Also, why is a Nosaurian* wielding a belt-fed machine gun/automatic rifle, complete with ejecting brass?
* Speaking of which -- looking at them, why does the name seem less than coincidental?

Moderator: Vympel
I think Wheatley still plans to base new blasters off real world weapons (which I, also, approve of), he just decided to avoid the P90 due to its usage in Stargate, or some other popular Sci-fi show. To avoid suggestions of copycat-ism.Vympel wrote:There's nothing wrong with using a P90 variant as a blaster, I'm unhappy that he won't use it anymore. All the guns in the Original Trilogy are vismodded real guns anyway.
Dark Empire had the right idea when they had Han using a vismodded Walther P-38.
Attention to detail is what makes good comic art.
That's assuming that all powerpacks come in the same size and type. What if one powerpack connector is unsuitable for the rifle?General Schatten wrote:Not really, blasters have an advantage over slugthrowers since the armies that use them don't have to design their weapons around a specific kind of round, using power packs, instead each and every weapon can be tuned for optimum efficiency with the projectile it fires rather than worrying about ammo compatibility.
I would guess that different manufacturers would allow thier weapons designs to use the same power pack and coupling design. From manufacturer to manufacturer, probably not. Competition and all.PainRack wrote:That's assuming that all powerpacks come in the same size and type. What if one powerpack connector is unsuitable for the rifle?General Schatten wrote:Not really, blasters have an advantage over slugthrowers since the armies that use them don't have to design their weapons around a specific kind of round, using power packs, instead each and every weapon can be tuned for optimum efficiency with the projectile it fires rather than worrying about ammo compatibility.
kinetic impact may have twisted him around.Major Maxillary wrote:bullets are more flexible than whatever the smeg blasters shoot.
also they look cool and make you bleed.
edit; I just noticed something;
That's true.Although that probably doesnt really make them any different from the "projectile" blaster I described above anyhow
It was the last holdout on the planet, I guess the troopers thought they had it in the bag. They bring in TX-130T tanks right after this scene though, and that finishes the battle quite quickly.But what is really buggin me is the WWIesque attack - just massive waves of troopers.
The "gatling blaster" has been given a name.. the Mer-Sonn Z6. Its description pegs it as a regular blaster, firing whatever the smeg it is most blasters fire.. no solid projectiles.Connor MacLeod wrote:Note, however that the belt fed machine gun actually seems to be spitting out something resembling blaster bolts, so I am guessing its some sort of cartridge or "projectile" style blaster (mentioned in the AOTC novel, VD, etc a few times.) We know they exist (there was the goofy chaingun in the Clone Wars cartoon carried by the commando/ARCs, and a few of the OT scenes like when Han fired on Vader on Bespin in TESB featured obvious casings being ejected.) So its probably not a slugthrower in the conventional sense.
Still, attacking in so large numbers without cover, essentially just throwing bodies at the enemy and depriving them of room to maneuver....not what one would expect from Stormtroopers.VT-16 wrote:It was the last holdout on the planet, I guess the troopers thought they had it in the bag. They bring in TX-130T tanks right after this scene though, and that finishes the battle quite quickly.
Yah, it's totally inconsistent with the skillful way they fought at the Battle of Endor.Thanas wrote:Still, attacking in so large numbers without cover, essentially just throwing bodies at the enemy and depriving them of room to maneuver....not what one would expect from Stormtroopers.VT-16 wrote:It was the last holdout on the planet, I guess the troopers thought they had it in the bag. They bring in TX-130T tanks right after this scene though, and that finishes the battle quite quickly.
The guy must've been going for the 'grittier', more realistic scifi ground combat that's become more common (Halo/BF1942/etc). As an outside observer regarding these comics, it seems a bit pathetic, like turning Mandalorians into SW-Klingons.
Out-of-universe, it's 'Siege of AR-558' Syndrome. People would rather see and show the type of war scenes they're already familiar with, regardless of easily available information contradicting the cliches. This sort of thing is why science fiction gets a bad reputation, it's all about the superficial scifi 'style' rather than any consistent worldbuilding.Connor MacLeod wrote:But what is really buggin me is the WWIesque attack - just massive waves of troopers.
Where were the human-wave attacks at Endor?Nieztchean Uber-Amoeba wrote:Yah, it's totally inconsistent with the skillful way they fought at the Battle of Endor.Thanas wrote:Still, attacking in so large numbers without cover, essentially just throwing bodies at the enemy and depriving them of room to maneuver....not what one would expect from Stormtroopers.![]()
![]()
Pathetic to have projectile weaponry? I consider it pathetic to have energy weapons only. Even the OT didn't fall into that mistake and that's decades prior to any of those stories you mentioned.Winston Blake wrote: The guy must've been going for the 'grittier', more realistic scifi ground combat that's become more common (Halo/BF1942/etc). As an outside observer regarding these comics, it seems a bit pathetic, like turning Mandalorians into SW-Klingons.
Actually, you could argue that it shows clones were abundant and expendable and not a small, elite force. We've seen other types of warfare in the films and the comics, so it's not some sort of standard attack they use constantly. Barring that, from the dialogue, the Nosarians were losing badly even before the tanks arrived.This sort of thing is why science fiction gets a bad reputation, it's all about the superficial scifi 'style' rather than any consistent worldbuilding.
They were winning that battle as well, the ewoks were nothing in an all-out fight, they even point it out on the commentary.Nieztchean Uber-Amoeba wrote:Yah, it's totally inconsistent with the skillful way they fought at the Battle of Endor. :roll: :lol:
I was talking out-of-universe. Projectile weapons are great, but drawing a P90 with blaster bolts coming out of it is just plain lazy.VT-16 wrote:Pathetic to have projectile weaponry? I consider it pathetic to have energy weapons only. Even the OT didn't fall into that mistake and that's decades prior to any of those stories you mentioned.Winston Blake wrote: The guy must've been going for the 'grittier', more realistic scifi ground combat that's become more common (Halo/BF1942/etc). As an outside observer regarding these comics, it seems a bit pathetic, like turning Mandalorians into SW-Klingons.
It's completely unnecessary for this guy to introduce a human-wave attack vs dozens of machineguns purely for style, even if it can be rationalised later as an outlier. Not even the most abundant, worthless troops of any real first-world military would be used in such a pointless tactic.Actually, you could argue that it shows clones were abundant and expendable and not a small, elite force. We've seen other types of warfare in the films and the comics, so it's not some sort of standard attack they use constantly. Barring that, from the dialogue, the Nosarians were losing badly even before the tanks arrived.This sort of thing is why science fiction gets a bad reputation, it's all about the superficial scifi 'style' rather than any consistent worldbuilding.