Is this Noah's Ark?

Superman · Post by **Superman** » 2006-09-29 01:44am

http://www.tentmaker.org/WAR/ See here...

Magnetic · Post by **Magnetic** » 2006-09-29 09:16am

Superman wrote:http://www.tentmaker.org/WAR/ See here...

This is an AWESOME find, Superman!! Thanks!!!!

Superman · Post by **Superman** » 2006-09-29 09:26am

Magnetic wrote:
Superman wrote:http://www.tentmaker.org/WAR/ See here...
This is an AWESOME find, Superman!! Thanks!!!!

Tell me if you want more.

Magnetic · Post by **Magnetic** » 2006-09-29 10:08am

Superman wrote:
Magnetic wrote:
Superman wrote:http://www.tentmaker.org/WAR/ See here...
This is an AWESOME find, Superman!! Thanks!!!!
Tell me if you want more.

Well, guess what? I offered this link to them, and one of them said something to the effect of, "Wow, an internet article. That will hold up in court." In other words, they are choosing to take their toys and go home.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2006-09-30 03:21am

So they want you to accept the validity of the idiotic Noah's Ark story that has been scientifically disproven more ways than I can count, based solely on the incredibly flimsy evidence of this Wyatt website. I guess they never heard that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. And when you find another website that claims Wyatt has a history of fraud, they dismiss that because it's ... just a website. Did these people get some sort of special education in hypocrisy?

Superman · Post by **Superman** » 2006-09-30 03:50am

Magnetic wrote:
Superman wrote:
Magnetic wrote: This is an AWESOME find, Superman!! Thanks!!!!
Tell me if you want more.
Well, guess what? I offered this link to them, and one of them said something to the effect of, "Wow, an internet article. That will hold up in court." In other words, they are choosing to take their toys and go home.

Ahahaha! Yes, that's just an internet article... Pfff... Believing in a magical boat with 2 of every animal makes much more sense.

Dig up more sources on this dumb fuck. He's in Wikepedia, all over using search engines, etc., and many point out that he was a fraud.

The fucker is dead now anyway. Oh look, no heaven! Joke's on you, dipshit!

Superman · Post by **Superman** » 2006-09-30 03:50am

By the way Magnetic, ask them what it would take to show that he was full of it. I am guessing nothing would change their minds...

Cao Cao · Post by **Cao Cao** » 2006-09-30 07:02am

In my view if they believe Noah's Ark was real, they're already far too gone to bother with.

Chris OFarrell · Post by **Chris OFarrell** » 2006-09-30 08:29am

No this is clearly one of Xenus soul re-education centers.

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2006-09-30 04:46pm

Magnetic wrote:
Superman wrote:
Magnetic wrote: This is an AWESOME find, Superman!! Thanks!!!!
Tell me if you want more.
Well, guess what? I offered this link to them, and one of them said something to the effect of, "Wow, an internet article. That will hold up in court." In other words, they are choosing to take their toys and go home.

What, after they offered a Photoshopped picture as "evidence"? Call them on their hypocrisy.

Cao Cao · Post by **Cao Cao** » 2006-09-30 06:16pm

DPDarkPrimus wrote:
Magnetic wrote:
Superman wrote: Tell me if you want more.
Well, guess what? I offered this link to them, and one of them said something to the effect of, "Wow, an internet article. That will hold up in court." In other words, they are choosing to take their toys and go home.
What, after they offered a Photoshopped picture as "evidence"? Call them on their hypocrisy.

But that picture is blessed by God, you heathen infidel!

Gil Hamilton · Post by **Gil Hamilton** » 2006-09-30 06:23pm

http://arcimaging.org/GeisslerRex/Durupinar20003.jpg

And people think that is Noah's Ark? Look at the scale of the man in that image, that thing isn't very big... how do people go "Hey, that could fit two of every animal that ever existed in it!"?

Magnetic · Post by **Magnetic** » 2006-10-02 11:30am

Fascinating developments in this topic on the other site. I came back from a rather rough weekend (grandmother passed away), and discovered that not only did the thread in question get closed, but the entire "Bible and Science" forum. Apparently too many "evolutionist proselytizers" on there, and too many heated debates.

There goes pretty much the whole reason why I was on that forum. Most all of my posts were in there, so . . . I guess I may be done there, until something is reinstated.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2006-10-02 11:33am

Magnetic wrote:Fascinating developments in this topic on the other site. I came back from a rather rough weekend (grandmother passed away), and discovered that not only did the thread in question get closed, but the entire "Bible and Science" forum. Apparently too many "evolutionist proselytizers" on there, and too many heated debates.

There goes pretty much the whole reason why I was on that forum. Most all of my posts were in there, so . . . I guess I may be done there, until something is reinstated.

That doesn't surprise me. People like that don't have any standards on how you debate, but they do have standards on what you debate.

Magnetic · Post by **Magnetic** » 2006-10-02 12:10pm

Darth Wong wrote:
Magnetic wrote:Fascinating developments in this topic on the other site. I came back from a rather rough weekend (grandmother passed away), and discovered that not only did the thread in question get closed, but the entire "Bible and Science" forum. Apparently too many "evolutionist proselytizers" on there, and too many heated debates.

There goes pretty much the whole reason why I was on that forum. Most all of my posts were in there, so . . . I guess I may be done there, until something is reinstated.

That doesn't surprise me. People like that don't have any standards on how you debate, but they do have standards on what you debate.

Their answer to that would be that it is their forum, so they can make the call on what people will be allowed to post on there.

The thing is, many of those who post on the side of evolution say that the church's stand on a literal 6 day creation (6,000 years ago) may very well cause many people to reject christianity who may have considered it before. I believe that those who hold to evolution, on that site, are the Theistic Evolutionists, and most of them basically only posted in that part of their forum as well.

Hmmmmm, . . . maybe it was their plan to free up some bandwidth.

General Trelane (Retired) · Post by **General Trelane (Retired)** » 2006-10-02 02:10pm

If they shut the forum down in its entirety, it would free up even more bandwidth. . .