Anyone else tired of whining Muslim bitches?

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

weemadando
SMAKIBBFB
Posts: 19195
Joined: 2002-07-28 12:30pm
Contact:

Post by weemadando »

Wyrm wrote:
theski wrote: That and the 72 virgins.. :roll:
72 virgins? Screw that! MY paradise comes with 72 hookers! :mrgreen:

Hmmm... The Muslim guy-martyrs would find 72 virgins waiting for them in paradise pretty appealing, but what do the the Muslim girl-martyrs get (and there's been a few)? Do they get 72 exotic dancers from Chipendales? Or do they get to be one of the 72 virgins of some guy-martyr? That doesn't seem like an even deal to me. :?
Actually a few years ago there were some linguists and historians who determined that it was not virgins, but a form of raisin considered a delicacy in the prophets time that they were referring to. Apparently the difference between the two words is, at best, minimal.
User avatar
Imperial Overlord
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11978
Joined: 2004-08-19 04:30am
Location: The Tower at Charm

Post by Imperial Overlord »

weemadando wrote: Actually a few years ago there were some linguists and historians who determined that it was not virgins, but a form of raisin considered a delicacy in the prophets time that they were referring to. Apparently the difference between the two words is, at best, minimal.
The other relevant part to this that in every other detail, paradise is really described as a large, lush garden. So exotic fruit and raisins fit right in with the rest of the description.
The Excellent Prismatic Spray. For when you absolutely, positively must kill a motherfucker. Accept no substitutions. Contact a magician of the later Aeons for details. Some conditions may apply.
User avatar
slebetman
Padawan Learner
Posts: 261
Joined: 2006-02-17 04:17am
Location: Malaysia

Post by slebetman »

Imperial Overlord wrote:
weemadando wrote: Actually a few years ago there were some linguists and historians who determined that it was not virgins, but a form of raisin considered a delicacy in the prophets time that they were referring to. Apparently the difference between the two words is, at best, minimal.
The other relevant part to this that in every other detail, paradise is really described as a large, lush garden. So exotic fruit and raisins fit right in with the rest of the description.
Don't know about the number 72, and almost certain that the fruit theory is wrong, but there is no proper english words for the "servants" waiting for you in heaven. These creatures, "virgins" in english, are somewhere between angels and humans and by their description take on human forms. And yes, for girls there will be male versions waiting for them. So these "virgins" are xenos. And we don't know what they look like exactly except that they are supposed to be beautiful. I'm thinking catgirls ;)
User avatar
Darth Servo
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8805
Joined: 2002-10-10 06:12pm
Location: Satellite of Love

Post by Darth Servo »

weemadando wrote:Actually a few years ago there were some linguists and historians who determined that it was not virgins, but a form of raisin considered a delicacy in the prophets time that they were referring to. Apparently the difference between the two words is, at best, minimal.
But that just isn't good enough. Who the hell is going to blow themselves up for a bunch of fruit?
"everytime a person is born the Earth weighs just a little more."--DMJ on StarTrek.com
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com

"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Darth Servo wrote:
weemadando wrote:Actually a few years ago there were some linguists and historians who determined that it was not virgins, but a form of raisin considered a delicacy in the prophets time that they were referring to. Apparently the difference between the two words is, at best, minimal.
But that just isn't good enough. Who the hell is going to blow themselves up for a bunch of fruit?
Besides, 72 fruit is nothing. A typical farmer could easily go into his backyard and pick 72 fruit. The idea of this being portrayed as some kind of fantastic divine reward is ridiculous, even 1400 years ago.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Wyrm
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2206
Joined: 2005-09-02 01:10pm
Location: In the sand, pooping hallucinogenic goodness.

Post by Wyrm »

Darth Servo wrote:
weemadando wrote:Actually a few years ago there were some linguists and historians who determined that it was not virgins, but a form of raisin considered a delicacy in the prophets time that they were referring to. Apparently the difference between the two words is, at best, minimal.
But that just isn't good enough. Who the hell is going to blow themselves up for a bunch of fruit?
It would be the practical joke of all time! :D

Generic Muslim Martyr: "But... but... I thought I would get 72 virgins!"

Allah: "Virgins?! Where'd you get that idea? If I wanted you to get sexual favors here for martyring yourself, I would've given you 172 hookers who knew what they were doing, not fumbling virgins. Now take your damn rasins and get outta here."
Darth Wong on Strollers vs. Assholes: "There were days when I wished that my stroller had weapons on it."
wilfulton on Bible genetics: "If two screaming lunatics copulate in front of another screaming lunatic, the result will be yet another screaming lunatic. 8)"
SirNitram: "The nation of France is a theory, not a fact. It should therefore be approached with an open mind, and critically debated and considered."

Cornivore! | BAN-WATCH CANE: XVII | WWJDFAKB? - What Would Jesus Do... For a Klondike Bar? | Evil Bayesian Conspiracy
weemadando
SMAKIBBFB
Posts: 19195
Joined: 2002-07-28 12:30pm
Contact:

Post by weemadando »

Darth Wong wrote:
Darth Servo wrote:
weemadando wrote:Actually a few years ago there were some linguists and historians who determined that it was not virgins, but a form of raisin considered a delicacy in the prophets time that they were referring to. Apparently the difference between the two words is, at best, minimal.
But that just isn't good enough. Who the hell is going to blow themselves up for a bunch of fruit?
Besides, 72 fruit is nothing. A typical farmer could easily go into his backyard and pick 72 fruit. The idea of this being portrayed as some kind of fantastic divine reward is ridiculous, even 1400 years ago.
Gene Expression wrote:September 18, 2004

Girls or grapes?

I was interested to see a suggestion this week that the 'virgins in paradise' offered as a reward to the Muslim martyr might be based on a misunderstanding of the Qu'ran. The word usually translated as 'virgin' might really just mean a bunch of grapes.

Anyway, here is a useful discussion of the issue...

Virgins? What virgins?
It is widely believed that Muslim 'martyrs' enjoy rich sensual rewards on reaching paradise. A new study suggests they may be disappointed. Ibn Warraq reports

Saturday January 12, 2002
The Guardian

In August, 2001, the American television channel CBS aired an interview with a Hamas activist Muhammad Abu Wardeh, who recruited terrorists for suicide bombings in Israel. Abu Wardeh was quoted as saying: "I described to him how God would compensate the martyr for sacrificing his life for his land. If you become a martyr, God will give you 70 virgins, 70 wives and everlasting happiness." Wardeh was in fact shortchanging his recruits since the rewards in Paradise for martyrs was 72 virgins. But I am running ahead of things .
Since September 11, news stories have repeated the story of suicide bombers and their heavenly rewards, and equally Muslim scholars and Western apologists of Islam have repeated that suicide is forbidden in Islam. Suicide (qatlu nafsi-hi) is not referred to in the Koran but is indeed forbidden in the Traditions (Hadith in Arabic), which are the collected sayings and doings attributed to the Prophet and traced back to him through a series of putatively trustworthy witnesses. They include what was done in his presence that he did not forbid, and even the authoritative sayings and doings of his companions.

But the Hamas spokesman correctly uses the word martyr (shahid) and not suicide bomber, since those who blow themselves up almost daily in Israel and those who died on September 11 were dying in the noblest of all causes, Jihad, which is an incumbent religious duty, established in the Koran and in the Traditions as a divine institution, and enjoined for the purpose of advancing Islam. While suicide is forbidden, martyrdom is everywhere praised, welcomed, and urged: "By the Being in Whose Hand is my life, I love that I should be killed in the way of Allah; then I should be brought back to life and be killed again in His way..."; "The Prophet said, 'Nobody who enters Paradise will ever like to return to this world even if he were offered everything, except the martyr who will desire to return to this world and be killed 10 times for the sake of the great honour that has been bestowed upon him'." [Sahih Muslim, chapters 781, 782, The Merit of Jihad and the Merit of Martyrdom.]

What of the rewards in paradise? The Islamic paradise is described in great sensual detail in the Koran and the Traditions; for instance, Koran sura 56 verses 12 -40 ; sura 55 verses 54-56 ; sura 76 verses 12-22. I shall quote the celebrated Penguin translation by NJ Dawood of sura 56 verses 12- 39: "They shall recline on jewelled couches face to face, and there shall wait on them immortal youths with bowls and ewers and a cup of purest wine (that will neither pain their heads nor take away their reason); with fruits of their own choice and flesh of fowls that they relish. And theirs shall be the dark-eyed houris, chaste as hidden pearls: a guerdon for their deeds... We created the houris and made them virgins, loving companions for those on the right hand..."

One should note that most translations, even those by Muslims themselves such as A Yusuf Ali, and the British Muslim Marmaduke Pickthall, translate the Arabic (plural) word Abkarun as virgins, as do well-known lexicons such the one by John Penrice. I emphasise this fact since many pudic and embarrassed Muslims claim there has been a mistranslation, that "virgins" should be replaced by "angels". In sura 55 verses 72-74, Dawood translates the Arabic word " hur " as "virgins", and the context makes clear that virgin is the appropriate translation: "Dark-eyed virgins sheltered in their tents (which of your Lord's blessings would you deny?) whom neither man nor jinnee will have touched before." The word hur occurs four times in the Koran and is usually translated as a "maiden with dark eyes".

Two points need to be noted. First, there is no mention anywhere in the Koran of the actual number of virgins available in paradise, and second, the dark-eyed damsels are available for all Muslims, not just martyrs. It is in the Islamic Traditions that we find the 72 virgins in heaven specified: in a Hadith (Islamic Tradition) collected by Al-Tirmidhi (died 892 CE [common era*]) in the Book of Sunan (volume IV, chapters on The Features of Paradise as described by the Messenger of Allah [Prophet Muhammad], chapter 21, About the Smallest Reward for the People of Paradise, (Hadith 2687). The same hadith is also quoted by Ibn Kathir (died 1373 CE ) in his Koranic commentary (Tafsir) of Surah Al-Rahman (55), verse 72: "The Prophet Muhammad was heard saying: 'The smallest reward for the people of paradise is an abode where there are 80,000 servants and 72 wives, over which stands a dome decorated with pearls, aquamarine, and ruby, as wide as the distance from Al-Jabiyyah [a Damascus suburb] to Sana'a [Yemen]'."

Modern apologists of Islam try to downplay the evident materialism and sexual implications of such descriptions, but, as the Encyclopaedia of Islam says, even orthodox Muslim theologians such as al Ghazali (died 1111 CE) and Al-Ash'ari (died 935 CE) have "admitted sensual pleasures into paradise". The sensual pleasures are graphically elaborated by Al-Suyuti (died 1505 ), Koranic commentator and polymath. He wrote: "Each time we sleep with a houri we find her virgin. Besides, the penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal; the sensation that you feel each time you make love is utterly delicious and out of this world and were you to experience it in this world you would faint. Each chosen one [ie Muslim] will marry seventy [sic] houris, besides the women he married on earth, and all will have appetising vaginas."

One of the reasons Nietzsche hated Christianity was that it "made something unclean out of sexuality", whereas Islam, many would argue, was sex-positive. One cannot imagine any of the Church fathers writing ecstatically of heavenly sex as al-Suyuti did, with the possible exception of St Augustine before his conversion. But surely to call Islam sex-positive is to insult all Muslim women, for sex is seen entirely from the male point of view; women's sexuality is admitted but seen as something to be feared, repressed, and a work of the devil.

Scholars have long pointed out that these images are clearly drawn pictures and must have been inspired by the art of painting. Muhammad, or whoever is responsible for the descriptions, may well have seen Christian miniatures or mosaics representing the gardens of paradise and has interpreted the figures of angels rather literally as those of young men and young women. A further textual influence on the imagery found in the Koran is the work of Ephrem the Syrian [306-373 CE], Hymns on Paradise, written in Syriac, an Aramaic dialect and the language of Eastern Christianity, and a Semitic language closely related to Hebrew and Arabic.

This naturally leads to the most fascinating book ever written on the language of the Koran, and if proved to be correct in its main thesis, probably the most important book ever written on the Koran. Christoph Luxenberg's book, Die Syro-Aramaische Lesart des Koran, available only in German, came out just over a year ago, but has already had an enthusiastic reception, particularly among those scholars with a knowledge of several Semitic languages at Princeton, Yale, Berlin, Potsdam, Erlangen, Aix-en-Provence, and the Oriental Institute in Beirut.

Luxenberg tries to show that many obscurities of the Koran disappear if we read certain words as being Syriac and not Arabic. We cannot go into the technical details of his methodology but it allows Luxenberg, to the probable horror of all Muslim males dreaming of sexual bliss in the Muslim hereafter, to conjure away the wide-eyed houris promised to the faithful in suras XLIV.54; LII.20, LV.72, and LVI.22. Luxenberg 's new analysis, leaning on the Hymns of Ephrem the Syrian, yields "white raisins" of "crystal clarity" rather than doe-eyed, and ever willing virgins - the houris. Luxenberg claims that the context makes it clear that it is food and drink that is being offerred, and not unsullied maidens or houris.

In Syriac, the word hur is a feminine plural adjective meaning white, with the word "raisin" understood implicitly. Similarly, the immortal, pearl-like ephebes or youths of suras such as LXXVI.19 are really a misreading of a Syriac expression meaning chilled raisins (or drinks) that the just will have the pleasure of tasting in contrast to the boiling drinks promised the unfaithful and damned.

As Luxenberg's work has only recently been published we must await its scholarly assessment before we can pass any judgements. But if his analysis is correct then suicide bombers, or rather prospective martyrs, would do well to abandon their culture of death, and instead concentrate on getting laid 72 times in this world, unless of course they would really prefer chilled or white raisins, according to their taste, in the next.

Posted by David B at 10:15 AM
So for an eternity of frosty beverages, you can blow yourself up...
User avatar
theski
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4327
Joined: 2003-01-28 03:20pm
Location: Hurricane Watching

Post by theski »

What I am a bit tired of is moral equivalence between current Islamic extremists.. and christians.. Yes back in the day they were the same.. but in the last 20years.. its not contest..
Sudden power is apt to be insolent, sudden liberty saucy; that behaves best which has grown gradually.
User avatar
Guardsman Bass
Cowardly Codfish
Posts: 9281
Joined: 2002-07-07 12:01am
Location: Beneath the Deepest Sea

Post by Guardsman Bass »

On a sidenote comment on that essay on what the 'virgins', it's interesting how specific the afterlife is; i.e. you get 72 wives and 80,000 servants, and rule over an area the size of Saudi Arabia.
“It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.”
-Jean-Luc Picard


"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
-Margaret Atwood
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

theski wrote:What I am a bit tired of is moral equivalence between current Islamic extremists.. and christians.. Yes back in the day they were the same.. but in the last 20years.. its not contest..
Why not? Christians living in secular nations are relatively harmless, but that's because they're living in prosperous liberal secular nations, not because Christianity itself somehow became more intrinsically moral.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
theski
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4327
Joined: 2003-01-28 03:20pm
Location: Hurricane Watching

Post by theski »

Darth Wong wrote:
theski wrote:What I am a bit tired of is moral equivalence between current Islamic extremists.. and christians.. Yes back in the day they were the same.. but in the last 20years.. its not contest..
Why not? Christians living in secular nations are relatively harmless, but that's because they're living in prosperous liberal secular nations, not because Christianity itself somehow became more intrinsically moral.

Ok.. how does that compare to the muslims Rioting in the EU. Secular.. prosperous..
Sudden power is apt to be insolent, sudden liberty saucy; that behaves best which has grown gradually.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

theski wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:
theski wrote:What I am a bit tired of is moral equivalence between current Islamic extremists.. and christians.. Yes back in the day they were the same.. but in the last 20years.. its not contest..
Why not? Christians living in secular nations are relatively harmless, but that's because they're living in prosperous liberal secular nations, not because Christianity itself somehow became more intrinsically moral.
Ok.. how does that compare to the muslims Rioting in the EU. Secular.. prosperous..
Obviously, someone doesn't know how to read. The Muslims rioting in the EU are rioting because they're not prosperous. They're treated like second-class citizens. They don't have the same rights as everyone else. If you were treated like that, and saw that your chlidren would be treated the same way, and knew that you could never see your way clear to anyone in your family being treated as equals, you'd consider rioting too. Look at those huge French riots.

As for these smaller recent demonstrations, they're like WTO demonstrations; there will always be demonstrations when people take their beliefs too seriously, but they're small-fry.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
theski
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4327
Joined: 2003-01-28 03:20pm
Location: Hurricane Watching

Post by theski »

Darth Wong wrote:
theski wrote:
Darth Wong wrote: Why not? Christians living in secular nations are relatively harmless, but that's because they're living in prosperous liberal secular nations, not because Christianity itself somehow became more intrinsically moral.
Ok.. how does that compare to the muslims Rioting in the EU. Secular.. prosperous..
Obviously, someone doesn't know how to read. The Muslims rioting in the EU are rioting because they're not prosperous. They're treated like second-class citizens. They don't have the same rights as everyone else. If you were treated like that, and saw that your chlidren would be treated the same way, and knew that you could never see your way clear to anyone in your family being treated as equals, you'd consider rioting too.

Mike.. they are rioting because someone drew a cartoon.. they killed a nun because the pope read a 14th century text..
Sudden power is apt to be insolent, sudden liberty saucy; that behaves best which has grown gradually.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

theski wrote:Mike.. they are rioting because someone drew a cartoon.. they killed a nun because the pope read a 14th century text..
And Christians have killed abortion doctors because they think God told them to. Christians are causing the deaths of millions in Africa by deliberately spreading misinformation about condoms in order to keep people from using the Devil's Raincoats. But I guess you just don't notice that, right? Callous disregard for human life is only newsworthy when Muslims do it?
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
theski
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4327
Joined: 2003-01-28 03:20pm
Location: Hurricane Watching

Post by theski »

Darth Wong wrote:
theski wrote:Mike.. they are rioting because someone drew a cartoon.. they killed a nun because the pope read a 14th century text..
And Christians have killed abortion doctors because they think God told them to. Christians are causing the deaths of millions in Africa by deliberately spreading misinformation about condoms in order to keep people from using the Devil's Raincoats. But I guess you just don't notice that, right? Callous disregard for human life is only newsworthy when Muslims do it?
On the second point we agree..

but to the first.. We as a country Arrest/and convict them not make them heroes.

and So if its ok to riot over a precived slight if you are a poor muslim, why then are not all the poor Catholics/Christians/Budists/Jews rioting when their religion takes a shot?
Sudden power is apt to be insolent, sudden liberty saucy; that behaves best which has grown gradually.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

theski wrote:and So if its ok to riot over a precived slight if you are a poor muslim, why then are not all the poor Catholics/Christians/Budists/Jews rioting when their religion takes a shot?
Because their religion did so much damage over the past few centuries that they knew they deserved it. There is a strong undercurrent of guilt over the White Man's Burden and Manifest Destiny which undercuts a lot of liberal Christian and secular politics. Muslims, on the other hand, feel like they're the ones who have been shit on, not the ones who did the shitting.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
SirNitram
Rest in Peace, Black Mage
Posts: 28367
Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere

Post by SirNitram »

If there's no 'moral equivalence' between Islam and Christianity, where's the widespread condemnation of radical Christianity? Where's the practical difference between seeking Rapture through violence and seeking 72 virgins through violence? Hell, it's damn easy to show trying to acheive Rapture is worse: A suicide bomber kills a couple dozen. The Rapture ends the world in fire and pain.
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.

Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter
User avatar
theski
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4327
Joined: 2003-01-28 03:20pm
Location: Hurricane Watching

Post by theski »

SirNitram wrote:If there's no 'moral equivalence' between Islam and Christianity, where's the widespread condemnation of radical Christianity? Where's the practical difference between seeking Rapture through violence and seeking 72 virgins through violence? Hell, it's damn easy to show trying to acheive Rapture is worse: A suicide bomber kills a couple dozen. The Rapture ends the world in fire and pain.
Nit.. do you know of any Christians actually seeking Bringing about the Rapture????
Sudden power is apt to be insolent, sudden liberty saucy; that behaves best which has grown gradually.
User avatar
Keevan_Colton
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10355
Joined: 2002-12-30 08:57pm
Location: In the Land of Logic and Reason, two doors down from Lilliput and across the road from Atlantis...
Contact:

Post by Keevan_Colton »

Wyrm wrote:
Darth Servo wrote:
weemadando wrote:Actually a few years ago there were some linguists and historians who determined that it was not virgins, but a form of raisin considered a delicacy in the prophets time that they were referring to. Apparently the difference between the two words is, at best, minimal.
But that just isn't good enough. Who the hell is going to blow themselves up for a bunch of fruit?
It would be the practical joke of all time! :D

Generic Muslim Martyr: "But... but... I thought I would get 72 virgins!"

Allah: "Virgins?! Where'd you get that idea? If I wanted you to get sexual favors here for martyring yourself, I would've given you 172 hookers who knew what they were doing, not fumbling virgins. Now take your damn rasins and get outta here."
Yes, that's right, your spot in paradise comes with this complementary fruit basket courtesy of Allah.
"Prodesse Non Nocere."
"It's all about popularity really, if your invisible friend that tells you to invade places is called Napoleon, you're a loony, if he's called Jesus then you're the president."
"I'd drive more people insane, but I'd have to double back and pick them up first..."
"All it takes for bullshit to thrive is for rational men to do nothing." - Kevin Farrell, B.A. Journalism.
BOTM - EBC - Horseman - G&C - Vampire
User avatar
SirNitram
Rest in Peace, Black Mage
Posts: 28367
Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere

Post by SirNitram »

theski wrote:
SirNitram wrote:If there's no 'moral equivalence' between Islam and Christianity, where's the widespread condemnation of radical Christianity? Where's the practical difference between seeking Rapture through violence and seeking 72 virgins through violence? Hell, it's damn easy to show trying to acheive Rapture is worse: A suicide bomber kills a couple dozen. The Rapture ends the world in fire and pain.
Nit.. do you know of any Christians actually seeking Bringing about the Rapture????
Yes. And since I read news, I can identify ones I don't know. Say, here.

So ram your incredulence up your asshole. You're either a liar or insensate if you don't think there are Christians trying to bring about the ENd Times.
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.

Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

theski wrote:
SirNitram wrote:If there's no 'moral equivalence' between Islam and Christianity, where's the widespread condemnation of radical Christianity? Where's the practical difference between seeking Rapture through violence and seeking 72 virgins through violence? Hell, it's damn easy to show trying to acheive Rapture is worse: A suicide bomber kills a couple dozen. The Rapture ends the world in fire and pain.
Nit.. do you know of any Christians actually seeking Bringing about the Rapture????
You're aware that much of the impetus behind Israel's knee-jerk unwavering American Amen Chorus is their desire to see the Book of Revelation fulfilled, right?
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
theski
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4327
Joined: 2003-01-28 03:20pm
Location: Hurricane Watching

Post by theski »

SirNitram wrote:
theski wrote:
SirNitram wrote:If there's no 'moral equivalence' between Islam and Christianity, where's the widespread condemnation of radical Christianity? Where's the practical difference between seeking Rapture through violence and seeking 72 virgins through violence? Hell, it's damn easy to show trying to acheive Rapture is worse: A suicide bomber kills a couple dozen. The Rapture ends the world in fire and pain.
Nit.. do you know of any Christians actually seeking Bringing about the Rapture????
Yes. And since I read news, I can identify ones I don't know. Say, here.

So ram your incredulence up your asshole. You're either a liar or insensate if you don't think there are Christians trying to bring about the ENd Times.
When I see that fool Falwell pick up a sword and go on Crusade I will believe he makes any kind of impact..

I guess that makes me insensate
Sudden power is apt to be insolent, sudden liberty saucy; that behaves best which has grown gradually.
User avatar
SirNitram
Rest in Peace, Black Mage
Posts: 28367
Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere

Post by SirNitram »

theski wrote:When I see that fool Falwell pick up a sword and go on Crusade I will believe he makes any kind of impact..

I guess that makes me insensate
No, just an excuse-generating asshole. What's different about Falwell declaring from his pulpit and an inciter in Islam, precisely? Or would you like to try some more empty excuses?
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.

Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter
User avatar
theski
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4327
Joined: 2003-01-28 03:20pm
Location: Hurricane Watching

Post by theski »

SirNitram wrote:
theski wrote:When I see that fool Falwell pick up a sword and go on Crusade I will believe he makes any kind of impact..

I guess that makes me insensate
No, just an excuse-generating asshole. What's different about Falwell declaring from his pulpit and an inciter in Islam, precisely? Or would you like to try some more empty excuses?
You were comparing
Where's the practical difference between seeking Rapture through violence and seeking 72 virgins through violence? Hell, it's damn easy to show trying to acheive Rapture is worse: A suicide bomber kills a couple dozen. The Rapture ends the world in fire and pain
Yes I think Falwell can be tuned out a Suicide bomber cant.
Sudden power is apt to be insolent, sudden liberty saucy; that behaves best which has grown gradually.
User avatar
SirNitram
Rest in Peace, Black Mage
Posts: 28367
Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere

Post by SirNitram »

theski wrote:
SirNitram wrote:
theski wrote:When I see that fool Falwell pick up a sword and go on Crusade I will believe he makes any kind of impact..

I guess that makes me insensate
No, just an excuse-generating asshole. What's different about Falwell declaring from his pulpit and an inciter in Islam, precisely? Or would you like to try some more empty excuses?
You were comparing
Where's the practical difference between seeking Rapture through violence and seeking 72 virgins through violence? Hell, it's damn easy to show trying to acheive Rapture is worse: A suicide bomber kills a couple dozen. The Rapture ends the world in fire and pain
Yes I think Falwell can be tuned out a Suicide bomber cant.
It's so cute how dishonest you get to defend Christianity.

What's the practical difference between Falwell and the Imams promoting the idea of strapping bombs onto yourself to get your 72 virgins? Answer, you goalpost-moving asshat.
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.

Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter
Post Reply