
Image
User avatar
Wicked Pilot
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 8972
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm

Post by Wicked Pilot »

Unless included in my price of admission is a blow job from a hot female usher and some free snocaps I don't see myself going. I honestly think TPM had the best lightsabre fight seens in the prequals, some of the better Jedi to Jedi dialog, and Darth Maul kicked ass, but that's about it.
The most basic assumption about the world is that it does not contradict itself.
User avatar
DesertFly
has been designed to act as a flotation device
Posts: 1381
Joined: 2005-10-18 11:35pm
Location: The Emerald City

Post by DesertFly »

I would watch it again. It's actually grown on me somewhat.
Proud member of the no sigs club.
User avatar
Dooey Jo
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3127
Joined: 2002-08-09 01:09pm
Location: The land beyond the forest; Sweden.
Contact:

Post by Dooey Jo »

I might. I didn't hate it then and I don't hate it now. It's just that I only go to the movies like once or twice a year...
Image
"Nippon ichi, bitches! Boing-boing."
Mai smote the demonic fires of heck...

Faker Ninjas invented ninjitsu
Post Reply