Oh... the Raiders...

"Where you at 85?" Gettin' stiches OUCH!!
Hey Tampa!! Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?!?!?
AND... one more Eagles meltdown for the record books. See ya next week Red

I'm 12-3 with MNF to go

Moderator: Edi
Rothlisberger should be playing, and the Jags have serious injury problems. It's not a bad pick, but I've definitely got the Steelers taking this one.Elfdart wrote:I don't see why my pick of the Jaguars over the Steelers is such a wild one. The Jags were a playoff team last year, beat the Steelers last year, are one of the few teams that are more brutish than the Steelers, Pittsburgh is sans their starting QB and the Jaguars are at home. I had to laugh all week when Cowboy fans called it an "upset" when they lost to Jacksonville. The Jaguars are a first-rate team and anyone who takes them lightly or plays them with without a full starting lineup is most likely going to lose.
the very same dolphins that SI picked to take the AFC Championship. Yet another little leage, er... College Football coach proves he can't hack it with the big boys.Kuja wrote:*trampling sound over screaming dolphins*havokeff wrote:Buffalo at Miami Dolphins
Well good. If you're going to have a fiasco, it might as well be a complete fiasco. These Birds don't do anything half-assed....except playcalling in the fourth quarter, of course.Darth Garden Gnome wrote:Good times roll in Philly: Kearse done for the season. What a craptacular day in football for the Eagles.
It certaintly says somethign when not even a Jim's cheesesteak erases the feeling of utter defeat after the game. I guess the Giants were due for one, anyone remember the Miracle at the Meadowlands?RedImperator wrote: I actually feel physically ill every time I think about that fucking game. Christ, I'm going to be telling my grandkids about this one.
We're still ahead of them in comeback wins in the last few years. This is the biggest point differential overcome by either side, but I don't think this is as big a stab in the chest for us as Westbrook scoring on that punt return in '03 was for them.That NOS Guy wrote:It certaintly says somethign when not even a Jim's cheesesteak erases the feeling of utter defeat after the game. I guess the Giants were due for one, anyone remember the Miracle at the Meadowlands?RedImperator wrote: I actually feel physically ill every time I think about that fucking game. Christ, I'm going to be telling my grandkids about this one.
We'll have to get them that much harder next time. Little bastards.
Because they're a "running team first" which is what every Steeler fan and Football aficionado would tell you ever since the Stele Curtain days of the 1970s. However the Jags seem to have figured out that if you stop the Steelers from running the football you stop the Steelers, basically doing to Pittsburgh what the Steelers have been doing to other teams ever since this team started to come together in 2005.thejester wrote:Can someone explain to a dumb Australian why the Steelers insisted on running the ball in the first half?
Indeed. Myself and the four guys I was watching the game with scratched our heads over that.Darth Garden Gnome wrote:Well Elfdart, I gotta hand it to you, you know your shit. Jacksonville and its defense is for real.
Also... did anyone notice a somewhat curious graphic appear in the final minute of the game? Its header was "NFL Generic" and it read "AAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGG."
For the reason stated above, and because the QB thought he could play a couple of weeks after an appendectomy. I shit you not. The coach should have kept him off the field.thejester wrote:Can someone explain to a dumb Australian why the Steelers insisted on running the ball in the first half?