[janus20] The Immorality of Themodynamic guessology

janus20 · Post by **janus20** » 2006-09-22 08:20am

Or if it does not load please go direct to unifiedtheory.org.uk/

Caps Lock is not for the win, dumbass ~GR

Post by **Surlethe** » 2006-09-22 08:28am

The picture didn't load. I went to the website. It's a bunch of pseudoscientific bullshit. Anything else?

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2006-09-22 08:53am

Who wants to bet this is one of those asstards who posts a link to some bullshit website espousing his beliefs and never actually tries to debate them?

Somebody remind me in a week if he never produces a proper explanation and defense of this website's claims. I'll ban the little shit so he can't come back and do it again in a month (which he will, if he follows the typical modus operandi of these little shits).

aerius · Post by **aerius** » 2006-09-22 09:07am

There's so much bullshit on that site that my computer monitor's turning brown.

Dooey Jo · Post by **Dooey Jo** » 2006-09-22 09:45am

I hate people who think they're on to something and then make one huge webpage that's weirdly formatted and completely unreadable. It's a little better than the Timecube guy though. But "thermodynamic guessology"? Is this one of those "let's laugh at the crazies" threads?

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2006-09-22 10:00am

For those who can't bother reading the bullshit, this idiot's website claims that the laws of thermodynamics are bunk, and that centrifugal force is a "free lunch" that can generate infinite energy. Apparently, scientists are holding back the truth to avoid being embarrassed for being wrong about thermodynamics.

Naturally, he does not produce a working prototype of a device to take advantage of this infinite source of free energy; he simply states all of his whack-job beliefs as if they are fact.

He sounds like an auto mechanic, judging by the way he tries to convert physics principles into terms that an auto mechanic might understand. Here's a good example of his profound stupidity:

Alan Creswell wrote:ISAAC NEWTON ...... universally credited with a theoretical solution for 'The Laws of Gravity'. He made three observations entitled 'Laws of Motion'.
1) Every object in a state of uniform motion remains in that state of motion unless an external force is applied to it.
No mention of gravity here but he does suggest that PERPETUAL MOTION exists. It also effectively states that PERPETUAL MOTION can be increased or suffocated if the 'object' is subjected to another (plus or minus) external force.
II) The relationship between an object's mass m, its acceleration a, and the applied force F is F = ma
Everything starts to go wrong here, because these later external force visitations are by his definition impulse forces and are of an mv nature [Aristotle and Quantum]. The situation can be rescued by making a = w^2 k, a radial rate of change of velocity [centrifugal/centripetal acceleration values]. This move can only be justified if a mass possesses a radius of gyration k and it is made internally dynamic by a wave event of frequency fo such that (2pfo)^2 k = a. This would unify every force within science and make them multiples of the cause and effect of gravity.

Physicists accept that all mass is extremely active internally by wave actions. They are clueless as to WHY? It is because all atoms are perpetual motion machines with an input-output of fusion-fission of light. Try to suffocate any mass internal action with an external force ... its frequency and light output will increase. It will go all the way to Oppenheimer's Mc^2.
III) For every action there is an equal and opposite re-action ......... (Sir Isaac Newton)
Very true from outside the apple looking in. Not true from inside the apple looking out. Inside the 'free lunch' runs the business. For Heisenberg and Schrodinger Uncertainty and the Cat-in-a-Box. For Newton all matter was God made from 'indestructible but movable material. Solid, massy, hard and impenetrable. Never to wear or break in pieces. All made by God for the purpose of his creation'.

A perfect neutrino aether Meccano set by Newton for God. And all God had to do was say "LET THERE BE EVOLUTION BY CONDENSATION". It is all so beautiful that no one can take offense.

Nothing more than meaningless jibberish. I particularly like the way he thinks that if an object floats through space indefinitely as per Newtonian physics, that is an example of "perpetual motion", even though "perpetual motion" refers to efficiency above 100% (something he claims to understand earlier when he complains about the Carnot cycle).

janus20 · Post by **janus20** » 2006-09-22 10:07am

Darth Wong wrote:Who wants to bet this is one of those asstards who posts a link to some bullshit website espousing his beliefs and never actually tries to debate them?

Somebody remind me in a week if he never produces a proper explanation and defense of this website's claims. I'll ban the little shit so he can't come back and do it again in a month (which he will, if he follows the typical modus operandi of these little shits).

Christ, an eight gold star, 44,000 posting Sith Lord. What is a freako Star Wars site doing with a logic thread. You are banned from my life as of right now.

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2006-09-22 10:09am

janus20 wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:Who wants to bet this is one of those asstards who posts a link to some bullshit website espousing his beliefs and never actually tries to debate them?

Somebody remind me in a week if he never produces a proper explanation and defense of this website's claims. I'll ban the little shit so he can't come back and do it again in a month (which he will, if he follows the typical modus operandi of these little shits).
Christ, an eight gold star, 44,000 posting Sith Lord. What is a freako Star Wars site doing with a logic thread. You are banned from my life as of right now.

Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

And really since this has nothing to do with any of the above three thoughts, off we go to where it fits.

Dooey Jo · Post by **Dooey Jo** » 2006-09-22 10:10am

Okay this wasn't a make fun of the crazies thread, but it soon will be. But with crazies in singular.

Post by **AdmiralKanos** » 2006-09-22 10:12am

As I suspected, the idiot refuses to debate his bullshit claims. But he surprises me with his abject stupidity by acting as if he didn't notice until now that this is a Star Wars board. That is truly even dumber than the average troll, which says a lot.

I'll leave this thread here for a while before moving it into Parting Shots, so that you may all dogpile on the idiot and make fun of his rampant stupidity.

Patrick Degan · Post by **Patrick Degan** » 2006-09-22 10:14am

Well, that didn't take long.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2006-09-22 10:50am

You really have to wonder about someone who starts a science-related thread on a Star Wars board and then comes back to wonder aloud why there's a science-related thread on a Star Wars board. Did he think that would be a really clever put-down or something? OMG you guys watch Star Wars? Something he never noticed while he was signing up on a forum called bbs.stardestroyer.net, with a big Star Destroyer as its logo?

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2006-09-22 10:57am

janus20 wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:Who wants to bet this is one of those asstards who posts a link to some bullshit website espousing his beliefs and never actually tries to debate them?

Somebody remind me in a week if he never produces a proper explanation and defense of this website's claims. I'll ban the little shit so he can't come back and do it again in a month (which he will, if he follows the typical modus operandi of these little shits).
Christ, an eight gold star, 44,000 posting Sith Lord. What is a freako Star Wars site doing with a logic thread. You are banned from my life as of right now.

...

Did I just read that correctly? The first thing he does upon responding to the thread he started is try to belittle the owner of the board? How fucking retarded do you have to be to do that?

I wonder if he even expected to be able to stick around.

Dartzap · Post by **Dartzap** » 2006-09-22 10:59am

Bloody Brummies.

Darth Garden Gnome · Post by **Darth Garden Gnome** » 2006-09-22 11:00am

Banned from his life. You can't get that back, man. If, like, maybe you see him walking down the street and you want to wave to him or something, he'll be like "nuh uh you're banned from my life," and all you get to do is lower your head in shame and walk away. You're gonna have to carry that weight.

Keevan_Colton · Post by **Keevan_Colton** » 2006-09-22 11:16am

And off to the graveyard for retards.